A suspected killer has more rights in America than a falsely accused parent.
A person suspected of murder gets a fair trial, verses a falsely accused parent.
A falsely accused parent's rights are violated in secrecy behind the juvenile court doors, without any due process or a fair trial.
A fair trial is held in the criminal courts, but not in the juvenile courts where you can loose your child without ever being convicted of child abuse or adjudicated.
According to their own statements which you can hear in the video on this petition, is a phone message that was left for me by the family courts informing me that they shredded the documents to this case.
They also sent a document confirming the phone message.
After the unlawful act was committed, they tried to make it difficult for me to file any court action either by blacking out sections of the files, or by shredding them.
They waited till one Halloween day to take my daughter.
Immediately, after the state took my daughter the state officials dressed her in a Halloween costume and even put lipstick on her.
Not showing any concerns for my daughters emotional state of being, the state officials made her stand around and pose for their camera.
They began to photograph her as soon as they placed her in their vehicle.
I found these pictures that were taken of my daughter by the state officials.
These photos were taken shortly after they took her, after they dressed her in this costume.


I owned my house for seven years before the state got involved.
After the St. Louis, family courts had my daughter in their state care, I discovered that two state Guardian Ad Litems were holding liens to our house whereby both of their names were attached to our house at the same time, while the court officials made court rulings that the Mother lacked adequate housing as a reason to terminate my parental rights.
The St. Louis Family Court, Child Protection Services, the Court Appointed Guardian Ad Litems, and the CASA Advocacy Group of the St. Louis Family courts, did the ultimate damage to her, denying her from her own mother, sister, and brother who still remained to together as a family unit.
I learned that the state granted full custody of my daughter to a newly divorced single man, along with several other little girls that were also adopted out by the state.
Also, the judge that granted full custody to a once newly divorced single man, (named Judge CW) is the same judge who handled the case before the state took her.
This is a photo of my daughter while she was being shuffled around from one foster care home to the next until the state found someone to adopt her for the bonuses and rewards.
Now the man who adopted my little girl receives state subsidies for her, when she has a Mother who does not need state subsidies to care for her.

My rights were terminated based on the time law, and the natural bond.
The Court Officials and Child Protection Services had to find other reasons to terminate my rights, because I was the non-offending parent.
If Child Protection Services returns the child to the non-offending divorced/single parent, what kind of financial incentive is there for the state?
There are no financial incentives for giving a child back to the divorced/single non-offending parent, that's why my little girl is not with her family today.
Please help us to return her back into her own home, with her real Mother, brother and sister who love and miss her.
Mother of three, still have two, while missing one,
Sincerely,
Sonja De Vivo
To all who have taken the time to read my petition, I want to thank you.
A suspected killer has more rights in America than a falsely accused parent.
A person suspected of murder gets a fair trial, verses a falsely accused parent.
A falsely accused parent's rights are violated in secrecy behind the juvenile court doors, without any due process or a fair trial.
A fair trial is held in the criminal courts, but not in the juvenile courts where you can loose your child without ever being convicted of child abuse or adjudicated.
According to their own statements which you can hear in the video on this petition, is a phone message that was left for me by the family courts informing me that they shredded the documents to this case.
They also sent a document confirming the phone message.
After the unlawful act was committed, they tried to make it difficult for me to file any court action either by blacking out sections of the files, or by shredding them.
They waited till one Halloween day to take my daughter.
Immediately, after the state took my daughter the state officials dressed her in a Halloween costume and even put lipstick on her.
Not showing any concerns for my daughters emotional state of being, the state officials made her stand around and pose for their camera.
They began to photograph her as soon as they placed her in their vehicle.
I found these pictures that were taken of my daughter by the state officials.
These photos were taken shortly after they took her, after they dressed her in this costume.


I owned my house for seven years before the state got involved.
After the St. Louis, family courts had my daughter in their state care, I discovered that two state Guardian Ad Litems were holding liens to our house whereby both of their names were attached to our house at the same time, while the court officials made court rulings that the Mother lacked adequate housing as a reason to terminate my parental rights.
The St. Louis Family Court, Child Protection Services, the Court Appointed Guardian Ad Litems, and the CASA Advocacy Group of the St. Louis Family courts, did the ultimate damage to her, denying her from her own mother, sister, and brother who still remained to together as a family unit.
I learned that the state granted full custody of my daughter to a newly divorced single man, along with several other little girls that were also adopted out by the state.
Also, the judge that granted full custody to a once newly divorced single man, (named Judge CW) is the same judge who handled the case before the state took her.
This is a photo of my daughter while she was being shuffled around from one foster care home to the next until the state found someone to adopt her for the bonuses and rewards.
Now the man who adopted my little girl receives state subsidies for her, when she has a Mother who does not need state subsidies to care for her.

My rights were terminated based on the time law, and the natural bond.
The Court Officials and Child Protection Services had to find other reasons to terminate my rights, because I was the non-offending parent.
If Child Protection Services returns the child to the non-offending divorced/single parent, what kind of financial incentive is there for the state?
There are no financial incentives for giving a child back to the divorced/single non-offending parent, that's why my little girl is not with her family today.
Please help us to return her back into her own home, with her real Mother, brother and sister who love and miss her.
Mother of three, still have two, while missing one,
Sincerely,
Sonja De Vivo
To all who have taken the time to read my petition, I want to thank you.
Please Help Me Get My Daughter Back.
The judicial courts and social workers have the ultimate freedom to write what they want without proving their statements.
A suspected killer has more rights in America than a falsely accused parent in the system.
A suspected killer has more rights than our own children do in the system.
Read below to learn how my youngest child ended up in the system.
The state of Missouri's Child Protection Services failed as they continued to allow a disgruntled ex-spouse use their hot line as a means of harassment.
The St. Louis Family Court, Guardian Ad Litems, and Child Protection Services all failed my daughter, by placing her with the offender, who was the one making all of the false hotline calls while she was in his care on a daily bases and who was adjudicated for abusing her by the same courts who allowed him to have custody after having full awareness of his history with past mental illnesses and institutionalized stays.
(They never put a stop to his daily false hotline calls, while using his mental instability while leaving the child at great risk of harm so to have reason to justify why they would take the child.
The St. Louis Family Court and the Child Protection Services removed my daughter from the offender's custody after leaving her there long enough to cause damage.
Child Protection Services violated my Child's rights even more so, by placing her in foster care immediately after rescuing her from the offenders care, denying her the love and care that she needed from her natural mother.
The St. Louis Family Court, Child Protection Services, the Court Appointed Guardian Ad Litems, and the CASA Advocacy Group of the St. Louis Family courts, did the ultimate damage to her, denying her from her own mother, sister, and brother who still remained to together as a family unit.
She was lined up and instructed to stand up against the wall with the other children, while standing in a long line, as she watched the court officials take two children in to a room where they would be adopted two at a time.
My rights were terminated based on the time law, and the bond, not the false allegations that were made by the father.
Child Protection Services stated that the bond was severed due to the amount of time the child was in the system, which was their fault in the first place, plus the bond was never severed.
The Court Officials and Child Protection Services had to find other reasons to terminate my rights, because I was the non-offending parent.
Child Protection Services is a state agency with the power to 'Kidnap With Impunity.
They can create a destructive file on any fit parent without any laws in place that would require them to prove their written statements unlike a criminal court whereby a suspect is innocent until proven guilty. Fit parents do not have the same rights as a suspected killer does.
This is why fit parents are dragged into the Juvenile courts so that court records will be sealed and no one of the outside will ever be able to see the destructing methods used to justify their reasoning for legalized kidnapping.
If Child Protection Services returns the child to the non-offending divorced/single parent, what kind of financial incentive is there for the state? There are no financial incentives for giving a child back to the divorced/single non-offending parent, that's why my little girl is not with her family today.
Please help us to return her back into her own home, with her real Mother, brother and sister who love and miss her.
We are grateful for your signatures!
Mother of three, still have two, while missing one,
Sincerely,
Sonja
petition over
Report abuse There should be no incentives for placing children. They already get a salary. Assistance for the child is different and that goes to the foster family. Foster parents are paid baby sitters until the child is adopted. Once adopted, no money should be sent to the adopting family. If they wanted to have the child, they should be fully responsible as if they had the child naturally. No one should have to get paid for adopting a child.
Report abuse No way.
Report abuse
Report abuse the state should not receive anything for taking away kids from their parents with out doing a thorough investigation and present evidence with out a reason of doubt.
Report abuse Do you feel that the states should receive incentives, bonuses and rewards for the children they place into their system?
Report abuse
Report abuse no. i hope someone puts a stop to CPS
Report abuse NO! The goverment, state and Fedral are corrupt! They deserve nothing, but pitchforks and torchs.. They no longer know what truth is or justice. I trust none of them. GIVE THEM NOTHING!!! If they can't achieve whats right and wholesome without being funded by American money then there not worth having in office.
Report abuse No not at all, that is going to be their goal so they can get what they want. There is a statue here in Florida that states if no reunification next step is adoption before relatives and that freaks me out I know now how dirty their game is.
Report abuse End the corruption now
Report abuse
Report abuse
Report abuse
Report abuse
Report abuse
Report abuse
Report abuse
Report abuse
Report abuse
Report abuse
Report abuse
Report abuse
Report abuse
Report abuse
Report abuse
Report abuse
Report abuse
Report abuse
Report abuse
Report abuse
Report abuse
Report abuse
Report abuse
Report abuse
Report abuse |
|
11:10 pm PDT, Jul 12,
Gena R. Beamon Pascascio, California
Report abuse I am a grandmothr that is fighting with my attorney to get my second grandson from the Los Angeles County Dept of Children Family and Services and the Dependency court awarded my grandson to a Foster Family that want to adopt and also the DCFS receives $50,000 when a child is adopted through their system. Resource: Copyright 1996-2007 Child Welfare League of America. All Rights Reserved. URL: http://www.cwla.org/programs/kinship/valentinesallyearlong.htm "Departing from its traditional role, the county attorney's office in Louisville, Kentucky, is supporting grandparent caregivers." By Frances Diana Hayden "From the heart of a child living in our midst come words, genuine and profound, that reflect the vital lifeline between children and their grandparents or kinship caregivers. Increasingly, grandparents and other family members are interceding on behalf of children whose basic needs are not being met. They are the family safety net of protection. They prevent the children in their families from becoming wards of the state. The American Association of Retired Persons (AARP) estimates that 3.7 million children live with kinship guardians--often the direct result of parental abandonment, substance abuse, child abuse, neglect, divorce, illness, or death. Since 1995, the Jefferson County Attorney's Office in Louisville, Kentucky, has offered support for people providing kinship care for their grandchildren." |
Report abuse
Report abuse
Report abuse
Report abuse
Report abuse
Report abuse