PETITION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING FOR 11th & 14th AMENDMENT VIOLATIONS

If you wish to sign the petition, send in the hard copy as well

http://www.rayservers.com/blog/breaking-news-the-coast-guard-filing-hit-the-mail-today---rod-class-show-tonight-15-oct-2010-9pm-edt


Here's the Latest version of the Coast Guard paperwork with the Indictment within...

     http://rayservers.com/blog/new-coast-guard-filing-with-five-exhibits-a-e
     This version has a new heading in place to the Commander In Chief.
     >>>>> The completed filing will be available soon !

Here's Rod's written message concerning the new version of the Coast Guard filing
and Indictment signing paperwork:
  
     When sending back the Indictment Form (only) to Rod Class, please also include a donation / gift to help with the costs of sending this to the coast guard and to the Attorney General's office. The indictment is part of, and at the end of, the new Coast Guard filing labeled with the date of 9.2010


U.S. COAST GUARD HEARING OFFICE DETACHMENT
CG HO MS 7160
4200 WILSON BLVD, SUITE 600
ARLINGTON, VA 20598-7160                                                                                                                   
 PHONE: (202) 493-6870 FAX: 202-493-6924

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY UNITED STATES COAST GUARD ADMINISTRATIVE COURT



IN THE NAME of the People of the united States of America                                                        :Rodney-Dale; Class; U.S.N. Veteran                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        Private Attorney General                                                                                                                                              P.O. Box 435                                                           CASE #______________                                                                         High Shoals, North Carolina [28077]                                                                                                                                  (704) 742 3123

Petitioner                                                                                                                                                       

Vs                                                      Administrative Law Judge                                                                                                                                                   

                                                           _____________________

                                                       Date received_____________

COMMANDER IN-CHIEF                                                                                                              OF                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  UNITED STATES dba CORPORATION  et, al                                                                                      CORPORATION LAW FIRM                                                                                                                                  LAW OFFICER ERIC HOLDER                                                                                                                                        U.S. Department of Justice                                                                                                                                           950 Pennsylvania Avenues, NW                                                                                                                   Washington, DC 20530-0001 

             AND                                                                                                                                                                                           

COMMANDER IN-CHIEF    et, al

OF EACH STATES GOVERNOR OFFICES                                                                                                         

                                     

DEFENDANTS                                                          

                                                                               PETITION FOR

PRAYER FOR ADMINISTRATIVE                                     HEARING FOR 11th & 14th AMENDMENTS VIOLATIONS  

   

 BILL OF INDICTMENT ATTACHED



Now Comes, We the People of the united States to bring claims of administrative violations against the UNITED STATES, d/b/a as a Corporation, a/k/a UNITED STATES, and its instrumentality called the STATE OF _______, a/k/a State of ______ , various other agencies, and various other departments under their control, and did, with intent, set out to injure the American people By Fraud and Conspiracy through Obstruction of justice, intimidation, and deprivation of Rights,%u201D under the Eleventh Amendment and under the Fourteenth Amendment of the UNITED STATES Constitution. A demand by the People to be heard is now placed before your Administrative Office in this PETITION FOR PRAYER FOR ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING FOR 11th & 14th AMENDMENT VIOLATIONS.                                                                     


            The meeting of Congress held in1866 was still considered valid and was in power until 1868 when the Reconstruction Act was passed that created the Fourteenth Amendment. Testimony can be found in the 1967 Congressional Record (Marked as Exhibit A). The 1866 Congress did create the Statutes and Constitutional legislative Laws. The THIRTY-NINTH CONGRESS, Sess. I, CH. 31, on page 27, on April 9, 1866, created and passed Chap. XXXI - An Act to protect all Persons in the United States in their Civil Rights, and furnish the Means of their Vindication%u201D (Marked as Exhibit B).

            This 1866 Congressional Act allows any of the People to step in as a Private Attorney General and represent the People of the united States of America. The authority of this Act outlined a Constitutional method under Chap. XXXI - An Act to protect all Persons in the United States in their Civil Rights, and furnish the Means of their Vindication, and I, ;Rodney-Dale; Class; (hereinafter PAG) as one of the People have stepped up to fill such a position. The power is vested in the People under the Bill of Rights under the organic Articles 11 & 12 of the organic 1789 Bill of Rights, and, expressed in the 110th Congress, 1st Session, booklet "Constitution of the United States, and The Declaration of Independence," Printed under the direction of the Joint Committee on Printing, 110th Congress, 1st Session, July 25, 2007, for sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 202-512-1800 (hereinafter the "booklet") - expressing the powers of the 9th and 10th Amendments.  


COMPLAINT

I, PAG, set forth the following proof of the Fraud perpetrated upon the people of the united States of America.  The fraud can be found in every booklet labeled as The Constitution of the United States and can be found in the organic United States Constitution up to 1866. The Congress of 1795 did amend the united States Constitution and by ratification of the States the 11th Amendment on Feb 5, 1795, by Amending Article III, Section 2, which reads as such (in the following) and created the new 11th Amendment which reads (further, as following) as such:

            Section 2 - Trial by Jury, Original Jurisdiction, Jury Trials

            (The judicial Power shall extend to all Cases, in Law and Equity, arising under   this Constitution, the Laws of the United States, and Treaties made, or which shall            be made, under their Authority; to all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public      Ministers and Consuls; to all Cases of admiralty and maritime Jurisdiction; to      Controversies to which the United States shall be a Party; to Controversies             between two or more States; between a State and Citizens of another State;   between Citizens of different States; between Citizens of the same State claiming            Lands under Grants of different States, and between a State, or the Citizens             thereof, and foreign States, Citizens or Subjects.) (The sections underlined    were modified by the 11th Amendment.)

            Amendment 11 - Judicial Limits. Ratified 2/7/1795.

            The Judicial power of the United States shall not be construed to extend to any suit in law or equity, commenced or prosecuted against one of the United States       by Citizens of another State, or by Citizens or Subjects of any Foreign State.


           The States are claiming the 11th Amendment protects them from the People bringing claims of abuse and misconduct of their public office, malicious persecution, malicious arrest, malfeasance, Due Process violations, Denial of an Affirmative Defense, etc. (See Exhibit C,  STATE OF OHIO, Attorney General filing in to the UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA.)  The Ohio AG clearly tells a Federal Judge, see Exhibit C, "Pursuant to the Eleventh Amendment to the United States Constitution, this Court (UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA) lacks jurisdiction to hear suits for money damages against a State..., which, to this date, has not been rebutted by the USDC for the DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA !


            The Eleventh Amendment affects Controversies to which the United States shall be a Party; to Controversies between a State and Citizens of another State. By the same token, this clearly shows that the UNITED STATES or a State can not bring a Controversy in Law or Equity against any of the the People as well ! The Eleventh Amendment amended the whole of Section of 2 under Article III, not just where the People can not bring a claim against the UNITED STATES or the States. The Courts are, therefore, operating with NO Judicial Power to hear any controversies, and all controversies and trials are by jury, by the people (See Article 9 of the organic 1789 Bill of Rights in the National Archives, or the 7th Amendment in YOUR booklet.) There is no place in the 1787, 1860, or even in YOUR 2007 Constitution booklet that gives a Judge, alone, the power to make a decsion in any case. It cannot be found in ANY version of the published Constitutions, whichever year you choose to use. The Eleventh Amendment is in all of the Different Constitutions (since 1795) and clearly removes Judical Power in Law or Equity: The Eleventh Amendment also removes the rest of the organic clause 1 of Article III, Section 2, meaning, No Controversies in Law or Equity can be heard.

 As PAG, I will set now forth my next proof of the Fraud upon the people of the united States of America. I refer you to the Fourteenth Amendment placed in the Constitution on July 9, 1868. In order to pass this amendment, the broken Congress had to create and pass the Reconstrction Act of 1867 - 1868. This Act places all the people of the ten southern States, therein named, under the absolute domination of military rulers; and the preamble undertakes to give the reason upon which the measure is based and the grounds upon which it is justified. It declares that there existed in those ten States no legal governments and no adequate protection for life or property, and asserts the necessity of enforcing peace and good order within their limits. Is this true as a matter of fact?


The Act, however, would seem to show upon its face that the establishment of peace and good order was not its real objective. The Fifth Section of the Act declares that the preceding Sections shall cease to operate in any State where certain events shall have happened. All those listed conditions must be fulfilled before the People of any of these States can be relieved from the bondage of military domination; but when they are fulfilled, then immediately the pains and penalties of the bill (the Reconstruction Act) are to cease, no matter whether there be peace and order or not, and without any reference to the security of life or property. The excuse given for the Reconstruction Act in the preamble is admitted by the Act, itself, NOT to be the real reason for the Act, according to Pres. Andrew Johnson himself (See below). "The military rule which it establishes is plainly to be used, not for any purpose of order or for the prevention of crime, but solely as a means of coercing the people into the adoption of principles and measures to which it is known that they are opposed, and upon which they have an undeniable right to exercise their own judgment." The Congress a hundred years later was given testimony on this matter which revealed that the military today still holds authority over  not only the ten southern States  but the whole country. (Exhibit A from the 1967 Congressional Record clearly confirms this to be true.)

The Andrew Johnson Veto of the First Reconstruction Act,

March 2, 1867

            The ten States named in the bill are divided into five districts. For each district an           officer of the Army, not below the rank of a brigadier-general, is to be appointed           to rule over the people; and he is to be supported with an efficient military force    to enable him to perform his duties and enforce his authority. Those duties and   that authority, as defined by the third section of the bill, are

            "to protect all persons in their rights of person and property, to suppress            insurrection, disorder, and violence, and to punish or cause to be punished all           disturbers of the public peace or criminals."

           

            It is plain that the authority here given to the military officer amounts to absolute despotism. But to make it still more unendurable, the bill provides that it may be       delegated to as many subordinates as he chooses to appoint, for it declares that he shall "punish or cause to be punished."


Such a power has not been wielded by any monarch in England for more than five         hundred years. In all that time no people who speak the English language have     borne such servitude. It reduces the whole population of the ten States-all persons,        of every color, sex, and condition, and every stranger within their limits-to the    most abject and degrading slavery. No master ever had a control so absolute over          the slaves as this bill gives to the military officers over both white and colored      persons.


This proposition is perfectly clear, that no branch of the Federal Government -   executive, legislative, or judicial - can have any just powers except those which it derives through and exercises under the organic law of the Union. Outside of the        Constitution we have no legal authority more than private citizens, and within it   we have only so much as that instrument gives us. This broad principle limits all           our functions and applies to all subjects. It protects not only the citizens of States           which are within the Union, but it shields every human being who comes or is     brought under our jurisdiction. We have no right to do in one place more than in     another that which the Constitution says we shall not do at all. If, therefore, the       Southern States were in truth out of the Union, we could not treat their people in a         way which the fundamental law forbids.


I need not say to the representatives of the American people that their    Constitution forbids the exercise of judicial power in any way but one -that is, by    the ordained and established courts. It is equally well known that in all criminal             cases a trial by jury is made indispensable by the express words of that instrument

            An act of Congress is proposed which, if carried out, would deny a trial by the           lawful courts and juries to 9,000,000 American citizens and to their posterity for an indefinite period. It seems to be scarcely possible that anyone should   seriously believe this consistent with a Constitution which declares in simple,       plain, and unambiguous language that all persons shall have that right and that no            person shall ever in any case be deprived of it. The Constitution also forbids the      arrest of the citizen without judicial warrant, founded on probable cause. This bill             authorizes an arrest without warrant, at the pleasure of a military commander. The          Constitution declares that

            "no person shall be held to answer for a capital or otherwise infamous crime       unless on presentment by a grand jury."


            This bill holds every person not a soldier answerable for all crimes and all charges          without any presentment. The Constitution declares that


            "no person shall be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law."


            This bill sets aside all process of law, and makes the citizen answerable in his     person and property to the will of one man, and as to his life to the will of two. .

            The United States are bound to guarantee to each State a republican form of     government. Can it be pretended that this obligation is not palpably broken if we carry out a measure like this, which wipes away every vestige of republican             government in ten States and puts the life, property, liberty, and honor of all the people in each of them under the domination of a single person clothed with         unlimited authority?

            "no person shall be held to answer for a capital or otherwise infamous crime       unless on presentment by a grand jury."


            This bill holds every person not a soldier answerable for all crimes and all charges          without any presentment. The Constitution declares that


            "no person shall be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law."


            This bill sets aside all process of law, and makes the citizen answerable in his     person and property to the will of one man, and as to his life to the will of two. .

ANDREW JOHNSON.


The Civil War started January 1861 and ended April 1865. Three years later in 1868, the Fourteenth Amendment was passed. The Fourteenth Amendment is still a part of the Constitution, thereby implementing military jurisdiction, military rule and military law and giving the military jurisdiction over this Complaint placed before it (See Exhibit A).  Under Title 10, all Public Offices(Officers) are to uphold the Constitution, and Federal, and State statutes according to Title 10, Section 333.  Under the Fourteenth Amendment there are No civilian courts  only military courts. The people are not being told this fact. And, when it comes into question, the court denies it !


CONCLUSION

The Eleventh Amendment removed Judicial Power to hear ALL cases  that are listed in Article III, Section 2, Clause 1..."The judicial Power shall extend to all Cases, in Law and Equity, arising under this Constitution, the Laws of the United States, and Treaties made, or which shall be made, under their Authority; to all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls; to all Cases of admiralty and maritime Jurisdiction; to Controversies to which the United States shall be a Party; to Controversies between two or more States; between a State and Citizens of another State; between Citizens of different States; between Citizens of the same State claiming Lands under Grants of different States, and between a State, or the Citizens thereof, and foreign States, Citizens or Subjects."


            The Eleventh Amendment removed all Judicial Power from the judges and placed it in the hands of the People known as Juries. The Eleventh Amendment did not uphold the States' immunity; it gave the People immunity From the Federal Government and the States from bringing allegations, and then convictions of the people in the name of the UNITED STATES or THE STATE OF. All charges on the American People are mistakenly being brought forth from Title 50 %u2014WAR AND NATIONAL DEFENSE,

Section 23:

            Jurisdiction of United States courts and judges

            After any such proclamation has been made, the several courts of the United      States, having criminal jurisdiction, and the several justices and judges of the           courts of the United States, are authorized and it shall be their duty, upon             complaint against any alien enemy resident and at large within such             jurisdiction or district, to the danger of the public peace or safety, and contrary to     the tenor or intent of such proclamation, or other regulations which the President          may have established, to cause such alien to be duly apprehended and conveyed            before such court, judge, or justice; and after a full examination and hearing on       such complaint, and sufficient cause appearing, to order such alien to be removed      out of the territory of the United States, or to give sureties for his good behavior,            or to be otherwise restrained, conformably to the proclamation or regulations      established as aforesaid, and to imprison, or otherwise secure such alien, until the      order which may be so made shall be performed.


This section of the statutes under Title 50 is being misapplied, abused and misused by the So-Called Civilian Court System in violation of the Eleventh Amendment, when the actual authority of the Court comes from the Reconstruction Act and the Fourteenth Amendment through "military authority."

The Fourteenth Amendment clearly places this whole country under Military Rule / Law as the the Fourteenth Amendment has NOT been amended as Article III, Section 2, Clause 1 of the Constitution WAS.  If the Fourteenth Amendment was a Fraud passed to usurp and overthrow a Constitutional form of government (See Exhibit A) then the military has the Duty and Authority under the Fourteenth Amendment to address This Petition /  Complaint in an administrative hearing, as the military court is the ONLY court having power.


I, ;Rodney Dale; Class;, invoke Congressional, and Constitutional authority in the name of the People of the united States of American under the 1866 THIRTY-NINTH CONGRESS, Sess. I, CH. 31 which in 1866 created and passed "Chap. XXXI - An Act to protect all Persons in the United States in their Civil Rights, and furnish the Means of their Vindication.  There is NO public office that has standing, after 1868, as they became De Facto and all power and authority comes from the military per Reconstruction Act of 1868, and the 14th Amendment.  As of this date, in 2010, the Reconstruction Act of 1868, and the 14th Amendment have not been Repealed and are still in operation !


By the power vested in me, I :Rodney-Dale; Class;, as a Private Attorney General, by the only lawful Congress of 1866, and the Congressional Act ("Chap. XXXI - An Act to protect all Persons in the United States in their Civil Rights, and furnish the Means of their Vindication. passed by the last lawful Congress, I come in the name of the People to address Civil Rights violations, and to get "a means of vindication" for the People of the united States of America with this PETITION FOR PRAYER FOR ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING FOR THE 11th and 14th AMENDMENTS VIOLATIONS, and place this Petition before your Military Administrative Court to be heard.

If the Coast Guard Administrative Hearing Office lacks such power to hear this Administrative Complaint, then it is your Constitutional duty as part of the Military to aid ;Rodney-Dale; Class; and direct him to the proper Military, or other Hearing Administrative Court venue to have this complaint heard, as it is in your Oath to defend against foreign and domestic transgressions against the People. Title 18, Section 4: 


"Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by         a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make            known the same to some judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three           years, or both."


The Military has Subject Matter and Jurisdiction pursuant to the Reconstruction Act of 1867-1868, Anderw Johnson Veto (Exhibit D & E) and the14th Amendment to hear this Administrative Complaint.    All Commander in -Chief are in Contempt of Constitution 



ALL RIGHTS RESERVED TO AMEND WITHOUT LEAVE OF COURT


Private Attorney General Seal

                                                                        ________________________

                                                                        ; Rodney-Dale; Class; U.S.N. Veteran                                                                                                                                                                                                               Private Attorney General                                                                                                                       C/O P.O. Box 435                                                                                                                               HIGH SHOALS, N.C. [28077]                                                                                               (704) 742 3123

                                                           








Instruction sheet

BILL OF PARTICULARS

A detailed informal statement of a plaintiff's cause of action, or of the defendant's set-off.

In all actions in which the plaintiff declares generally, without specifying his cause of action, a judge upon application will order him to give the defendant a bill of the particulars, and in the meantime stay proceedings. And when the defendant gives notice or pleads a set-off, he will be required to give a bill of the particulars of his set-off, on failure of which he will be precluded from giving any evidence in support of it at the trial. The object in both cases is to prevent surprise and procure a fair trial. The bill of particulars is an account of the items of the demand and states in what manner they arose.

TRUE BILL

These words are endorsed on a bill of indictment, when a grand jury, after having heard the witnesses for the government, are of opinion that there is sufficient cause to put the defendant on his trial. Formerly, the endorsement was Billa vera, when legal proceedings were in Latin; it is still the practice to write on the back of the bill Ignoramus, when the jury do not find it to be a true bill

The grand juries need to circle grand juries to separate your selves from the other groups

Country Assembly need to circle County Assembly to separate your from selves the other groups

We the People of the united States need to circle The People of America to separate your from selves the other groups

BILL OF INDICTMENT

We the Grand Jury and or County Assembly of the Republic  or The  People of America  of the united States of America in the Republic State of ________, pursuant to the 1787 Constitution, and the Bill of Rights of 1789, and the last known lawful Congress of this united States being in the year of 1866-1867 by historical records, set forth first the historical facts before the Military of your Lawful Authority to hear this complaint and except this Law indictment against the Defendants of the UNITED STATES De-facto government and against their De-facto State instrumentals offices.


1. Congressional records also show that in February 5 of 1795 that the Eleventh Amendment was passed and by doing so reduced the judicial power in all case of law, equity and all cases in Controversies. The Grand jury read the Eleventh amendment as removing all judicial power from the judges and placing such authority in the jury as found under the Bill of Rights Articles 7 and 9 and amendments 5 and 7 in the new constitution.



2. Congressional records show in 1866 that Congress did empower the people with authority to bring claim of civil rights violation and other damages done to the people by and through the THIRTY-NINTH CONGRESS, Session I, CH.31 1866 created and passed %u201CChap XXXI - an act to %u201CProtect all Person in the United States in their Civil Rights, and furnish the Mean of their Vindication


3. Congressional records show that the Reconstruction Act of 1867-1868 after the civil war ended empowered the Military with the authority under section 5 of the Act to over throw ten Constitutional setting lawful government and placed all the people of the ten States therein named under the absolute domination of military rulers and would deny a trial by the lawful courts and juries to 9,000,000 American citizens and to their posterity for an indefinite period. This was recorded in 1867 when Andrew Johnson vetoed this Congressional Act.


4. Congressional records show that the Fourteen Amendment was passed on July 9th 1868, and by doing so placed the whole United States under Federal District under Military rule/law. The 1967 Congressional record on pages 15641-15646 a hundreds years later shows this to be a true statement of facts. The 90th Congressional Congress addressed this issue and in failing to correct the wrong has constituted their wiliness to continue this path to defraud the American people. By doing so, the Reconstruction Act and the Fourteen Amendment still stand in full force and affect and the United States is still under Military domination and not civil authority as the people are allowed to believe.



We, the Grand Jury and or County Assembly or The  People of America  of the Republic State of _________, reviewed and deliberated on the evidence placed before us by Rodney Dale; Class under the authority to what is the be last historical Congress Act, Congressional Act %u201CChap XXXI - an act to Protect all Person in the United States in their Civil Rights, and furnish the Mean of their Vindication This Congressional authority which empowers Rodney Dale; Class the authority to act as a Private Attorney General in the name of the People of the Republic united States of America and the Republic State of ___________, now set forth before you this True Bill of Indictment.


 All Counts in this Bill of Indictment are in violate the 1787 Constitution under Article 6, clause 3 - Oath of Office, the Bill of Rights of 1789 articles 7, 9 11 and 12 and under the newer constitutions, article 6 clause 3 and amendments 5, 7 9, 10, 11 and 14th .



Count One of the Bills of Indictment


The judicial branches of both the Federal and States Courts of the Constitutional Republic form of government did with full understanding of the laws with deceit and intent set out to defraud the American people out of a lawful court and lawful juries to represent the people in a fair unbiased court of law.


Count Two of the Bills of Indictment


The Executive office of the Attorney General office of both the Federal and States of the Constitutional Republic form of government did with full understanding of the laws with deceit and intent set out to defraud the American people by false prosecutions by bringing fraudulent allegations into a court of no jurisdiction and denying the people out of a lawful court and lawful juries to represent the people in a fair unbiased court of law.

Count Three of the Bills of Indictment


The Congress office of the House and Senate in 1867- 1868 by passing the Reconstruction Act and the Fourteen Amendment did violate the Peoples Right to a Lawful government and did replace such government under Military jurisdiction. The 90th Congress discovered the fraud in 1967 and failed to correct the wrong. The Congress, upon many complaints from the People to the federal legislators to address the corruption of the government and of the judicial branch of government, did with full understanding of the laws with deceit and intent set out to defraud the American people out of a lawful government, court and lawful juries to represent the people in a fair unbiased court of law.

Count Four of the Bills of Indictment


The Public Officials, who hold and have held Public office did swear an Oath to the Constitution as pursuant to the first Statute at Large, Statute One of 1789 - Oath of office and found in the constitution under article 6 clause 3, did with deceit and intent set out to defraud the American people out of a Republic form of government there by denying the people of honest service in a trusted position of public offices.  These public Offices have failed to inform the People of the Reconstruction Act and the Fourteen Amendment true intent to overthrow the people and to enslave the united States population into nothing less enemy of the State subject. They mislead and allowed the people to think that they held standing as a federal citizen and then denied the people even that standing as well. 

Count Five of the Bill of Indictment


By Congressional records of the 81st Congressional records it shows that a communistic take over by the National Lawyer Guild was not stopped by the 81st Congress. In Congress allowing this, it violated Title 50 - War and National Defense, Chapter 23, Sections 841 & 842 in violation of National defense under the Military authority.




NOT GUILTY OR GUILTY SHEET



Count One - We the Grand Jury and or County Assembly or The People of America of the Republic State of ____________ find the judicial branch of the Federal Government and State Government GUILTY of violating the United States Constitution or State Constitution or any of the Federal or State Statutory Laws.

Count One - We the Grand Jury and or County Assembly or The People of America of the Republic State of ____________ find the judicial branch of the Federal Government and State Government GUILTY of violation of the Eleventh Amendment of the Constitution by action in a judicial fraud against the People of the united States of America by passing judgment with no Constitutional authority or Statutory authority to do so. 


Count Two - We the Grand Jury and or County Assembly or The People of America of the Republic State of ____________ find The Executive office of the Attorney General of both the Federal and States GUILTY of violating the United States Constitution or State Constitution or any of the Federal or State Statutory Laws.

Count Two - We the Grand Jury and or County Assembly or The People of America of the Republic State of ____________ find The Executive office of the Attorney General of both the Federal and States GUILTY of violation of the Eleventh Amendment of the Constitution by action in a prosecutorial and judicial fraud against the People of the united States of America by allowing allegation in Law, Equity or Controversies before a judicial power with no Constitutional authority or Statutory authority to hear or make a Ruling on or against the People of the united States of America. 






Count Three - We the Grand Jury and or County Assembly or The People of America of the Republic State of ____________ find The Congressional offices of the House and Senate GUILTY of violating the United States C

Sign Petition

privacy policy

By signing, you accept Care2's terms of service.

Having problems signing this? Let us know.