Butterfly Rewards - earn free credits and redeem for good causes -  learn more!
For more information see http://www.nohr669.com

Save Our Pets-Stop HR 669!

Target:
Our Honorable Representatives
Sponsored by: 

H.R. 669 is a bill designed to federally mandate what pets people can and can't own, what pets can and can't be sold.  Though the intent is to help protect the US against invasion by "exotic" species, this is already being regulated at a state level.  The effect of this "one-size-fits-all" bill will be to:



  • Make it illegal for people to own, breed, or transport any animal not on the "approved" list--currently, this means that people would be banned from owning all species of exotic birds (parakeets, parrots, cockatiels, etc.), virtually all reptiles, nearly all fish, whether captive bred or not (currently only fan tail goldfish are approved), even hamsters, gerbils, guinea pigs, and ferrets!

  • Put the pet industry out of business overnight--thousands of stores, millions of jobs--in an an economy like ours, do we really need to be passing a bill that will INCREASE unemployment and put thousands of businesses into bankruptcy--not just the big chains, but the small mom-and-pop pet stores that have been in your neighborhood for years?

  • Make it a long, expensive, and nearly impossible task to get an animal placed on the "approved" list, as the person or organization asking for the animal to be "evaluated" will have to pay a fee and the animal must be shown to not have any possibility of harmful effect in ANY state.

  • Make it so that the only contact our kids have with these "exotic" creatures are pictures in books--not a good way to foster understanding and appreciation for the biological diversity that makes our world a wonderful place to live in.

And what do you think they are going to do with all the suddenly-illegal critters?  The law says you can have them if you can prove you owned them before the law goes into effect...so do you have a receipt for the parakeet you bought 10 years ago?  Too bad.  If you can't prove it, the animals could  be confiscated and "humanely euthanized".  And what do you do if your kid's hamsters have babies? According to HR 669, you just broke the law.  Moving to another state?  Can't take your pets across state lines--according to HR 669, you just broke the law. 

So to sum it up, HR 669 will allow your pets to be confiscated and euthanized, put the pet industry out of business, and no doubt cost taxpayers a large amount of money to administer the program.

There are better ways to ensure that we don't have a problem with pets that escape into the wild, and they are at a state level on a case by case basis, not a federal "guilty until proven innocent" policy. 

Tell everyone you can to spread the word--to save our pets, we need to stop HR 669.
 

H.R. 669 is a bill designed to federally mandate what pets people can and can't own, what pets can and can't be sold.  Though the intent is to help protect the US against invasion by "exotic" species, this is already being regulated at a state level.  The effect of this "one-size-fits-all" bill will be to:



  • Make it illegal for people to own, breed, or transport any animal not on the "approved" list--currently, this means that people would be banned from owning all species of exotic birds (parakeets, parrots, cockatiels, etc.), virtually all reptiles, nearly all fish, whether captive bred or not (currently only fan tail goldfish are approved), even hamsters, gerbils, guinea pigs, and ferrets!

  • Put the pet industry out of business overnight--thousands of stores, millions of jobs--in an an economy like ours, do we really need to be passing a bill that will INCREASE unemployment and put thousands of businesses into bankruptcy--not just the big chains, but the small mom-and-pop pet stores that have been in your neighborhood for years?

  • Make it a long, expensive, and nearly impossible task to get an animal placed on the "approved" list, as the person or organization asking for the animal to be "evaluated" will have to pay a fee and the animal must be shown to not have any possibility of harmful effect in ANY state.

  • Make it so that the only contact our kids have with these "exotic" creatures are pictures in books--not a good way to foster understanding and appreciation for the biological diversity that makes our world a wonderful place to live in.

And what do you think they are going to do with all the suddenly-illegal critters?  The law says you can have them if you can prove you owned them before the law goes into effect...so do you have a receipt for the parakeet you bought 10 years ago?  Too bad.  If you can't prove it, the animals could  be confiscated and "humanely euthanized".  And what do you do if your kid's hamsters have babies? According to HR 669, you just broke the law.  Moving to another state?  Can't take your pets across state lines--according to HR 669, you just broke the law. 

So to sum it up, HR 669 will allow your pets to be confiscated and euthanized, put the pet industry out of business, and no doubt cost taxpayers a large amount of money to administer the program.

There are better ways to ensure that we don't have a problem with pets that escape into the wild, and they are at a state level on a case by case basis, not a federal "guilty until proven innocent" policy. 

Tell everyone you can to spread the word--to save our pets, we need to stop HR 669.
 

We, the undersigned, say no to HR 669.  

HR 669 will cause needless hardship by putting the pet industry out of business and deprive current and future generations of the experience of bonding with "exotic" pets like birds, lizards, snakes, guinea pigs, ferrets,  and most kinds of fish.

The process of adding species to the "approved" list as described in HR 669 takes far too long, is potentially costly, and is too ambiguous.  There is not enough flexibility to account for differences between states (for example, a species that may cause trouble in Florida if released would not cause any trouble in Illinois as it would not survive the winter, but would still be banned overall). 

There needs to be another solution that doesn't involve banning species that have been classified as pets for years, and putting the pet industry and the millions of workers who depend on it for jobs out of business.  Please save our pets and our pet industry--vote no to HR 669.

Thank you for your time and consideration!
signature
goal: 25,000
 
sign petition!
50
50 log in or sign up to start earning Butterfly Credits today!
Already a Care2 member? log in. Or, 
connect with Facebook

This petition is closed. Thank you for your interest.

You can do more! Show me more petitions »
We signed the "Save Our Pets-Stop HR 669!" petition!
# 628:
3:30 pm PDT, Oct 13, Michelle Palmer, Ohio
Hi we would really like your help in supporting this petition.
# 627:
12:19 pm PDT, Oct 12, Donovan Palmer, Ohio
I am Donovan Palmer , and i have a leopard Gecko as a pet. I love him really much.The law states that the animals on the list will have to be killed. That is not right , i meen , would you like to be killed just because you are a ciertian person. WE HAVE TO STOP THIS FROM HAPPENING , PLEASE SIGHN LIKE I DID. YOU ARE DOING THE RIGHT THING
# 626:
4:37 am PDT, Oct 6, Heather Olvier, North Carolina
# 625:
9:53 am PDT, Sep 24, Name not displayed, California
Please allow responsible people to be responsible pet owners.
# 624:
5:22 am PDT, Sep 10, Madeline Aldea, Romania
# 623:
1:48 pm PDT, Sep 9, Brittany Fanaian, Florida
Personally, I am flabbergasted at the thought of HR 669. As a RESPONSIBLE pet owner of small exotic mammals, I cannot support this bill. The guinea pigs (cavies) I have had under my care for many years now have been the spotlight of my life. I can't begin to imagine what kind of people want this bill passed. There is obviously an abundant amount of ignorance among them, because this bill has not thoroughly been thought through. DOMESTICATED EXOTIC ANIMALS do not belong in the wild here, or in their "native" habitats. A specific point I would like to make about cavies: Where are they going to go after their owners are separated from them? They are EXTINCT in the wild, the only guinea pigs left in the world are domesticated pets and (VERY UNFORTUNATELY) test subjects. Is the government just going to take our animals and turn them into test subjects? Until they are blind, deaf, deprived, and murdered? It is morally unjust for this bill to pass, just as it is for the selfish humans who release their reptiles, small animals, and birds in to the wild because they feel they no longer take on the responsibility they did when they purchased the animal. There various pet rescues, sanctuaries, and foster homes available (until a permanent owner is found.) Instead of being pompous, and ignorant about this matter, be pro-active. Fund for the well being of these animals, or encourage the media to give pet owners the correct resources as to where they should go for help if they cannot care of their animals. Do not ruin the lives of pet owners and the pets.
# 622:
2:54 pm PDT, Sep 7, Robert Carper, Washington
# 621:
6:27 pm PDT, Sep 6, Melinda Lunsford, North Carolina
I do not agree with this at all nor will I stand behind and support this bill, however I will say that I think it's a shame that people are too lazy to do the reasearch that is required when when you buy an animal in order to learn what it needs in order to survive, I also think it's ashame that the people whom take theese animals in and poor every bit of their time and love into rehablitating small animals such as a sugarglider, that theese people are being treated adif they have done somthing wrong when they haven't. IT'S theese idiots that buy on impulse yet are to lazy to do their research and later on decide either the animal is to complicated to take care of, they just don't have the time or the money to invest in them, or they just don't want them any more for one reason or another. But I don't think thepeople that take theese animals in when they have no one to love them and their previous have given up on them so they turn to rescue homes and sanctuarys to take care of them, I don't agree that we should have to suffer the consquenses for what idiots do.
# 620:
7:43 am PDT, Sep 3, Name not displayed, California
all my life, I have loved keepeing rptiles and fish. If hR 669 passes, my life will be ruined and i will be split up from my pets.
# 619:
4:09 pm PDT, Sep 1, David Harrah II, Florida
If you are going to ban,need a permit or license to own a exotic pet. You should need one to bring a kid into this world! Lets ban having kids to while we are at it. You need to do something to help this country not mess it up more. No to HR 669
# 618:
1:09 pm PDT, Aug 30, Sheila Pearson, South Carolina
# 617:
1:23 am PDT, Aug 30, Elizabeth Belflower, Alabama
# 616:
12:46 pm PDT, Aug 24, Ricky Godwin Jr, North Carolina
i own a hedgehog a guinea pig a russian tortise two cockatiels and my uncle has 5 chinchillas we are not giving them up without a fight!!!
# 615:
2:23 pm PDT, Aug 19, Michael Desjarden, Florida
I wouldn't say or create a law that strangles small business and learning experiences in the process of blaming the responsible public those that have spent hundreds of dollars on an animal, hundreds on the proper equipment, hundreds on the care of the animal for its lifetime, and if necessary the costs of licenses and permits particularly here in Florida where the supposed cost of living is so much cheaper until you get here, where the government will nickel and dime you to death if you expect to have anything from a small deck on your house to a special fishing license for what ever fishing you may want to do. It isn't the responsible licensed business owners, and keepers that are to blame for the governments' continual inabilty to control the same business entities and regulations that are on the books already. Import/Export business is promoted here in Florida at the expense of citizens particularly in the agriculture industries. Those like cattle and livestock, agriculture and the ever depleating Florida Citrus industry, all to make room for the expecting baby boomer generation, so we now import citrus products from Brazil as well as livestock aside from the Pet Trade. I recall when I used to work at Cargill Citro in Frostproof, Florida everything imaginable that creap and crawl along the Exotic Earth crawling through that plant that also happened to be on a CSX Rail Spur, the "Ol' Bush CSX Rail Road" that Cargill used to import citrus products from their sister company in Brazil even after they sold the sister comapny in Brazil where some of us would even quarantine full grown Monitors that we also got in trouble for liability, and of course those creatures are still through the Frostproof and Avon Park Plants even after they closed them and put over 500 people out of work. There are also the Lykes Brothers operations along another identified invasive species spot along the CSX Rail and Lake Istokpoga and Lake Okeechobbee (the Burmese Pythons), and of course US Sugar at the Everglades along the CSX Rail that Ol' Governor Charlie Crist felt so compelled all of the sudden to buy from US Sugar when they also decided to close up shop (the Red-tail Boas and Caimens). It's quite more probable that it is the continual sloppy regulation enforcement of what's on the books already, if not because of polical expediancy, then for quicker personal political capital. After all they don't even have abenefical community presence there anymore. It sounds like it is much more consistant, if nothing else! I'd say I know a little!
# 614:
4:11 pm PDT, Aug 13, Evelyn Matlock, Wisconsin
# 613:
5:43 am PDT, Aug 12, Cathy Hart, Texas
Say NO to HR669, You evidently have no idea of the economic impact this will have. People will panic, euthanize an animal because now it is illegal, after being cared for for years by its owner. I consider this heartless. or they will just let them go. Isn't that what you want to stop? You know there are better ways to handle this. THis sounds like a PETA tactic. If you are listening to them, GOD help you. They terroize others and do illegal things to make a point. They break the law to make law? STOP HR 669 CAthy Hart
# 612:
7:14 am PDT, Aug 8, James J Delaney Sr, Florida
I own and love Exotic Birds. I disagree with this bill.
# 611:
8:35 pm PDT, Jul 28, Samantha Ploegert, Florida
My pythons are in no way dangerous to anyone. This HR 669 makes me sick to my stomach. I feel it is no less then ignorant to ban all exotics, even the idea of banning all "Pythons" is senseless. I agree that Burmese pythons are indeed dangerous and may need to be banned from importation but Ball Pythons which are basically harmless should not be lumped together with them. Not to mention all other creatures exotica. This bill is truely absurd, Please rethink your decision before you ruin the lives and businesses of many people.
# 610:
4:03 pm PDT, Jul 28, Miriam Cameron, Florida
# 609:
4:54 am PDT, Jul 27, Flora Bateman, Missouri
# 608:
11:06 pm PDT, Jul 26, Kristin Andrade, California
I love my parrot, he is my baby. I don't want him to have to be euthanized.
# 607:
11:57 pm PDT, Jul 25, Bryce Lee, North Carolina
please do not pass the bill for not only my sake but for the reptile communitey
# 606:
3:06 pm PDT, Jul 22, Carole Elker, Florida
I can't imagine not being able to have my pets as members of my household. I've always had a dog or cat as a constant in my life. Then 20 years ago birds were also added. Now have a total of 2 rescued dogs and 7 birds (1 Macaw, 1 Amazon, 2 Lovebirds, 1 Cockatiel and 2 Parakeets}. My husband passed away last year (April 2008) and they are such a source of company and love. Without their presence, I would not want to be in this world of ours. They keep me going and are a source of enjoyment in this trying time.
# 605:
7:55 pm PDT, Jul 21, Daniel White, Arizona
# 604:
8:47 pm PDT, Jul 20, Zach Eskow, Minnesota
# 603:
5:03 pm PDT, Jul 20, Rochelle Stromness, California
# 602:
10:08 am PDT, Jul 20, Evan Wiedling, Indiana
This bill is absurd the vast majority of people with nonnative species as pets are responsible owners who love and care for their animals...
# 601:
5:44 am PDT, Jul 20, Robert Ambrose, Maryland
I implore you to rethink or rewrite this legislation. This bill will do more harm than good as it is written. Additionally, do we really need the government delving once again far too deeply into the lives of Americans. There are thousands of species not on the approved list that have been in the US for decades. What about them and their owners? Be smart.
Copyright © 2009 Care2.com, inc. and its licensors. All rights reserved