Restrict/Label Formaldehyde in Textile Products

Restrict/Label Formaldehyde in Textile Products

Target:
President-Elect Barack Obama
Sponsored by: 

Safbaby.com is urging legislation to restrict the presence of formaldehyde in textile products.  For any clothing articles that do contain formaldehyde, a mandatory label ("contains formaldehyde...") needs to be available for the consumer to know that the presence of this toxic gas is there.

Formaldehyde is strongly suspected of carcinogenic properties and can provoke allergic reactions like irritation of the eyes, skin and the respiratory system. Furthermore, formaldehyde can cause lung oedema and asthma when it is taken up through the respiratory organs.

It is commonly used in the clothing manufacturing industry as a stain resistant mechanism, to resist mildew, to fix color to a fabric, to give a permanent press effect, to stop shrinking and to make fabric more flame resistant. The application of formaldehyde primarily concerns cotton, viscose, linen and their blends with synthetic fibers.

Although Europe and Japan have limits set as to what they will allow for formaldehyde in textiles, the USA does not have ANY safety standard in place.

European Countries like Austria, Finland,  Germany, Norway and Netherlands have laid down national  legislation restricting the presence of formaldehyde in textile products.  The US needs to get with the times here as well.  This needs to be done for the health and well-being of our children and consumers at large.

Safbaby.com is urging legislation to restrict the presence of formaldehyde in textile products.  For any clothing articles that do contain formaldehyde, a mandatory label ("contains formaldehyde...") needs to be available for the consumer to know that the presence of this toxic gas is there.

Formaldehyde is strongly suspected of carcinogenic properties and can provoke allergic reactions like irritation of the eyes, skin and the respiratory system. Furthermore, formaldehyde can cause lung oedema and asthma when it is taken up through the respiratory organs.

It is commonly used in the clothing manufacturing industry as a stain resistant mechanism, to resist mildew, to fix color to a fabric, to give a permanent press effect, to stop shrinking and to make fabric more flame resistant. The application of formaldehyde primarily concerns cotton, viscose, linen and their blends with synthetic fibers.

Although Europe and Japan have limits set as to what they will allow for formaldehyde in textiles, the USA does not have ANY safety standard in place.

European Countries like Austria, Finland,  Germany, Norway and Netherlands have laid down national  legislation restricting the presence of formaldehyde in textile products.  The US needs to get with the times here as well.  This needs to be done for the health and well-being of our children and consumers at large.

Dear President Obama

We are writing to express our concern about the lack of regulations regarding the dangerous gas, formaldehyde, that hides excessively in textiles in the United States.

European Countries and Japan strictly restrict the presence of formaldehyde in textile products and following label must be added to textiles: "Contains Formaldehyde. It is recommended to wash this garment before the first use to avoid irritation of the skin"

Formaldehyde is strongly suspected of carcinogenic properties and can provoke allergic reactions like irritation of the eyes, skin and the respiratory system. Furthermore, formaldehyde can cause lung oedema and asthma when it is taken up through the respiratory organs.
Our children are especially vulnerable to these toxins!

It's time for the US to take action to restrict and clearly label formaldehyde in textiles. We are urging strict regulations and labeling in children's clothing and bedding.

Thank you for looking into this issue, and for making our children's health and well-being a top priority. 
signature
goal: 10,000
 
sign petition!
50
50 log in or sign up to start earning Butterfly Credits today!
Already a Care2 member? log in. Or, 
connect with Facebook
Name

optional
Email
Address
City
State
Province
Zip code Postal code

Increase your signature's impact by personalizing your letter


I agree to Care2's terms of service. We respect your privacy. Your email address is used to confirm your signature and is NOT displayed publicly.  
We signed the "Restrict/Label Formaldehyde in Textile Products" petition!
# 190:
11:02 pm PDT, Mar 19, Sandra Ballestrasse, California
Please protect us from harmful chemicals that are being used in almost everything, from clothing to furniture to foods that we consume daily. A great number of people are not even aware that these chemicals are in our products. There are alternatives!
# 189:
2:56 pm PDT, Mar 18, Heather Parker-Larini, New York
Please help to allow our babies to grow up healthy without chemicals that are known to create health problems.
# 188:
11:22 pm PDT, Mar 16, Siouli Stella, Greece
# 187:
6:54 am PST, Mar 4, Name not displayed, Virginia
Please help to allow our babies to grow up healthy without chemicals that are known to create health problems.
# 186:
8:24 am PST, Mar 2, Name not displayed, Michigan
# 185:
7:26 pm PST, Feb 21, Rheann Kester, California
What a sad world we live in now... Remember when foods and clothing didn't contain poisons? ....So sad....
# 184:
7:56 pm PST, Feb 17, Tiffany Bjorlie, Oklahoma
# 183:
10:41 am PST, Feb 17, Name not displayed, Oregon
I am a new mother and am quite frusterated with all the knowledge I must acquire just to purchase some clothes for my child. I cannot believe all of the chemicals being allowed in childrens clothing and products. Please ban these horrible chemicals from products or at least make it a legal issue where companies must disclose what has been used on the clothing/products. Thank you
# 182:
9:58 am PST, Feb 17, Name not displayed, California
Mr. Obama, Please help us keep our babies safe from as much chemicals as possible. You have two daughthers and I'm sure you understand how a parent feels when you come to find out that the clothing your babies have been wearing aare full of harmful stuff. Please help us stop the BIG manufactures from rui our babies overall health and growth. THANK YOU! My 6 months old baby will appreciate that very much!
# 181:
5:04 am PST, Feb 16, Misty Bornert, Pennsylvania
# 180:
3:14 pm PST, Feb 15, Veronica Montelibano, California
# 179:
11:56 am PST, Feb 15, Tabitha Stevenson, Tennessee
# 178:
5:59 am PST, Feb 15, Chris Stevenson, Tennessee
It is a sham we even have to have a petition for this.
# 177:
5:25 am PST, Feb 12, Jill Braxtan, Washington
# 176:
11:40 am PST, Feb 11, Laura Jones, California
# 175:
10:38 pm PST, Feb 10, Name not displayed, Washington
# 174:
7:39 am PST, Feb 10, Name not displayed, Illinois
# 173:
7:34 pm PST, Feb 9, Ashley Fiore, Illinois
# 172:
5:45 pm PST, Feb 9, Name not displayed, Illinois
# 171:
3:54 pm PST, Feb 9, Wendy Crain, Washington
It is unforgiveable that this can happen.
# 170:
2:18 pm PST, Feb 9, Lynn Guerra, Illinois
# 169:
12:23 pm PST, Feb 9, Laina Poon, Washington
Restricting the use of harmful chemicals in children's clothing is a social justice issue. It is not surprising that discount retailers like Children's Place and Target (sources of inexpensive kids clothes that my family and many other lower-middle class Americans depend on) use formaldehyde and other toxics in their manufacturing processes. Expensive organics and brands like Hanna Andersen are free of harmful chemicals but are priced out of reach for many parents. It is wrong that rich people are better able to ensure their children's health than poor people. Please take action on this matter.
# 168:
11:58 am PST, Feb 9, Jeffrey Keddie, Florida
# 167:
11:53 am PST, Feb 9, Name not displayed, Florida
We have the right to know what our children are exposed to. The government should do everything in its power to protect our children from being harmed further, which includes exposing these known toxins. If the dangers are known, there are no excuses for not taking every action possible!
# 166:
11:42 am PST, Feb 9, Chandra Sherman, Maryland
# 165:
11:37 am PST, Feb 9, Name not displayed, Colorado
Formaldehyde is a toxic substance and people have the right to know if a company is choosing to use a toxic substance. Otherwise...please restrict it's use!
# 164:
9:29 am PST, Feb 9, Jennifer Strauss, Colorado
Why can't we get something right in the U.S.? We're destroying the environment, our food supply and water are so polluted it's a death sentence to eat conventional and unfiltered, and now I've become aware that we don't even regulate the junk we put on our children's clothes? What is wrong here?? Let's think about what this might mean for our future.
# 163:
9:10 am PST, Feb 9, Shannon Rehlmeyer, Illinois
President and Mrs. Obama, As parents setting a wonderful example for the rest of the nation, I'm sure you care about the chemicals all our children are exposed to. By calling national attention to this delima, and supporting legislation to change it, your voices would be extremely important and infulential.
# 162:
7:21 am PST, Feb 9, Patricia Beyhaut, Florida
I think it's a real shame that we as a country place profit ahead of our children's safety. We should at least follow European standards in this issue. We should be ashamed.
# 161:
7:16 am PST, Feb 9, Rebecca Zedan, Delaware
# 160:
6:15 am PST, Feb 9, Name not displayed, Virginia
# 159:
6:07 am PST, Feb 9, Tabitha Good, Pennsylvania
# 158:
5:30 am PST, Feb 9, Angelica Fahy, Texas
# 157:
5:14 am PST, Feb 9, Name not displayed, Indiana
# 156:
4:47 am PST, Feb 9, Name not displayed, Illinois
# 155:
4:07 am PST, Feb 9, Nancy Slaybaugh, Ohio
It is time we got serious in the USA about protecting our children. Too many chemicals are unregulated and too many are added to items for children with no proof that they are harmless. It is time that we stopped assuming synthetic chemicals are safe unless proven to do harm. They should have to be proven to be safe before they are used.
# 154:
3:09 am PST, Feb 9, Name not displayed, Florida
# 153:
8:56 pm PST, Feb 8, Rachel Bush, Pennsylvania
# 152:
6:29 pm PST, Feb 8, Name not displayed, New Jersey
# 151:
6:04 pm PST, Feb 8, Pam Edwards, Canada
Copyright © 2010 Care2.com, inc. and its licensors. All rights reserved