In protest at Amazon's new

In protest at Amazon's new "adult" policy

Target:
Amazon
Sponsored by: 
We the undersigned, state our strong objection to Amazon's "Adult" policy as outlined in their letter in italics below

"In consideration of our entire customer base, we exclude "adult" material from appearing in some searches and best seller lists. Since these lists are generated using sales ranks, adult materials must also be excluded from that feature.

Hence, if you have further questions, kindly write back to us.

Best regards,

Ashlyn D
Member Services
Amazon.com Advantage

We find it hypocritical that Amazon continues to sell adult books but thinks that removing the sales rating to (keep them out of the public eye) will achieve this.

We would like to hear the rationalisation for allowing sales ratings for explicit books with a heterosexual focus such as:

--Playboy: The Complete Centerfolds by Chronicle Books (pictures of over 600 naked women)
--Rosemary Rogers' Sweet Savage Love" (explicit heterosexual romance);
--Kathleen Woodiwiss' The Wolf and the Dove (explicit heterosexual romance);
--Bertrice Smal's Skye o'Malley which are all explicit heterosexual romances
--and Alan Moore's Lost Girls (which is a very explicit sexual graphic novel)

Yet the following books, which have a gay or lesbian focus, have been classed as "adult books" and stripped of their sales ratings:

--Radclyffe Hill's classic novel about lesbians in Victorian times, The Well of Loneliness, and which contains not one sentence of sexual description;
--Mark R Probst's YA novel The Filly about a young man in the wild West discovering that he's gay (gay romance, no sex);
--Charlie Cochrane's Lessons in Love (gay romance with no sex);
--The Dictionary of Homophobia: A Global History of Gay & Lesbian Experience, edited by Louis-George Tin (non-fiction, history and social issues);
--and Homophobia: A History by Bryan Fone (non-fiction, focus on history and the forms prejudice against homosexuality has taken over the years).

Please tell us, Amazon, why the explicit books with a heterosexual focus are allowed to keep their sales ratings while the non-explicit romances, the histories and the biographies that deal with LGBTQ issues are not.

We would love to hear your reasoning.

Los abajo firmantes mostramos nuestra fuerte protesta hacia la pol�tica de %u201CAdultos%u201D que Amazon ha descrito en la carta en cursiva que citamos:

"En consideraci�n de todos nuestros clientes, el material %u201Cadulto%u201D se excluye de aparecer en algunas b�squedas y listas de Best Sellers. Como estas listas se generan usando las estad�sticas de ventas, los materiales de adultos tambi�n ser�n excluidos de estas estad�sticas.

Por lo tanto, si tienen m�s preguntas, por favor escr�bannos.

Saludos cordiales,

Ashlyn D
Member Services
Amazon.com Advantage

Encontramos hip�crita que Amazon contin�e vendiendo libros para adultos pero piense que retir�ndolos de las estad�sticas de ventas (quit�ndolos de los ojos del p�blico) lo lograr�.

Nos gustar�a escuchar el razonamiento para permitir estad�sticas de ventas para libros expl�citos con romances heterosexuales como:

--Playboy: The Complete Centerfolds por Chronicle Books (fotograf�as de casi 600 mujeres desnudas)
-- Sweet Savage Love  de Rosemary Rogers (romance heterosexual expl�cito);
-- The Wolf and the Dove  de Kathleen Woodiwiss (romance heterosexual expl�cito);
-- Skye o'Malley  de Bertrice Smal que son todos romances heterosexuales expl�citos

--y Lost Girls de Alan Moore (que es una novela gr�fica sexual muy expl�cita)

No obstante, los siguientes libros, que tienen orientaci�n gay o l�sbica, han sido clasificados como %u201Clibros para adultos%u201D y retirados de las estad�sticas de ventas:

--La novela cl�sica de Radclyffe Hill de la �poca Victoriana, The Well of Loneliness, y que no contiene ning�n p�rrafo de descripci�n sexual;

--La novela de Mark R Probst The Filly acerca de un hombre joven en el viejo oeste, que descubre que es gay (romance gay, sin sexo);
-- Lessons in Love  de Charlie Cochrane (romance gay sin sexo);
--The Dictionary of Homophobia: A Global History of Gay & Lesbian Experience, editado por Louis-George Tin (no-ficci�n, publicaci�n hist�rica y social);
--y Homophobia: A History por Bryan Fone (no-ficci�n, orientada a la historia y a la forma en que los antiguos prejuicios contra la homosexualidad se han desarrollado a lo largo de los a�os).

Por favor expl�quennos, se�ores de Amazon, por qu� se permite que los libros expl�citos con una orientaci�n heterosexual mantengan sus estad�sticas de ventas, mientras los romances no expl�citos, las novelas hist�ricas y biograf�as que tocan temas gays o l�sbicos, no las mantienen.

Nos gustar�a o�r vuestro razonamiento.

#amazonfail
We the undersigned, state our strong objection to Amazon's "Adult" policy as outlined in their letter in italics below

"In consideration of our entire customer base, we exclude "adult" material from appearing in some searches and best seller lists. Since these lists are generated using sales ranks, adult materials must also be excluded from that feature.

Hence, if you have further questions, kindly write back to us.

Best regards,

Ashlyn D
Member Services
Amazon.com Advantage

We find it hypocritical that Amazon continues to sell adult books but thinks that removing the sales rating to (keep them out of the public eye) will achieve this.

We would like to hear the rationalisation for allowing sales ratings for explicit books with a heterosexual focus such as:

--Playboy: The Complete Centerfolds by Chronicle Books (pictures of over 600 naked women)
--Rosemary Rogers' Sweet Savage Love" (explicit heterosexual romance);
--Kathleen Woodiwiss' The Wolf and the Dove (explicit heterosexual romance);
--Bertrice Smal's Skye o'Malley which are all explicit heterosexual romances
--and Alan Moore's Lost Girls (which is a very explicit sexual graphic novel)

Yet the following books, which have a gay or lesbian focus, have been classed as "adult books" and stripped of their sales ratings:

--Radclyffe Hill's classic novel about lesbians in Victorian times, The Well of Loneliness, and which contains not one sentence of sexual description;
--Mark R Probst's YA novel The Filly about a young man in the wild West discovering that he's gay (gay romance, no sex);
--Charlie Cochrane's Lessons in Love (gay romance with no sex);
--The Dictionary of Homophobia: A Global History of Gay & Lesbian Experience, edited by Louis-George Tin (non-fiction, history and social issues);
--and Homophobia: A History by Bryan Fone (non-fiction, focus on history and the forms prejudice against homosexuality has taken over the years).

Please tell us, Amazon, why the explicit books with a heterosexual focus are allowed to keep their sales ratings while the non-explicit romances, the histories and the biographies that deal with LGBTQ issues are not.

We would love to hear your reasoning.

Los abajo firmantes mostramos nuestra fuerte protesta hacia la pol�tica de %u201CAdultos%u201D que Amazon ha descrito en la carta en cursiva que citamos:

"En consideraci�n de todos nuestros clientes, el material %u201Cadulto%u201D se excluye de aparecer en algunas b�squedas y listas de Best Sellers. Como estas listas se generan usando las estad�sticas de ventas, los materiales de adultos tambi�n ser�n excluidos de estas estad�sticas.

Por lo tanto, si tienen m�s preguntas, por favor escr�bannos.

Saludos cordiales,

Ashlyn D
Member Services
Amazon.com Advantage

Encontramos hip�crita que Amazon contin�e vendiendo libros para adultos pero piense que retir�ndolos de las estad�sticas de ventas (quit�ndolos de los ojos del p�blico) lo lograr�.

Nos gustar�a escuchar el razonamiento para permitir estad�sticas de ventas para libros expl�citos con romances heterosexuales como:

--Playboy: The Complete Centerfolds por Chronicle Books (fotograf�as de casi 600 mujeres desnudas)
-- Sweet Savage Love  de Rosemary Rogers (romance heterosexual expl�cito);
-- The Wolf and the Dove  de Kathleen Woodiwiss (romance heterosexual expl�cito);
-- Skye o'Malley  de Bertrice Smal que son todos romances heterosexuales expl�citos

--y Lost Girls de Alan Moore (que es una novela gr�fica sexual muy expl�cita)

No obstante, los siguientes libros, que tienen orientaci�n gay o l�sbica, han sido clasificados como %u201Clibros para adultos%u201D y retirados de las estad�sticas de ventas:

--La novela cl�sica de Radclyffe Hill de la �poca Victoriana, The Well of Loneliness, y que no contiene ning�n p�rrafo de descripci�n sexual;

--La novela de Mark R Probst The Filly acerca de un hombre joven en el viejo oeste, que descubre que es gay (romance gay, sin sexo);
-- Lessons in Love  de Charlie Cochrane (romance gay sin sexo);
--The Dictionary of Homophobia: A Global History of Gay & Lesbian Experience, editado por Louis-George Tin (no-ficci�n, publicaci�n hist�rica y social);
--y Homophobia: A History por Bryan Fone (no-ficci�n, orientada a la historia y a la forma en que los antiguos prejuicios contra la homosexualidad se han desarrollado a lo largo de los a�os).

Por favor expl�quennos, se�ores de Amazon, por qu� se permite que los libros expl�citos con una orientaci�n heterosexual mantengan sus estad�sticas de ventas, mientras los romances no expl�citos, las novelas hist�ricas y biograf�as que tocan temas gays o l�sbicos, no las mantienen.

Nos gustar�a o�r vuestro razonamiento.

#amazonfail
We the undersigned, state our strong objection to Amazon's "Adult" policy as outlined in their letter in italics below

"In consideration of our entire customer base, we exclude "adult" material from appearing in some searches and best seller lists. Since these lists are generated using sales ranks, adult materials must also be excluded from that feature.

Hence, if you have further questions, kindly write back to us.

Best regards,

Ashlyn D
Member Services
Amazon.com Advantage

We find it hypocritical that Amazon continues to sell adult books but thinks that removing the sales rating to (keep them out of the public eye) will achieve this.

We would like to hear the rationalisation for allowing sales ratings for explicit books with a heterosexual focus such as:

--Playboy: The Complete Centerfolds by Chronicle Books (pictures of over 600 naked women)
--Rosemary Rogers' Sweet Savage Love" (explicit heterosexual romance);
--Kathleen Woodiwiss' The Wolf and the Dove (explicit heterosexual romance);
--Bertrice Smal's Skye o'Malley which are all explicit heterosexual romances
--and Alan Moore's Lost Girls (which is a very explicit sexual graphic novel)

Yet the following books, which have a gay or lesbian focus, have been classed as "adult books" and stripped of their sales ratings:

--Radclyffe Hill's classic novel about lesbians in Victorian times, The Well of Loneliness, and which contains not one sentence of sexual description;
--Mark R Probst's YA novel The Filly about a young man in the wild West discovering that he's gay (gay romance, no sex);
--Charlie Cochrane's Lessons in Love (gay romance with no sex);
--The Dictionary of Homophobia: A Global History of Gay & Lesbian Experience, edited by Louis-George Tin (non-fiction, history and social issues);
--and Homophobia: A History by Bryan Fone (non-fiction, focus on history and the forms prejudice against homosexuality has taken over the years).

Please tell us, Amazon, why the explicit books with a heterosexual focus are allowed to keep their sales ratings while the non-explicit romances, the histories and the biographies that deal with LGBTQ issues are not.

We would love to hear your reasoning.  We have heard the above, then we heard from another official source that it was a "glitch" and now we are told that it was a hamfisted and embarrassing error. But all anyone is getting is standard emails, with no official statement. 

I think that this is the least we deserve.
signature
goal: 26,000
 
sign petition!
50
50 log in or sign up to start earning Butterfly Credits today!
Already a Care2 member? log in. Or, 
connect with Facebook

This petition is closed. Thank you for your interest.

You can do more! Show me more petitions »
We signed the "In protest at Amazon's new "adult" policy" petition!
# 28,678:
5:27 pm PDT, Oct 12, Name not displayed, New Jersey
this is greatly offending, and almost feels like a step back into the judgemental views of gays.
# 28,677:
10:28 pm PDT, Oct 11, Jessica Watson, Australia
I feel that the exclusion of literature listed as containing Gay & Lesbian content, irrespective of whether the content is adult in nature, is inappropriate and judgmental censorship. Additionally the removal of all adult content is an insult to the intelligence of users by assuming they are incapable of searching appropriately. Perhaps the option of turning ON a filter for adult content would be better than Amazon assuming control of people's choices.
# 28,676:
2:22 am PDT, Oct 11, Eric Myrin, Sweden
# 28,675:
6:21 pm PDT, Oct 10, Alex Penner, Pennsylvania
# 28,673:
11:37 pm PDT, Oct 5, Nwjrolwuial Nwjrolwuial, Greenland
zuXU5q wnfpdeifgcck, [url=http://yfqnbjvtxypr.com/]yfqnbjvtxypr[/url], [link=http://tgwdusfyvinm.com/]tgwdusfyvinm[/link], http://veagglqhmbvc.com/
# 28,672:
10:37 am PDT, Oct 5, Celeste Hoffman, Washington
Adult material should be defined by explicit sexuality, not by a difference of opinion on whether homosexuality is an acceptable state.
# 28,671:
5:47 am PDT, Oct 3, Name not displayed, North Carolina
# 28,670:
5:27 pm PDT, Sep 30, Name not displayed, United Kingdom
I was really surprised when I heard that Amazon was automatically going to catagorize Male/Male books as adult, erotic no matter the content apparently. Amazon will be at a great loss because of this as I read a book a day but the only books I read any more are male/male romances and all of my friends are exactly the same. We just wont be buying from Amazon any longer.
# 28,669:
12:12 pm PDT, Sep 29, Ashley Davis, Arizona
# 28,668:
8:29 am PDT, Sep 29, Lise Fumex, France
Why do you remove this " adult " books ? I don't understand this ! This books are like these others ! People buy and read them, no ? It's the more important things, for me. The books are use for this, no ?
# 28,667:
7:08 am PDT, Sep 29, M Berry, United Kingdom
# 28,666:
6:55 pm PDT, Sep 28, Amanda Coleman, Texas
I find this "glitch" offensive. In my opinion, the books not removed from the sales rating are much worse than the books that have been removed. Glitch or no, if you remove some books you deem as adult, you should remove all books deemed as adult including the playboy books being sold.
# 28,665:
11:18 am PDT, Sep 28, Pam DeLitta, Texas
# 28,664:
11:03 am PDT, Sep 28, Joseph Lupariello, California
I have been a loyal customer to Amazon over the years but will order from other online vendors until this policy is over turned. Amazon's policy is not only unfair and arbitrary but it also feeds into the notion that being gay is shameful and worthy of being excluded from the general public.
# 28,663:
8:13 pm PDT, Sep 27, Lisa J, Australia
# 28,662:
7:51 pm PDT, Sep 25, Emma Ward, Massachusetts
# 28,661:
11:32 am PDT, Sep 25, Robert E Wilkeson, Ohio
# 28,660:
7:37 pm PDT, Sep 24, Matt Jerry, Massachusetts
I think that this is a horrific act of homophobia on the part of amazon
# 28,659:
6:34 am PDT, Sep 24, Aasun Eble, California
# 28,658:
5:24 am PDT, Sep 22, Maureen Shields, New York
I use(d) Amazon heavily, but will be switching back to Barnes and Noble until this practice is stopped and the rankings and searchability of these books is restored. The timing of the new policy is doubly ironic since we're coming up on October's Banned Books Month, which booksellers have always supported. I am truly disgusted with and disappointed in Amazon.
# 28,657:
5:42 am PDT, Sep 19, Name not displayed, Canada
# 28,656:
4:45 pm PDT, Sep 18, John Ayala, California
# 28,655:
3:47 pm PDT, Sep 18, Hillary Brown, Hawaii
It is very hypocritical to exclude certain genres and types of books. Does that mean that Amazon has a problem with gay customers buying books and spending their money on the sight. I don't think so. They should really re-think that horrible policy. I love amazon but am now thinking I might stick to borders and barnes and noble to purchase my books.
# 28,654:
1:02 pm PDT, Sep 17, Rebecca Savage, Colorado
# 28,653:
7:49 am PDT, Sep 17, Scott Eckhoff, Colorado
I have been a big amazon.com shopper, but not anymore!
# 28,652:
4:02 am PDT, Sep 17, Name not displayed, Germany
# 28,651:
11:17 am PDT, Sep 16, Name not displayed, Philippines
WTF! this is blatant censorship and discrimination!
Copyright © 2009 Care2.com, inc. and its licensors. All rights reserved