HERE IS THE UPDATE AND THE ACTION I RECEIVED TODAY:
Mexican gray wolf recovery has been hampered by rules that severely limit the project's ability to recover the species. Illegal hunting, and at times, excessive removals have also contributed to the slow recovery. The proposed revision to the existing nonessential experimental population designation of the Mexican wolf under the Endangered Species Act is a step in the right direction, but much more needs to be done to ultimately save the species. The proposed revision would allow Mexican wolves to be classified as an endangered subspecies that may be released and dispersed into wider areas in Arizona and New Mexico. While the proposed rule changes are a significant positive step for the ultimate survival of this unique species, we must temper our optimism with the knowledge that gray wolves may be delisted elsewhere prior to a full recovery.
As a result of these developments, we are asking supporters to participate in three easy actions to join us in opposition to these proposals. Stay tuned for another message from us about another opportunity to have input into this decision, when the official public comment period on this proposal opens.
1 - We ask that you email Secretary Jewell and your representatives using the links
2- Please participate in the California Wolf Center's "Thunderclap" by signing
on to join hundreds of thousands of others who oppose this plan. This action expires
on June 21st, so please act quickly.
Talking points may include the following:
Please feel free to personalize these points with your own concerns, too.
Sixteen scientists expressed "serious concerns" with a recent draft rule to remove Endangered Species Act protections for gray wolves across the Lower 48 States. They do not believe that the rule reflects the conclusions of their work or the best available science concerning the recovery of wolves. They also do not believe the rule reflects the fundamental purpose of the Endangered Species Act to conserve endangered species and the ecosystems upon which they depend. By law, Endangered Species Act decisions are supposed to be governed by the best available science.
There is a growing body of scientific literature demonstrating that top predators play critical roles in maintaining a diversity of other wildlife species and healthy, balanced ecosystems.
The gray wolf has barely begun to recover or is absent from significant portions of its former range where substantial suitable habitat remains. The Service's draft rule fails to consider extensive suitable habitat in the Pacific Northwest, California, the southern Rocky Mountains and the Northeast. It also fails to consider the importance of these areas to the long-term survival and recovery of wolves, or the importance of wolves to the ecosystems of these regions.
By signing, you accept Care2's Terms of Service.
You can unsub at any time here.
Having problems signing this? Let us know.