Care2 member? Log in
Care2 petitionsite
 
  1. sign petition
  2. confirm
  3. thank you!

Oppose New Nuclear Weapons Today

Target: U.S. Senate
Sponsored by: Union Of Concerned Scientists
The Bush administration has asked for $8.5 million in the 2006 budget for research on a "Robust Nuclear Earth Penetrator" (RNEP). This new nuclear weapon, also known as the nuclear "bunker buster," is being promoted as a useful tool in attacking deeply buried command centers or underground stores of chemical and biological weapons. But numerous scientific critiques, including one by the National Academy of Science, find that in many cases such a weapon would be ineffective. In addition, the nuclear blast and radioactive fall-out could kill millions of innocent people in surrounding areas. A single "bunker buster" would be nearly 100 times more powerful than the nuclear bomb that destroyed Hiroshima.

In the coming weeks, the Senate will consider funding for this new nuclear weapon. Please tell your Senators to reject all funding for the dangerous nuclear "bunker buster."
deadline: 7-11-2005
goal: 10,000
 

Sign Petition!  see who signed this
log in

This petition has been closed.

see more petitions

Dear Senator,

I am greatly opposed to the Administration's proposal to seek funding for research on a Robust Nuclear Earth Penetrator (RNEP). This nuclear weapon is not needed, sets the United States on a new course of developing nuclear war fighting weapons, and sends a counterproductive message to the international community at a time when we are trying to discourage other nations from developing nuclear weapons. I hope that you will support Senator Feinstein's amendment to eliminate funding for the RNEP program.

As you know, RNEP is intended to destroy deeply buried bunkers and/or underground stores of chemical or biological weapons. However, a recent National Academy of Sciences study (http://books.nap.edu/catalog/11282.html?onpi_newsdoc04272005) concludes that the weapon would have limited utility against such targets, and that its use could kill millions of people downwind from the explosion. Moreover, the United States already has precision conventional weapons that could collapse all entrances and exits to underground bunkers.

To illustrate the technical realities of the RNEP weapon, the Union of Concerned Scientists has produced a two-minute flash video that shows both the weapon's technical shortcomings and the consequences of its use. I strongly recommend that you and your staff consider and use this important resource--it can be found at: http://www.ucsusa.org/global_security/nuclear_weapons/page.cfm?pageID=1781

Finally, I believe that Congress needs to match their words with their actions when addressing the cause of nuclear proliferation. If we are calling on other nations to refrain from building nuclear weapons, we should refrain as well.

I look forward to hearing your position on this important issue and hope that you will support Senator Feinstein’s amendment to deny all funding for the RNEP program.

Thank you.

Sincerely,
We signed the “Oppose New Nuclear Weapons Today” petition!
# 150:
6:43 am PDT, Jun 25, Kym Ralston, Indiana
# 149:
6:42 am PDT, Jun 25, Pete Odonnell, United Kingdom
We have enough weapons to blow the world several times over.....We have found that we have not needed them agains what is considered our threats. where will the go when their uselessness runs out ???
# 148:
6:38 am PDT, Jun 25, Lanie Costeas, Illinois
# 147:
6:29 am PDT, Jun 25, Anita Brehm, Missouri
# 146:
6:23 am PDT, Jun 25, Nick JoshKKarean, Malaysia
I agree with the author's cause and other supportive comments posted
# 145:
6:22 am PDT, Jun 25, Le Baron De Mueller Ba Gua, HOMB, Illinois
# 144:
6:21 am PDT, Jun 25, Giuliana Gorlei-Pittsey, Italy
Because funding them might destroy mankind!
# 143:
6:21 am PDT, Jun 25, David Daniels, Minnesota
# 142:
6:16 am PDT, Jun 25, Dawn Carroll, New York
# 141:
5:59 am PDT, Jun 25, Jill Tetreault, Rhode Island
# 140:
5:57 am PDT, Jun 25, Richard Hatton, United Kingdom
# 139:
5:51 am PDT, Jun 25, Michelle Chesko, Illinois
# 138:
5:47 am PDT, Jun 25, Stanley Pendze, Pennsylvania
# 137:
5:47 am PDT, Jun 25, Carrie lynn Clouse, Kentucky
Nuclear war has never been and never will be the answer. Why would anyone want to support the creation of anything so destructive? This would be a very hypocritical move for the Bush Administration.
# 136:
5:45 am PDT, Jun 25, DeNae Dandridge, Wisconsin
# 135:
5:39 am PDT, Jun 25, Justine Rolfe, United Kingdom
# 134:
5:36 am PDT, Jun 25, Annmarie Smith, Massachusetts
# 133:
5:31 am PDT, Jun 25, Name not displayed, Slovakia
# 132:
5:24 am PDT, Jun 25, Greg McCain, Illinois
# 131:
5:14 am PDT, Jun 25, Kimberly Wright, Indiana
# 130:
5:14 am PDT, Jun 25, David Myers, Pennsylvania
# 129:
5:13 am PDT, Jun 25, Mariahz Ferrazi, Brazil
I think as thinks Marlies Van Dijen, a war on poverty and ignorance makes nuclear weapons obsolete
# 128:
5:08 am PDT, Jun 25, Erin Walden, Washington
# 127:
5:05 am PDT, Jun 25, Maria Scripture, Illinois
# 126:
5:01 am PDT, Jun 25, Danilo Chiaradia, Italy
# 125:
5:00 am PDT, Jun 25, Ravyne Hawke, Oklahoma
# 124:
4:58 am PDT, Jun 25, Name not displayed, United Kingdom
# 123:
4:44 am PDT, Jun 25, Name not displayed, North Carolina
# 122:
4:40 am PDT, Jun 25, Jon Martell, Rhode Island
# 121:
4:29 am PDT, Jun 25, John Cornwell, Missouri
# 120:
4:22 am PDT, Jun 25, Dee Cushman, Connecticut
# 119:
4:17 am PDT, Jun 25, Rain Devitt, Ireland
# 118:
4:11 am PDT, Jun 25, Henk ahrue van Grootveld, Netherlands
# 117:
4:06 am PDT, Jun 25, Joel Cox, Georgia
# 116:
4:00 am PDT, Jun 25, Mary Riley, California
No nuclear proliferation. Keep that in mind, and spend the money on people and services, right here in our own country.
# 115:
3:58 am PDT, Jun 25, Torri Hansen, Michigan
# 114:
3:50 am PDT, Jun 25, Vicki Vaughan, South Carolina
# 113:
3:45 am PDT, Jun 25, Marlies Van Dijen, Ohio
A war on poverty and ignorance makes nuclear weapons obsolete.
# 112:
3:37 am PDT, Jun 25, Markku Sukanen, Finland
# 111:
3:37 am PDT, Jun 25, Kristin Summerlin, Alaska
# 110:
3:35 am PDT, Jun 25, Cindy Goustin, Michigan
# 109:
3:31 am PDT, Jun 25, Sunetra Neogy, India
# 108:
3:27 am PDT, Jun 25, ME Turner, Texas
# 107:
3:16 am PDT, Jun 25, K S Graffmo, Sweden
# 106:
3:13 am PDT, Jun 25, Misha Fredericks, New York
We already have enough nukes to blow ourselves to smitherenes. More is only a waste of resources, time and money. If you are that suicidal, just go jump off a bridge or blow your heads off and save us the trouble of having to die with you because you are addicted to more-nothing is ever enough. Time to face the music chaps--I know you long for the good ole times of WWII and the Cold War--but those days are over. Time to face reality. Get a grip and get with the bloody times, dudes!
# 105:
3:11 am PDT, Jun 25, Name not displayed, Finland
# 104:
3:10 am PDT, Jun 25, Kim Bainbridge, United Kingdom
It's stupid, and just causes outrage and panic
# 103:
3:01 am PDT, Jun 25, Jacqueline McVicar, Florida
Am sick and tired of the "he with the most toys wins" mentality. Give me one good reason why we need to have an 'instrument of destruction' that is this powerful.
# 102:
3:01 am PDT, Jun 25, Peace Key, Greece
I wonder... Do these people think?
# 101:
2:59 am PDT, Jun 25, Melissa Britton, Washington