Dear Ms. Nancy McGarigal, Mr. Casey, and other planners,
We, the signers of this petition, want you to drop all consideration of recreational fur trapping & targeted fur trapping from your management planning for Lake Umbagog National Wildlife Refuge.
The top 8 reasons why allowing trapping on the refuge is a wrong decision:
1. As you say in your Compatibility Determination, %u201Cindirect impacts may include displacing migratory birds during the pair bonding/nesting season or the destruction of nests by trampling. Direct impacts may include the catch of target and non-target species that are predators on migratory birds or nests, or the removal of species that induce that induce habitat change (e.g., beavers).%u201D And you add, %u201CNon-target species could be taken through this trapping program.%u201D Reason #1 to not allow trapping is, Why would you allow trapping knowing ahead of time that such negative impacts as trampling and catch of non-targets would take place?
8. A final reason (#8) to not allow trapping is that trapping was identified dead last in public responses about the importance of activities when respondents visit Lake Umbagog (Question 7, Table 4.). Whereas %u201Cbeing in natural, undeveloped lands%u201D got a whopping 91% importance rating, %u201Ctrapping%u201D got a miniscule 19%, obviously indicating that trappers and their families are the only ones desiring the commercial and recreational benefits of trapping.
Finally, when all the critique of trapping is examined, it leaves the Service with No Good Reason to allow trapping in our refuge. Remember to put wildlife first %u2013 this is not a %u201Cpeople refuge,%u201D it is a %u201Cwildlife refuge.%u201D
Sincerely,
Signers of the Petition to Dis-allow trapping at Lake Umbagog NWRefuge
|
|
2:35 am PDT, Oct 6,
Misty Rennebohm, Canada
I oppose all fur trapping everywhere! |