Demand that the Appellate Courts issue their PCA's at least with a short explanation

  • by: Anna K
  • recipient: Courts, attorneys and litigants in Florida

The trial court judge validated a promissory note without paid documentary stamps, ignored the fact that the plaintiff perpetrated fraud on the court, continuously lied, and the proposed final judgment is almost verbatim to plaintiff's closing argument. Moreover, the final judgment written by plaintiff's attorney has additional findings what the court never considered in the process.

The Fifth District Court without even look into the case, denied appellants/defendant's well-written arguments, the cited laws and case laws, what irrefutably supported appellants/defendants. However, the Fifth DCA issued a PCA without any explanation, confirming the trial court's findings, then issued an order to show cause, but before appellants/defendants were able to respond, before the deadline of the motion the Court issued a Mandate, a violation of appellants' due process right.

Then the Court barred appellants/defendants to filing anything in the future on the court, and their explanation was "Enough is enough". Completely ignored the fact that appellants/defendants were fighting for justice!

With their action, confirming the trial court's findings, they're also utterly ignored and abolished Florida Statutes §201.08 and §837.02(1) (a), and the Florida Administrative Rule, Rule 12B–4.050 – 12B–4.051.

Therefore, appellants/defendants suffering and suffered enormous damages, including but not limited to that they're losing their property, since the plaintiff is foreclosing on it with the unenforceable (by law) promissory note what merged into the judgment.

With their decision they're affirmed that no one has to pay anymore documentary stamp taxes in Florida, just refer back to this case.

The Fifth DCA with their affirmation also created inter-district and intra-district conflicts, since they are in conflict with their own, the Supreme Court of Florida and with the other district courts. But, seems like no one is care!

The Fifth DCA also violated appellants/defendant's constitutional and civil rights of due process by the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments, Section 1, section 2 of the United States Constitution and the Constitution of the State of Florida Section 2 and section 9, the Civil Rights, section 3, and also 42 U.S. Code §1981 and §1983, the 18 U.S. code §242, and discriminated them!

The Fifth District's decision will have greater impact within the community, and the ability of other potential litigants to seek their own remedies, and fairly regard as an authoritative precedent of the stabilized laws, and harmonized case laws.

We want that the Appellate Courts do not issue PCA's without any explanation or issue it but at least a very short explanation of their action. The appellants' has a right to know why an appeal court's agreeing with the lower tribunal findings.

Case No.: 5D17-615

Sign Petition
Sign Petition
You have JavaScript disabled. Without it, our site might not function properly.

Privacy Policy

By signing, you accept Care2's Terms of Service.
You can unsub at any time here.

Having problems signing this? Let us know.