Speak Up about Mexican Wolves!

Target:
Dr. Benjamin Tuggle, SW Regional Director US Fish & Wildlife Service
Sponsored by: 

The Mexican wolf is promoted as one of the most endangered animals in the world, yet it is actually a %u201Cnon-essential, experimental%u201D population of animals, with hundreds of wolves in captive breeding programs around the USA, plus an unknown number of uncollared wolves in the wild (including Mexico). 

Recovery efforts to date have not been successful, yet no one is questioning the real science behind why this might be. 

Mexican wolves are a desert species, not a species that evolved hunting and living in mixed conifer high-altitude forests of the Mexican wolf project area.  These wolves once ranged from central Mexico to southwestern Texas, southern New Mexico and southeastern Arizona - but the high-altitude mixed conifer forests of west central New Mexico and east central Arizona were not part of Mexican wolves%u2019 regular territory, because that area was already populated by a different wolf species, the Mogollon wolf (Canis lupus mogollonensis). 

Pro-wolf organizations promote Mexican wolves as playing an important role in restoring balance to Southwest forests but how can balance be restored when in fact the introduction of Mexican wolves has added a totally new factor to the environment?Each wolf in the project costs taxpayers an average of $285,000.  Documented damages to people living in the project area include psychological trauma, depredations on pets, horses and livestock,  constant stress from habituation, the need to build bus stop shelters to protect children.  Bad management means these costs will never end, but will rather increase. 


Dr. Tuggle, isn%u2019t it time to bring this project back to science and stop taking direction from pro-wolf organizations who want Mexican wolves in our southwestern forests at any cost?  Scientists should be looking at why the species is not thriving in the Mexican wolf project area, instead of how to force wolves to live there.  It is time to restore the Mexican wolf to its rightful place and ecological role - but that may not be the mixed-conifer forests of the Southwest.

The Mexican wolf is promoted as one of the most endangered animals in the world, yet it is actually a %u201Cnon-essential, experimental%u201D population of animals, with hundreds of wolves in captive breeding programs around the USA, plus an unknown number of uncollared wolves in the wild (including Mexico). 

Recovery efforts to date have not been successful, yet no one is questioning the real science behind why this might be. 

Mexican wolves are a desert species, not a species that evolved hunting and living in mixed conifer high-altitude forests of the Mexican wolf project area.  These wolves once ranged from central Mexico to southwestern Texas, southern New Mexico and southeastern Arizona - but the high-altitude mixed conifer forests of west central New Mexico and east central Arizona were not part of Mexican wolves%u2019 regular territory, because that area was already populated by a different wolf species, the Mogollon wolf (Canis lupus mogollonensis). 

Pro-wolf organizations promote Mexican wolves as playing an important role in restoring balance to Southwest forests but how can balance be restored when in fact the introduction of Mexican wolves has added a totally new factor to the environment?Each wolf in the project costs taxpayers an average of $285,000.  Documented damages to people living in the project area include psychological trauma, depredations on pets, horses and livestock,  constant stress from habituation, the need to build bus stop shelters to protect children.  Bad management means these costs will never end, but will rather increase. 


Dr. Tuggle, isn%u2019t it time to bring this project back to science and stop taking direction from pro-wolf organizations who want Mexican wolves in our southwestern forests at any cost?  Scientists should be looking at why the species is not thriving in the Mexican wolf project area, instead of how to force wolves to live there.  It is time to restore the Mexican wolf to its rightful place and ecological role - but that may not be the mixed-conifer forests of the Southwest.

Dear Dr. Tuggle:


We the undersigned are writing to urge you to not allow the political complexities of the Mexican wolf project in Arizona and New Mexico to overwhelm the biological and legal realities of the project.  It is the job of the US Fish and Wildlife Service to secure recovery of an endangered species through the use of best science practices and adherence to the strictures of the law, and to not allow the pressures of special interest groups to cloud management decisions. 


We urge you to make sure that management actions and operating procedures of the Mexican wolf project include adaptive management that recognizes that 1) humans and human activities (including ranching) are a rightful part of the environment of the project area and are protected by civil rights and environmental justice law, and 2) the Mexican wolf is a non-essential, experimental population that was only a visitor to the current Mexican wolf project area (which was the historical territory of the Mogollon wolf) and therefore cannot be restored to an area it never was resident of. 


We are asking you to acknowledge that the very basis for wolf management in the Southwest may be flawed and to accept that a non-essential, experimental population may call for unique adaptive management.  We additionally ask you to implement management practices that are appropriately and cautiously developed, and that are based on best science practices rather than the recommendations of special interest groups.  We also request that the Service use pro-active approaches to wolf management to protect human safety and interests, particularly ensuring that inappropriate wolves are not released into the wild (including wolves with a history of predation and/or habituation behavior, and wolves which have been raised primarily in captivity). 

Thank you for your unbiased and fair consideration of our concerns.

signature
goal: 5,000
 
sign petition! Already a Care2 member? log in

This petition is closed. Thank you for your interest.

You can do more! Show me more petitions »
We signed the "Speak Up about Mexican Wolves!" petition!
# 349:
6:19 pm PST, Dec 19, Mervi Rantala, Finland
Please take action on behalf of the Mexican wolf before it is too late!!!
# 348:
5:24 pm PST, Dec 18, Dan Hale, Florida
# 347:
12:56 pm PST, Dec 1, Noella Lamoreux, California
# 346:
7:49 pm PST, Nov 30, Kyle 3 Hale, Florida
# 345:
3:53 am PDT, Oct 30, Octavian Paul Draja, Romania
# 344:
5:40 am PDT, Oct 27, Timea Melinda Kovacs, Romania
# 343:
8:58 am PDT, Oct 11, Name not displayed, Kentucky
# 342:
5:31 am PDT, Oct 11, Izzie Martin, Kentucky
# 341:
4:45 pm PDT, Oct 9, Name not displayed, Kentucky
Don't let the wolves die! Wolves are very important to our food chain and if they go everything;s going to get crazy! SAVE THE WOLVES! THEY DESERVE A CHANCE TO LIVE!
# 340:
4:01 pm PDT, Sep 30, Marie-Rose HECKMANN, France
# 339:
12:03 pm PDT, Sep 30, Kassandra Santana, Florida
# 338:
5:29 pm PDT, Sep 28, Chantal Chavassieux, France
# 337:
6:56 pm PDT, Sep 27, Mireille Azouzou, France
# 336:
12:57 am PDT, Sep 26, Jean-damien SUSINI, France
# 335:
11:23 pm PDT, Sep 25, Maya Puerta, France
# 334:
2:06 pm PDT, Sep 25, Severine Stockling,, France
# 333:
3:40 am PDT, Sep 24, Michele Quintric, France
# 332:
1:45 pm PDT, Sep 19, Simos Tarabatzis, Greece
# 331:
7:03 am PDT, Sep 18, Kelly Hemmer, New Mexico
# 330:
2:33 am PDT, Sep 9, Andrée Hussard, France
# 329:
6:36 am PDT, Sep 7, Annie Bertrand, France
# 328:
1:51 pm PDT, Sep 6, Victoria Eisermann, United Kingdom
Is "saving" a species that isn't endangered and isn't thriving in an area it never lived worth the cost?
# 327:
10:10 am PDT, Aug 27, Gisel Rodriguez Vale, Puerto Rico
# 326:
1:27 am PDT, Aug 24, Carolyn Vanini, France
# 325:
1:27 am PDT, Aug 24, Marie-france Zamblera, France
# 324:
1:26 am PDT, Aug 24, Caroline Prout, France
# 323:
1:25 am PDT, Aug 24, Name not displayed, France
# 322:
5:48 am PDT, Aug 23, Chantal Buslot, Belgium
# 321:
7:35 pm PDT, Aug 21, Dinda Evans, California
# 320:
7:02 am PDT, Aug 21, Asli Gedik, Germany
# 319:
6:34 am PDT, Aug 21, Linda Mira-Bateman, Australia
# 318:
9:15 am PDT, Aug 17, Roberto Angarita Vargas, Colombia
Is "saving" a species that isn't endangered and isn't thriving in an area it never lived worth the cost?
# 317:
1:23 am PDT, Aug 17, Diane McCarthy, Illinois
Is "saving" a species that isn't endangered and isn't thriving in an area it never lived worth the cost?
# 316:
8:11 pm PDT, Aug 16, Pamela White, North Carolina
Is "saving" a species that isn't endangered and isn't thriving in an area it never lived worth the cost?
# 315:
2:35 pm PDT, Aug 16, Elena Gageanu, Romania
Is "saving" a species that isn't endangered and isn't thriving in an area it never lived worth the cost?
# 314:
1:31 pm PDT, Aug 16, Laura - Elena Doltu, Romania
Is "saving" a species that isn't endangered and isn't thriving in an area it never lived worth the cost?
# 313:
12:29 pm PDT, Aug 14, THE PHOENIX, California
Dr. Benjamin Tuggle, SW Regional Director US Fish & Wildlife Service, ARE FOUND NON COMPLIANT WITH WHAT IS KNOWN HARMONIOUS WITH HUMANITY TOWARDS THESE WOLVES. FOR YOUR INHUMANITY AND MISS JUDGMENT, COMPASSION WILL BE SHOWN PROPORTIONATE AS WAS SHOWN THESE WOLVES TO YOU AND YOURS.
# 312:
8:07 pm PDT, Aug 12, Sherri Bessire, Texas
Is "saving" a species that isn't endangered and isn't thriving in an area it never lived worth the cost?
# 311:
9:18 am PDT, Aug 10, Kenneth Claridge, Arizona
Is "saving" a species that isn't endangered and isn't thriving in an area it never lived worth the cost?
# 310:
10:52 pm PDT, Aug 8, Debbie Gadbois, California
Is "saving" a species that isn't endangered and isn't thriving in an area it never lived worth the cost?
# 308:
3:14 pm PDT, Aug 7, Elisabeth Karcher, France
.
# 307:
9:15 pm PDT, Aug 6, Erin Maher, Illinois
Is "saving" a species that isn't endangered and isn't thriving in an area it never lived worth the cost?
# 306:
6:29 am PDT, Aug 2, Karin Carter, United Kingdom
Is "saving" a species that isn't endangered and isn't thriving in an area it never lived worth the cost?
# 305:
7:24 pm PDT, Jul 30, Deven Blue, Tennessee
Is "saving" a species that isn't endangered and isn't thriving in an area it never lived worth the cost?
# 304:
2:25 pm PDT, Jul 30, Andi Alnwick, New York
Is "saving" a species that isn't endangered and isn't thriving in an area it never lived worth the cost?
# 303:
1:18 pm PDT, Jul 28, Becky Visco, Texas
Is "saving" a species that isn't endangered and isn't thriving in an area it never lived worth the cost?
# 302:
4:13 pm PDT, Jul 27, Austin Kendall, Florida
Is "saving" a species that isn't endangered and isn't thriving in an area it never lived worth the cost?
# 301:
9:17 am PDT, Jul 27, Pamela WolfSong, Rhode Island
Is "saving" a species that isn't endangered and isn't thriving in an area it never lived worth the cost?
Copyright © 2009 Care2.com, inc. and its licensors. All rights reserved