Butterfly Rewards - earn free credits and redeem for good causes -  learn more!
Help Grass Valley stop the mine so that the inherent mine waste and other associated impacts will not affect our families health.

Stop Idaho Maryland Mine Reopening in Grass Valley

Target:
Grass Valley City Council, Nevada County Bd. of Supervisors
Sponsored by: 

The Idaho Maryland Mine Corporation (IMMC) proposes to reopen a long closed gold mine in the middle of Grass Valley, CA.  The health impacts associated with reopening this mine far outweigh any possible benefit. 


This project will: 

   <> significantly and unavoidably increase local air pollution; 
   <> increase noise, traffic and dust;
   <> drain wells in the vicinity of the project site and impact local water quality; 
   <> inflict incessant blasting on the community, which will likely force several high-tech companies to relocate; 
   <> increase Green House Gas emissions by 20M tons
   <> create real potential for contamination from cyanide, lime, hydrochloric acid, and others.

For more information:  http://www.claim-gv.org/

We wholeheartedly support bringing high technology jobs, alternative fuel R&D, solar cell development and other 21st century jobs into our area.  Now is the time for Grass Valley and Nevada County to come together and aggressively seek to capture as much new green industry as possible given the imminent federal funding being made available for these opportunities.  We are certain that Grass Valley and Nevada County will be better off in both the short term and the long term without the IMMC project.

The Idaho Maryland Mine Corporation (IMMC) proposes to reopen a long closed gold mine in the middle of Grass Valley, CA.  The health impacts associated with reopening this mine far outweigh any possible benefit. 


This project will: 

   <> significantly and unavoidably increase local air pollution; 
   <> increase noise, traffic and dust;
   <> drain wells in the vicinity of the project site and impact local water quality; 
   <> inflict incessant blasting on the community, which will likely force several high-tech companies to relocate; 
   <> increase Green House Gas emissions by 20M tons
   <> create real potential for contamination from cyanide, lime, hydrochloric acid, and others.

For more information:  http://www.claim-gv.org/

We wholeheartedly support bringing high technology jobs, alternative fuel R&D, solar cell development and other 21st century jobs into our area.  Now is the time for Grass Valley and Nevada County to come together and aggressively seek to capture as much new green industry as possible given the imminent federal funding being made available for these opportunities.  We are certain that Grass Valley and Nevada County will be better off in both the short term and the long term without the IMMC project.

We, the undersigned, are opposed to re-opening the Idaho-Maryland Gold Mine and the establishment of a related Ceramics Factory and /or Aggregate Plant (IMMC project) in Grass Valley, California.

The health impacts associated with the IMMC project far outweigh any possible benefit.  Our community's air quality has received a failing "F" grade for the last several years from the American Lung Association.  The IMMC project would (per the 2008 Draft Environmental Impact Report) significantly and unavoidably increase local air pollution.  It is simply unacceptable to approve a project that would further increase air pollution in our community.  We are also deeply concerned about the noise, traffic and dust generated by the mine; the de-watering that could drain wells in the vicinity of the project site and impact their water quality; the blasting vibrations that could force local high-tech companies to leave our area; the significant increase in Green House Gas emissions and the potential of contamination from the toxic materials used in the mine, which include cyanide, lime, hydrochloric acid and many others.  These materials will be regularly transported by truck along dangerous Highway 49 and through Grass Valley.  In addition, there is the very likely possibility that toxic heavy metals from legacy mining, including mercury, lead and arsenic, could be released by the proposed mining and ceramics plant operations. 

Our community is currently suffering from the toxic legacy of past gold mining in the area, including polluted watersheds, Superfund cleanup sites, and contaminated water from the Magenta Drain in Grass Valley, and at Grizzly Hill School in North San Juan.  We do not want to add additional mining related impacts to our community for years into the future. 

Our community has the capacity, resources, knowledge and wisdom to create permanent, sustainable 21st century jobs and to stimulate the local economy in ways that will not negatively impact the health of our community. We ask the Grass Valley Planning Commission, the Grass Valley City Council, and the Nevada County Board of Supervisors to reject the re-opening of the Idaho-Maryland Mine, the rezoning of the IMM site, the project plan and any and all other applications for this purpose.

signature
goal: 1,000
 
sign petition!
50
50 log in or sign up to start earning Butterfly Credits today!
Already a Care2 member? log in. Or, 
connect with Facebook
Name

optional
Email
Address
City
State
Province
Zip code Postal code

Increase your signature's impact by personalizing your letter


I agree to Care2's terms of service. We respect your privacy. Your email address is used to confirm your signature and is NOT displayed publicly.  
We signed the "Stop Idaho Maryland Mine Reopening in Grass Valley" petition!
# 560:
4:18 pm PDT, Oct 13, Name not displayed, California
I'm strongly against the proposed mine. We moved here 9 years ago, because of the natural beauty, and we do not want that ruined with the industry of a new mine. Please do not allow the mine to open or be permitted. The trucks alone, will dramatically change the character of Grass Valley, and mine will be an eyesore. We're still dealing with the legacy of mining and all the problems it caused from the past. Don't let it happen again!
# 559:
10:02 am PDT, Aug 15, Michael Lewis, California
Underground Miner overlooks the fact that the old mines are flooded, flooded with toxic water, and that toxic water will need to be pumped out before reopening the mines. Where do you think that water will go? By the way, my grandfather was an underground gold miner in Grass Valley and he died from the effects of the toxic environment.
# 558:
1:23 pm PDT, Aug 14, Joanne Clark, California
I am a resident of Grass Valley for 10 years, and a resident of Nevada County for 22 years. I DO NOT want the mine reopened or any business related to mining in Grass Valley!
# 557:
6:04 pm PDT, Jul 30, Name not displayed, California
# 556:
2:35 pm PDT, Jul 24, Brion Coyne, California
In this time of enlightenment about the world we live in, it is unthinkable that anyone would consider the massive destruction and pollution created by hard rock mining for a "fistfull of dollars". Trading the beauty and serenity of Nevada County AGAIN for fleeting profits is a reckless and shortsighted venture. Doesn't anyone remember this land's history? Raped by loggers and miners repeatedly in the past, surely our wonderful forests now deserve better. Shame on those who will look only as far as thier wallets. Brion Coyne
# 555:
6:14 pm PDT, Jul 13, Name not displayed, Illinois
# 554:
9:22 pm PDT, Jul 2, Underground Miner, Nevada
Hello to all who know little, or nothing, but what they are told about underground hardrock mining. Don't base your case on speculation and assumption. G.V. and surrounding cities were founded through mining over a hundred years ago. And are they still not beautiful lands? Don't tell me it's because of the "clean up " efforts of agendists like yourselves. G.V. has looked this beautiful since long before environmental activists like your group were claiming to "save lands" from potential destruction. Your assumptions don't add up, i.e: If there were contaminants or "poisons" in the waters that flood the mine, that could threaten the wildlife of nearby Wolf Creek when introduced, then why would you make such a contradictory statement as that of the local water table being effected? If the water IS in FACT tied in to the local table and wells, and if it WERE toxic, wouldn't people have already been suffering the effects through thier potable water source? This is a fraction of the facts. There are many more to equally support the opposite preference on this subject. Educate yourself from both sides of the argument before trying to deliver a statement worthy of public viewing as not to improperly inform an individual of the FACTS! I am an UNDERGROUND MINER. I KNOW THE FACTS!!!
# 553:
1:08 am PDT, Jun 8, Tatiana Costa, Brazil
# 552:
11:05 am PDT, Jun 7, Frida Simms, Virginia
# 551:
9:03 pm PDT, Jun 6, Name not displayed, California
This clearly will have no real positive outcome for Grass Valley and it's citizens.
# 550:
1:58 pm PDT, May 31, Marilyn Hunt, Ohio
support HR 1310 sto gas, coal and other mining interests from destroying the drinking water
# 549:
4:16 pm PDT, May 22, Nancy Piano, California
# 548:
4:12 pm PDT, May 22, Robert Berry, California
# 547:
1:09 am PDT, May 17, Barbara Colangelo, California
# 546:
11:12 am PDT, May 16, Michael Evans, California
I live in Nevada City. This project must not be allowed to proceed. It would take our community backwards, when we should be going forward.
# 545:
2:02 pm PDT, May 14, David Rosky, California
This is definitely the wrong direction. We should be attracting clean, low-impact industries with higher-end jobs and a long-term outlook.
# 544:
7:24 am PDT, May 13, Lorraine Reich, California
I am against this mining project. I do not want more air pollution, water contamination, heavy truck usage, and other environmental impacts on our county. We already have major issues with all of the above. thank you. L. Reich
# 543:
1:31 pm PDT, May 12, Janet De Prosse, California
I am a Nevada County resident who does not look forward to the ill effects of allowing a gold mine to resume operation in my area. The adverse effects on the health of county residents far outweigh any possible benefit from allowing this mine to operate in the county.
# 542:
1:20 am PDT, May 12, Name not displayed, California
# 541:
6:53 pm PDT, May 11, Mary Englund, California
I am a resident of Nevada County and am very concerned about the impacts of the proposed mine operations. There are many more profitable ways to make a living that do not cause harmful impact on the earth and its inhabitants.
# 540:
12:03 pm PDT, May 11, Lindsay Kremple, California
# 539:
12:00 pm PDT, May 11, Name not displayed, California
My concerns are similar to those already mentioned particularly the impact on our local roadways.
# 538:
10:12 am PDT, May 11, Kathleen Black, California
Banner Mountain is a beautiful place to live. I moved from Southern California to escape the noise, traffic and pollution. Please do not open the mine. I feel there is not enough economic gain to justify the negative impact the mine operation would cause to the local eco-system and neighborhood. Children are growing up in this area, we need insure that they will have a beautiful, and healthy neighborhood to grow up in.
# 537:
9:48 am PDT, May 11, Brenda Sapp, California
I live on Banner Mt. and I do no support this project in our community due to the toxic risks that are involved with our environment, especially the mining process that affects our water table and land.
# 536:
9:44 am PDT, May 11, Linda Elston, California
I do not support creating businesses in Nevada City that makes such a toxic impact upon our community. I am an property owner in Nevada City and concerned that the clean-up and risk to our health, and potential impact on our property values, makes this Idaho Maryland mine a bad idea. Now is the time to start cleaning up the planet and supporting choices for a clean world and stop these toxin cycles, by starting in our own community.
# 535:
9:03 am PDT, May 11, Name not displayed, California
I am a resident of Nevada County. Please, let's look to creating environmentally friendly jobs so that our children have a great place to live. Thank you.
# 534:
8:33 am PDT, May 11, Sarah Perl, California
Please do not open the Idaho Maryland Mine. The toxic substances that are used in the mining process affect our land and water table.
# 533:
8:19 am PDT, May 11, Name not displayed, California
I live on Banner Mountain, and feel that we need to look beyond the benefit of creating jobs here to what it means environmentally to our grandchildren if the mine is re-opened. For me the environmental risks are too great to justify reopening the mind.
# 532:
6:53 am PDT, May 11, Name not displayed, California
# 531:
7:40 pm PDT, May 10, Tem Tarriktar, California
I am against the mine re-opening, and it's not even a close call. Just one of many reasons: air quality -- I don't want to have to explain to kids with asthma why people here think that making a bunch of shareholders of a Canadian company richer is more important than their ability to breathe.
# 530:
6:57 pm PDT, May 10, Hope Light, California
To Whom It May Concern: I absolutely, unequivocably do not support the reopening of the Idaho-Maryland mine. thank you,
# 529:
6:42 pm PDT, May 2, Toni Bautista, California
# 528:
3:33 pm PDT, May 2, Sharon Peterson, California
To whom it may concern: I do not this mine to be re-opened for the health risks it poses to the citizens of our community,the wildlife of our community,and the welfare of our community.All evidence shows that this only provides temporary if any gains economically. Thank you, Sharon Peterson
# 527:
3:50 am PDT, Apr 22, Collette Castro, California
My family loves the natural beauty and the community of Grass Valley. When we found out that a mining operation may come to town, we were quite disappointed to see that the city of Grass Valley was considering such a move. The effect on are quality, traffic, water and the neighborhoods would be devastating. Please do not allow this company come to town and ruin our way of life. Let's find other ways to attract clean businesses and create jobs. Let's save our remaining resources for our families.
# 526:
9:27 am PDT, Apr 20, Sophie Szeferowicz, France
# 525:
7:58 pm PDT, Apr 19, Ellen Howe, California
Any benefits that this mine would bring to Grass Valley are far outweighed by the negative impacts on the environment of this beautiful town. This mine will also have a adverse impact on the businesses and residents in the area of the mine.
# 524:
6:50 pm PDT, Apr 18, Jamie Lee, California
# 523:
8:10 am PDT, Apr 17, Robert Clark, California
Re-opening the mine would cause serious damage to the health and welfare of the community. Negative impacts on real estate values is one of the many impacts that have been ignored. The reported number of jobs that would be created and available to the community is a joke. The ceramics portion was added only to make the number of jobs appear greater. IMM and Emgold are inexperience and incapable of actually doing the work and will just sell any license they may get to someone who has not made the promises that they have made. We need jobs, but this option is irresponsible and won't have the result desired.
# 522:
4:16 pm PDT, Apr 15, Jim Free, California
This will not benefit the Grass Valley/Nevada City communities in any significant way over the long term. The infrastructure is not in place to support this kind of operation and the downside to the health risk including air polution, water polution, damage to our streets caused by truck traffic, major incidiary devices being set off within the City Limits as a result of the mining operations, etc., etc., etc. should not be acceptable under any circustances. jf
# 521:
11:18 am PDT, Apr 13, Name not displayed, California
The thought of opening this mine troubles me. It seems that the impacts on the Citizens of the Grass Valley and Nevada county area far outweigh the amount of gold that may or may not be found.
# 520:
11:05 am PDT, Apr 13, Marc Halpern, California
Lets not engage in business that makes such a toxic impact upon our community. No amount of jobs is worth putting the lives of our children at risk. No amount of profit will pay for the clean up later.
# 519:
3:03 pm PDT, Apr 11, Charles Staetz, California
There is no valid reason the IMM should be reopened. The overall project will cost the Grass Valley / Nevada City area far more than any monetary gain from the mine. A few jobs may be created but they will not compensate for the loss of jobs due to the many negative aspects of the mine. Grass Valley will not receive any revenue from the gold that is obtained, the tile production facility is relying on unproven technology. (A patent does not guarantee a viable process.) The damage to roads, GV streets and Hwy 49 will be substantial and require frequent repair, the presence of trucks in GV will discourage tourism, the air quality will be significantly and negatively impacted and the constant blasting will eliminate the quiet that is appreciated by all those that live in the area. In addition, the mitigations offered by the IMM owners will not actually compensate the impacts of the mine. It is also very likely the mine will be sold to an actual mining company before any ore is removed. In many other similar situations the purchasing company has not felt constrained to abide by the mitigations that have been offered previously. The water in the mine is contaminated and will remain so requiring continued treatment. It is also nearly certain de-watering the mine will result in the removal of water from Banner Mountain. The agreement to provide a water source to those whose wells are negatively affected applies only to those very few people that live directly over the mine; not the surrounding area In the end Grass Valley will most likely be left with cleanup costs int the millions, damaged roads, polluted water and air, and a quality of life that is much degraded from that enjoyed today. One only has to review a number of other mines that have been reopened or worked to see what the real impact of a mine. Lastly, since the mine will actually be located in GV,not in a rural area as has been stated, the impact on home values will be substantial and negative. This area cannot afford the cost of reopening the mine to the benefit of a very few.
# 518:
9:41 am PDT, Apr 6, William Alvarez, California
There is no need to re-open this mine at the sacrifice of so many things. All it takes is one mess up, and the whole water table for Nevada County may be in jeopardy. Please consider the health of the county, before the wealth of the mine.
# 517:
5:50 pm PDT, Mar 31, Willy Kollmeyer, California
In my opinion as a resident of Nevada County, any benefits accruing to the reopening of the Idaho Maryland Mine will be far outweighed by the negatives such as the dewatering of many wells, unmitigitable air pollution and increased traffic congestion. History also suggests that we will be stuck with long term environmental and public health issues for decades after the mine and its fleeting economic benefits, if any, are finished and gone.
# 516:
6:10 pm PDT, Mar 29, Sushila Mertens, California
Please vote no on reopening Idaho Maryland Mine. I have lived in Nevada County for 30 years and have seen the negative environmental impacts of reopening old mines. Please think of our children and their health. Thank you.
# 515:
5:57 pm PDT, Mar 29, Steve Haimovitz, California
I am a resident of Nevada County. I do not want this mine to open. Our air and environment are more important than making a few Canadians wealthy.
# 514:
4:18 pm PDT, Mar 29, Pamela Disque Hall, California
I'm a neighbor of the Idaho-Maryland Mine and am particularly concerned about the impact the project will have on my well and the availability of water for the community. Anything that increases air pollution is also of major concern especially since we already have unhealthy air.
# 513:
9:43 am PDT, Mar 29, Robert Hilsman, California
I don't believe that the release of asbestos dust that is sequestered in the serpentine soils that will be disturbed by this mine have been adequately addressed by the environmental review. I own rental housing within 1 mile of the proposed mine site and I am concerned for the health of my tenants.
# 512:
10:34 am PDT, Mar 28, Virginia Hilsman, California
# 511:
12:34 pm PDT, Mar 27, Cal McKitrick, California
How much is your property worth? How much is your property worth without water? The dewatering of the mine could effect the wells of thousands of residents not just a couple. Blasting with trucks hauling away debris 24hrs a day 7 days a week.... oh boy! As a Nevada County resident...I oppose the reopening of this mine.
# 510:
9:37 am PDT, Mar 27, Georgia Dow, California
No mine!
# 509:
8:21 pm PDT, Mar 22, Kent Bennett, California
The health impacts associated with reopening this mine far outweigh any possible benefit.
# 508:
7:41 am PDT, Mar 21, Susan Powell, California
Check the statistics --this area has a hight cancer rate. We know arsenic, mercury, lead can be causes. Areas of Empire Mine have been closed down because of presence of those elements left from old mines. You can't convince me that reopening a mine will be healthy for human beings or for the planet. Please consider your environment and your children.
# 507:
1:45 pm PDT, Mar 20, V. Moran, California
Time to vote in people that live in the 21st century and understand the incredible challenges we face for a habitable future. As other communities get this, ours hangs on to the dysfunctional past kicking and screaming.
# 506:
5:25 pm PDT, Mar 18, Name not displayed, California
Please do not allow this. It is not good for the environment or residence!!
# 505:
1:03 pm PDT, Mar 18, Kent Sheldon, California
We are still dealing with the costly impacts this mine had when it first opened. Reopening this mine will renew all of the same problems as well as significantly reducing our quality of life. I did not more here to deal with an active gold mine in my backyard.
# 504:
3:55 am PDT, Mar 17, Kitty Meekins, California
Just one of the myriad ills reopening the Idaho Maryland would bring would be enough to deny the project. Enough ravaging of poor little Grass Valley, already.
# 503:
12:08 am PDT, Mar 17, Garnet Lewis, California
# 502:
11:09 pm PDT, Mar 16, Terry Jean Meekins, California
Resident of Alta Sierra Ranches, Nevada County south of Grass Valley
# 501:
2:53 pm PDT, Mar 16, Owen Dockham, California
Copyright © 2009 Care2.com, inc. and its licensors. All rights reserved