Butterfly Rewards - earn free credits and redeem for good causes -  learn more!
*This photo is not a representation of the actual proposed tower

No Marinwood Park Cell Tower

Target:
NO MARINWOOD TOWER
Sponsored by: 

The Marinwood Community Services District board is considering a proposal to place a 20- to 40-foot cell phone tower/antenna at the Marinwood Community Center. This is despite warnings from experts on potential health risks to children and the medically fragile and statements by many scientists and medical doctors that long-term biological health effects due to electromagnetic radiation, while not fully established, are cause for concern and should be avoided based on the internationally recognized Precautionary Principle (In this case: Not to place cell towers within the hot zone of 1,500 feet of a school, playground, day care center, or hospital.)

WHY YOU SHOULD CARE

Unknown Health Risks:
1. The mounting evidence of harmful biological effects from phone towers shows that a positive assertion of safety with respect to chronic exposure to low intensity levels cannot be made by the wireless industry. Scientists warn that children, pregnant women, seniors and persons who have damaged immune systems are at greatest risk.

·         The industry says the antennas will transmit emissions within the FCC's guidelines, but these guidelines only protect human health from heating of tissue or nerve excitation, not the low-levels effects, which do not involve heating but transmit information that can cause physiological and biochemical changes, such as rapid cellular division, DNA damage, mitochrondrial changes, heat shock protein release, rapid heartbeat, and neurological and behavioral effects, including adverse health symptoms known as electrical hypersensitivity. Chronic exposure could result in neurological disease such as Parkinson's and cancers. The threshold for what is considered a 'safe' exposure has not yet been established biologically and, as this technology is new, precaution is advised, especially near vulnerable areas such as homes, schools, and community centers. 

·         There is a preschool in the community center, Marin Waldorf School is just down the road, and the swimming pool, playground, and park is our community epicenter.

2. People with lifesaving implanted devices, such as pacemakers or defibrillators, can be harmed if in close proximity to cell towers, as these RF signals can interfere with and reset their devices.

Property Values May Decrease
1. Cell phone towers are unsightly and have been documented as having reduced property values in some neighborhoods where they have been sited.

2. It is extremely difficult to regain land rights once a mandatory long-term lease is in place, even if adverse effects are evident and there is no course of remuneration if problems arise later. And if it's a co-location tower, once it's approved, it and whatever goes on it will be regulated by the CA State PUC; local government loses control over notice and review of any technology changes in the future according to AB 1629, CA state Legislature in 2006.

Aesthetics and Neighborhood Character May Be Affected Even if the tower is disguised as a flag pole or tree, we will know it is there and will avoid it. The presence of antennas in our gathering center could adversely affect community living.  

Cellular Antennas Are Being Banned Around the World
1. The European Parliament passed a major EMF resolution in April 2009 calling for a full investigation into potential health effects due to antennas, cell phones, power lines, and other EMF sources and for member nations to adopt lower exposure standards. The French National government has an investigation underway. Many communities, in UK,  Europe, Latin America and in the US  (the LA Unified School District, the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors, the cities of Glendale, California and Portland, Oregon,  and the International Association of Fire Fighters), are expressing health concerns and recommend banning antennas in vulnerable areas and heeding the internationally recognized Precautionary Principle, which prohibits towers from being erected around schools, hospitals, and highly populated residential areas.

In this case the reward is just not worth the risk.

The Marinwood Community Services District board is considering a proposal to place a 20- to 40-foot cell phone tower/antenna at the Marinwood Community Center. This is despite warnings from experts on potential health risks to children and the medically fragile and statements by many scientists and medical doctors that long-term biological health effects due to electromagnetic radiation, while not fully established, are cause for concern and should be avoided based on the internationally recognized Precautionary Principle (In this case: Not to place cell towers within the hot zone of 1,500 feet of a school, playground, day care center, or hospital.)

WHY YOU SHOULD CARE

Unknown Health Risks:
1. The mounting evidence of harmful biological effects from phone towers shows that a positive assertion of safety with respect to chronic exposure to low intensity levels cannot be made by the wireless industry. Scientists warn that children, pregnant women, seniors and persons who have damaged immune systems are at greatest risk.

·         The industry says the antennas will transmit emissions within the FCC's guidelines, but these guidelines only protect human health from heating of tissue or nerve excitation, not the low-levels effects, which do not involve heating but transmit information that can cause physiological and biochemical changes, such as rapid cellular division, DNA damage, mitochrondrial changes, heat shock protein release, rapid heartbeat, and neurological and behavioral effects, including adverse health symptoms known as electrical hypersensitivity. Chronic exposure could result in neurological disease such as Parkinson's and cancers. The threshold for what is considered a 'safe' exposure has not yet been established biologically and, as this technology is new, precaution is advised, especially near vulnerable areas such as homes, schools, and community centers. 

·         There is a preschool in the community center, Marin Waldorf School is just down the road, and the swimming pool, playground, and park is our community epicenter.

2. People with lifesaving implanted devices, such as pacemakers or defibrillators, can be harmed if in close proximity to cell towers, as these RF signals can interfere with and reset their devices.

Property Values May Decrease
1. Cell phone towers are unsightly and have been documented as having reduced property values in some neighborhoods where they have been sited.

2. It is extremely difficult to regain land rights once a mandatory long-term lease is in place, even if adverse effects are evident and there is no course of remuneration if problems arise later. And if it's a co-location tower, once it's approved, it and whatever goes on it will be regulated by the CA State PUC; local government loses control over notice and review of any technology changes in the future according to AB 1629, CA state Legislature in 2006.

Aesthetics and Neighborhood Character May Be Affected Even if the tower is disguised as a flag pole or tree, we will know it is there and will avoid it. The presence of antennas in our gathering center could adversely affect community living.  

Cellular Antennas Are Being Banned Around the World
1. The European Parliament passed a major EMF resolution in April 2009 calling for a full investigation into potential health effects due to antennas, cell phones, power lines, and other EMF sources and for member nations to adopt lower exposure standards. The French National government has an investigation underway. Many communities, in UK,  Europe, Latin America and in the US  (the LA Unified School District, the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors, the cities of Glendale, California and Portland, Oregon,  and the International Association of Fire Fighters), are expressing health concerns and recommend banning antennas in vulnerable areas and heeding the internationally recognized Precautionary Principle, which prohibits towers from being erected around schools, hospitals, and highly populated residential areas.

In this case the reward is just not worth the risk.

Dear Marinwood Community Services District Board and Marin County Officials:

We, the undersigned community members of Marinwood, California, request that no cellular towers are built and/or erected within 1,500 feet of children%u2019s playgrounds or schools.

Thank you for your consideration.

Sincerely,
signature
goal: 500
 
sign petition!
50
50 log in or sign up to start earning Butterfly Credits today!
Already a Care2 member? log in. Or, 
connect with Facebook
Name

optional
Email
Address
City
State
Province
Zip code Postal code

Increase your signature's impact by personalizing your letter


I agree to Care2's terms of service. We respect your privacy. Your email address is used to confirm your signature and is NOT displayed publicly.  
We signed the "No Marinwood Park Cell Tower" petition!
# 83:
7:59 pm PDT, Oct 27, Name not displayed, California
We are house-hunting in the Marinwood and Novato areas, and ask that you NOT place any new cellphone towers in Marinwood or Novato. Please use the Precautionary Principle and do not erect any additional cell phone towers in Marin County. Thank you.
# 82:
11:48 am PDT, Oct 16, Name not displayed, California
# 81:
12:56 pm PDT, Sep 27, Debra Suarez, California
# 80:
9:50 am PDT, Aug 15, Bruce Bartolf, California
I think that this entire process is ill-informed and a bit odd. We already have multiple cell towers in the area. We have a huge radio transmitter already on the community center that has been there for almost 40 years. Finally, it seems that you are interested in odd internet-based non-scientific scare tactics rather than real world safety issues that are encouraged by having good cellular coverage. Our community should not support this ill-informed petition.
# 79:
3:20 pm PDT, Aug 7, Kirsten Burke, California
# 78:
2:56 pm PDT, Jul 26, Michael Mahoney, California
# 77:
6:18 am PDT, Jul 18, Ginger Byrd, Georgia
# 76:
4:39 pm PDT, Jul 15, Harry Jackson, California
# 75:
5:19 pm PDT, Jul 14, Juliette Anthony, California
# 74:
10:10 am PDT, Jul 14, Margaret Jackson, California
A few years ago, a company wanted to put a cell tower on the Church of the Nativity on the hill. It would not have been a 40 foot tower, quite unobtrusive, but the neighbors were vehemently opposed. We could have used the money, but we considered our neighbors feelings first and turned it down. I oppose this new tower.
# 73:
4:36 pm PDT, Jul 13, Maya Weissensee, California
# 72:
3:19 pm PDT, Jul 13, Cindy Flinn, California
# 71:
3:19 pm PDT, Jul 13, Byron Morales, California
# 70:
2:24 pm PDT, Jul 13, Tamara Keith, California
# 69:
4:10 am PDT, Jul 13, Michael Keith, California
I took to the streets to defeat Cohen when they wanted to build homes at St. Vincents. I will go door to door to stop this, and move to defeat any Board member who votes for this cell tower even if the resolution fails.
# 68:
8:00 pm PDT, Jul 12, Mary Moynihan, California
# 67:
7:04 pm PDT, Jul 12, Suzanne Egan, California
There is absolutely no logic in going through with a plan where clearly the risks outweigh the benefits, and with this said, I'm not worried. I trust that Marinwood community leaders will make the smart and healthy choice. Our community thrives on taking care of the natural beauty and health of each member and world that surrounds them here. Please don't let us down. Make the choice that allows zero unneccessary health risks in our environment and protect the people who spend their daily lives in such a safe and healthy community.
# 66:
4:57 pm PDT, Jul 11, Maria Davila, California
# 65:
12:35 pm PDT, Jul 11, Beatrice Tocher, California
As Marinwood Park has a child playground I am concerned about long term health effects, still unknown, on these young lives.
# 64:
12:56 pm PDT, Jul 10, Jo McDonough, California
I can't believe this is even being considered. Please do not ruin this beautiful community by agreeing to this.
# 63:
11:46 am PDT, Jul 10, Mark Koop, California
# 62:
10:17 pm PDT, Jul 9, Alice Ostrovsky, California
# 61:
2:48 pm PDT, Jul 9, Susan Fox, California
# 60:
8:55 am PDT, Jul 9, Lynnsey Urbaitel, California
# 59:
5:23 pm PDT, Jul 8, Barbra Rosenstein, California
We have two young children and do not want anything that could potentially harm them being erected in Marinwood where we live.
# 58:
3:36 pm PDT, Jul 8, Marco Garbarino, California
# 57:
3:34 pm PDT, Jul 8, Julie Garbarino, California
# 56:
3:15 pm PDT, Jul 8, Beth Nelson, California
# 55:
11:18 am PDT, Jul 7, Sarah Irving, California
# 54:
11:18 am PDT, Jul 7, Sarah Irving, California
# 53:
8:34 pm PDT, Jul 6, Cheryl Williams, California
# 52:
5:13 pm PDT, Jul 6, Colie Wertz, California
I can't believe you're even thinking about this...I understand that there's info out there that says "it's safe enough", but there's also a lot of stuff out there that says it isn't. Why even take the chance? Cash? Please, don't be that selfish.
# 51:
11:51 pm PDT, Jul 5, Garrett Burdick, California
  • View Signatures:
  • |<
  • <
  • 83
  • 50
  • >
  • >|
Copyright © 2009 Care2.com, inc. and its licensors. All rights reserved