Help find Justice for David Camm

Target:

Indiana Supreme Court

Sponsored by:

Mary Sears www.groups.msn.com/friends4davidcam

We, the people, feel that David Camm has not received

a fair trial, as is his Constitutional Right, as a citizen of

these United States of America.

In America we are presumed innocent until it is proven

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT, that we are guilty.

This case is a very disturbing reminder that our Jucicial System

is being manipulated by those elected servants that, we the people,

trust to ensure our Constitutional Rights.

From the moment David Camm found his family in the garage

of his home and called the Indiana State Police, their focus

has always been on David in spite of several pieces of evidence

that proves otherwise.

Listed here are some of the evidence proving that David

is innocent, and that he was, from day 1, Law Enforcements

ONLY suspect.

http://justicefordavidcamm.com/

11 eyewitnesses were with Camm playing basketball during the time the family was murdered; they have never wavered that Camm did not leave the gym where they were playing.

The blood "expert" and crime scene re-constructionist had never processed a homicide scene before, had never taken an elementary course on blood stain patterns and was supposedly only present to take photographs and make notes.

That same "expert" identified high velocity blood stains on the garage door; they were later confirmed to be oil spots.

The first probable cause affidavit was inaccurate, misleading, incomplete, and based in large part upon false deductions and speculations, as well as critical information provided by the "expert."

Prosecutor Faith’s own investigators had no police training or experience, yet they collected and retained evidence at the crime scene and conducted interviews of witnesses. Critical evidence was lost.

There was never any evidence that Jill's injuries, whatever they were, had been caused by her father. In fact, after two trials, the Indiana Attorney General, in arguing against the current Camm appeal, admitted that there was no connection between him and Jill’s injuries.

The first prosecutor changed theories three times as to when Camm killed his wife and children.

The second prosecutor stuck with the third theory, but was forced to change to a fourth theory.

The only physical evidence that put Camm at the shooting was the opinion of some blood stain experts; other experts said the stains were contact or transfer stains and not the result of blowback from a gunshot.

A sweatshirt was found at the crime scene which contained the name of BACKBONE. Unknown male DNA and female DNA, mixed with the blood of Kim, was found on the sweatshirt.

Prosecutor Faith claimed he told the ISP to run the DNA on the sweatshirt; the ISP claimed that never happened.

The sweatshirt was ignored for over four years, including by the new "Fresh Eyes" investigation.

The "Fresh Eyes" investigation conducted but 20 interviews prior to Camm being re-charged and conducted no forensic testing on mountains of evidence.

The DNA on the sweatshirt was finally run, but only after the threat of a motion to compel them to do so was filed by the defense.

The DNA was that of Charles Boney, an 11 time convicted felon who had assaulted and robbed women at gunpoint and who had kidnapped three college coeds.

Boney was a shoe freak, having assaulted women for their shoes; Kim’s shoes were off and had been placed on the roof of the Bronco.

The unknown female DNA was that of Boney's girlfriend.

Prosecutor Henderson claimed in a press conference that Boney’s story about how his sweatshirt got to the scene had checked out, yet didn’t tell the public of Boney's failed polygraph and alibi witnesses (that didn't alibi him).

Deputy prosecutor Steve Owen said in that press conference that it didn’t make sense to him that Boney would have just gotten out of prison, brutally murdered three people and then left his sweatshirt at the scene of the crime; Boney, who had left evidence at several other crime scenes, previously said that his "escape plan" involved removing a sweatshirt so he would look different if any witnesses reported his description to the police.

Boney was threatened with the death penalty but then was told that he was an "opportunist" and that his "best scenario was to be a witness. He seized the opportunity to be that witness and wasn't charged with the death penalty. He was also provided information that he incorporated into his stories.

No part of Boney's ever-changing and inconsistent stories was ever verified by the authorities.

Boney claimed that he was at the crime scene and that after Camm tried to kill him, he walked into the garage, tripped over the shoes, placed them on top of the Bronco, and then leaned against the side of the car because he was "curious;" his left palm print was found at the same location on the Bronco where a right-handed shooter would have steadied himself.

Prosecutor Henderson charged Boney and Camm with conspiracy to commit murder even though there was no evidence of any such conspiracy; that conspiracy charge was later summarily dismissed by the Camm trial judge.

Three inmates/informants who had been convicted of drug dealing, escape, and murder, testified for the prosecution even though their stories didn't match the facts; they benefited from their stories; one, after having his 25 year sentence modified was allowed to be on house arrest; he fled and is now a fugitive.

A witness was found by the defense who testified that Boney bragged about having three murders on his conscience; he was used in Boney's trial but in Camm's trial prosecutor Henderson fought vigorously against his testimony.

Boney, prior to his palm print being matched at the crime scene, confessed to a former FBI Agent that it would be "obvious" that he killed the family if any of his prints were there.

Prosecutor Henderson, who charged Boney and Camm with conspiracy, fought hard against allowing any of Boney's stories, confessions, criminal signature, and leg and foot fetish which would have allowed the defense to mount a 6th Amendment defense as guaranteed by the Constitution.

The judge in Camm's second trial allowed the prosecutor to allege that Camm had molested his daughter even though he later admitted that there was "on the surface... (no)thing other than a natural father and daughter relationship between the defendant and his daughter."

The possible source of the murder weapon was discovered by the defense; the "Fresh Eyes" investigators ridiculed that possibility and didn't take it seriously.

And on, and on, and on.................

This video is most important … http://www.indianacourts.org/apps/webcasts/default.aspx?search=camm&view=table&sort=

Please help us find Justice for David Camm and his family!

http://groups.msn.com/Friends4DavidCamm