This petition is drawn up to show companies that hard working Americans who pay their taxes and buy the products of companies that we absolutely DO NOT approve of any offers of money or free products made to Ms. Nadya Suleman, such companies as KINGDOM CLOTHING, GA GA DESIGN CO., MILLION DOLLAR BABY CO., UPTOWN FLOORING AND DESIGN, LAUZON DISTINCTIVE HARDWOOD FLOORING, WHITAKER GENERAL CONTRACTING, and PARAMOUNT STUDIOS for their charity drive on Saturday March 14th. We also DO NOT support any magazine, television show, or media outlet that pays money to interview her or simply gives her any free publicity to pander for money and donations for her gain, such as Dr. Phil McGraw. Her irresponsibility of having octuplets while being a single, unemployed mother should not come at the price of the American consumer while she still continues to receive state and federal assistance monies paid for by the American taxpayer. Signers of this petition agree to a boycott against any companies or people who give any kind of assistance to Nadya Suleman.
This petition is drawn up to show companies that hard working Americans who pay their taxes and buy the products of companies that we absolutely DO NOT approve of any offers of money or free products made to Ms. Nadya Suleman, such companies as KINGDOM CLOTHING, GA GA DESIGN CO., MILLION DOLLAR BABY CO., UPTOWN FLOORING AND DESIGN, LAUZON DISTINCTIVE HARDWOOD FLOORING, WHITAKER GENERAL CONTRACTING, and PARAMOUNT STUDIOS for their charity drive on Saturday March 14th. We also DO NOT support any magazine, television show, or media outlet that pays money to interview her or simply gives her any free publicity to pander for money and donations for her gain, such as Dr. Phil McGraw. Her irresponsibility of having octuplets while being a single, unemployed mother should not come at the price of the American consumer while she still continues to receive state and federal assistance monies paid for by the American taxpayer. Signers of this petition agree to a boycott against any companies or people who give any kind of assistance to Nadya Suleman.
This petition is drawn up to show companies that hard working Americans who pay their taxes and buy the products of companies that we absolutely DO NOT approve of any offers of money or free products made to Ms. Nadya Suleman, such companies as KINGDOM CLOTHING, who has offered her a year's supply of free clothing ($500/month) for her children. We also DO NOT support any magazine, television show, or media outlet that pays money to interview her or simply gives her any free publicity to pander for money and donations for own selfish gain, such as Dr. Phil McGraw. Her irresponsibility of having octuplets while being a single, unemployed mother should not come at the price of the American consumer while she still continues to receive state and federal assistance monies paid for by the American taxpayer. Signers of this petition agree to a boycott against any companies or people who give any kind of assistance to Nadya Suleman.
We signed the "Petition to Boycott Companies that Support Nadya Suleman" petition!
# 485:
6:11 pm PDT, Oct 26,Name not displayed, Colorado
# 484:
6:32 am PDT, Oct 15,Debbie R, Maine
I feel so bad for the kids having Nadya as their mother; she is not capable of nurturing her kids the way a loving parent does. I hope that the only reason that CPS has not removed the children from her is because they are waiting to have a strong case that will hold up in the court system. I'm sure she is being monitored very closely by the state of CA and it's only a matter of time before her "baby bubble" bursts.
# 483:
1:15 pm PDT, Aug 24,Alexis Brandy, California
This woman is being constantly rewarded for her irresponsible behavior. These companies etc are enabling her and it needs to stop. She's taking tax money from hard working Americans and needs to be examined by a real psychologist or have those children taken away for their own safety. She disgusts me.
# 482:
11:47 am PDT, Aug 23,Name not displayed, California
I agree to boycott Paramount studios tv, feature films and home enterttainment products and all other companies providing donations to or sponsorship of Miss Suleman or her show.
The children need protecting from her and the public hungry for information.
By the way, where did she get the money for plastic surgery?
# 481:
9:15 am PDT, Aug 23,Jason Nelson-Wolfe, California
Signed with enthusiasm.
# 480:
9:02 am PDT, Aug 23,Ruth Holbrook, Washington
# 479:
1:30 am PDT, Aug 23,Gabriel Garcia, California
Disgusting.
# 478:
8:01 am PDT, Aug 22,Name not displayed, Minnesota
This goes for KATE GOSSLIN, too. Neither of them should make money off the backs of their children -- parents are supposed to support their children, not the other way around. Shame on TLC, Shame on THE GOSSLINS and Shame on Nadya Shuleman. Lots of families have 10 -12 children BY CHOICE and who's helping them?
# 477:
5:28 pm PDT, Aug 20,Ericka Maravilla, California
# 476:
2:29 pm PDT, Aug 20,Name not displayed, Kentucky
I am a professional and teach at a univeristy. I am also a clinical social worker and have worked as therapist for many years. I am absolutely outraged by this woman's lack of insight, and immaturity. She is clearly incapable of compentently rasisng one child let alone 14. Under most circumstances, children living in that sort of environment under such duress and inadequate supervision, would be pulled from the home immediately. Any company that supports, Suleman's obvious desire for attention, fame and fortune at the expense of her children, (which I suspect she had for this very reason, seeking a reality show like Jon and Kate Plus 8) demonstrates unethical behavior. The woman has serious pyschological problems and seems to suffer from a personality disorder. Even though she has had some education in counseling and knows some of the jargin, she is completely oblivious to her own mental problems. Any business, network or company that supports the exploitation of these children and this mentally ill woman should be taken to task. I will not patronize any sponsor, company or business that contributes to this travesty. When Suleman no longer benefits from these 14 children, they will be placed in loving homes with people who are emotionally equipped to care for them. I have a acess to thousands of students each semester and I will encourage them to consider this boycott on this basis as well.
# 475:
11:38 am PDT, Jul 25,Name not displayed, Texas
I can't legally type what I wish would happen to Nadya Suleman..........
# 474:
11:55 pm PDT, Jul 24,Caitlin Boger, North Dakota
"Reality TV like this is the reason I won't pay for tv."
I pay for tv on my 52" so that I can watch what I want when I want and reality TV has not helped that YET. I have netflix and I have dvds/blu-rays for what I want to watch. I CERTAINLY won't be watching a single woman suck up my taxes with her 14 children, payed for with my taxes just to be be born, sucking up my taxes on the platform that she "wanted them all" 'cause "having a job" is a big pre-requisite for having children in my book.
You want a child, you work. You PLAN for a child or *8* you'd better damned have the means to support them or else you'd better suffer the same system every other hard-up family has to deal with. If you don't, hmm, that sounds like someone's looking for insta-fame.
Plenty of people can't feed their kids right or have unexpected twins. BUT, people start having SEXTUPLETS; that's just simply unnatural. It's not right in any sense and anyone making a reality show out of something involving it is both defying nature and marketing their children as freaks. Freaks that were too young too realize they were being sold to the public to promote their parents goals of getting rich on their children's experience of life, that their parent's were creating.
# 473:
8:43 pm PDT, Jun 17,Julia Tawyea', Pennsylvania
# 472:
4:03 pm PDT, Jun 14,Name not displayed, Oklahoma
Thank you for a job well done in compiling all of this information and making it available on the Internet. I can't think of one adjective that completely describes Octomom. As a retired Licensed Clinical Social Worker in private practice and with an additional 10 years of experience as an "eligibility worker" for Oklahoma's state welfare programs I bring a certain degree of expertise in my assessment of Nadya Suleman, but expertise is certainly not required to assess her.
As I've pondered this case I've tried to be fair in considering the fraud element. It is possible that Nadya was actually eligible for some of the programs she accessed. For instance, her 3 older children could have been eligible for Supplemental Security Income while Nadya received some forms of student aid such as grants and scholarships. The student loans are supposed to help the student pay for living expenses as well as the cost of tuition, books and fees. The disability payments she received as a result of the accident in the work place would not automatically made her ineligible for all student grants, loans and/or
scholarships. Just as the children's SSI payments would not have made her ineligible to receive aid to go to college. It appears that she didn't always receive food stamps during the entire time she was paid for her disability. It may be that she only received food stamps when her disability payments ceased with this last ( WE HOPE) pregnancy.
Because Nadya is not always truthful we don't really know if she was eligible or when she was eligible. One thing that has bothered me are the lies she told her parents and that is assuming they are being truthful when they say they did not know she was receiving disability payments all of those years she wasn't able to work. Angela Suleman alleges that she just turned her retirement check over to the support of Nadya and the children during her 5 pregnancies when she bore their older 6 grandchildren. Nadya has finally admitted that she had the services of a nanny at a cost of $500 per week and paid for by her mother's retirement check. We've never been told how much her father contributed to the living cost of that household. I must admit that I would dearly love to review her applications for the various assistance programs she applied for. Eligibility for programs varies from state to state and the requirements change for these programs.
I truly believe an investigation is in order but I don't think the truth will ever be known because her rights of privacy shield her from full exposure to the public.
Another area of Nadya's life that bears contemplation is choice of degree programs and her subsequent admittance to a graduate school. A certain grade point average was required for admittance to the graduate school I attended - at a minimum a B average was necessary. That would be quite an accomplishment for a mother of 6 children. I notice that Nadya is fond of labeling people she doesn't like as having Historonic personality disorders (recently Kate Gosselin). It is very unprofessional to be careless with labels when describing the state of a person's mental health. I doubt if Nadya has ever seen any psychological testing for Kate Gosselin. I would certainly like to see an MMPI-2 assessing Nadya Suleman. But the long and the short of this situation is that at least some of her children will be on public assistance from the womb to the tomb. Her apparent lack of thoughtfulness in bearing 8 more babies knowing full well that 3 of her older 6 children have diagnosis of Autism and/or Attention Deficet-Hyperactivity Disorder is what I find to be so repugnent and viciously careless. These are serious disorders that require life long professional care.
And so I too will boycott all those who provide Octomom with merchandise and/or services. I will not watch a reality or documentry show starring Nadya and the Octuplets. It is cruel for these little ones to be paraded before the world because we are naturally curious. I am old enough to remember the Dioanne Quints born in Canada in the 1930's and have read their very sad history of what it was like to be used by the adults in their lives. Not one of them has had a life not permanently scarred by their being placed on exhibition as Infants and until they were too old to be considered "cute" by the public. As adults the public devoured the events of their personal lives just as it now hungers for news about pop stars and movie actors. Judge Larry Sidelan who ruled on the case of Anna Nicole Smith's death and the future of her baby daughter said from the bench and in tears something like, "I hope some of you people do right by the kid". I hope somebody will do right by the Octuplets but also that they will do right by the taxpayers of both California and the rest of the United States. Rewarding Nadya's decisions to make unhealthy choices is not the answer. Intervention is going to be necessary to guarantee that any sense of normalcy is provided to these babies and even then it's not a sure thing.
# 471:
4:08 pm PDT, Jun 4,Anthony Savatt, Ohio
Surprised this fiasco got this far. It's easy; this behavior can't be condoned or supported!
# 470:
3:28 pm PDT, Jun 4,Melissa Spangle, Texas
Please sign and help send a message to companies that this kind of irresponsibility should not be rewarded! This womens out of her mind!
# 469:
2:53 pm PDT, Jun 2,Sherry Johnston, Michigan
# 468:
4:33 pm PDT, Jun 1,Name not displayed, Arizona
# 467:
5:44 pm PDT, May 30,Jane Stauffer, New Mexico
# 466:
5:42 pm PDT, May 30,David Stauffer, New Mexico
# 465:
3:12 pm PDT, May 30,Name not displayed, Michigan
I will not buy products that endorse Octomom. I will encourage others to boycott the products also!
# 464:
4:57 am PDT, May 9,L. Burnell, Maine
# 463:
4:02 am PDT, May 5,Name not displayed, California
I will not buy products from a company that supports Ms. Suleman in any way, such as, by providing Ms. Suleman with free products or by paying her for pictures or interviews from her.
# 462:
10:16 pm PDT, Apr 30,Hope Youngblood, Nevada
# 461:
7:55 pm PDT, Apr 30,Ernie Kemp, Indiana
Endorsing her by giving is going to encourage others to do the same. Rip off the government and she doesnt think its welfare, cause she doesnt pay taxes. These kids must be removed from the home. Please call family services in CA and tell them that too many people live in that house.
# 460:
2:59 pm PDT, Apr 30,Name not displayed, Michigan
She needs to get a job and support her children like everyone else! Those babies deserve better then her!
# 459:
4:15 am PDT, Apr 27,Name not displayed, New Jersey
I don't understand how a doctor could have even thought of putting all 8 eggs in her, both He and Octofreak should be a ashamed of themselvs. What is she thinking, 14 children and no job!
# 458:
5:10 pm PDT, Apr 26,Name not displayed, New Jersey
# 457:
11:51 am PDT, Apr 24,Name not displayed, Tennessee
do not feed here addiction
# 456:
7:21 am PDT, Apr 24,Name not displayed, Washington
# 455:
12:40 pm PDT, Apr 21,P Tyler, California
She deserves nothing!
# 454:
12:22 pm PDT, Apr 21,Terry Warren, New Hampshire
I am against any reality show with Octomom, who needs money to support her children after, (Opps), she agreed to being fertilized with 8 eggs. This is not fair to those children to be used to support her. This is not fair to other americans who have to pay the tab for a welfare mother with six children, who has invitro with 8 eggs. I will not watch and will boycott advertisers who purchase advertising during any show involving her.
# 453:
10:24 am PDT, Apr 21,Debbie Henderson, Canada
# 452:
6:38 pm PDT, Apr 20,Name not displayed, South Dakota
I think it's extremely irresponsible for this woman to have so many children when she is not married and unemployed
# 451:
4:40 pm PDT, Apr 20,Name not displayed, California
Anyone that uses Baby's for money making is unhuman!!!