Stop The Bailout

Target:
U.S. Taxpayers
Sponsored by: 

To Our Elected Officials:


I have been in the tax and investment world for nearly 25 years; the last 10 in my own small business, working with several hundred businesses and individuals, in helping their personal and business hopes and dreams tangle with the realities of daily living.


In all of those years, I have never been moved to write to my elected officials. I have always trusted our democratic ways; and supposed that better minds than mine have properly wrestled with the enigmas of modern society %u2013 even when I have disagreed with the plans put forth; the actions taken; and/or the rhetoric given.


However, given our current environment of indecision, %u201Cnondecision%u201D and %u201Cundecision%u201D, I am compelled to spill forth. Please allow a small business owner his moment to opine.


Wall Street has proven that it cannot regulate itself. Business Titans have shown that they cannot see past their own seven, eight and nine-figure salaries. If the government is to be in the business world, as its actions seem to imply, it needs to adopt the attributes of the business world with which it is dealing. Government needs to stop pandering to those titans of industry, who crawl before it, looking for hand-outs. The government needs to apply the same practices that business uses on itself %u2013 tough negotiations; solid action plans; measurable objectives %u2013 before any funds and/or assistance is advanced. That%u2019s only good business advice.


The first item on the agenda is to shut off the spigot %u2013 the bailout has thus far proven ineffective. There are no clear objectives. There is no clear action plan. Indeed, as of this writing, the original bailout plan is already being redefined; before it has even really begun. This, after a three-page summary needed to be bloated to a 450-page free-for-all to get passed as legislation.


Cash thrown at the financial industry has, thus far, been horded by those charged with liquidating that cash into our system. This is %u201CProtectionism%u201D at its most selfish. %u2013 by those same unregulated entities that helped create our current crisis in the first place. The consumer remains strapped; the mortgagee remains choked. Credit relief has not gone to all who need it.


If getting the money back into our economy, as quickly as possible, is the objective, please consider that the bailout funds need to be returned to the American taxpayer. If the consumer is 2/3 of our GDP; that majority 2/3 cannot be held hostage by the 1/3 minority.


The current bailout package of  $ 700-plusBillion represents at least  $ 2,500 for every U.S. taxpayer. Since the U.S. government has already documented its fondness for %u201Cstimulus packages%u201D, perhaps it should send a message with yet another.


Evaluate what might happen if every U.S. taxpayer received his or her  $2,500 check. Should the taxpayer spend the money as a consumer, doesn%u2019t that money end up in corporate coffers anyway (saving jobs, stabilizing corporate profits, and shoring up shareholder value)? Should the taxpayer spend those funds on debt reduction, does that not free up capital for that debt to go elsewhere (new business, home improvement)? Should the taxpayer save that money; would not the banking industry get more deposit assets, strengthening their own balance sheets, thereby freeing up capital for more lending and investment? Should the taxpayer choose to invest for retirement, doesn%u2019t

that create more demand for our capitalist markets, helping right the listing ship of our stock and bond markets?


As a whole, then, under this %u201Creturn%u201D policy, isn%u2019t the money placed back into our system more quickly; and in more diversified ways, than the current corporate bailout ever will allow? Isn%u2019t diversification a societal cornerstone of our business, investment and personal lives?


A majority of Americans know what a stock is; and what a bond is. Our retirement plans are full of them. We are more savvy than ever in the ways of the investment world; and of the business world. Those of us who choose self-employment know how to run businesses on a shoestring; how to cobble together relationships that benefit both sides of the business table; and how to plan for the long-term viability of our businesses, for the sake of ourselves; our families; and our communities. This is %u201CProtectionism%u201D at its best.


We can see and feel greed and avarice running rampant in our system. We can see and feel the sloth and exploitation. And, to combat that, we know the K.I.S.S. theory. We know that straight-forward, honest assessments are what will get us ahead; in business and in life. We embrace empathy and compassion, when required. Indeed, we are the first to congratulate losers %u2013 as long as those losers have fought the good fight.


The auto industry has not fought the good fight. Their leaders %u2013 be they corporate management or union representation %u2013 have ignored long-term planning for short-term gain. In the world of business, their business model has been one of ineptness and, some would argue, outright stupidity. Had their recent business models been offered to the U.S. Small Business Administration, in request for an SBA loan, by any small-business entity in America today, that loan application would have been rejected outright. Any business-plan student would have been able to highlight their

lack of proper projections, their lack of understanding in assessing the competition; their lack of knowledge of the marketplace. Any similar small-business would have been allowed to wither and die; for there are plenty of existing, solid, forward-thinking businesses that will quickly fill the empty niche.


And, then, in the brutal world of business, if that empty niche does not get filled; it will be deemed that that niche was not viable to begin with.


Next.


If a bailout is to go to the auto industry, it is the rank-and-file taxpaying employees that deserve those designated funds, in extended and increased unemployment and mortgage work-out benefits that will be needed as they retrain, regroup; and re-assess what comes next in the land of opportunity.


And if you need political slogans to get the word out, please consider the following:


%u201CWall Street is No Street without Main Street%u201D


%u201CThe Bailout %u2013 The High, giving to the Mighty, Much of what came from the Many%u201D


Thank you for your time and attention %u2013 and I wish you Godspeed in continuing to do the People%u2019s Business.

To Our Elected Officials:


I have been in the tax and investment world for nearly 25 years; the last 10 in my own small business, working with several hundred businesses and individuals, in helping their personal and business hopes and dreams tangle with the realities of daily living.


In all of those years, I have never been moved to write to my elected officials. I have always trusted our democratic ways; and supposed that better minds than mine have properly wrestled with the enigmas of modern society %u2013 even when I have disagreed with the plans put forth; the actions taken; and/or the rhetoric given.


However, given our current environment of indecision, %u201Cnondecision%u201D and %u201Cundecision%u201D, I am compelled to spill forth. Please allow a small business owner his moment to opine.


Wall Street has proven that it cannot regulate itself. Business Titans have shown that they cannot see past their own seven, eight and nine-figure salaries. If the government is to be in the business world, as its actions seem to imply, it needs to adopt the attributes of the business world with which it is dealing. Government needs to stop pandering to those titans of industry, who crawl before it, looking for hand-outs. The government needs to apply the same practices that business uses on itself %u2013 tough negotiations; solid action plans; measurable objectives %u2013 before any funds and/or assistance is advanced. That%u2019s only good business advice.


The first item on the agenda is to shut off the spigot %u2013 the bailout has thus far proven ineffective. There are no clear objectives. There is no clear action plan. Indeed, as of this writing, the original bailout plan is already being redefined; before it has even really begun. This, after a three-page summary needed to be bloated to a 450-page free-for-all to get passed as legislation.


Cash thrown at the financial industry has, thus far, been horded by those charged with liquidating that cash into our system. This is %u201CProtectionism%u201D at its most selfish. %u2013 by those same unregulated entities that helped create our current crisis in the first place. The consumer remains strapped; the mortgagee remains choked. Credit relief has not gone to all who need it.


If getting the money back into our economy, as quickly as possible, is the objective, please consider that the bailout funds need to be returned to the American taxpayer. If the consumer is 2/3 of our GDP; that majority 2/3 cannot be held hostage by the 1/3 minority.


The current bailout package of  $ 700-plusBillion represents at least  $ 2,500 for every U.S. taxpayer. Since the U.S. government has already documented its fondness for %u201Cstimulus packages%u201D, perhaps it should send a message with yet another.


Evaluate what might happen if every U.S. taxpayer received his or her  $2,500 check. Should the taxpayer spend the money as a consumer, doesn%u2019t that money end up in corporate coffers anyway (saving jobs, stabilizing corporate profits, and shoring up shareholder value)? Should the taxpayer spend those funds on debt reduction, does that not free up capital for that debt to go elsewhere (new business, home improvement)? Should the taxpayer save that money; would not the banking industry get more deposit assets, strengthening their own balance sheets, thereby freeing up capital for more lending and investment? Should the taxpayer choose to invest for retirement, doesn%u2019t

that create more demand for our capitalist markets, helping right the listing ship of our stock and bond markets?


As a whole, then, under this %u201Creturn%u201D policy, isn%u2019t the money placed back into our system more quickly; and in more diversified ways, than the current corporate bailout ever will allow? Isn%u2019t diversification a societal cornerstone of our business, investment and personal lives?


A majority of Americans know what a stock is; and what a bond is. Our retirement plans are full of them. We are more savvy than ever in the ways of the investment world; and of the business world. Those of us who choose self-employment know how to run businesses on a shoestring; how to cobble together relationships that benefit both sides of the business table; and how to plan for the long-term viability of our businesses, for the sake of ourselves; our families; and our communities. This is %u201CProtectionism%u201D at its best.


We can see and feel greed and avarice running rampant in our system. We can see and feel the sloth and exploitation. And, to combat that, we know the K.I.S.S. theory. We know that straight-forward, honest assessments are what will get us ahead; in business and in life. We embrace empathy and compassion, when required. Indeed, we are the first to congratulate losers %u2013 as long as those losers have fought the good fight.


The auto industry has not fought the good fight. Their leaders %u2013 be they corporate management or union representation %u2013 have ignored long-term planning for short-term gain. In the world of business, their business model has been one of ineptness and, some would argue, outright stupidity. Had their recent business models been offered to the U.S. Small Business Administration, in request for an SBA loan, by any small-business entity in America today, that loan application would have been rejected outright. Any business-plan student would have been able to highlight their

lack of proper projections, their lack of understanding in assessing the competition; their lack of knowledge of the marketplace. Any similar small-business would have been allowed to wither and die; for there are plenty of existing, solid, forward-thinking businesses that will quickly fill the empty niche.


And, then, in the brutal world of business, if that empty niche does not get filled; it will be deemed that that niche was not viable to begin with.


Next.


If a bailout is to go to the auto industry, it is the rank-and-file taxpaying employees that deserve those designated funds, in extended and increased unemployment and mortgage work-out benefits that will be needed as they retrain, regroup; and re-assess what comes next in the land of opportunity.


And if you need political slogans to get the word out, please consider the following:


%u201CWall Street is No Street without Main Street%u201D


%u201CThe Bailout %u2013 The High, giving to the Mighty, Much of what came from the Many%u201D


Thank you for your time and attention %u2013 and I wish you Godspeed in continuing to do the People%u2019s Business.

signature
goal: 1,000
 
sign petition! Already a Care2 member? log in

This petition is closed. Thank you for your interest.

You can do more! Show me more petitions »
We signed the "Stop The Bailout" petition!
# 31:
7:22 am PDT, May 13, Rick Shaddock, Washington D.C.
The Federal Reserve is a banking cartel that Natural Selection is trying to kill off. So are cars that consume too much gas. Let them die so there will be Survival of the Fittest solutions. Credit unions and smaller banks will pick up the slack, buy up the mortgages, and offer deals to the home owners. Energy effient autos will evolve. Don't mess with Natural Law. Mother Nature knows what she is doing. Trust her.
# 30:
4:16 pm PDT, Apr 18, Jamie Lee, California
# 29:
5:53 am PDT, Apr 15, Lisa Dexter, New Hampshire
Businesses and Citizens are cutting back on everything, the government needs to cutback too. Cutback on wasteful spending. This country is a disaster. The government made this mess and is making it worse.
# 28:
2:24 pm PST, Feb 24, Charles Cooper, Texas
please stop it now. our grandchildren can not pay back and should not have too. please stop this bailout !!!!!
# 27:
1:44 am PST, Feb 19, Lynda Harding, United Kingdom
# 25:
1:06 pm PST, Feb 8, Name not displayed, California
Please! Please! Please! Vote no on the so called stimulus package. We are already in debt over 10 trillion dollars and he wave another 40 trillion that we will need to keep social security and medicare from going bankrupt!!! Stop the madness. Obama keeps saying that we are on the verge of catastrophe yet I was in Applebee's last night and the place was packed!!......If Americans are still willing to pay $8.50 for a mango margarita and $13.50 for fajitas we can not be hurting THAT bad.
# 26:
1:06 pm PST, Feb 8, Name not displayed, California
Please! Please! Please! Vote no on the so called stimulus package. We are already in debt over 10 trillion dollars and he wave another 40 trillion that we will need to keep social security and medicare from going bankrupt!!! Stop the madness. Obama keeps saying that we are on the verge of catastrophe yet I was in Applebee's last night and the place was packed!!......If Americans are still willing to pay $8.50 for a mango margarita and $13.50 for fajitas we can not be hurting THAT bad.
# 24:
5:51 am PST, Jan 26, Anita Kofta, Wisconsin
# 23:
10:27 am PST, Jan 12, Silky Wylder, Wisconsin
# 22:
2:01 pm PST, Jan 7, BiLL Fowlie, Maine
# 21:
8:38 am PST, Jan 4, Octavian Paul Draja, Romania
# 20:
3:13 pm PST, Dec 19, Terra Ranger, Canada
# 19:
3:04 pm PST, Dec 19, Ron McHugh, Canada
Why should Canadian tax payer dollars be used to bailout failing business' that could have helped themselves years earlier? It's not like these three big American companies didn't see it coming. I wonder would these union workers share their benefit and retirement package with the rest of us Canadians who are going to pay to keep them working? I think this money can be better spent else where and it is irresponsible of our government to even consider. Say no to Bailout! These companies should be responsible for themselves not the Canadian tax payers!
# 18:
11:43 am PST, Dec 16, Sara Merriman, Missouri
# 17:
3:58 pm PST, Dec 15, John Waller, New York
I agree from my heart . J Waller -Structural Improvements inc. It takes a chunk out of a small business owner to start a business alone with limited tools to breathe life into something there never was . Something created new that generated new payroll for men and women. Payroll tax for this country .... Company is 16 years old now and beat up by insurance premiums by AIG - demand letters for a NYC 9/11 disaster loan. A loan in which its last strong asset was collateral for the distaster loan .Even the SBA wants that asset now. Today ,The same energy used to create something new -the small business in which every "struggle we all took home" where we found solutions on our own . That energy is drained and tested every day with a storm that never was meant to have come. Nothing new anymore. Just a struggle to keep the one business where all mistakes were ours . "Corporations" that dwarfed other SB owners in dollar value now have locked a wonderful country to use their laws. We who created new a short time ago must remember our integrity and spinal strength we gave and give to this country . As they say "truth be told" We in Small business are the only titans left ,Rocking ,yet still standing in honor , somewhat shocked we are forced to do it again " and why" .
# 16:
9:37 am PST, Dec 12, Kristin Kott Kott, Texas
Dear senator/congressional rep The Auto industry is attempting to employ the same scare tactics used by Paulson to get Congress to approve a $700 billion bailout for banks. Please remember that we were told huge measures were needed to prevent a stock market collapse. Congress passed the $700 billion bailout on Friday October 3. Since $700 Billion Bailout Passed The S&P collapsed from 1114 on October 3rd to 848 on November 17th. This is a drop of 24%. Paulson did not use the funds as requested. Bernanke promised to disclose how taxpayer money would be used but has refused to do so. Bloomberg has filed a lawsuit against the Fed under the Freedom of Information Act to find out just how Paulson has used the money. Not a single job was created with the money. Fannie Mae has announced it may need another $100 billion. Freddie Mac proclaimed it had negative net worth. AIG received another $37 billion. Cities and Auto companies now want a share of the $700 Billion. There was not a single positive result out of the money that was spent. The Paulson plan was poorly thought out and poorly executed which is exactly what one would expect when Congress rushes to pass bills without considering alternatives. Paulson Humiliated On November 14 Paulson stated " We have in many ways humiliated ourselves as a nation with some of the problems that have taken place here. " Humiliated Again We were humiliated again by wasting half of the appropriated $700 billion and getting virtually nothing out of it. Worse yet, Congress violated free market principles to waste that money. Now Congress is complaining banks do not want to lend. Of course banks do not want to lend. Unemployment is rising, credit card defaults are rising, foreclosures are rising, and commercial real estate losses are rising. Banks need reserves to offset increasing loan loss provisions. Forcing Banks To Lend Is A Huge Mistake Forcing banks to lend would be a huge mistake. All it will do is increase bank losses. We are in this mess in the first place because banks lent recklessly. Now the ultimate irony is right in the midst of a recession, certain members of Congress are attempting to force banks to lend. Stop The Madness! Consumers are tapped out. They are not going to buy autos no matter how much money Congress throws at the sector. World Will Not End If GM Goes Bankrupt The very best thing that can happen to GM and Ford is they go bankrupt. The sooner the better. Congress will then see that the world will not end. Both companies will reorganize. Both companies will keep making cars. The airline industry did not stop flying when it went bankrupt and the auto companies will not stop producing cars if they go bankrupt. In fact, bankruptcies will eliminate the debt on the books decrease interest payments and make the companies more competitive, if and when they ever get around to producing autos that consumers want instead of what the manufactures want to produce. The combined market cap of GM and Ford is $1.84 Billion + $4.30 Billion or a grand total of $6.14 Billion. Spending $50 billion on companies worth $6.14 billion makes no sense. Furthermore, GM alone has a negative net worth (Stockholder's Deficit) of $60 Billion according to GM's 10Q for the period ended September 30, 2008 . If Congress gave GM $50 billion, GM would be worth -$10 billion! The Downside In Trying Barney Frank says "There is no downside in trying." Of course there is a downside in trying. The downside is however much money Congress is willing to throw at the problem because every bit of it will be wasted. Paulson gave Citigroup $25 billion. Today Citigroup announced it will shed 50,000 jobs. Exactly what taxpayer benefit did we get for that $25 billion? It is high time Congress stop wasting taxpayer money. Let GM and Ford go bankrupt. The world will not end and no jobs will be lost that are not going to be lost anyway. The more money Congress wastes attempting to bail out organizations that deserve to fail, the less money there will be for legitimate uses down the road. It's high time that Congress understand that simple economic fact. I urge you to vote against any bailout for the Auto companies. To do so would be a further waste of taxpayer money.
# 15:
2:31 am PST, Dec 2, Can Atik, Turkey
# 14:
6:07 am PST, Nov 28, Necole Cook, Virginia
# 13:
6:26 am PST, Nov 26, Name not displayed, Germany
# 12:
1:21 pm PST, Nov 24, Name not displayed, West Virginia
# 11:
11:58 am PST, Nov 23, Dick Artley, Idaho
The corporations spend $$$$ tens of millions to hire well educated financial consultants to discover more ways to screw the consumer financially. When the corporations make a poor decision that costs THEM money, the US government uses the consumer's tax money to assure that the corporate profit levels are never affected. This defines insanity if the consumers let this happen.
# 10:
11:13 pm PST, Nov 22, Pam Boland, Georgia
For more impact, add a personal comment here
# 8:
3:04 am PST, Nov 20, Bill Craig, Germany
# 7:
1:14 am PST, Nov 20, David Dunkleberger, Pennsylvania
# 6:
9:29 pm PST, Nov 19, Name not displayed, New York
# 5:
9:12 pm PST, Nov 19, Cynthia Matthews, Iowa
# 4:
6:40 pm PST, Nov 19, Steve Dale, Australia
TO GIVE THE GREEDY TAX PAYERS MONEY IS INHUMAN AND A WASTE OF TAX PAYERS MONEY,THE MONEY SHOULD BE GIVEN TO THE TAX PAYERS TO SPEND TO HELP THE ECONOMY AND NOT TO THE OVERPAID AND UNDERWORKED CEOS AND EXECUTIVES WHO WILL ONLY POCKET THE MONEY AS USUAL,CORPORATE GREED IS WHAT IS BRINGING THE WORLD TO ITS KNEES AND NOW OUR DUMB INHUMAN GOVERNMENTS ARE GIVING THEM MORE TO SPLURGE ON THEMSELVES WITH STUPIDITY AGAIN,THEY NEVER LEARNT THE FIRST TIME THEY WERE BAILED OUT SO FOR THAT REASON THEY SHOULDNT BE HELPED AGAIN,ITS THERE OWN GREED THAT HAS SENT THEM BROKE AND NOTHING ELSE.
# 3:
6:22 pm PST, Nov 19, Dinda Evans, California
# 2:
5:11 pm PST, Nov 19, Brooke Werner, Texas
For more impact, add a personal comment here
# 1:
5:04 pm PST, Nov 19, David Myers, Pennsylvania
  • View Signatures:
  • |<
  • <
  • 31
  • >
  • >|
Copyright © 2009 Care2.com, inc. and its licensors. All rights reserved