Care2 member? Log in
Care2 petitionsite
 
  1. sign petition
  2. confirm
  3. thank you!

Oppose New Nuclear Weapons Today

Target: U.S. Senate
Sponsored by: Union Of Concerned Scientists
The Bush administration has asked for $8.5 million in the 2006 budget for research on a "Robust Nuclear Earth Penetrator" (RNEP). This new nuclear weapon, also known as the nuclear "bunker buster," is being promoted as a useful tool in attacking deeply buried command centers or underground stores of chemical and biological weapons. But numerous scientific critiques, including one by the National Academy of Science, find that in many cases such a weapon would be ineffective. In addition, the nuclear blast and radioactive fall-out could kill millions of innocent people in surrounding areas. A single "bunker buster" would be nearly 100 times more powerful than the nuclear bomb that destroyed Hiroshima.

In the coming weeks, the Senate will consider funding for this new nuclear weapon. Please tell your Senators to reject all funding for the dangerous nuclear "bunker buster."
deadline: 7-11-2005
goal: 10,000
 

Sign Petition!  see who signed this
log in

This petition has been closed.

see more petitions

Dear Senator,

I am greatly opposed to the Administration's proposal to seek funding for research on a Robust Nuclear Earth Penetrator (RNEP). This nuclear weapon is not needed, sets the United States on a new course of developing nuclear war fighting weapons, and sends a counterproductive message to the international community at a time when we are trying to discourage other nations from developing nuclear weapons. I hope that you will support Senator Feinstein's amendment to eliminate funding for the RNEP program.

As you know, RNEP is intended to destroy deeply buried bunkers and/or underground stores of chemical or biological weapons. However, a recent National Academy of Sciences study (http://books.nap.edu/catalog/11282.html?onpi_newsdoc04272005) concludes that the weapon would have limited utility against such targets, and that its use could kill millions of people downwind from the explosion. Moreover, the United States already has precision conventional weapons that could collapse all entrances and exits to underground bunkers.

To illustrate the technical realities of the RNEP weapon, the Union of Concerned Scientists has produced a two-minute flash video that shows both the weapon's technical shortcomings and the consequences of its use. I strongly recommend that you and your staff consider and use this important resource--it can be found at: http://www.ucsusa.org/global_security/nuclear_weapons/page.cfm?pageID=1781

Finally, I believe that Congress needs to match their words with their actions when addressing the cause of nuclear proliferation. If we are calling on other nations to refrain from building nuclear weapons, we should refrain as well.

I look forward to hearing your position on this important issue and hope that you will support Senator Feinstein’s amendment to deny all funding for the RNEP program.

Thank you.

Sincerely,
We signed the “Oppose New Nuclear Weapons Today” petition!
# 100:
2:55 am PDT, Jun 25, Timothy Ditchley, Indiana
# 99:
2:43 am PDT, Jun 25, Wendy Brown, Canada
You must be totally insane to even consider such a thing when most of the people of the world have already said " no more War " so what on God's green earth do you think you need these for...are you planning to take over the world one country at a time...like Iraq ??? Please put your ear to the ground and know that people don't want anything like this ever again...never again.
# 98:
2:39 am PDT, Jun 25, Fran Cannon, California
# 97:
2:37 am PDT, Jun 25, Name not displayed, France
# 96:
2:30 am PDT, Jun 25, William Assmus, Illinois
Howabout Nuclear disarmament worked for the russians and U.S. in the late 70 ,80's
# 95:
2:23 am PDT, Jun 25, Petra Spehar, Slovenia
# 94:
2:16 am PDT, Jun 25, Name not displayed, Mexico
Nuclear weapons destroy our earth
# 93:
2:03 am PDT, Jun 25, Lesley Ann Mills, United Kingdom
# 92:
2:01 am PDT, Jun 25, Angelika Tanha, Germany
There is no need for that - leading countries have destroyed theirs already!!! Stop that now!
# 91:
12:38 am PDT, Jun 25, Liz DeWitt, Oklahoma
George Bush we do not need your nuclear weapons armament.
# 90:
12:34 am PDT, Jun 25, Steve Dale, Australia
We dont need them,peace is a better option,and what happened to disarmament.
# 89:
12:33 am PDT, Jun 25, Martin Gulledge, Texas
Don't we have enough already?
# 88:
12:23 am PDT, Jun 25, Pat Donald, United Kingdom
# 87:
12:12 am PDT, Jun 25, Mehr Iranmehr, Iran, Islamic Republic Of
one of the most dangerous Governments about using nuclear weapons have been UNINETSTATES OF AMERICA and it has to stop it immediately instead of making another lands to stop to use it in peaceful ways.
# 86:
12:08 am PDT, Jun 25, Eleanor Boyd, United Kingdom
# 85:
12:05 am PDT, Jun 25, Eleanor Hayton, United Kingdom
There are so many decent, life-affirming things you could do with this money and i appeal to you to consider them instead.
# 84:
11:54 pm PDT, Jun 24, Sandra Cardona, France
# 83:
11:54 pm PDT, Jun 24, Dianne Robbins, Kentucky
# 82:
11:51 pm PDT, Jun 24, Kathleen Cole, Ohio
# 81:
11:44 pm PDT, Jun 24, Pam Boland, Georgia
# 80:
11:43 pm PDT, Jun 24, Marietherese Van Hooijdonk, Netherlands
# 79:
11:35 pm PDT, Jun 24, Sunny Glasser, Armed Forces Pacific
now is the time for disarmement!! WHAT GIVES YOU THE RIGHT TO SPEAK FOR THE PEOPLE AND REQUEST MORE WEAPONS OF SUCH DESTRUCTION. NO NO NO
# 78:
11:24 pm PDT, Jun 24, Carrie Tucker, California
# 77:
11:08 pm PDT, Jun 24, Kathryn Slaughter, New York
# 76:
11:03 pm PDT, Jun 24, Vickie Brown, North Carolina
This is an absurd request. We have more than enough nuclear weapons. This proposed $8.5 million should be put toward helping the American people. The poor, sick, hungry, disabled Americans who's lives are existing day to day with few to no luxeries and what most consider as neccessities they consider luxeries. Help our own. Americans first & foremost. Enough on totally unnecessary wasteful funding. Just how much does it take to destroy the entire world? There are more than enough desturctive weapons on hand now. WAKE UP!
# 75:
10:59 pm PDT, Jun 24, Jodi Slauter, Florida
# 74:
10:55 pm PDT, Jun 24, Name not displayed, Alabama
NO MORE NUKES!!!
# 73:
10:52 pm PDT, Jun 24, Susie Wallace, Michigan
# 72:
10:12 pm PDT, Jun 24, Patricia Sullivan, Connecticut
# 71:
9:45 pm PDT, Jun 24, Jose Soria Tamayo, Spain
# 70:
9:37 pm PDT, Jun 24, Name not displayed, Tennessee
I think we have enough.
# 69:
9:30 pm PDT, Jun 24, Nur Farraliza, Malaysia
Is that gives you the right to bomb other countries and then ask for fund to make more destruction? Nuclear weapons are not necessary. Using Nuclear to generate power is useful, but no and never to nuclear weapons. Using nuclear weapons to bomb other countries is a coward act.
# 68:
9:29 pm PDT, Jun 24, Rebekah Garcia, New Mexico
I would like to see America moving more and more towards disarmament, not developing and testing harmful nuclear weapons. Also, has anyone thought how hypocritical it is for America to ivade and start a preemptive war on the bases of Weapons of Mass Distruction, yet we are still developing and testing our own.
# 67:
9:27 pm PDT, Jun 24, Carmen Rico, Canada
# 66:
9:18 pm PDT, Jun 24, Jonathan Stephenson, New Hampshire
# 65:
9:10 pm PDT, Jun 24, Wendy Steiner, California
# 64:
9:06 pm PDT, Jun 24, Jon Greening, Australia
# 63:
9:03 pm PDT, Jun 24, Zigmund Connell, Massachusetts
# 62:
8:59 pm PDT, Jun 24, Name not displayed, Texas
# 61:
8:55 pm PDT, Jun 24, Nicole Rae, Georgia
# 60:
8:34 pm PDT, Jun 24, Dee Emry, Iowa
# 59:
8:32 pm PDT, Jun 24, Mike Pearson, Mississippi
NOT NEEDED
# 58:
8:17 pm PDT, Jun 24, Emily Trube, Texas
Don't we have ENOUGH weapons and such? I mean, it's bad enough we have people killing each other HERE! Why do we need to go blow up other coutries? We don't need to cause an end to the world. We haven't even caused an end to killing each other here! IN OUR OWN COUNTRY!! I mean, WHAT'S UP WITH THAT?!
# 57:
8:16 pm PDT, Jun 24, Eva Lightfoot, Alabama
# 56:
8:02 pm PDT, Jun 24, Lauren Verruni, Pennsylvania
# 55:
8:02 pm PDT, Jun 24, Melanie Loper, Michigan
# 54:
8:01 pm PDT, Jun 24, John Weatherman, Sweden
# 53:
7:59 pm PDT, Jun 24, Carla Harrington, Washington
Is there no end to your disgusting thirst for blood?
# 52:
7:58 pm PDT, Jun 24, Lacy Sweigart, Washington
# 51:
7:57 pm PDT, Jun 24, Carmen Stauss, Indiana