Butterfly Rewards - earn free credits and redeem for good causes -  learn more!

Make Colorado Monitor the Special Advocates that are Hurting Our Children

Target:
Bill Ritter, Barbara O'brien, & Law Makers
Sponsored by: 
Colorado Courts are enforcing a 50/50 parenting plan and not a primary parent plan which is leaving high conflict divorces at dangerous levels. This type of parenting schedule allows more room for children to be placed in the middle of this high conflict and is severely hurting their growth and health.
Colorado courts are also enforcing Parenting Coordinators/Decision Makers to your case. Most Parenting Coordinators/ Decision Maker are only interested in your money and are rarely monitored. For example my PC/DM wanted to go on vacation. She called us in for a meeting in her office and charged an expensive office fee. In this meeting nothing was accomplished and the matters were then attempted to be resolved via email. Due to the high conflict situation of our case many emails were required for any resolution which resulted in a very extreme email fee by the PC/DM. When an issue is finally resolved our PC/DM will write a formal letter for both parents and will again result in another fee. You must regularly monitor your PC/DM billing as most fees will change with no notice. A PC/DM will most likely show favoritism to one parent which and will show bias to the other parent. For example our PC/DM will tell me I may have a certain date with my son but will later say you are required to email the other parent and give them three options of time to trade. The other parent will (usually last minute) protest the whole exchange and claim they had plans leaving the child and other parent no recourse. Even though this event is a once in a life time and the other parents takes place every year the PC/DM won't enforce the trade. However if the same situation arises with the other parent with favoritism they will receive the time with no question and you are left with no options. The PC/DM's are also grouping cases as a whole not using any individual case management. I have asked our PC/DM how to stop the abuse and we were told the courts will never change unless we move, however the Colorado court systems are strongly against relocation even in-state. 

A Child Family Investigator will allow children to stay with unsafe parents citing the child is not showing signs of problems and the two parents live close enough to maintain a 50/50 schedule. On my case they performed all the testing and found that the father was narcissistic and could explode at any moment. It was also found that he had substance abuse issues which have even lead to a DWI. The investigator reported the father would not get any help if he were asked to. Despite this alarming report the investigator still does not want to disrupt things because the child isn't having too many issues. Also with proven evidence that did not meet the measures that the CFI investigator needed allowing more to prove that the test results were actuate no further actions were taken. But with other data that was placed on the table the investigator made a command decision to remove a grandparent from the child's life with no investigation on the incident. Even though both parties had since birth of child allowed visits and overnights with the grandparent. The accusations were a plow to hurt the mother only. I have been told by another CFI investigator that in Colorado Springs area that the %u201Creal%u201D way this system works is the parent with the most money gets the children. 
We need to have Colorado Law Makers to require that all cases with Special Advocates be monitored and fees need to be mandatory sliding scales and regulated with 30 days notice before fees can be changed. 
Colorado Courts are enforcing a 50/50 parenting plan and not a primary parent plan which is leaving high conflict divorces at dangerous levels. This type of parenting schedule allows more room for children to be placed in the middle of this high conflict and is severely hurting their growth and health.
Colorado courts are also enforcing Parenting Coordinators/Decision Makers to your case. Most Parenting Coordinators/ Decision Maker are only interested in your money and are rarely monitored. For example my PC/DM wanted to go on vacation. She called us in for a meeting in her office and charged an expensive office fee. In this meeting nothing was accomplished and the matters were then attempted to be resolved via email. Due to the high conflict situation of our case many emails were required for any resolution which resulted in a very extreme email fee by the PC/DM. When an issue is finally resolved our PC/DM will write a formal letter for both parents and will again result in another fee. You must regularly monitor your PC/DM billing as most fees will change with no notice. A PC/DM will most likely show favoritism to one parent which and will show bias to the other parent. For example our PC/DM will tell me I may have a certain date with my son but will later say you are required to email the other parent and give them three options of time to trade. The other parent will (usually last minute) protest the whole exchange and claim they had plans leaving the child and other parent no recourse. Even though this event is a once in a life time and the other parents takes place every year the PC/DM won't enforce the trade. However if the same situation arises with the other parent with favoritism they will receive the time with no question and you are left with no options. The PC/DM's are also grouping cases as a whole not using any individual case management. I have asked our PC/DM how to stop the abuse and we were told the courts will never change unless we move, however the Colorado court systems are strongly against relocation even in-state. 

A Child Family Investigator will allow children to stay with unsafe parents citing the child is not showing signs of problems and the two parents live close enough to maintain a 50/50 schedule. On my case they performed all the testing and found that the father was narcissistic and could explode at any moment. It was also found that he had substance abuse issues which have even lead to a DWI. The investigator reported the father would not get any help if he were asked to. Despite this alarming report the investigator still does not want to disrupt things because the child isn't having too many issues. Also with proven evidence that did not meet the measures that the CFI investigator needed allowing more to prove that the test results were actuate no further actions were taken. But with other data that was placed on the table the investigator made a command decision to remove a grandparent from the child's life with no investigation on the incident. Even though both parties had since birth of child allowed visits and overnights with the grandparent. The accusations were a plow to hurt the mother only. I have been told by another CFI investigator that in Colorado Springs area that the %u201Creal%u201D way this system works is the parent with the most money gets the children. 
We need to have Colorado Law Makers to require that all cases with Special Advocates be monitored and fees need to be mandatory sliding scales and regulated with 30 days notice before fees can be changed. 
Dear Bill Ritter, Barbara O'brien, & Law Makers

We are currently undersigned but are looking for help to Save our Children. Children of divorced families do need both parents in their lives whenever possible. Much research proves the benefit of this. However, forcing this idea to the fullest measures isn't always in the best interest of the child especially when working with high conflict divorce cases. Currently Colorado courts and professionals support a 50/50 schedule most times to the detriment of the child. Closer examination needs to be made to determine a truly healthy environment for the child. Which leads to our Special Advocates and the needs that need to be looked at closer involving their jobs. As noted in many forms of research, Special Advocates are not usually needed and are often not even monitored. Monitoring of these individuals on a monthly to bi-monthly basis and standards need to be set at a minimum. Our children are being forced to live in unhealthy and sometimes even dangerous environments under their guide and are often placed in the middle of very painful situations. The Special Advocates charge extreme fees and claim there is nothing they can do to help and state that it is all up to the courts which only charge more high fees. We need to have Colorado Law Makers to require that all cases with Special Advocates be monitored and fees need to be mandatory sliding scales and regulated with 30 days notice before fees can be changed. Please look at the current divorce/custody situation and know our children are in danger. This has to stop. Thank you so much for taking the time to read this letter.


 

signature
goal: 10,000
 
sign petition!
50
50 log in or sign up to start earning Butterfly Credits today!
Already a Care2 member? log in. Or, 
connect with Facebook

This petition is closed. Thank you for your interest.

You can do more! Show me more petitions »
We signed the "Make Colorado Monitor the Special Advocates that are Hurting Our Children" petition!
# 38:
3:48 pm PST, Feb 25, Therese Inman, Colorado
# 37:
2:12 pm PST, Feb 7, Suzanne Papke, New York
I am a grandmother of a 6 year old taken from her mother by the corrupt CFi's and Custody Evaluators in Colorado...a system which the best interests are never heard, the predonderance of domestic violence is ignored and children are hurt. We have the evidence and I am ready to contact the governor. Please contact me. 845-753-5903
# 36:
3:07 pm PST, Jan 30, Name not displayed, Colorado
# 35:
3:00 pm PST, Jan 14, Kelly Seeber, California
# 34:
7:47 pm PST, Jan 13, Eileen Allswede, Michigan
Someone has to be smart enough to protect the abuse.
# 33:
9:20 pm PST, Jan 11, Name not displayed, Colorado
Revise the 50/50 rule. Moms should have primary and majority time, since most of the dads do not care, and only want to get out of paying Child Support
# 32:
7:20 am PST, Jan 11, Filomena Pereira, United Kingdom
# 31:
9:49 pm PST, Jan 7, Name not displayed, Colorado
This is an outrage and must stop.
# 30:
9:00 am PST, Jan 4, Name not displayed, Colorado
# 29:
9:06 pm PST, Jan 1, Jennifer Gardner, Florida
# 28:
10:49 am PST, Dec 30, Name not displayed, Arizona
# 27:
2:18 pm PST, Dec 29, Danna Tullis, Colorado
# 26:
12:13 pm PST, Dec 27, Rev. Jim Weeden, Colorado
It is time to STOP this. We all need to help.
# 25:
11:44 am PST, Dec 27, Stacy Sekiya, Colorado
We need to focus on what's in the childs best interest!
# 24:
2:40 pm PST, Dec 24, Cindy Payne, South Carolina
# 23:
7:56 pm PST, Dec 23, Chris Normile, California
# 22:
2:33 pm PST, Dec 23, Kim Shankland, Colorado
# 21:
12:13 pm PST, Dec 23, Maryann Armata, Colorado
# 20:
10:58 am PST, Dec 19, Name not displayed, Colorado
Please help our children. This is causing unrepairable damage to them.Is the world really about greed. When you look at your children think if you would want them to be put through this also. Or if you want your child killed by a child that is being put through this and can't deal anymore. I'm seeing my child turn into something I am afraid of because no one will help him or stop this madness. PLEASE STOP THIS!
# 19:
1:11 pm PST, Dec 17, Name not displayed, Colorado
# 18:
9:31 am PST, Dec 17, Jessica DuBoe, Colorado
Please support the rights of parents by allowing them the freedom to live where they choose and provide the best life they can for their children.
# 17:
11:16 am PST, Dec 16, Name not displayed, Florida
Never ever give up!
# 16:
7:19 pm PST, Dec 15, Sheree Brennan, Illinois
# 15:
1:47 pm PST, Dec 15, Harley Court, Colorado
# 14:
9:09 am PST, Dec 15, Belinda Court, Colorado
# 13:
2:49 pm PST, Dec 13, Kristi Eljuri, Texas
# 12:
1:34 pm PST, Dec 13, Name not displayed, California
# 11:
9:30 am PST, Dec 13, David Reed, Ohio
As a father who has a daughter in a custody situation I would be appalled to have to deal with someone like this. Judges are elected to deal with these issues and to pass it off to someone else and allow that person to charge for those services with zero resolution is ridiculous. I would be voting for a different Judge in the next election.
# 10:
9:23 am PST, Dec 13, MIchelle Loftis, Colorado
Let's make sure that the PC/DM's are monitored so the decisions that they make are fair to all parties involved and more importantly to put the best interest of the child first. It seems wrong that one person's biased opinion should make this sort of "ruling" on the lives of 2 families. No amount of money that a parent has will guarantee that a child will grow up happy and healthy, it's the amount of love and stability the child receives. The best interests of the child are the MOST important thing!
# 9:
9:23 am PST, Dec 13, MIchelle Loftis, Colorado
Let's make sure that the PC/DM's are monitored so the decisions that they make are fair to all parties involved and more importantly to put the best interest of the child first. It seems wrong that one person's biased opinion should make this sort of "ruling" on the lives of 2 families. No amount of money that a parent has will guarantee that a child will grow up happy and healthy, it's the amount of love and stability the child receives. The best interests of the child are the MOST important thing!
# 8:
8:17 am PST, Dec 12, SELENA TRUJILLO, Colorado
WE SHOULD THINK ABOUT THE KIDS NOT THE MONEY
# 7:
4:53 am PST, Dec 12, Name not displayed, Colorado
W need to think of our future! These children are our future! We need to think of what will be best for the child instesd of money!! These are lives we are talking about!! What if someone took your child and gave them to an alcoholic, drug user, or abusive father/or mother because they had more money then you and the child seemed to be ok? This is wrong and needs to be stopped!!!!
# 5:
12:18 pm PST, Dec 11, Sally Jones, Montana
It is wrong to split a child. 50-50 custody is not good.Parenting is never 50-50 when a couple is married so why should it be denmanding of divocred couple. The laws allow divorce so why does the law punish a good parent who has been the primary parent by limiting that parents custodial time. That is simple wrong and it is detroying the famiky. Obviously our very government does not feel a child really needs to be with both parents 50-50 or they would not allow a parent to go to war or even be in the service. Divorce is made more traumaticing to the children by the courts interference in forcing the children into 50-50 custody which in too many cases forces a child to be with a controlling and abusive parent half the child's life. This is not only wrong but downright evil. Parent might have dispute but generally do what is right by the child. owever in high conflict, they is a serious problem with at least one of the parents. Yes, one can be totally innocent and one totally evil. Many say it takes two to fight and suppose that's corrupt-- IT TAKES A VICTIM AND A PERPETRATOR> Why continue to punish the victims. Another fallacy is one saying he or she doesn't take a side==Yes, one is taking a side when they say that==they are taking the side of the abuser for they are failing to defend and failing to defends allows evil to continue. Folks please be part of the solution and not part of the probem speak up for the children and let them have as normal a life as possible with the caregiver who has usually been there and yes see the other parent but don't by being split 50-50 they are humans not apples
# 4:
7:41 am PST, Dec 11, Angela W., Colorado
I strongly agree, to much power and immunity is given not only to CFI's but to CLR's as well and so many are not following the giude lines of the CRS Laws,any normal person that brinks the law or does not follow it, is punished or held accountable for there actions, NO ONE IS ABOVE THE LAW, time to reform this problem.. for the sake of all children..
# 3:
11:13 am PST, Dec 10, Katrice Haislip, Colorado
I am lucky I haven't had this horrible experience and would be terrified if my children were put through this useless drama.
# 2:
10:34 am PST, Dec 10, Name not displayed, Colorado
  • View Signatures:
  • |<
  • <
  • 38
  • >
  • >|
Copyright © 2009 Care2.com, inc. and its licensors. All rights reserved