U.S. Citizens defending the U.S. Constitution

Please like and share the link that you found this petition on, and share this petition so we can get more digital signatures. This isn't so much about ASKing the govern body for a change, this is about informing the governed of the crimes that are being committed against them by the governing body, and DEMANDING the change. We will do this by empowering ourselves with information, and rejecting the governing bodies lies.

• Please read all the way to the end, there is very important advice at the end of this petition. 

We the people demand, and have a legal right to the following:

1. An immediate stop to levying fees through court filing costs against our right to petition the government through the courts for grievance and crimes brought against us as secured through the 1st Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, where it is cited that "No state [or the U.S.] shall convert a liberty into a privilege, license it, and [or] attach a fee to it. (MURDOCK v. PENN., 319 U.S. 105)".
2. The immediate dismantling of the ABA (American BAR Association) and all of their subordinate State divisions. These citizens maintain titles of nobility that are granted by the British Accreditation Registry [See BAR Association attorneys and Esquire] as well as positions of profit and trust within this country. This is distinctly in conflict with Article 1 Clause 9 Section 8 of the U.S. Constitution, and all members must be banned per the U.S. Constitution from holding any position within the peoples government [which includes the judicial, legislative, and presidential branch]. 
3. The immediate prosecution of every Judge that has warred against the U.S. Constitution for treason. A Judge has sworn an Oath of Office to uphold and defend the U.S. Constitution (formed a binding contract under the respective jurisdiction), when that same judge wars against the U.S. Constitution they are voiding their oath of office and acting outside of their jurisdiction. [See U.S. v. Will, 449 U.S. 200, 216, 101 S.Ct. 471, 66 L.Ed.2d 392, 406 (1980); Cohens v. Virginia, 19 U.S. (6 Wheat) 264, 404, 5 L.Ed 257 (1821).] This will also involve the prosecution of every (prosecuting and /or defense) attorney that was in court at the time be be prosecuted for misprison of treason [See 18 U.S.C., Sections 4 and 2382]. This case qualifies for the use of the RICO Act against the AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION (A.B.A.), and all State BAR Associations.
4. The people demand a justice system that uses common language (such as is expressed in the Declaration of Independence and the U.S. Constitution) to which the people can readily practice the laws without being forced to move through bureaucratic boundaries that separated them from their U.S. Constitutional rights and liberties, and turn those same rights and liberties into nothing more than shabby commodities.
5. All the people that are currently being unconstitutionally held in violation of the 5th amendment, through the malpractice of the law be immediately released, and compensated for their injustice they have suffered.

To better understand the way the way things work in this country and how you are the victim of crimes being committed against "the people" by members of the justice department, I will start by explaining how the U.S. Constitution is different than your State Constitution.

First off, the [U.S. Constitution] is the supreme law of the land, and any law that is repugnant to the constitution is null and void of law. (MARBURY v. MADISON, 5 U.S. 137). No state shall convert a liberty into a privilege, license it, and[/or] attach a fee to it. (MURDOCK v. PENN., 319 U.S. 105). If the state[/federal government] converts a liberty into a privilege the citizen can engage in the right with impunity. (SHUTTLESWORTH v. BIRMINGHAM, 373 U.S. 262). Where rights secured by the [U.S.] Constitution are involved, there can be no rule [law] making or legislation which would abrogate [abolish] them. (MIRANDA v. ARIZONA, 384 U.S. 436). An unconstitutional act is not law; it confers no rights; it imposes no duties; affords no protection; it creates no office; it is in legal contemplation, as [an] inoperative as though it had never been passed. (NORTON v. SHELBY COUNTY, 118 U.S. 425). Therefore, the State Constitution can not limit or encroach on any liberty or RIGHT secured under the U.S. Constitution. Rather the purpose of the State Constitution may only confer upon it's citizens additional State granted RIGHTS. This is in fact supported by the 10th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution where it is stated "The powers not delegated to the United States by the [U.S.] Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people."

Secondly, have you ever wondered why law enforcement officers and members of the Justice system get away with committing crimes against the citizens with little to no regard for the law, why your State laws and legal practices violate your U.S. Constitutional “RIGHTS”, those same State laws sometimes just scream of being unconstitutional, and why you legally cannot do nor afford to do anything about it?

WAIT, WHAT, afford to do anything about it?

            Do you smell something fishy, I did too. So I asked myself a simple question, “Why do my rights and the protections of those rights have a price tag?” Doesn’t that simple act turn my U.S. and/or State Constitutional “RIGHTS” into shabby commodities? That is like being guaranteed a Hamburger and having to buy the “all” beef patty.

This is actually called Public Corruption, and it has, and is being used in a conspiracy (18 U.S. Code § 371 - Conspiracy to commit offense or to defraud United States) to extort monies from the citizens of the UNITED STATES through a racketeering scheme that targets citizens of the UNITED STATES through the BAR (British Accredited Registry) Association members and their agents, the supposed “Law Enforcement Officers”. The justice system is comprised of 3 BAR Association members, the Judge, the Prosecuting Attorney, and the Defense Attorney. The Supreme Court (BAR Association members) have granted the Judges (Themselves and their fellow BAR Association members) Judicial Immunity.

Judicial Immunity is a form of legal immunity which protects judges and others employed by the judiciary from lawsuits brought against them for judicial actions, no matter how incompetent, negligent, or malicious such conduct might be, even if this conduct is in violation of statutes.

 Therefore, this is not a land of laws as we the citizens have been led to believe, this is a land of corrupt judicial discretion. These BAR Association members have a financially vested interest in sustained litigation, and that is where the public corruption comes into practice, and the intended targets are us the citizens of the UNITED STATES. Article I, Section 9, Clause 8 of the U.S. Constitution clearly establishes that the Supreme Court’s granted Judicial Immunity based on the English common law idea that "the King can do no wrong." to themselves and their fellow BAR (British Accredited Registry) Association members (Judges) is in fact an act of the Supreme Court themselves warring against U.S. Constitutional. Additionally, these same BAR members are granted the title of nobility of Esquire exclusively from the BAR (British Accredited Registry), which grants them exclusive access to operating in prosecutor fashion within the peoples courts.  

U.S. Constitution Article I, Section 9, Clause 8:
“No Title of Nobility shall be granted by the United States: And no Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under them, shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince, or foreign State.”

 The U.S. Supreme Court has made the following very important rulings:

These previous Supreme Court rulings establish a legal precedent [not opinion] which all court rulings that follow [even the Supreme Court], must follow to maintain the integrity and belief in the justice system.

• no "judicial officer can war against the Constitution without violating his undertaking to support it." Cooper v. Aaron, 358 U.S. 1, 78 S.Ct. 1401 (1958).
• If a judge does not fully comply with the Constitution, then his orders are void, In re Sawyer, 124 U.S. 200 (1888), she is without jurisdiction, and she has engaged in an act or acts of treason.
• Whenever a judge acts where she does not have jurisdiction to act, the judge is engaged in an act or acts of treason. U.S. v. Will, 449 U.S. 200, 216, 101 S.Ct. 471, 66 L.Ed.2d 392, 406 (1980); Cohens v. Virginia, 19 U.S. (6 Wheat) 264, 404, 5 L.Ed 257 (1821).
• Any judge or attorney who does not report a judge who has committed treason as required by law might themselves be guilty of misprision of treason. 18 U.S.C., Sections 4 and 2382.
• The Constitution of these United States is the supreme law of the land. Any law that is repugnant to the constitution is null and void of law. (MARBURY v. MADISON, 5 U.S. 137).
• Officers of the court have no immunity, when violating a constitutional right, from liability. For they are deemed to know the law. (OWEN v.INDEPENDENCE, 100 S.C.T. 1398)
• The court is to protect against any encroachment of constitutionally secured liberty. (BYARS v. U.S., 116 U.S. 616).
• Where rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no rule [law] making or legislation which would abrogate [abolish] them. (MIRANDA v. ARIZONA, 384 U.S. 436).
• An unconstitutional act is not law; it confers no rights; it imposes no duties; affords no protection; it creates no office; it is in legal contemplation, as [an] inoperative as though it had never been passed. (NORTON v. SHELBY COUNTY, 118 U.S. 425)

 This specifically proves that a Judges who fail to ascend to law, or break the law are guilty of treason, and are liable for their actions even acting in the scope of their duty to the judiciary. Additionally, if you have attempted to take it before the courts, every judge that has been made aware and failed bring these cases in front of the courts citing judicial immunity are guilty of treason for warring against the U.S. Constitution themselves, and when they failed to notify the appropriate channels they are guilty of misprision of treason. 
            That is only the start of the problem. The next question is how do we the citizens of the UNITED STATES end up in front of these corrupt public figures in the first place, these judges who commit their Constitutional violations against us in an effort to extort monies for their corporate BAR Association members through their racketeering scheme? That is a simple answer; it’s the “Law Enforcement Officers.” Practical deductive reasoning allows you to know and understand why “Law Enforcement Officers” are rarely ever held accountable for their Constitutional “RIGHTS” violations (RIGHTS VIOLATIONS (42 U.S.C. §1983), DEPRIVATION OF RIGHTS UNDER COLOR OF LAW (18, U.S.C., Section 242)), and crimes against the citizens of the UNITED STATES. Simply put, if the judiciary offends those that promote their corrupt practices, then how will they get you into the courts to extort monies from you. But, judges don’t grant the State(s) the authority to grant the “Law Enforcement Officers” the authority to stop and detain you, and make allegations against the citizens. That additionally is a grand misconception that has been presented to the citizens of the UNITED STATES, the “Law Enforcement Officers” are not the charging agents for the State(s), and they are simply the alleging agents. The Prosecuting Attorney is the charging agent in the State(s) interest, by that same State’s Laws, in that State’s jurisdiction, and the Jury are the convicting agents [Become aware of jury nullification].

The Federal government has granted the State(s) sovereign authority as long as the State(s) adopt the U.S. Constitution which is the “supreme law of the land.”(MARBURY v. MADISON, 5 U.S. 137), and before someone asks you about the Articles of Confederation, you might want to know that the Articles of Confederation occurred in 1777; however, ratification of the Articles of Confederation by all thirteen states did not occur until March 1, 1781. The Articles created a loose confederation of sovereign states and a weak central government, leaving most of the power with the state government(s) and that was the reason why that inception of the country FAILED. It failed because the individual State(s) printed so much money that the inflation of their currency caused it to value at less than the paper it was printed on. Here’s further proof that that inception of this country failed, George Washington is the "FIRST" president of the UNITED STATES right, then why was he sworn into office on April 30, 1789; because he wasn’t the first president that ever held office in this country starting from the year 1781. John Hanson was the FIRST president of "America" sworn into office November 1781, he was elected President of the Continental Congress, and became the first president to serve a one-year term under the provisions of the Articles of Confederation. Because of that failure, they decided there was a need for a stronger Federal government and eventually led to the Constitutional Convention in 1787. The present U.S. Constitution replaced the Articles of Confederation on March 4, 1789, and the 10th Amendment disproves this argument completely.
            I can’t speak for all States, but I can speak on the STATE OF INDIANA in particular, and use it as a case study as to how the citizens of the UNITED STATES are the victims of Constitutional crimes, and having their U.S. Constitutional “RIGHTS” violated; the judges know it, the attorneys know it, the State(s) know it, and the Federal Government KNOWS IT! The STATE OF INDIANA has violated their granted State sovereign authority by failing to fully adopt the U.S. Constitution, specifically the 5th Amendment which guarantees the citizens of the UNITED STATES the “RIGHT” , “No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand jury…..”

The Definition of Infamous crime is as follows:
“A crime judged infamous because it constitutes treason or a felony, because it involves moral turpitude of a nature that creates a strong presumption that the one guilty is unworthy of belief in a court of law, or because it subjects the one guilty to infamy ”

 It should be noted that the first word in that quote from the 5th Amendment is the word “NO”, it is a term of absolution, there is NO room for consent, it cannot be infringed on in any way, and yet again I will cite that the U.S. Constitution is the “supreme law of the land. Any law that is repugnant to the constitution is null and void of law.”(MARBURY v. MADISON, 5 U.S. 137). The STATE OF INDIANA commits this DEPRIVATION OF RIGHTS UNDER COLOR OF LAW violation to statistically increase their ability to successfully prosecute and fine the governed in an effort to gain additional revenue for the State, which is corruption a COLOR OF LAW violation. The STATE OF INDIANA reserves the right to grand jury for “Political” legal issues, which is to say that only agents of the State are granted their 5th Amendment constitutional right to the fullest extent of the law, yet the normal citizens are not. This is a DEPRIVATION OF RIGHTS UNDER COLOR OF LAW violation against all the governed of the STATE OF INDIANA through the 14th Amendment where the governed are guaranteed Equal protection under the law, and clearly shows that most of you tax payers are literally of a lesser "subject" class, maybe that explains why so many of these people and agencies have the immunity of kings; it’s because you are the peasant. 
            Long and short of it, every felony case that has not been indicted by grand jury, and held trial by grand jury is a voided court order, and the Judge, Prosecuting attorney, and Defense attorney are guilty of treason and misprison of treason. Through failing to act in accordance to the Law which they are sworn to uphold and defend. This is actual proof that the BAR Association is committing crimes against this country, they have sworn allegiance to a foreign National organization not only in the STATE OF INDIANA; but across this nation as a whole, and that fact alone proves that NO BAR Association member should hold any political office. The State(s), nor any of their agencies, or agents have the authority to rule over you (tax, take you to court, detain you). In closing what document are the following lines from?

"For Quartering large bodies of armed troops among us:
For protecting them, by a mock Trial, from punishment for any Murders which they should commit on the Inhabitants of these States:"

If you answered the Declaration of Independence, you would be correct, and I would ask why someone as informed as yourself has not yet filed your Declaration of Independence from the United States of America in your Federal Courts yet and released yourself from being the subject class of a corrupt governing body?

The Declaration of Independence is the 1st highest legal document in the United States of America, above that of the U.S. Constitution, and if the governing body is unwilling to or cannot defend the governs constitutional rights, they you the governed have the legal right, and the necessity to ascend to the Declaration of Independence.

Disclaimer
I in no way shape or form claim to be a lawyer, nor represent myself as such. To do so would find me guilty of misrepresenting myself as a lawyer, and prove that I am in violation of federal statutes. Rather what I am doing is DEMANDING my right to freedom of speech secured under the 1st Amendment of the constitution, to inform the citizens of acts of treason that are being committed and ignored by the governing body against the UNITED STATES (us the citizens), by the BAR Association.

Here is just a little advice on how I would suggest handling 2 situations:
7th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution (See your State Civil claim's courts [Small claims court and family courts]):
"In Suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved".

DEMAND (never ask) per the 7th Amendment a grand jury trial [the 7th never specifies which type of jury trial you are guaranteed through the U.S. Constitution]. When the Judge denies it state openly in court, "I Move to add a 3rd party to the defendant Judge "[their name]" for committing fraud upon the courts, perjury of their Oath of Office, and treason against the UNITED STATES by warring against the U.S. Constitution proven through their actions in this court of law witnessed by the court reporter, and DEMAND that this civil action be transferred to federal jurisdiction. If the Bailiff is in the courts at the time, DEMAND that they take the Judge into custody as you are placing them under civil arrest, and that they are being reminded that their failure to do so is violating their Oath of office, wherein they could find themselves as well guilty perjury and misprison of treason.

5th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution (See your State criminal court proceedings in regard to Felony charges):

"No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand jury"; a crime is judged infamous because it constitutes treason or a felony. 
DEMAND (never ask) per the 5th Amendment a grand jury trial, the 5th specifically says "No person", no is an operative of absolution, it affords no room for Judicial discretion, it can not be tread on at all. By simply Declaring that you are DEMANDING under any article or amendment and the basis of such, if the Judge denies your demand, take it in front of a jury and make an allegation against that Judge for committing perjury when they took their Oath of office, and treason against the UNITED STATES by in court warring against the U.S. Constitution (there is also a State Constitution, and State treason statute). If you are in a criminal matter, you are in a better position because the jury is already there. Declare to the jury foreman that you move to add as a 3rd party defendant the Judge and cite the charge of Perjury, Treason, etc. and make your verbal allegation to them. Then DEMAND that the judge step down from where they are seated and join the defense, because they cannot hear their own case.

A Judge has sworn an Oath of Office to uphold and defend the U.S. Constitution [formed a binding contract under the respective jurisdiction], when that same judge wars against the U.S. Constitution they are voiding their oath of office and acting outside of their jurisdiction. This will also involve the prosecution of every (prosecuting and /or defense) attorney that was in court at the time be be prosecuted for misprison of treason [See 18 U.S.C., Sections 4 and 2382].

Judges (BAR Association members) and other Oath takers have sworn an Oath of Office in the following fashion, “I solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support the Constitution of the United States, and.....". If a Judge violated or wars against any U.S. Constitutional article and/or amendment, they are committing treason against the United States, and perjury.

You can obtain any oath takers (i.e. Politician/Judge/ Law Enforcement Officer) Oath of Office from their respective treasury (i.e. County/State/Federal treasurer), remember to also obtain their bond number, because while these officials maintain forms of immunity based on the English common law of "the King can do no wrong" [See Article 1 Clause 9 Section 8 of the U.S. Constitution], which protects them from personal liability, it doesn't protect their bond from liability.

Christopher Ryan Marks

Native American Citizen
TheWordByChris@gmail.com

Indigenous Declaration of Independence Filing:
https://www.facebook.com/groups/246328108893095/394222017437036/

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0ByAQQqSR7lDDVHV5Wm9pMmtxczQ/view?usp=sharing

U.S Citizen Declaration of Independence Filing:
https://www.facebook.com/groups/246328108893095/394204087438829/

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0ByAQQqSR7lDDeUpJUUlvdGEyU2c/view?usp=sharing