Butterfly Rewards - earn free credits and redeem for good causes -  learn more!

Warning Label for Incandescent Power Costs

Target:
U.S. Congress
Sponsored by: 

CFLs contribute less CO2, mercury and other pollutants than comparable incandescent bulbs and save money, yet many consumers are not aware of CFLs or their benefits. CFL manufacturers attempt to educate consumers through packaging labels but consumers either do not see the CFL products, or do not believe these facts.

I therefore feel regulations should require these facts to appear in a conspicuous location of incandescent bulb packaging. Additionally the same facts should appear in incandescent bulb product catalogues and advertisements either electronic or print.

While exact wording is an appropriate matter for debate, I offer the following starting point (for 100 watt bulbs).

WARNING: Each bulb in this package will cost $12.00 more in energy bills per year than a Compact Fluorescent Lightbulb of equal or superior light output (based on average use of 4 hours per day). The EPA recommends against the installation of this bulb in fixtures used more than 15 minutes per day.


Manufacturers would be allowed and encouraged to suffix this label with a list of suitable replacement bulbs. I would expect them to choose from their product line, and the only restriction would be that all listed bulbs must consume at least 70% less energy (or more than 50 lumens per watt).

I believe it is reasonable to ask all retailers to perform the necessary changes within a 9 month period following the approval of these regulations.

CFLs contribute less CO2, mercury and other pollutants than comparable incandescent bulbs and save money, yet many consumers are not aware of CFLs or their benefits. CFL manufacturers attempt to educate consumers through packaging labels but consumers either do not see the CFL products, or do not believe these facts.

I therefore feel regulations should require these facts to appear in a conspicuous location of incandescent bulb packaging. Additionally the same facts should appear in incandescent bulb product catalogues and advertisements either electronic or print.

While exact wording is an appropriate matter for debate, I offer the following starting point (for 100 watt bulbs).

WARNING: Each bulb in this package will cost $12.00 more in energy bills per year than a Compact Fluorescent Lightbulb of equal or superior light output (based on average use of 4 hours per day). The EPA recommends against the installation of this bulb in fixtures used more than 15 minutes per day.


Manufacturers would be allowed and encouraged to suffix this label with a list of suitable replacement bulbs. I would expect them to choose from their product line, and the only restriction would be that all listed bulbs must consume at least 70% less energy (or more than 50 lumens per watt).

I believe it is reasonable to ask all retailers to perform the necessary changes within a 9 month period following the approval of these regulations.

Dear Representative/Senator,

CFLs contribute less CO2, mercury and other pollutants than comparable incandescent bulbs and save money, yet many consumers are not aware of CFLs or their benefits. CFL manufacturers attempt to educate consumers through packaging labels but consumers either do not see the CFL products, or do not believe these facts.
I therefore feel regulations should require these facts to appear in a conspicuous location of incandescent bulb packaging. Additionally the same facts should appear in incandescent bulb product catalogues and advertisements either electronic or print.
While exact wording is an appropriate matter for debate, I offer the following starting point (for 100 watt bulbs).

WARNING: Each bulb in this package will cost $12.00 more in energy bills than a Compact Fluorescent Lightbulb of equal or superior light output (based on average use of 4 hours per day). The EPA recommends against the installation of this bulb in fixtures used more than 15 minutes per day.


Manufacturers would be allowed and encouraged to suffix this label with a list of suitable replacement bulbs. I would expect them to choose from their product line, and the only restriction would be that all listed bulbs must consume at least a 70% less energy.

I believe it is reasonable to ask all retailers to perform the necessary changes within a 9 month period following the approval of these regulations.

Thank you,

signature
goal: 1,000
 
sign petition!
50
50 log in or sign up to start earning Butterfly Credits today!
Already a Care2 member? log in. Or, 
connect with Facebook

This petition is closed. Thank you for your interest.

You can do more! Show me more petitions »
We signed the "Warning Label for Incandescent Power Costs" petition!
# 20:
6:14 pm PDT, Aug 19, Elizabeth Whitney, Maine
# 19:
5:13 pm PDT, Aug 3, John Knoepfle, Illinois
# 18:
11:27 am PDT, Jul 31, Dan Snned, Texas
# 17:
5:29 pm PDT, Jul 15, Edward Worden, New York
# 16:
12:42 pm PDT, Jul 14, Jane Engeman, Pennsylvania
# 15:
4:04 pm PDT, Jul 12, Nancy Hesse, Indiana
# 14:
7:42 pm PDT, Jul 11, Marilyn Tormey, Ohio
# 13:
2:32 pm PDT, Jul 11, Mary Berke, Illinois
# 12:
10:58 am PDT, Jul 11, Brad Follmer, California
# 11:
8:50 am PDT, Jul 11, Elspeth Willoughby, Ohio
# 10:
7:09 am PDT, Jul 11, Karen Shallcross, Ohio
# 9:
5:17 am PDT, Jul 11, Judy Beyda, Florida
# 8:
3:47 am PDT, Jul 11, Joan Foley, Louisiana
# 7:
12:54 pm PDT, Jul 10, Gerard Foley, New York
# 6:
11:47 am PDT, Jul 10, Name not displayed, New York
# 5:
7:27 am PDT, Jul 10, Suzanne Coletta, New York
# 4:
6:32 am PDT, Jul 10, Rosemary Waltzer, New York
# 3:
6:27 am PDT, Jul 10, Duncan Foley, New York
# 2:
9:06 am PDT, Jul 2, Matthew Feldman, Pennsylvania
# 1:
11:52 pm PDT, Jun 13, Ryan Baker, Illinois
  • View Signatures:
  • |<
  • <
  • 20
  • >
  • >|
Copyright © 2009 Care2.com, inc. and its licensors. All rights reserved