The Bush administration has asked for $8.5 million in the 2006 budget for research on a "Robust Nuclear Earth Penetrator" (RNEP). This new nuclear weapon, also known as the nuclear "bunker buster," is being promoted as a useful tool in attacking deeply buried command centers or underground stores of chemical and biological weapons. But numerous scientific critiques, including one by the National Academy of Science, find that in many cases such a weapon would be ineffective. In addition, the nuclear blast and radioactive fall-out could kill millions of innocent people in surrounding areas. A single "bunker buster" would be nearly 100 times more powerful than the nuclear bomb that destroyed Hiroshima.
In the coming weeks, the Senate will consider funding for this new nuclear weapon. Please tell your Senators to reject all funding for the dangerous nuclear "bunker buster."
We signed the “Oppose New Nuclear Weapons Today” petition!
# 10,350:
7:04 pm PDT, Jun 30,Julie Bond, Wisconsin
what part of dead, do you not understand?
# 10,349:
7:01 pm PDT, Jun 30,David and Betty Knutzen, Wisconsin
# 10,348:
6:59 pm PDT, Jun 30,Barbara H. Labrecque, New York
Let's stop focusing on "killing" and let's start "saving" lives!!!
# 10,347:
6:59 pm PDT, Jun 30,Gary Lewis, United Kingdom
Look in your sons, your daughters eyes, then tell me this is a good idea.
# 10,346:
6:56 pm PDT, Jun 30,Neil Strother, North Carolina
# 10,345:
6:54 pm PDT, Jun 30,Rainer Rothen, Maryland
Conventional Laser guided bombs do the job, already. The shelfs are already filled with nukes. We do not need more such 'immoral' weapons. Let's go back to peaceful means of conflict- solving.
# 10,344:
6:52 pm PDT, Jun 30,Ryan Wingerd, California
# 10,343:
6:52 pm PDT, Jun 30,Heryl Kroopnick, Arizona
# 10,342:
6:52 pm PDT, Jun 30,Peter Bromer, Florida
# 10,341:
6:51 pm PDT, Jun 30,Peter Marrls, Connecticut
# 10,340:
6:47 pm PDT, Jun 30,Ms. Maryellen Boudman, New Hampshire
# 10,339:
6:46 pm PDT, Jun 30,Carol Marsh, New York
# 10,338:
6:41 pm PDT, Jun 30,Cindy Clark, Florida
# 10,337:
6:40 pm PDT, Jun 30,Deborah Hicks, California
# 10,336:
6:39 pm PDT, Jun 30,Evan and Elaine Hazard, Minnesota
# 10,335:
6:39 pm PDT, Jun 30,Doris Lefley, Illinois
Our country needs to go back to the principles of democracy and peaceful resolution of conflicts. We do not and should not be building any nuclear weapons if we truly believe what we say to the rest of the world like n korea iran among others including now india Pakista andIsrael.
# 10,334:
6:38 pm PDT, Jun 30,Leslie Glendye, Massachusetts
# 10,333:
6:37 pm PDT, Jun 30,Michal Jakimowski, Florida
Dear God! What is on the minds of our elected officials!? Have they learned nothing from history? Is a quarter-million civilian deaths in Hiroshima and Nagasaki not enough. Is the blight of environmental pollution and spreading cancers not incentive enough to shelve such a belligerant idea. Does America need a serious ass-kicking from an emerging power such as China, or a coaltion of nations tired of America's militarism to get us to stop with such irresponsible forays into new methods of self-annihilation?
# 10,332:
6:34 pm PDT, Jun 30,Joseph Ferraro, Mexico
# 10,331:
6:33 pm PDT, Jun 30,Rosemary Frain, Pennsylvania
There are many other better places to spend our money.
# 10,330:
6:33 pm PDT, Jun 30,Brian Vaughan, Connecticut
Nuclear weapons have not been used in any wars since World War 2. Building such weapons is a waste of time and money.
# 10,329:
6:31 pm PDT, Jun 30,Name not displayed, Texas
We should stop developing new nuclear weapons before we can demand anyone else not to do so. It is as simple as this.
# 10,328:
6:29 pm PDT, Jun 30,Sara Townsend, Texas
# 10,327:
6:29 pm PDT, Jun 30,Name not displayed, Kentucky
The world's nuclear weapons are a menace to life on this planet. Funding should go to eliminate, not propogate, these weapons.
# 10,326:
6:27 pm PDT, Jun 30,Nancy Berman, California
# 10,325:
6:25 pm PDT, Jun 30,John Brennan, Texas
# 10,324:
6:24 pm PDT, Jun 30,Helga Freund, Arizona
# 10,323:
6:24 pm PDT, Jun 30,Pam Wiseman, Arizona
And beside all of that, I am a sensitive to earthquakes, volcanoes, storms and yes feel bomb blasts too. It does terrible things to the human body, just with the infrasound and electromagnetic energies felt by us sensitives. Not to mention the radiation fall out. We do the world no good by continuing with death and mayhem. A man such as the president of the USA should not be involved in developing more death. Peace must prevail.
# 10,322:
6:20 pm PDT, Jun 30,Noah Doane Sandler, Pennsylvania
# 10,321:
6:16 pm PDT, Jun 30,Kathleen L. Bryant, Colorado
Not with MY tax dollars you won't!!!!!
# 10,320:
6:14 pm PDT, Jun 30,Deborah Hepler, Pennsylvania
# 10,319:
6:14 pm PDT, Jun 30,Christopher Anderson, Ohio
This must be some kind of a bad joke. Is anyone serious in claiming that more nukes will make the world "safer"? If anything, our "wars" need to be de-escalated, not hyper-escalated. By the way, who is expected to survive these future wars to negoitate a peace; or is that important?
# 10,318:
6:12 pm PDT, Jun 30,Name not displayed, Florida
It is time to stop making war...
# 10,317:
6:10 pm PDT, Jun 30,Thor Mathiason, Washington
Nuclear weapons destroy a lot of area, not just where they're targeted. They also release a lot of radiation. From what I've read, that's a bad way to die. A really bad way. Nuclear weapons are the kinds of weapons we should never have made. Besides, in an era where other countries are discussing nuclear nonproliferation, this would come as a direct slap in the face to all of the other countries on this planet. We cannot, in good conscience, support nuclear warfare.
# 10,316:
6:10 pm PDT, Jun 30,Angela Smith, Illinois
We have got to stop this senseless power-hungry attitude that is causing us more grief than good. It is actions like this that cause other countries to hate us as much as they do, which in turn, causes terrorist actions against us. We are the source of our own terrorism, due in part to our desire to be the most powerful country in the world. What good will it do us to be the best if we have to live in constant fear for our lives from those who we have stepped on in order to become it? The world does not need any more nuclear weapons of any kind.
# 10,315:
6:09 pm PDT, Jun 30,Philip Blaustein, Florida
# 10,314:
6:05 pm PDT, Jun 30,Gail Nason, Massachusetts
For God's sake, let the insanity end.
We bomb one country for WMD and now we want more. Our country is becoming the most feared and hated in the world.
"Absolute power corrupts absolutely".
# 10,313:
6:02 pm PDT, Jun 30,Steve Edwards, Missouri
How can we demand that others cease nuclear production and development if we expand our programs and weapons? We should set an example for the world by not expanding our nuclear weapon capabilities.
# 10,312:
6:01 pm PDT, Jun 30,Diana Frost, Oklahoma
We cannot win friends and influence enemies by being the biggest bully on the block. By building our nuclear aresenal, we give the green light for other nations to do the same.
# 10,311:
5:59 pm PDT, Jun 30,Linda R. McGill, Michigan
# 10,310:
5:59 pm PDT, Jun 30,Pat Genova, Connecticut
# 10,309:
5:58 pm PDT, Jun 30,Patricia Cook, Illinois
Please protect our nation and our country by banning nuclear weapons.The damage and destrtuctive power cannot be justifiied.The plants themsleves are a great danger
# 10,308:
5:56 pm PDT, Jun 30,Eleanor Cohen, California
They are a huge step toward creating the utter destruction o the world
# 10,307:
5:53 pm PDT, Jun 30,Paulette Zimmerman, Connecticut
To paraphrase Eisenhower, every dollar spent on weapons of destruction takes food from the hungry, shelter from the homeless, education from children. We must stop investing in war and start investing in peace.
# 10,306:
5:52 pm PDT, Jun 30,Name not displayed, North Carolina
Stop trying to destory the world and mankind!
# 10,305:
5:52 pm PDT, Jun 30,Patricia Stelter, Ohio
War on Terror? Any nuclear weapon is dangerous. We invade other countries because they may have the ingredients to build a nuclear weapon? How can the United States even begin to think about expanding their nuclear power? We need to be seeking peace not building up fear, intimidation, and retaliation against our country.
# 10,304:
5:52 pm PDT, Jun 30,Geri Williams, Pennsylvania
# 10,303:
5:52 pm PDT, Jun 30,Damien Moody, Maryland
Fine. Build 'em. Just don't act surprised when other countries we "don't want" building similar weapons see what we're doing and merrily ramps up their own production, itching to push the button. Everybody dies - whoever does not get bombed dies the most horribly from the fallout. Your kids will lose their hair and teeth. Their skin will start sliding off. Hopefully, you'll go before they do so you won't have to watch.
# 10,302:
5:52 pm PDT, Jun 30,Richard D Long, New Jersey
It is clear in my mind that the Bush administration wishes to attack Iran, ostensibly because they are developing nuclear weapons, but of course it will be for continued imperialistic designs and oil. We dont have the troops to do this. So this is where the so called bunker buster comes in. First dont believe any CRAP that this can be done safely by which I mean the buster will penetrate layers of concrete and/or rock and only hit the putative weapons. All research show that no metal is strong enough to penetrate such depth and hardness and the metal on the missile will fall apart and explode mainly on the surface killing hundreds of thousands, maybe millions of innocent Iranians. And you know full well that the Bush administration and military dont give a damn about any Iranian. So at the shock of seeing so many Iranians killed, the Iranian goverment surrenders to us just like Japan did. Now we have the oil, Russia and China dont, and control of the Middle East. Oh, you think that is farfetched? Think again. And dont believe any CRAP that the technology is better now and it can be done safely. Sorry for the sarcasm, but things are getting out of control in Washington.
# 10,301:
5:51 pm PDT, Jun 30,Luis Antonio Salinas, Florida
because it is very dangerous for the hole word