FREE RICHARD FINE

WE ASK SHERIFF LEE BACA TO USE HIS DUE AUTHORITY AND PROPERLY ADDRESS THE LEGAL,  CIVIL, AND HUMAN RIGHTS OF AN AMERICAN, INMATE RICHARD FINE (CJ INMATE 1824367),  WE PRAY SHERIFF LEE BACA REVIEW THE ARREST, BOOKING, AND PERMANENT HOUSING ASSIGNMENT RECORDS, AND IF ANY IS FOUND INADVERTENTLY INSUFFICIENT - TAKE CORRECTIVE ACTIONS AND IMMEDIATELY RELEASE ATTY FINE. WITH IT, THE SHERIFF MAY MARK A NEW BEGINNING FOR THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY JUSTICE SYSTEM, WITH DIGNITY OF THE LEGAL, CIVIL, AND HUMAN RIGHTS OF ALL...View images of the FALSE ON ITS FACE March 4, 2009 Judgment at:1) http://inproperinla.com/Doc2.jpg2) http://inproperinla.com/00-00-00-la-sup-ct-marina-v-county-09-03-04-false-fine-judment-record-copy-from-us-dist-ct-habeas-corpus-doc-16-response-by-la-sup-ct-filed-may-1-2009.pdf
Executive Summary:This appeal is filed with the Los Angeles County Sheriff %u2013 LEE BACA, %u2013 to use his due authority and properly address thelegal, civil and human rights of an American, inmate RICHARD FINE (1824367).Reconstructed Chronology: Prior to the March 4, 2009 proceeding a request was forwarded to the Sheriff Department to have the Warrant Detail present in the proceeding, with the understanding that the proceeding would end with the sentencing and jailing of Atty Fine for contempt. Indeed, Judge DAVID YAFFE pronounced such sentence in open court, as evidenced in court reporter%u2019s transcript %u2013 the first record of the proceeding. Through such oral directives, Judge Yaffe mislead the Sheriff%u2019s Warrant Detail to arrest Atty Fine at 11:05 am. However, Judge Yaffe then left them with no record as an adequate legal foundation for such action. Instead, Judge Yaffe proceeded to create a second, contradictory record in court file %u2013 which did not reflect any sentencing or jailing at all. In fact %u2013 the March 4, 2009 proceeding was entirely eliminated from the record! The consequent Sheriff%u2019s Warrant Detail record of booking in San Pedro at 12:32 pm was likely insufficient, and is the main subject of this appeal. By 4:31 pm, papers were received by the Sheriff%u2019s Department through an anonymous fax transmission from %u201CJudicial Services%u201D. Such papers reflected yet a third, again misleading record for the litigation, including invalid records: The March 4, 2009 Remand Order and the March 4, 2009 Judgment for contempt. On such background it was understandable why Sheriff Baca refused to respond to Atty Richard Fine%u2019s habeas corpus petition. The LA Superior Court and Judge Yaffe eventually responded, through papers filed on May 1, 2009 by Atty KEVIN MCCORMICK. Such Response failed to include a declaration under penalty of perjury by Judge Yaffe %u2013 the competent fact witness, it also failed to produce the quintessential litigation records %u2013 the Register of Actions (docket), and any evidence of entry of judgment. It relied upon records from the Sheriff Department and the Court Reporter%u2019s transcript %u2013 records which absent, at variance, and/or contradictory of the records in court file. Key records were filed as evidence with no authentication. Finally, there is no reason to believe that Judge Yaffe ever saw such pleading before or after it was filed on his behalf in court. It is inconceivable for the court to engage in such litigation practices to affect false imprisonment of an individual. Request was therefore filed directly with Judge Yaffe, to confirmthat such records were filed with his knowledge and on his behalf. However, it remained unanswered.
Pleading: We pray Sheriff Lee Baca review the arrest, booking, and permanent housing assignment records, and if any is found inadvertently insufficient - take corrective actions and immediately release Atty Fine. With it, the Sheriff may mark a new beginning for the Los Angeles County justice system, with dignity of the legal, civil, and human rights of all.

WE ASK SHERIFF LEE BACA TO USE HIS DUE AUTHORITY AND PROPERLY ADDRESS THE LEGAL,  CIVIL, AND HUMAN RIGHTS OF AN AMERICAN, INMATE RICHARD FINE (CJ INMATE 1824367),  WE PRAY SHERIFF LEE BACA REVIEW THE ARREST, BOOKING, AND PERMANENT HOUSING ASSIGNMENT RECORDS, AND IF ANY IS FOUND INADVERTENTLY INSUFFICIENT - TAKE CORRECTIVE ACTIONS AND IMMEDIATELY RELEASE ATTY FINE. WITH IT, THE SHERIFF MAY MARK A NEW BEGINNING FOR THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY JUSTICE SYSTEM, WITH DIGNITY OF THE LEGAL, CIVIL, AND HUMAN RIGHTS OF ALL...View images of the FALSE ON ITS FACE March 4, 2009 Judgment at:1) http://inproperinla.com/Doc2.jpg2) http://inproperinla.com/00-00-00-la-sup-ct-marina-v-county-09-03-04-false-fine-judment-record-copy-from-us-dist-ct-habeas-corpus-doc-16-response-by-la-sup-ct-filed-may-1-2009.pdf
Executive Summary:This appeal is filed with the Los Angeles County Sheriff %u2013 LEE BACA, %u2013 to use his due authority and properly address thelegal, civil and human rights of an American, inmate RICHARD FINE (1824367).Reconstructed Chronology: Prior to the March 4, 2009 proceeding a request was forwarded to the Sheriff Department to have the Warrant Detail present in the proceeding, with the understanding that the proceeding would end with the sentencing and jailing of Atty Fine for contempt. Indeed, Judge DAVID YAFFE pronounced such sentence in open court, as evidenced in court reporter%u2019s transcript %u2013 the first record of the proceeding. Through such oral directives, Judge Yaffe mislead the Sheriff%u2019s Warrant Detail to arrest Atty Fine at 11:05 am. However, Judge Yaffe then left them with no record as an adequate legal foundation for such action. Instead, Judge Yaffe proceeded to create a second, contradictory record in court file %u2013 which did not reflect any sentencing or jailing at all. In fact %u2013 the March 4, 2009 proceeding was entirely eliminated from the record! The consequent Sheriff%u2019s Warrant Detail record of booking in San Pedro at 12:32 pm was likely insufficient, and is the main subject of this appeal. By 4:31 pm, papers were received by the Sheriff%u2019s Department through an anonymous fax transmission from %u201CJudicial Services%u201D. Such papers reflected yet a third, again misleading record for the litigation, including invalid records: The March 4, 2009 Remand Order and the March 4, 2009 Judgment for contempt. On such background it was understandable why Sheriff Baca refused to respond to Atty Richard Fine%u2019s habeas corpus petition. The LA Superior Court and Judge Yaffe eventually responded, through papers filed on May 1, 2009 by Atty KEVIN MCCORMICK. Such Response failed to include a declaration under penalty of perjury by Judge Yaffe %u2013 the competent fact witness, it also failed to produce the quintessential litigation records %u2013 the Register of Actions (docket), and any evidence of entry of judgment. It relied upon records from the Sheriff Department and the Court Reporter%u2019s transcript %u2013 records which absent, at variance, and/or contradictory of the records in court file. Key records were filed as evidence with no authentication. Finally, there is no reason to believe that Judge Yaffe ever saw such pleading before or after it was filed on his behalf in court. It is inconceivable for the court to engage in such litigation practices to affect false imprisonment of an individual. Request was therefore filed directly with Judge Yaffe, to confirmthat such records were filed with his knowledge and on his behalf. However, it remained unanswered.
Pleading: We pray Sheriff Lee Baca review the arrest, booking, and permanent housing assignment records, and if any is found inadvertently insufficient - take corrective actions and immediately release Atty Fine. With it, the Sheriff may mark a new beginning for the Los Angeles County justice system, with dignity of the legal, civil, and human rights of all.

WE ASK SHERIFF LEE BACA TO USE HIS DUE AUTHORITY AND PROPERLY ADDRESS THE LEGAL,  CIVIL, AND HUMAN RIGHTS OF AN AMERICAN, INMATE RICHARD FINE (CJ INMATE 1824367),  WE PRAY SHERIFF LEE BACA REVIEW THE ARREST, BOOKING, AND PERMANENT HOUSING ASSIGNMENT RECORDS, AND IF ANY IS FOUND INADVERTENTLY INSUFFICIENT - TAKE CORRECTIVE ACTIONS AND IMMEDIATELY RELEASE ATTY FINE. WITH IT, THE SHERIFF MAY MARK A NEW BEGINNING FOR THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY JUSTICE SYSTEM, WITH DIGNITY OF THE LEGAL, CIVIL, AND HUMAN RIGHTS OF ALL..Executive Summary:This appeal is filed with the Los Angeles County Sheriff %u2013 LEE BACA, %u2013 to use his due authority and properly address thelegal, civil and human rights of an American, inmate RICHARD FINE (1824367).Reconstructed Chronology: Prior to the March 4, 2009 proceeding a request was forwarded to the Sheriff Department to have the Warrant Detail present in the proceeding, with the understanding that the proceeding would end with the sentencing and jailing of Atty Fine for contempt. Indeed, Judge DAVID YAFFE pronounced such sentence in open court, as evidenced in court reporter%u2019s transcript %u2013 the first record of the proceeding. Through such oral directives, Judge Yaffe mislead the Sheriff%u2019s Warrant Detail to arrest Atty Fine at 11:05 am. However, Judge Yaffe then left them with no record as an adequate legal foundation for such action. Instead, Judge Yaffe proceeded to create a second, contradictory record in court file %u2013 which did not reflect any sentencing or jailing at all. In fact %u2013 the March 4, 2009 proceeding was entirely eliminated from the record! The consequent Sheriff%u2019s Warrant Detail record of booking in San Pedro at 12:32 pm was likely insufficient, and is the main subject of this appeal. By 4:31 pm, papers were received by the Sheriff%u2019sDepartment through an anonymous fax transmission from %u201CJudicial Services%u201D. Such papers reflected yet a third, again misleading record for the litigation, including invalid records: The March 4, 2009 Remand Order and the March 4, 2009 Judgment for contempt. On such background it was understandable why Sheriff Baca refused to respond to Atty Richard Fine%u2019s habeas corpus petition. The LA Superior Court and Judge Yaffe eventually responded, through papers filed on May 1, 2009 by Atty KEVIN MCCORMICK. Such Response failed to include a declaration under penalty of perjury by Judge Yaffe %u2013 the competent fact witness, it also failed to produce the quintessential litigation records %u2013 the Register of Actions (docket), and any evidence of entry of judgment. It relied upon records from the Sheriff Department and the Court Reporter%u2019s transcript %u2013 records which absent, at variance, and/or contradictory of the records in court file. Key records were filed as evidence with no authentication. Finally, there is no reason to believe that Judge Yaffe ever saw such pleading before or after it was filed on his behalf in court. It is inconceivable for the court to engage in such litigation practices to affect false imprisonment of an individual. Request was therefore filed directly with Judge Yaffe, to confirmthat such records were filed with his knowledge and on his behalf. However, it remained unanswered.Pleading: We pray Sheriff Lee Baca review the arrest, booking, and permanent housing assignment records, and if any is found inadvertently insufficient - take corrective actions and immediately release Atty Fine. With it, the Sheriff may mark a new beginning for the Los Angeles County justice system, with dignity of the legal, civil, and human rights of all.