Port Phillip Bay at 30 metres before the

Save Port Phillip Bay from destructive dredging

Target:
Peter Garrett, Kevin Rudd, Gavin Jennings, John Brumby, Julia Gillard, Penny Wong
Sponsored by: 

Sadly, dredging to deepen shipping channels in Port Phillip Bay (Melbourne, Australia) has already begun. However, anti-dredging group Blue Wedges will face the Federal Court on Feb 20 to try to put a stop to the project entirely.

Until then, work cannot begin on the more destructive parts of the plan; deepening of the Bay entrance - which will affect tides permanently, and bury reefs full of diverse life, and creatures found nowhere else in the world under tonnes of rock; or dredging of the contaminated silt at the mouth of Yarra River - which will release industrial pollutants into the water which until now have lain dormant - risking human health, wildlife, fish stocks, and the fishing industry.

It's not too late to fight! Enough public outcry and public support for Blue Wedges CAN make a difference.

Further reasons why dredging is a bad idea:

Federal Environment Minister Peter Garrett (ex lead singer of environmental rock band Midnight Oil), who approved the project in December 2007, has admitted that there will be a permanent rise in water levels in the bay. This will most likely destroy many of Melbourne's much loved beaches and will lead to flooding in low lying areas and wetlands.

If that's not enough already, this project is also likely to result in the following:

* Loss of marine life on a large scale, including over 100 species that occur nowhere else on Earth, including unique and beautiful sponges, corals and seagrasses. Many of these creatures have never even been properly studied.

* Damage to the habitat of penguins, dolphins, seals, sharks, whales and thousands of marine plant and animal species that interactively rely on Port Phillip Bay. 

* The dumping of up to 3 million tonnes of contaminated silt into the water, carrying industrial contaminants and toxicants. Because of this, heavy metals such as Cadmium, Mercury, Zinc, Lead and Arsenic and Ammonia would re-enter the food chain. Who will want to swim in that, and what will this do to the commercial and recreational fishing industries?

* Losses to the many thousands of jobs in tourism, fishing and diving and their support industries by this sustained assault on the health of the bay.

* LESS ECONOMIC BENEFITS than the CURRENT sustainable Bay related industries. The diving industry ALONE provides $70 million per year, the SAME amount as the figure for estimated benefits of channel deepening.

This last point is particularly important, since the Port of Melbourne Corporation has been trumpeting the expected "economic benefits" to soothe public concern about the impacts on the Bay's environment, and human health.


But it's not too late to stop this destructive project. Blue Wedges is still fighting in the courts, and Peter Garrett still has the power to revoke his decision to allow dredging to occur, by implementing the EPBC Act s 146. With enough public pressure, he might get the message that people don't want the Bay destroyed!

Sadly, dredging to deepen shipping channels in Port Phillip Bay (Melbourne, Australia) has already begun. However, anti-dredging group Blue Wedges will face the Federal Court on Feb 20 to try to put a stop to the project entirely.

Until then, work cannot begin on the more destructive parts of the plan; deepening of the Bay entrance - which will affect tides permanently, and bury reefs full of diverse life, and creatures found nowhere else in the world under tonnes of rock; or dredging of the contaminated silt at the mouth of Yarra River - which will release industrial pollutants into the water which until now have lain dormant - risking human health, wildlife, fish stocks, and the fishing industry.

It's not too late to fight! Enough public outcry and public support for Blue Wedges CAN make a difference.

Further reasons why dredging is a bad idea:

Federal Environment Minister Peter Garrett (ex lead singer of environmental rock band Midnight Oil), who approved the project in December 2007, has admitted that there will be a permanent rise in water levels in the bay. This will most likely destroy many of Melbourne's much loved beaches and will lead to flooding in low lying areas and wetlands.

If that's not enough already, this project is also likely to result in the following:

* Loss of marine life on a large scale, including over 100 species that occur nowhere else on Earth, including unique and beautiful sponges, corals and seagrasses. Many of these creatures have never even been properly studied.

* Damage to the habitat of penguins, dolphins, seals, sharks, whales and thousands of marine plant and animal species that interactively rely on Port Phillip Bay. 

* The dumping of up to 3 million tonnes of contaminated silt into the water, carrying industrial contaminants and toxicants. Because of this, heavy metals such as Cadmium, Mercury, Zinc, Lead and Arsenic and Ammonia would re-enter the food chain. Who will want to swim in that, and what will this do to the commercial and recreational fishing industries?

* Losses to the many thousands of jobs in tourism, fishing and diving and their support industries by this sustained assault on the health of the bay.

* LESS ECONOMIC BENEFITS than the CURRENT sustainable Bay related industries. The diving industry ALONE provides $70 million per year, the SAME amount as the figure for estimated benefits of channel deepening.

This last point is particularly important, since the Port of Melbourne Corporation has been trumpeting the expected "economic benefits" to soothe public concern about the impacts on the Bay's environment, and human health.


But it's not too late to stop this destructive project. Blue Wedges is still fighting in the courts, and Peter Garrett still has the power to revoke his decision to allow dredging to occur, by implementing the EPBC Act s 146. With enough public pressure, he might get the message that people don't want the Bay destroyed!

We the undersigned request that the decision to allow the Channel Deepening project to proceed in Port Phillip Bay be overturned immediately.

Your decision to approve this destructive project reflects negatively on the environmental and social credentials of the Rudd government. The long term impacts on the ecosystem of the Bay and its unique organisms, human health, and the economic livelihood of the many industries which rely on the Bay do not appear to have been fully independently investigated before your decision was passed.

Permanent tidal changes, toxic algal blooms, low land flooding, significant wildlife losses (including many species endemic to the area), fish stocks declining, risks to human health from pollutants and dioxins - these are all probable if not certain outcomes of channel deepening and widening of the entrance to the Bay.

In addition, the economic benefit of this project appears negligible: $70 million per annum, which is comparable to the annual value of the Bay's dive industry alone. This industry, plus tourism in general, and the fishing industry will almost certainly be badly affected by the dredging.

We fully support Blue Wedges in their Federal Court hearing on February 20th.

Please take action to revoke your decision under EPBC Act section 146 and put a stop to this pointless assault on Port Phillip Bay.

We thank you for your consideration in this matter.

signature
goal: 1,000
 
sign petition!
Already a Care2 member? log in. Or, 
connect with Facebook

This petition is closed. Thank you for your interest.

You can do more! Show me more petitions »
We signed the "Save Port Phillip Bay from destructive dredging" petition!
# 241:
9:34 pm PST, Feb 18, Teresa Cowley, Texas
# 240:
5:32 pm PST, Feb 18, Gwen Harper, Pennsylvania
# 239:
4:22 pm PST, Feb 18, Deanne Bell, Australia
# 238:
2:43 pm PST, Feb 18, Courtney Boeck, Michigan
# 237:
1:57 pm PST, Feb 18, Sarah Panullo, Pennsylvania
No, of course not.
# 236:
1:44 pm PST, Feb 18, Angel Halloran, Virginia
# 235:
11:04 am PST, Feb 18, Malissa Romero, Arizona
# 234:
9:50 am PST, Feb 18, Lisye Liem, Indonesia
# 233:
2:29 am PST, Feb 18, Kathleen Cole, Ohio
# 232:
2:22 am PST, Feb 18, Ljerka Hrzenjak-Sego, Croatia
# 231:
11:09 pm PST, Feb 17, Jocelyn Koopmann, Australia
Ladies & Gentlemen you can only go so far. The bay has had enough without this dredging. Please think of the Enviroment not the $$$$$. Thank you for your time.

No thank you. Poor fish & everything else living in the water.

# 230:
2:55 pm PST, Feb 17, Silvana Procopio, California
Peter Garrett, You are aware that here will be a permanent rise in water levels in the bay. This will most likely destroy many of Melbourne's much loved beaches and will lead to flooding in low lying areas and wetlands. So, please stop the dredging!
# 229:
8:57 am PST, Feb 17, Michael Saunders, United Kingdom
# 228:
4:01 am PST, Feb 17, Beatrice DUPONT, France
# 227:
1:29 am PST, Feb 17, Terry L. west, West Virginia
# 226:
12:14 am PST, Feb 17, Katie Johns, Australia
# 225:
5:44 pm PST, Feb 16, Christian Tammer, Australia
# 224:
3:41 pm PST, Feb 16, Garabet Manuelyan, United Kingdom
# 223:
1:14 pm PST, Feb 16, Abigail Disalvo, Maryland
# 222:
9:56 am PST, Feb 16, Kenneth Lapointe, Canada
# 221:
9:48 am PST, Feb 16, RIVER FRANCE, Canada
# 219:
8:18 am PST, Feb 16, Gaetana Degrecio, New Jersey
# 218:
5:46 am PST, Feb 16, Dagmar FourBears, Sweden
# 217:
5:18 am PST, Feb 16, S. Rotkop, Israel
Would you not want your name to enter History as the person who did make a difference?
# 216:
5:10 am PST, Feb 16, Gerri Desjardin, Georgia
# 215:
3:22 am PST, Feb 16, Prima Baily, New York
# 214:
7:30 pm PST, Feb 15, Sami Storey, Florida
# 213:
4:35 pm PST, Feb 15, Carl Donsbach, New Mexico
# 212:
2:43 pm PST, Feb 15, Sarah Onave, France
# 211:
11:41 am PST, Feb 15, Dellianan Of the Sea, Colorado
Please Don't do this!

No!

# 210:
10:40 am PST, Feb 15, Annette Bork, California
# 209:
10:09 am PST, Feb 15, Amanda Hash, Maryland
How can everyone from each part of the earth continue to bother our water supplies and beautiful diversity which only survives in our waters? Please rethink your decisions before you affect everyone's life. If the waters are continuously bothered these animals will not be there to provide us with oxygen and many other pleasures. If they are gone, then our oxygen supply will decrease, therefore causing us to extinct ourselves. Stop before it is too late.

Absolutely not!

# 208:
9:13 am PST, Feb 15, Shirley Miller, Oregon
# 207:
8:36 am PST, Feb 15, Azel Beckner, Kentucky
Endangered spaces must be protected from all destructive practices.
# 206:
8:22 am PST, Feb 15, Sonia Gluzniewicz, Poland
# 205:
7:29 am PST, Feb 15, Jude Drewery, United Kingdom
# 204:
5:20 am PST, Feb 15, Sabina Podjed, Slovenia
# 203:
4:48 am PST, Feb 15, Martha Rickman, California
# 202:
4:08 am PST, Feb 15, Louis Bauer, New York
# 201:
4:06 am PST, Feb 15, Christine Wolff, Netherlands
Copyright © 2009 Care2.com, inc. and its licensors. All rights reserved