Say'NO' to new x-rated airport x-ray machines!
Target:
Senator Kirsten Gillibrand of New York
Sponsored by:
Big brother, otherwise known as the Department of Homeland Security, is using the latest airport security breakdown to implement their new airport x-ray scanning equipment that will photograph you and your children naked! You heard right! The new super high tech x-ray machine is in the last stages of being rolled out into every U.S. airport and has but one setting- to take a high resolution color photograph of you and your children beneath your clothing. Airport employees will undoubtedly become the new kings of child porn as you and your children's naked photographs can and will find their way onto internet porno websites. In the UK, the level of detail produced by the body scanners is such that their implementation would break child pornography laws,specifically the Protection of Children Act 1978, under which it is illegal to create an indecent image or a %u201Cpseudo-image%u201D of a child. %u201CThey do not have the legal power to use full body scanners in this way,%u201D said Terri Dowty, of Action for Rights of Children, adding there was an exemption in the 1978 law to cover the %u201Cprevention and detection of crime%u201D but the purpose had to be more specific than the %u201Ctrawling exercise%u201D now being considered,%u201D reports the Guardian.
Those vigorously pushing for the widespread rollout of body scanners in the aftermath of the highly suspicious Christmas Day bombing attempt have been found to have their own financial motives. "Since the attempted bombing of a US airliner on Christmas Day, former Homeland Security secretary Michael Chertoff has given dozens of media interviews touting the need for the federal government to buy more full-body scanners for airports,%u201D reports the Boston Globe. %u201CWhat he has made little mention of is that the Chertoff Group, his security consulting agency, includes a client that manufactures the machines. Chertoff disclosed the relationship on a CNN program Wednesday.
Approaching the issue from a health angle, despite official assurances that the scanners are safe, there are many concerns about the physical impact of firing radiation at the body, especially if the individual has had previous x-ray scans, mammograms, or is a frequent flyer. Please sign the petition and tell your congressman no to x-rated airport body scanners.
Those vigorously pushing for the widespread rollout of body scanners in the aftermath of the highly suspicious Christmas Day bombing attempt have been found to have their own financial motives. "Since the attempted bombing of a US airliner on Christmas Day, former Homeland Security secretary Michael Chertoff has given dozens of media interviews touting the need for the federal government to buy more full-body scanners for airports,%u201D reports the Boston Globe. %u201CWhat he has made little mention of is that the Chertoff Group, his security consulting agency, includes a client that manufactures the machines. Chertoff disclosed the relationship on a CNN program Wednesday.
Approaching the issue from a health angle, despite official assurances that the scanners are safe, there are many concerns about the physical impact of firing radiation at the body, especially if the individual has had previous x-ray scans, mammograms, or is a frequent flyer. Please sign the petition and tell your congressman no to x-rated airport body scanners.
Big brother, otherwise known as the Department of Homeland Security, is using the latest airport security breakdown to implement their new airport x-ray scanning equipment that will photograph you and your children naked! You heard right! The new super high tech x-ray machine is in the last stages of being rolled out into every U.S. airport and has but one setting- to take a high resolution color photograph of you and your children beneath your clothing. Airport employees will undoubtedly become the new kings of child porn as you and your children's naked photographs can and will find their way onto internet porno websites. In the UK, the level of detail produced by the body scanners is such that their implementation would break child pornography laws,specifically the Protection of Children Act 1978, under which it is illegal to create an indecent image or a %u201Cpseudo-image%u201D of a child. %u201CThey do not have the legal power to use full body scanners in this way,%u201D said Terri Dowty, of Action for Rights of Children, adding there was an exemption in the 1978 law to cover the %u201Cprevention and detection of crime%u201D but the purpose had to be more specific than the %u201Ctrawling exercise%u201D now being considered,%u201D reports the Guardian.
Those vigorously pushing for the widespread rollout of body scanners in the aftermath of the highly suspicious Christmas Day bombing attempt have been found to have their own financial motives. "Since the attempted bombing of a US airliner on Christmas Day, former Homeland Security secretary Michael Chertoff has given dozens of media interviews touting the need for the federal government to buy more full-body scanners for airports,%u201D reports the Boston Globe. %u201CWhat he has made little mention of is that the Chertoff Group, his security consulting agency, includes a client that manufactures the machines. Chertoff disclosed the relationship on a CNN program Wednesday.
Approaching the issue from a health angle, despite official assurances that the scanners are safe, there are many concerns about the physical impact of firing radiation at the body, especially if the individual has had previous x-ray scans, mammograms, or is a frequent flyer. Please sign the petition and tell your congressman no to x-rated airport body scanners.
Those vigorously pushing for the widespread rollout of body scanners in the aftermath of the highly suspicious Christmas Day bombing attempt have been found to have their own financial motives. "Since the attempted bombing of a US airliner on Christmas Day, former Homeland Security secretary Michael Chertoff has given dozens of media interviews touting the need for the federal government to buy more full-body scanners for airports,%u201D reports the Boston Globe. %u201CWhat he has made little mention of is that the Chertoff Group, his security consulting agency, includes a client that manufactures the machines. Chertoff disclosed the relationship on a CNN program Wednesday.
Approaching the issue from a health angle, despite official assurances that the scanners are safe, there are many concerns about the physical impact of firing radiation at the body, especially if the individual has had previous x-ray scans, mammograms, or is a frequent flyer. Please sign the petition and tell your congressman no to x-rated airport body scanners.
We signed the "Say'NO' to new x-rated airport x-ray machines!" petition!
# 64:
11:15 am PDT, Mar 20,
Name not displayed, United Kingdom
# 63:
10:05 am PDT, Mar 19,
Richard Ivey, California
The Martian colony that landed in Roswell, New Mexico, in 1947 invented the airport xRay machine and is now using these machines to sterilze human beings so that it will be easy to take over the earth by the year 2050. They put so-called fluoride additives in our drinking water in order to speed up the process. Things are so bad now that even your own relatives can be these Martians in disguise.
The Martian colony that landed in Roswell, New Mexico, in 1947 invented the airport xRay machine and is now using these machines to sterilze human beings so that it will be easy to take over the earth by the year 2050. They put so-called fluoride additives in our drinking water in order to speed up the process. Things are so bad now that even your own relatives can be these Martians in disguise.
# 62:
8:15 am PDT, Mar 19,
Name not displayed, California
# 61:
6:22 am PDT, Mar 19,
Name not displayed, California
# 60:
6:09 am PDT, Mar 19,
Phil Roussy, Canada
# 59:
10:34 pm PDT, Mar 18,
Chad Ivey, California
This is all about putting humans through a form of "dog training." Getting us to capitulate and hang ourselves. By people avoiding travel in order to avoid the body scanners, we'll fall right into the plans of the NWO. We can not allow them to force us into their schemes and planning. We must freely travel AND SAY NO! to the body scanners. They desire to both force us to give in to their false security methods AND be compartmentalized in the world by refusing to travel. Remember! The "underwear bomber" was escorted around security by an "intelligence official." No amount of security can help when 99% of the terrorist acts are inside jobs. A successful deployment of the scanners will be followed by an installation of these devices at the street level. Let's show the Elite who really runs this country.
This is all about putting humans through a form of "dog training." Getting us to capitulate and hang ourselves. By people avoiding travel in order to avoid the body scanners, we'll fall right into the plans of the NWO. We can not allow them to force us into their schemes and planning. We must freely travel AND SAY NO! to the body scanners. They desire to both force us to give in to their false security methods AND be compartmentalized in the world by refusing to travel. Remember! The "underwear bomber" was escorted around security by an "intelligence official." No amount of security can help when 99% of the terrorist acts are inside jobs. A successful deployment of the scanners will be followed by an installation of these devices at the street level. Let's show the Elite who really runs this country.
# 58:
4:22 pm PDT, Mar 18,
Name not displayed, Canada
# 57:
2:22 pm PDT, Mar 18,
Name not displayed, Louisiana
This is an obvious infringement on our Constitutional rights. We are being treated as if we are guilty and have to prove ourselves innocent. Not to mention, it is a complete invasion of privacy. I had a trip planned to Chicago; however, I will be taking alternative methods of transportation and will NEVER go through a body-scanner. I should not have to endure the humiliation of someone, not only looking at my naked body, but also subjecting it to harmful and unnecessary radiation to merely board an airplane. Our country has now grown to a full-blown police state...pathetic.
This is an obvious infringement on our Constitutional rights. We are being treated as if we are guilty and have to prove ourselves innocent. Not to mention, it is a complete invasion of privacy. I had a trip planned to Chicago; however, I will be taking alternative methods of transportation and will NEVER go through a body-scanner. I should not have to endure the humiliation of someone, not only looking at my naked body, but also subjecting it to harmful and unnecessary radiation to merely board an airplane. Our country has now grown to a full-blown police state...pathetic.
# 56:
10:45 pm PDT, Mar 17,
Lesa Swaner, Idaho
# 55:
5:08 pm PDT, Mar 17,
Name not displayed, California
NO FORCED Digital Strip Searches! I refuse to put myself or my family through an unnecessary and humiliating procedure that is damaging to our health! We demand the right to travel WITHOUT airport scanners!
NO FORCED Digital Strip Searches! I refuse to put myself or my family through an unnecessary and humiliating procedure that is damaging to our health! We demand the right to travel WITHOUT airport scanners!
# 54:
8:16 am PST, Mar 5,
Jennifer YM, Ohio
How dare you perverts use this technology to get off!!!! This is just an excuse to be able to get naked photos. Isn't playboy and porn enough? Any government that would allow this should be taken out of power. This is rediculous and it doesn't take a damn rocket scientist to figure out they are not going to commit terrorism in airports again. They are going to attack things that we aren't securing yet like subways, shipping docs public places that have nothing to do with planes. Is the American government really that stupid???
How dare you perverts use this technology to get off!!!! This is just an excuse to be able to get naked photos. Isn't playboy and porn enough? Any government that would allow this should be taken out of power. This is rediculous and it doesn't take a damn rocket scientist to figure out they are not going to commit terrorism in airports again. They are going to attack things that we aren't securing yet like subways, shipping docs public places that have nothing to do with planes. Is the American government really that stupid???
# 53:
12:03 pm PST, Mar 3,
Name not displayed, Massachusetts
After being raped, I am very uncomfortable with strangers seeing my naked body. Not to mention the idea of strangers seeing my KIDS nude. You should be ashamed! Please, remove these scanners at once. Thank you very much.
After being raped, I am very uncomfortable with strangers seeing my naked body. Not to mention the idea of strangers seeing my KIDS nude. You should be ashamed! Please, remove these scanners at once. Thank you very much.
# 52:
8:44 pm PST, Feb 7,
Serbacov Emilia, Romania
# 51:
2:26 pm PST, Feb 3,
Name not displayed, New York
I don't think it's rite that random people look at you and your children naked and who knows where those pictures could end up. This will also make such an opening for child preditors.
I don't think it's rite that random people look at you and your children naked and who knows where those pictures could end up. This will also make such an opening for child preditors.
# 50:
4:23 pm PST, Jan 19,
Rachel Melnychuk, Canada
I feel this to be a huge violation of my own and my children's privacy. Also, no matter what is said about the safety of the radiation, there is an issue of multiple sources of radiation and multiple exposures that lead to an accumulative effect and can be harmful over the long run. If this is to be brought into effect, there has to be room for voluntary decline, and another solution if a person excercises their right to decline. I will always refuse an xray scan in security.
I feel this to be a huge violation of my own and my children's privacy. Also, no matter what is said about the safety of the radiation, there is an issue of multiple sources of radiation and multiple exposures that lead to an accumulative effect and can be harmful over the long run. If this is to be brought into effect, there has to be room for voluntary decline, and another solution if a person excercises their right to decline. I will always refuse an xray scan in security.
# 49:
10:16 am PST, Jan 16,
Name not displayed, Italy
who protects us against the use and divulgation of the images? the government tells us they will not be recorded but wouldnt they be part of the material used against someone in case they get charged? and if they arent kept and something does happen how they find what they missed and how to correct it? How do we know the machine could be rigged to save images anyway by unethical operators? Will we find that for every attractive girl/guy passing the machine a small crowd of security guards will gather around the screen? will there be two lines girls on one side and guys on the other because they will have one female operator at the girls line and one male operator at the other? Health is not a concern? What about people that had cancer treatments in the past and the amount of radiation they accumulated is already high, what about people that for healt reasons get xrayed often, what about frequent flyers that for work find themselves passing through such machines a few times a week? There is no real trial, and as many other things assumed safe will we find that they arent healthy when its too late? They cannot see inside the body, they cannot see low density materials, they are not a big increase in security and for sure not worth the price tag that will end being paid by travellers anyway
who protects us against the use and divulgation of the images? the government tells us they will not be recorded but wouldnt they be part of the material used against someone in case they get charged? and if they arent kept and something does happen how they find what they missed and how to correct it? How do we know the machine could be rigged to save images anyway by unethical operators? Will we find that for every attractive girl/guy passing the machine a small crowd of security guards will gather around the screen? will there be two lines girls on one side and guys on the other because they will have one female operator at the girls line and one male operator at the other? Health is not a concern? What about people that had cancer treatments in the past and the amount of radiation they accumulated is already high, what about people that for healt reasons get xrayed often, what about frequent flyers that for work find themselves passing through such machines a few times a week? There is no real trial, and as many other things assumed safe will we find that they arent healthy when its too late? They cannot see inside the body, they cannot see low density materials, they are not a big increase in security and for sure not worth the price tag that will end being paid by travellers anyway
# 48:
6:36 pm PST, Jan 12,
Name not displayed, United Kingdom
# 47:
9:18 am PST, Jan 12,
Shauneen Kolesarek, Nevada
# 46:
1:58 pm PST, Jan 10,
Danielle M, Ecuador
# 45:
3:35 am PST, Jan 10,
Katarzyna Gawron, Poland
# 44:
3:20 pm PST, Jan 9,
Kalena Madsen, Colorado
It isn't safe especially for high risk ammune systems like myself. If you get an extra at the dentist or hospital they put a thick protection pad over you, becasue over use of radiation is not good for you or unborn babies, so how can this be any safer. I also think we shouldn't have to take off our shoes and have to stand on a dirty, possibly with people who had staff infections, athlec foot and then we get it. There should be booties for us to put on if we choose, than have to set on a filty floor. I wouldn't walk barefoot in an airport, yet we have to to take our shoes off in the summer with sandles ons. Xrays is a invasion of our privacy act and no one has a right to see our bodies that way. If feel like a total violation of privacy and it feels like a slight rape when i have no rights for someone to see my body parts thru an xray! So, so againist it! There's got to be a better way.
It isn't safe especially for high risk ammune systems like myself. If you get an extra at the dentist or hospital they put a thick protection pad over you, becasue over use of radiation is not good for you or unborn babies, so how can this be any safer. I also think we shouldn't have to take off our shoes and have to stand on a dirty, possibly with people who had staff infections, athlec foot and then we get it. There should be booties for us to put on if we choose, than have to set on a filty floor. I wouldn't walk barefoot in an airport, yet we have to to take our shoes off in the summer with sandles ons. Xrays is a invasion of our privacy act and no one has a right to see our bodies that way. If feel like a total violation of privacy and it feels like a slight rape when i have no rights for someone to see my body parts thru an xray! So, so againist it! There's got to be a better way.
# 43:
2:03 pm PST, Jan 9,
Richard Mapp, United Kingdom
RichardMapp
RichardMapp
# 42:
9:32 am PST, Jan 9,
Debbie Peddicord, Missouri
# 41:
11:33 am PST, Jan 8,
Debbie Lee, Kentucky
# 40:
9:00 pm PST, Jan 7,
Name not displayed, Wisconsin
# 39:
8:14 pm PST, Jan 7,
M Metton, Canada
One more way to take away people's dignity. This is obvious fear of terrorists - a fear that Americans 'claim' they do not have and will not show, but is moving them (and others) to such drastic and ridiculous action. Hypocrisy. And yet another one of our human rights out the window
One more way to take away people's dignity. This is obvious fear of terrorists - a fear that Americans 'claim' they do not have and will not show, but is moving them (and others) to such drastic and ridiculous action. Hypocrisy. And yet another one of our human rights out the window
# 38:
7:24 pm PST, Jan 7,
Fatima Bukhary, Saudi Arabia
# 37:
7:17 pm PST, Jan 7,
Nils Kleemann, Germany
# 36:
6:02 pm PST, Jan 7,
Alexis Campbell, Canada
# 35:
5:44 pm PST, Jan 7,
Jenn Siggens, Canada
# 34:
3:50 pm PST, Jan 7,
Kelly McGary, Texas
I can not agree with such a gross invasion of my privacy. These would force many like-minded Americans to boycott airports.
I can not agree with such a gross invasion of my privacy. These would force many like-minded Americans to boycott airports.
# 33:
3:04 pm PST, Jan 7,
Rebecca May, Alabama
# 32:
2:06 pm PST, Jan 7,
Snezana Krajci, Serbia And Montenegro
# 31:
1:18 pm PST, Jan 7,
Graca Tilson, United Kingdom
# 30:
1:08 pm PST, Jan 7,
Andrew Bernier, Indiana
# 29:
11:12 am PST, Jan 7,
Gino Foti, Massachusetts
# 28:
10:45 am PST, Jan 7,
Ruth S., Germany
# 27:
9:43 am PST, Jan 7,
Roland S, Germany
# 26:
9:24 am PST, Jan 7,
Lynn Miller, New York
# 25:
8:52 am PST, Jan 7,
Christiane Henker, Germany
# 24:
5:24 am PST, Jan 7,
Sho Morrison, United Kingdom
1984 much?
1984 much?
# 23:
5:18 am PST, Jan 7,
Petra Haisam, Egypt
What about pregnant women, will they also be X-rated? Or excluded from flying? Anyway, these people are gaining money and power on your fear! Don't let them scare you.
What about pregnant women, will they also be X-rated? Or excluded from flying? Anyway, these people are gaining money and power on your fear! Don't let them scare you.
# 22:
4:39 am PST, Jan 7,
Anthony Page, United Kingdom
# 21:
4:33 am PST, Jan 7,
Kyle McKay, New York
# 20:
3:30 am PST, Jan 7,
Name not displayed, Canada
# 18:
10:11 pm PST, Jan 6,
Name not displayed, Canada
They increasingly ask us to bow down to the powers that be and give up our rights, our bodies, and ourSELVES. We do not deserve to recieve a full body radiation treatment. Once it becomes bad for airline business they will get rid of them, boycott, demonstrate, refuse to walk through them, strip naked and show them your beautiful body willingly in the lineup. They want it ? give it to them in all its brilliance without the radiation.
They increasingly ask us to bow down to the powers that be and give up our rights, our bodies, and ourSELVES. We do not deserve to recieve a full body radiation treatment. Once it becomes bad for airline business they will get rid of them, boycott, demonstrate, refuse to walk through them, strip naked and show them your beautiful body willingly in the lineup. They want it ? give it to them in all its brilliance without the radiation.
# 17:
10:10 pm PST, Jan 6,
Name not displayed, California
# 16:
4:51 pm PST, Jan 6,
Name not displayed, Massachusetts
# 15:
4:37 pm PST, Jan 6,
Name not displayed, Washington
# 14:
3:21 pm PST, Jan 6,
Shaktiva Irahs, Netherlands
It's scaremongering
It's scaremongering
# 13:
3:01 pm PST, Jan 6,
Nicole Shurtleff, Oklahoma
Thats why I just drive or take something else the airports are just to crazy for me,and i would bring some one on charges if they ever took photos of me or my children/family.I am a little scared of the new things this country is coming up with are we still safe here anymore?
Thats why I just drive or take something else the airports are just to crazy for me,and i would bring some one on charges if they ever took photos of me or my children/family.I am a little scared of the new things this country is coming up with are we still safe here anymore?
# 12:
2:15 pm PST, Jan 6,
Scott Zorc, Georgia
# 11:
|
9:45 am PST, Jan 6,
Valeri Imashev, Kazakhstan
|
# 10:
9:41 am PST, Jan 6,
Name not displayed, Illinois
# 9:
9:32 am PST, Jan 6,
Thorton Wells, Kansas
# 8:
9:22 am PST, Jan 6,
Name not displayed, Germany
# 7:
8:41 am PST, Jan 6,
Carole Hagen, Oregon
GREAT IDEA!
GREAT IDEA!
# 6:
8:30 am PST, Jan 6,
Maria Santos, Portugal
I am against x-ray machines used in the airports because that takes away our privacy and our health. In name of safety they tell that all must be done, but I don’t agree. I am sure that must be another away to keep people safe. Before they want to put us in jail because we take pictures from our kids without clothes, now they let some strange people see our kids like that. I have the right to ask about the safety of this procedure. Who is behind x-ray machines? Could be some pervert person.
I am against x-ray machines used in the airports because that takes away our privacy and our health. In name of safety they tell that all must be done, but I don’t agree. I am sure that must be another away to keep people safe. Before they want to put us in jail because we take pictures from our kids without clothes, now they let some strange people see our kids like that. I have the right to ask about the safety of this procedure. Who is behind x-ray machines? Could be some pervert person.
# 5:
8:14 am PST, Jan 6,
Brent Allen, Florida
NO NO NO I will SUE if they try to make me or force me to be X RAYED by these unconstitutional and dangerous machines.
NO NO NO I will SUE if they try to make me or force me to be X RAYED by these unconstitutional and dangerous machines.
# 4:
7:30 am PST, Jan 6,
Chum R, Canada
# 3:
7:26 am PST, Jan 6,
Name not displayed, New Jersey
# 2:
6:50 am PST, Jan 6,
April Decker, Pennsylvania
Beside being an invasion of personal privacy, it's true that these pictures can and will end up online of unknowing travelers. I also do not want to be exposed to that much radiation, considering I am a frequent flyer. There have not been enough tests done to prove that it is as harmless as it is being promoted. We are diving into this blindly, and it is illegal to create pornographic images of children and all travelers.
Beside being an invasion of personal privacy, it's true that these pictures can and will end up online of unknowing travelers. I also do not want to be exposed to that much radiation, considering I am a frequent flyer. There have not been enough tests done to prove that it is as harmless as it is being promoted. We are diving into this blindly, and it is illegal to create pornographic images of children and all travelers.
# 1:
6:48 am PST, Jan 6,
Name not displayed, New Hampshire
- View Signatures:
- |<
- <
- 64
- >
- >|
