I believe she should be freed because I believe all animals should be able to live in their own natural habitat. We don't have the right to kidnap animals and display them just for our viewing pleasure.
Our zoo has been losing it's larger mammals due to age, or captivity. We should give Lucky the chance to live out the rest of her years in a more appropriate setting.
yes
As a life long animal lover I find it hard to ignore the fact that the San Antonio Zoo has repeatedly let the people of the city down. When it comes to making a decision about an animals life it should always be what is best for the animal. Lucky is lonely, hurt, and needs companionship. I think the main reason the San Antonio Zoo is turning the cheek, is the money. It makes me sad to know that money comes before the well being of an animal in the eyes of the city. That reason alone will keep me and my family and whoever else I can convince away from the zoo. If they cannot properly care for animals they should not be in charge in them.
Let Lucky live his remaining years free.
She belongs with other elephants and she deserves the freedom to live the rest of her life in a santuary.
I think Lucky should be freed because she is all only in her confinement and not given the freedom to roam as she pleases. She is only allowed to walk from point A to point B and that is it. She needs to have more room to roam and only freedom will give her that.
Lucky is doomed to the same consequences as her prior companions; a shorter life span followed by an early death. There is no pride or joy in living out a life of captivity in a small prison yard. I ask that you please allow Lucky to live out her remaining years in a sanctuary that more closely resembles her habitat than the cramped prison courtyard that she is currently on display in. Surely if you ask all of the children that visit her in the zoo which would they rather see: Lucky in her isolated concrete yard or in a 2400 acre sanctuary with other elephants the children would pick the latter. Please grant Lucky the opportunity to experience a better life with her own kind in a friendlier more natural environment where I'm sure she will live at minimum another 25 years. Thank you.
Lucky should be moved to the larger santuary because it is the right thing to do for her. Put yourself in her place, then try to answer any other way. Let's work to get her to her new home before it's too late!
she has served us as an atraction in a enclosed space in a Zoo for 46 years. Now we should give her the flavor of diying in liberty.
|
|
1:01 am PDT, Jun 7,
Karen Williams, Connecticut
Freedom in a sanctuary of course! The choice with the word "freedom" in it is obviously the better of the two! EVERY animal just as EVERY human deserves the opportunity to live their life to the FULLEST! Lucky would have freedom to roam about, minus a zoo's confining quarters and restrictions. In that environment, Lucky is allowed to live SOLELY as an "entertainment factor" for gawking humans! In a santuary, Lucky would be given access to medical care, basic needs of water & food would be met and she'd now FINALLY, be able to roam about WHEN & WHERE she chose and mingle with her own kind! Please let her given name "Lucky", become a reality for her! |
Because all animals deserve it.
Large wild animals such as Lucky need room to roam and to be with other elephants.
From all the information I have gathered on elephants, they are social animals that need to roam. Lucky needs to be removed from the zoo so she can enjoy the rest of her remaining years with other elephants just like her.
It is in her best interest.
Elephants need land to travel and they require companionship.
He's lost his fellow elephants and am certain he's wondering what's going on. What a relief to go somewhere that's open and he'll have fellow elephants to be able to actually roam with.
I belive Lucky should be freed because she is lonely and she would be much happier if she had company.
cAUSE ALL THE HATERS ARE GETTING LUCKY DOWN IN THAT DAMN ZOO CAGE! bITCHES
Here in China, where the recent earthquake and aftershocks displaced hundreds of thousands of people - those who were 'lucky' enough to survive - frantic efforts are underway to relocate the traumatized and broken . Does not an aging and broken-spirited elephant merit at least a modicum of similar compassion? Your zoo's pathetic inmate - a breathtakingly intelligent creature with a complex and nuanced inner life - is now advanced in years, and has for its entire life been deprived of the chance to live and roam freely among her own kind. You are now presented with the gift of an opportunity to right a grievous wrong. Seize it. You MUST take the necessary step of recognizing Lucky's inherent dignity, and granting this noble and beautiful creature for once in its miserable life the ability to roam more widely among its own. Nothing whatsoever justifies further prolonging Lucky's solitary confinement, least of all the marginal profits realized from the odd zoo gawker. Do the right thing and be proud of yourselves, knowing that you made a difference. Richard Jackson, Hangzhou, China
It is wrong to keep animals in ways other than they are used to living in in the wild!
it just is not right to hold any animal captured in such a manner.
Because it is wrong to keep her cooped up in an uncomfortable environment.
Because no one would like to be penned up in such a small enclosure & Elephants do like long walks nor should she be away from other elephants would be be company for her & a comfort.
I think that he should live out his life in freedom. Its not like cageing a little critter with few brain cells. Lucky is an intelligent creature an is unhappy not roaming with his own kind.
It's our birthright to live in freedom & dignity. How can we take it away from others (whether man or animal)?
Sounds like everything about the sanctuary would be more beneficial for her and that keeping her somewhere so prison like is bound to kill her. Prison versus freedom - not too hard of a decision to make.
He should have what is left of his life being able to walk about with some freedom and have some enjoyment of what he has left. He may be able to associate with other elephants rather than be isolated. Let him go!
Zoos in the last two centuries may have served educational purposes but those days are long gone. Today's lesson for our youth should be the importance of respecting our environment, animals included and ending unnatural and cruel incarceration of wild animals. Why not have film/video screenings of herds of elephants roaming in their natural setting- that would be much more educational- and you could charge those few $s people would have otherwise spent oggling a caged animal.
Lucky should be freed because it is a proven fact that elephants have a strong sense of family & community and it is inhumane and insensitive for her to be kept in "solitary confinement" when there is the option available to her to be with her own kind! Put yourself in her place!
Lucky doesn't seem so lucky to me!!
Hopefully your facility will come to the same conclusion and participate in Lucky's transfer to an appropriate elephant sanctuary. Cordially, Rita
Lucky should be freed to a sanctuary specializing in the care of elephants, they are very social animals and deserve so much better than incarceration in a zoo.
So she can be healthier and happier with some companions