Butterfly Rewards - earn free credits and redeem for good causes -  learn more!

Fix the Massachusetts Freelancer Law!

Target:
Local Massachusetts Lawmakers
Sponsored by: 
If you're a freelancer in the state of Massachusetts or you work with one, a new law will adversely impact your ability to do work in this state.

Massachusetts has a law (see this site), originally passed in the 1990s and amended in 2004 that classifies freelancers or independent contractors differently than all other states. In 2008, the Attorney General of Massachusetts sent out an advisory which prompted a new policy on freelancers. Essentially, Massachusetts is the only state that has a clause that eliminates Massachusetts residents from being hired as Independent Contractors.

Many local businesses are paying attention to this law, as it carries fines if broken. This means that, if you're a freelancer in the state of Massachusetts, you cannot be hired.

Fortunately, this bill is awaiting committee discussion:  Bill S. 670, An Act Relative to Independent Contractors. The bill has been scheduled for a public hearing sometime in January. Note that there is a similar bill in the House, House No. 1844. To see the text of the actual Bills you can click on the following URL http://www.mass.gov/legis/then enter the appropriate number for the particular bill:  670 for the Senate bill and 1844 for the House Bill.

Please sign this petition to show your support. Please send this to every Massachusetts freelancer you know, the people who work with them, and the people who care about them, and ask them to sign it. If we can show that people want this law changed, we will have a better chance at doing so at the hearing in January.

In addition to signing this petition, you may also contact the chairs of the committee directly (State Senator Thomas McGee, 617-722-1350, Thomas.McGee@state.ma.us and Representative Cheryl Coakley-Rivera, 617-722-2014, Rep.CherylCoakley-Rivera@Hou.State.MA.US).

Thank you!

Sincerely,
Massachusetts Freelancers
If you're a freelancer in the state of Massachusetts or you work with one, a new law will adversely impact your ability to do work in this state.

Massachusetts has a law (see this site), originally passed in the 1990s and amended in 2004 that classifies freelancers or independent contractors differently than all other states. In 2008, the Attorney General of Massachusetts sent out an advisory which prompted a new policy on freelancers. Essentially, Massachusetts is the only state that has a clause that eliminates Massachusetts residents from being hired as Independent Contractors.

Many local businesses are paying attention to this law, as it carries fines if broken. This means that, if you're a freelancer in the state of Massachusetts, you cannot be hired.

Fortunately, this bill is awaiting committee discussion:  Bill S. 670, An Act Relative to Independent Contractors. The bill has been scheduled for a public hearing sometime in January. Note that there is a similar bill in the House, House No. 1844. To see the text of the actual Bills you can click on the following URL http://www.mass.gov/legis/then enter the appropriate number for the particular bill:  670 for the Senate bill and 1844 for the House Bill.

Please sign this petition to show your support. Please send this to every Massachusetts freelancer you know, the people who work with them, and the people who care about them, and ask them to sign it. If we can show that people want this law changed, we will have a better chance at doing so at the hearing in January.

In addition to signing this petition, you may also contact the chairs of the committee directly (State Senator Thomas McGee, 617-722-1350, Thomas.McGee@state.ma.us and Representative Cheryl Coakley-Rivera, 617-722-2014, Rep.CherylCoakley-Rivera@Hou.State.MA.US).

Thank you!

Sincerely,
Massachusetts Freelancers

I am writing to request that you show your support for Senate Bill 670, "An Act Relative to Independent Contractors." 

The original bill (M.G.L.- Chapter 149, Section 148b) requires businesses to meet the

following three standards when defining an individual as an independent contractor:

(1) the individual is free from control and direction in connection with the performance of

the service, both under his contract for the performance of service and in fact; and

(2) the service is performed outside the usual course of the business of the employer; and,

(3) the individual is customarily engaged in an independently established trade, occupation, profession or business of the same nature as that involved in the service performed.  

S670 is designed to allow employers to contract with other businesses or individuals by relaxing certain employee requirements.  Specifically it deletes clause 2 of Ch.149, Sec.148B requiring that the service is performed outside the usual business of the employer.  It also adds to Clause 3 by requiring that they are customarily engaged in an independently established trade, occupation or business and have registered it pursuant to state law.%u201D 

This bill, as it now stands, broadly affects many occupations and industries.  Many businesses do not wish to expand their staff on a year-round basis but wish to do so only when they need help for a specific project or time.  Hiring non-employees (independent contractors), on a mutually agreed upon basis, provides these businesses with flexibility and allows them to better control the flow of work during the busiest part of their season.  As a result of this bill and because other states do not use the Massachusetts three-prong test, independent contractors, who live in Massachusetts, are not being hired.  Instead Massachusetts businesses are hiring independent contractors who live in other states.  This law not only impacts the ability of Massachusetts residents to make a living, but it is also reducing Massachusetts tax revenue in a very challenging economy. 

I understand that this law was initially intended for employers who intentionally sought to curb their financial and legal obligations to employees.  Instead it has had the unintended consequence of preventing Massachusetts%u2019 residents, who want to work on an independent Contractor basis, from working. 

I urge you to support Senate Bill 670, which deletes Clause 2 and institutes the registering of the business pursuant to state law.
signature
goal: 1,000
 
sign petition!
50
50 log in or sign up to start earning Butterfly Credits today!
Already a Care2 member? log in
Name

optional
Email
Address
City
State
Province
Zip code Postal code

Increase your signature's impact by personalizing your letter


I agree to Care2's terms of service. We respect your privacy. Your email address is used to confirm your signature and is NOT displayed publicly.  
We signed the "Fix the Massachusetts Freelancer Law!" petition!
# 106:
7:10 am PST, Nov 21, Lisa Clark, Massachusetts
The Massachusetts Independent Contractor Law is putting members of your consituency out of work, in favor of workers in other states, and as a result, reducing Massachusetts tax revenues.
# 105:
4:46 pm PST, Nov 20, Name not displayed, Massachusetts
Basically, the law as currently written makes it impossible a freelance copy editor to be classified as an independent contractor (because of clause 2), which makes COMPANIES WORRY that I COULD be classified as an employee. But I don't fit the definition of that either (because I'm outside the control of the company, have many clients, etc.), which leaves me without a classification and yet I must pay income tax and outrageously for insurance. The companies may worry all they want about possibilities but I don't see them worrying about what happens to me should I get sick or have to retire... no insurance, no 401k, paid vacation or sick days... and no classification.
# 104:
3:06 pm PST, Nov 20, Nathaniel Prottas, Pennsylvania
# 103:
6:54 am PST, Nov 20, Sheila Manditch, Massachusetts
The State of Massachusetts should not restrict a person's ability to earn a living. Small, independent businesses and freelance workers contribute many tax dollars to our State and should be encouraged, not penalized.
# 102:
1:21 pm PST, Nov 19, Erica Appel, New Jersey
# 101:
12:33 pm PST, Nov 19, Helane Prottas, Massachusetts
I am a photo researcher with twenty years experience working successfully as an independent contractor. Now long-standing clients will not hire me as a consequence of this law because they are required to send work out of state. A law that places constraints on a company's ability to match jobs with freelancers whose expertise and reliability are known quantities is a law that needs to be reconsidered. Please support Senate Bill 670 and fix the freelancer law so Massachusetts freelancers can get back to work.
# 100:
11:25 am PST, Nov 19, Kate House, Massachusetts
# 99:
11:00 am PST, Nov 19, Laura Wheel, Massachusetts
# 98:
10:31 am PST, Nov 19, Brian Wheel, Massachusetts
# 97:
10:30 am PST, Nov 19, John Sisson, Massachusetts
Join this discussion at http://misclassified.blogspot.com/
# 96:
10:04 am PST, Nov 19, Beth Castrodale, Massachusetts
Please change the Massachusetts law that prevents our state's residents from being hired as Independent Contractors. It creates a horrible circumstance for freelancers, especially in this economy. Thanks, Beth Castrodale
# 95:
9:57 am PST, Nov 19, John Sullivan, Massachusetts
# 94:
9:44 am PST, Nov 19, Name not displayed, Massachusetts
# 93:
9:38 am PST, Nov 19, Ellen Thibault, Massachusetts
Dear Massachusetts lawmakers: Please fix the freelancer law. The law, as is, has led companies to hire out-of-state contractors, instead of local ones. Whatever its intended goal, the law, in practice, has put many expert and long-trusted people out of work in this state.
# 92:
9:19 am PST, Nov 19, Shannon Walsh, Massachusetts
I was a freelancer up until a few months ago when I was lucky enough to be hired full-time by Bedford/St. Martin's (one of the companies I was doing proofreading and copyediting work for). I thought I was lucky already, but when I see how this new law is negatively impacting freelancers (and especially people who would like to become freelancers) I am even more grateful for the job. I wouldn't get any work, though I chose to leave my paid internship (where I wasn't making enough money) to try my hand at freelancing a year ago. I think that if this law were in effect when I began freelancing, I would not have had any work at all. Also, I recently thought about freelancing part time to help pay the bills, but that seems impossible now. I really think this law should be fixed.
# 91:
9:05 am PST, Nov 19, Alicia Young, Massachusetts
# 90:
8:49 am PST, Nov 19, Name not displayed, Massachusetts
This law is illogical and harmful to families and the Massachusetts economy. It must be fixed quickly.
# 88:
8:44 am PST, Nov 19, Leasa Burton, Massachusetts
# 89:
8:44 am PST, Nov 19, Nicholas Murphy, Massachusetts
# 87:
8:37 am PST, Nov 19, Maura Crowley, Massachusetts
Please fix the law regarding Independent Contractors in Massachusetts. The unintended consequence is unemployment for thousands of formerly self employed Massachusetts residents.
# 86:
6:22 pm PST, Nov 18, Jean Hammond, Massachusetts
I supported my state, Massachusetts, with the tax I paid on my freelance income and on purchases on which I paid sales tax. Will the Commonwealth continue to benefit when Massachusetts freelancers lose their income to freelancers in other states?
# 85:
2:54 pm PST, Nov 18, Name not displayed, Massachusetts
I cannot currently get a full time job in my field. I have a masters degree and 6 years experience in educational publishing. NO one is hiring people of my experience level. But I was able to obtain freelance work. Which is perfect and allows me to make money and still work around my husband's busy schedule. Please don't make it so that I can't make a living in this horrible economy.
# 84:
8:53 pm PST, Nov 17, Stephanie Geuns-Meyer, Massachusetts
Hmm, I'm not sure that I have all of the context, but I can't imagine a rationale for this law.
# 83:
1:35 pm PST, Nov 17, Lee Goodwin, Massachusetts
# 82:
1:58 pm PST, Nov 16, Ken Krause, Massachusetts
If this law doesn't put me into poverty, my health insurer will: Friday I was informed that my premium was going up by 44 percent on Jan. 1.
# 81:
9:20 am PST, Nov 16, Name not displayed, Massachusetts
I am an art director for a college textbook publishing company. Because of the independent contractor law, I am no longer using Massachusetts-based freelance designers and art researchers. The Attorney General's independent contractor ruling is unfortunate for my company and myself, but it is disastrous for the independent freelancers of this state.
# 80:
9:13 am PST, Nov 16, Carolyn Nichols, Massachusetts
# 79:
7:04 am PST, Nov 16, Michelle Kousidis, Massachusetts
# 78:
6:17 am PST, Nov 16, Andrea Cava, Massachusetts
The Massachusetts Freelancer Law effectively put me out of business this year (2009). I enjoyed fourteen successful years as a freelance textbook editor from 1994 through 2008, but because of the law, my long-time publisher clients located in Massachusetts no longer hire me. Instead of helping freelance editors, designers, proofreaders, and copyeditors, this law put me and my freelance colleagues out of business. Many of us are at the top of our game and love publishing but can barely make a living anymore. This law must be eradicated.
# 77:
6:12 am PST, Nov 16, Jean Bermingham, Massachusetts
# 76:
5:58 am PST, Nov 16, Deb Agliano, Massachusetts
This has far reaching consequences that have not been thought out carefully enough.
# 75:
3:13 am PST, Nov 16, Claudia Bruno, Massachusetts
# 74:
8:08 pm PST, Nov 15, Lisa Wehrle, Massachusetts
The unintended effect of the original bill's language is nothing short of disasterous for independent contractors like myself. It is equally disasterous for the state treasury, at what is already a perilous financial time for the state and its citizens. In anticipation of the original bill becoming law, one major publishing client of mine has already instituted new policies designed to abandon its Massachusetts freelancers and to protect itself. Like others who have written, then, I know the threat this bill presents is very real; this is not a theoretical exercise, but one that will result in real suffering. The day I can't work in Massachusetts as an independent contractor is the day I put my house on the market, box up my computer, break the news to my close-knit Massachusetts family members, and prepare to move to a state that allows me to work. My heartbreak at taking such a step would be matched only by my sense of desperation and outrage. Please vote in favor of Bill 670 to amend the original bill's language.
# 73:
3:00 pm PST, Nov 15, John Goodwin, Massachusetts
# 72:
7:16 am PST, Nov 13, Mark Chase, Massachusetts
Great... just when the economy is going down hill, Massachusetts makes it harder for me to find work here in my own state!
# 71:
2:34 pm PST, Nov 12, Mary Callaghan, Massachusetts
# 70:
7:06 am PST, Nov 12, Beverly Heinle, Massachusetts
# 69:
1:05 pm PST, Nov 11, Ann Wigglesworth, Massachusetts
# 68:
10:27 am PST, Nov 11, Name not displayed, Massachusetts
# 66:
10:23 am PST, Nov 11, Michael Cappiello, Massachusetts
The idea of not having the ability to hire a freelancer is absurd! Aren't all people that are self-employed considered to be freelancers? If this is the case, then what about all the workers that we all hire to complete general tasks at our own businesses or homes? Think of it, the real estate agents, lawyers, accountants, maintenance and repair workers; carpenters, painters, etc., etc., and the list goes on. Consider all the missed tax revenues that the state of Massachusetts will lose due to this law? It doesn't make sense! I don't get this! Maybe I'm wrong, but our economy thrives when small and independent business owners are providing us with the necessary services that we all need! WHO DO WE HIRE TO COMPLETE THE WORK THAT WE ALL NEED DONE AT SOME POINT?? This is a typical BIG Business ploy and results in the taking away of our (Massachusetts Citizens) freedom of choice! Isn't this in conflict with our constitutional rights? I am forwarding these comments to the "legislators" above. I encourage any and all concerned parties to do the same.
# 65:
9:26 am PST, Nov 11, Jane Cappiello, Massachusetts
This country was built on the ingenuity of talented individuals. Freelancers have provided services to many for a reasonable cost. Freelancers think out-of-the-box because they are competing with Big Business. Massachusetts has always been a liberal state that has supported free thinking and new ideas; this has made us great! Now, let’s support these freelancers, and allow them to provide us with needed services without the interference, control, and restrictions of Big Business. Furthermore, how will this law affect small business owners and independent contractors, such as painters, plumbers, landscapers, and consultants, etc.? Legislators work for the people, so they need to step up to the plate and reword this law to encourage and support the free thinkers, our freelancers! Sincerely, Jane Cappiello
# 64:
8:11 am PST, Nov 11, Jodi Martino, Massachusetts
# 63:
7:43 am PST, Nov 11, Name not displayed, Massachusetts
My clients tell me that they will only hire out-of-state freelancers now! I feel so discriminated against. Please, please fix this law before I lose all of my clients!
# 62:
12:27 pm PST, Nov 10, Name not displayed, Massachusetts
Massachusetts freelancers who have for years been doing skilled and specialized jobs, reporting their incomes and paying their state and federal taxes are made victims to the law as it is now worded. Please take the time to word this law properly so that people can get back to work.
# 61:
8:41 am PST, Nov 3, Name not displayed, Massachusetts
# 60:
3:41 pm PST, Nov 2, Judith Lane, Massachusetts
It's not right for the state to take away a citizen's right to work. Please fix this law.
# 59:
12:34 pm PST, Nov 2, Name not displayed, Massachusetts
In a recession where employees are already paying high city and state taxes and have had bonuses and merit raises eliminated, how can this law be fair? How can freelancers survive with this law?
# 58:
4:41 pm PST, Nov 1, Emily Keaton, Massachusetts
I am a Massachusetts freelancer in the publishing industry. After 13 years of having no shortage of freelance projects to work on, this law has made it difficult for me to find work--during economic times in which I most need the work. This law handicapping thousands of tax-paying Massachusetts professionals. We deserve better from our lawmakers.
# 57:
3:36 pm PDT, Oct 29, Name not displayed, New York
This law, intended to protect workers, is inadvertently hurting many of them. I work for a publishing house in New York, in the copyediting department. We are suddenly now unable to hire some of our best copyeditors, proofreaders, and indexers because of this law--people who have worked for us, in some cases, for decades. These are people who couldn't possibly be classified as employees, as they work for multiple companies, on a project by project basis. This law needs to be changed so it doesn't hurt legitimate freelancers.
# 56:
1:17 pm PDT, Oct 25, Cathy Romeo, Massachusetts
# 55:
12:31 pm PDT, Oct 25, Deborah Wolfman, Massachusetts
# 54:
4:58 pm PDT, Oct 23, Name not displayed, Massachusetts
# 53:
7:25 am PDT, Oct 23, Name not displayed, Delaware
I grew up in MA, attended college there and our oldest child lives there now. My husband's job took us away but our intention is to return to MA in a couple of years when he retires. However, with your new freelance law in place that WILL BE A HUGE DETERRENT. I guess we will look for property in New Hampshire or elsewhere. Your current law jeopardizes the livelihood of the citizens of MA, and in fact, encourages them to move out of state. Where is the sense in that?? I am very disappointed that the state that I love, and always protected it citizens is now stifling their ability to earn a living. Please reconsider this law very carefully. The Commonwealth of MA may lose businesses as well as individuals as a result of this restrictive law.
# 52:
3:31 pm PDT, Oct 22, Tristan Lestat, Alabama
# 51:
10:56 am PDT, Oct 22, Marilyn Eichner, Massachusetts
I do NOT wish to receive any emails as a result of this signature process.
  • View Signatures:
  • |<
  • <
  • 106
  • 50
  • >
  • >|
Copyright © 2009 Care2.com, inc. and its licensors. All rights reserved