yes
The cost LDN should be easily covered by all provincial health plans and all private insurance.
Yes
Yes
Absolutely!!!
Absolutely!!
Yes
Aboslutley! Why not? It is so much less expensive then many of the other drugs that are covered and it does not have any of the side effects that most expensive drugs do!
Yes it should be covered by insurance plans because all other Off Label Drugs are.
Yes, have insurance companies pay for this drug. It is affordable to the insurance companies as well.
Yes, a lot more people could stay in the work force longer and pay more TAXES!
I don't see why LDN isn't covered under medical plans. The cost of LDN is a such a fractional cost compared to the cost of the CRAB drugs. It will happen soon I hope. But to be honest I don't care if it is covered by my drug plan or not. Reason being is that the cost of LDN at $30 per month for the relief I am getting I will pay it out of my pocker gladly for the rest of my life.
it is a very inexpensive treatment therefore it is not neccessary to cover it, however for insurance companies it would make more sense to cover ldn rather than the other typical treatments say for example avonex which costs around 1200$ monthly compared with around $30 monthly for ldn.
yes
Yes. I realize the pharmaceutical companies (predominately Bayer in my case) will be opposed to this study, but if LDN is found a safe alternatve to the drugs currently used it will save the insurance companies and the governments millions is drug cost for MS alone.
YES, LDN should be considered under insurance plans and covered by government insured plans. It is inexpensive and effective for many people. Until there is a cure for MS, there is LDN.
Yes!
Yes.
Do be more readily available.
definately
We have to have insurance help. There are so many people without proper medication and without insurance we have to help everyone every way we can. No question. I do have insurance and the last drug I took still cost me $700 a month. Combine that with rent and bills and I have $100 left for food a month. Please help us work this into our daily lives easier.
YES
DEFINATELY..IT COULD SAVE YEARS OF SUFFERING AND RELATED HEALTH CARE COSTS
If this medical approach were successful among a majority of people with chronic diseases, then it would be very worthwhile to cover the cost of this medication to enable us to return to the workforce!!! Thank you for your consideration.
If it's cheap I don't care but also then it shoulgn't be a problem for health insurances... I'm paying most of my income for relatively cheap drugs that are not provided by multi-billion-companies - of course that may also be the problem - not much to earn with the stuff...
It does not need to be covered by insurance companies. It is so cheap that it costs less than the copay, so forget the insurance companies, get the testing done so that it can be prescribed.
Yes it should be covered under insurance plans
It should be covered on all drug plans.
It would be great but if it slows the process, it shouldn't be an excuse.
This should defiantly be covered by insurance plans. A low cost drug like this should lower the insurance plan costs through lower pay-outs for medical claims costs which should then reflect in lower insurance premiums but would likely end up increasing the insurance underwriter profits more than reducing premiums.
LDN should be covered by health insurance.
I absolutely believe LDN should be covered under one's insurance plan. If insurance companies can approve other MS medications that cost more than $2,000 a month, then they should approve LDN. This medication costs as little as $30 a month. To me it's a no-brainer!
It should be affordable and covered, certainly.
yes.
Yes, I do.