Evolution being taught in schools

To: U.S. Dept. of Education

Re: Evolution being taught in schools

Don't teach evolution in the schools, it's not true, don't teach kids lies.  Teach young people the truth that the world was created by God and is six thousand years old as is revealed in the Bible, not billions of years old like the text books say.  See this link to explain the age of the earth   http://www.answersingenesis.org/articles/2007/05/30/how-old-is-earth Scientist think that the earth is so old cause of radiometric dating which has been proven not to be true, see this link to explain http://www.answersingenesis.org/articles/nab/does-radiometric-dating-prove

This is what two of the greatest scientific minds in history said about creation.  Isaac Newton said the most beautiful systems of the sun, the planets and comets could only proceed from the council and dominion of an intelligent and powerful being.  Albert Einstein said in the view of such harmony in the cosmos, which I with my limited human mind am able to recognize, there are yet people that say there is no God.  He also said, what makes me really angry is they quote me to support such views.

Darwin said that the fossil record is incomplete.  He also said, in order for his theory to be true there must be millions of in between stages, transitional forms, in the fossil record and if within 100 years we don't find those transitional forms that his theory should be discarded.  More then 100 years has gone by and those missing links, transitional forms, the in-between stages are still missing.  Darwin said, often a cold shutter has run thru me as I have asked myself if I have not devoted myself to a fantasy.

Time Magazine: Scientist conceive that their most cherished theories are based on embarrassingly few fossil fragments and huge gaps exist in the fossil record.

News Week: The more Scientist have searched for the transitional forms that lie between species the more they have been frustrated.

Scientist Earnest Chain, Nobel Prize Winner for developing Penicillin, said I would rather believe in fairy tales then such wild speculation as evolution.

Micro evolution is adaptation within a species.  Look at dogs, there is the tiny Chihuahua and the Great Dane; they are very different but their both dogs.  Adaptation within a species is totally different then man evolving from an entirely different species.  Science has never found a genuine transitional form that is one kind of animal crossing over into another kind, either living or in the fossil record and there is supposed to be billions of them.  Evolutionists have been searching for hundreds of years for an animal created by two different species.  Nature is observable proof that every animal brings forth after its own kind.  Even the famous fossil archeoptrics said to be a reptile transitioning into a bird, if you do the research you'll find out it's shown to be fully bird.

Macro evolution: Any fossil that you find at your museum is a fully formed creature.  There is not something in there that is halfway between one animal and halfway between another animal that you can observe to be so.  The observable evidence is that you have animals that are fully formed, you have adaptation within a species but you have never seen any animal produce anything other then that type of animal.  Evolutionist say over time it will turn into something else but you have never seen it happen, no one has ever seen it happen.

You can't extrapolate micro evolution over time and equal macro evolution; no one has ever seen it demonstrated.

If you connected all of your DNA strands together they would reach from the earth to the sun and back 66 times, just the ones in your body.  That whole thing is packed with genetic encoded digital information that is the instructions on how to make a nose, eyes, teeth, skin, hair, bones, and your whole body.  How did the information get in there, by accident?  Charles Darwin spoke of the simple cell but that was so long ago, he didn't have the level of knowledge that we have now and couldn't see down to the DNA level where you have the enormous complexity and the very specific information.  Any self respecting molecular biologist will tell you no one has a clue how the human body could possibly build itself by an accidental process.

Nature is observable proof that God made us to produce after our own kind.  Man did not evolve from amebas. 

To: U.S. Dept. of Education

Re: Evolution being taught in schools

Don't teach evolution in the schools, it's not true, don't teach kids lies.  Teach young people the truth that the world was created by God and is six thousand years old as is revealed in the Bible, not billions of years old like the text books say.  See this link to explain the age of the earth   http://www.answersingenesis.org/articles/2007/05/30/how-old-is-earth Scientist think that the earth is so old cause of radiometric dating which has been proven not to be true, see this link to explain http://www.answersingenesis.org/articles/nab/does-radiometric-dating-prove

This is what two of the greatest scientific minds in history said about creation.  Isaac Newton said the most beautiful systems of the sun, the planets and comets could only proceed from the council and dominion of an intelligent and powerful being.  Albert Einstein said in the view of such harmony in the cosmos, which I with my limited human mind am able to recognize, there are yet people that say there is no God.  He also said, what makes me really angry is they quote me to support such views.

Darwin said that the fossil record is incomplete.  He also said, in order for his theory to be true there must be millions of in between stages, transitional forms, in the fossil record and if within 100 years we don't find those transitional forms that his theory should be discarded.  More then 100 years has gone by and those missing links, transitional forms, the in-between stages are still missing.  Darwin said, often a cold shutter has run thru me as I have asked myself if I have not devoted myself to a fantasy.

Time Magazine: Scientist conceive that their most cherished theories are based on embarrassingly few fossil fragments and huge gaps exist in the fossil record.

News Week: The more Scientist have searched for the transitional forms that lie between species the more they have been frustrated.

Scientist Earnest Chain, Nobel Prize Winner for developing Penicillin, said I would rather believe in fairy tales then such wild speculation as evolution.

Micro evolution is adaptation within a species.  Look at dogs, there is the tiny Chihuahua and the Great Dane; they are very different but their both dogs.  Adaptation within a species is totally different then man evolving from an entirely different species.  Science has never found a genuine transitional form that is one kind of animal crossing over into another kind, either living or in the fossil record and there is supposed to be billions of them.  Evolutionists have been searching for hundreds of years for an animal created by two different species.  Nature is observable proof that every animal brings forth after its own kind.  Even the famous fossil archeoptrics said to be a reptile transitioning into a bird, if you do the research you'll find out it's shown to be fully bird.

Macro evolution: Any fossil that you find at your museum is a fully formed creature.  There is not something in there that is halfway between one animal and halfway between another animal that you can observe to be so.  The observable evidence is that you have animals that are fully formed, you have adaptation within a species but you have never seen any animal produce anything other then that type of animal.  Evolutionist say over time it will turn into something else but you have never seen it happen, no one has ever seen it happen.

You can't extrapolate micro evolution over time and equal macro evolution; no one has ever seen it demonstrated.

If you connected all of your DNA strands together they would reach from the earth to the sun and back 66 times, just the ones in your body.  That whole thing is packed with genetic encoded digital information that is the instructions on how to make a nose, eyes, teeth, skin, hair, bones, and your whole body.  How did the information get in there, by accident?  Charles Darwin spoke of the simple cell but that was so long ago, he didn't have the level of knowledge that we have now and couldn't see down to the DNA level where you have the enormous complexity and the very specific information.  Any self respecting molecular biologist will tell you no one has a clue how the human body could possibly build itself by an accidental process.

Nature is observable proof that God made us to produce after our own kind.  Man did not evolve from amebas.