Care2 member? Log in

Reject President Bush's Anti-Choice Nominee, Robert Conrad

Target: U.S. Senate
Sponsored by: NARAL Pro-Choice America
Do you remember Richard Honaker? He was President Bush's pick for a lifetime appointment to a federal district court who tried to outlaw abortion three times in Wyoming. Now, Bush is at it again! This time, he and his allies in the Senate are pushing for a new anti-choice nominee as judge on the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals: Robert Conrad. Robert Conrad has called Planned Parenthood a "radical, pro-abortion fringe group" that "promotes a radical abortion agenda." What's more, from 1983 to 1986, Conrad served on the board of directors for a so-called "crisis pregnancy center" that provided medically inaccurate information about pregnancy, contraception and abortion. Clearly, he isn't fair-minded – and he doesn't deserves a lifetime appointment as a federal judge! Urge your senators to reject the nomination of Robert Conrad today.
deadline: Ongoing...
goal: 8,000
 

Sign Petition!  see who signed this
log in
Prefix
optional
First name
Last name
Email
Country
Address
City
State
Province
Zip code Postal code
 
Add a note on why this anti-choice nominee should not be awarded a judgeship.
 
 
Care2's terms of service.
We respect your privacy. Your email address is used to confirm your signature and is NOT displayed publicly.
 
Having problems signing this petition? Please let us know.
Dear Senator [Name],

As your constituent, I urge you to reject Robert Conrad, President Bush's nominee to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.

Conrad has a clear anti-choice record. In 1988, Conrad wrote an op-ed piece for The Charlotte Observer in which he labeled Planned Parenthood a "radical, pro-abortion fringe group" that "promotes a radical abortion agenda."

From 1983 to 1986, Conrad served on the board of directors for the Charlottesville Pregnancy Center, an organization seemingly modeled as a so-called "crisis pregnancy center" (CPC). Many CPCs intentionally misinform and mislead women who are seeking pregnancy-related assistance by providing medically inaccurate information about pregnancy, contraception, or abortion. In fact, the Charlottesville Pregnancy Center's website includes anti-choice propaganda like, "Remember that abortion doesn't erase a mistake - it only adds new ones."

[Your comment here]

I urge you to carefully review Conrad's record and oppose this nomination should it reach the Senate floor for a vote.

Sincerely,
[Your name]
[Your address]
We signed the “Reject President Bush's Anti-Choice Nominee, Robert Conrad” petition!
# 4,500:
9:27 am PDT, May 28, Brian Ellison, Utah
# 4,499:
9:27 am PDT, May 28, Charles LeBlanc, California
# 4,498:
9:27 am PDT, May 28, John Hatton, Vermont
# 4,497:
9:27 am PDT, May 28, Name not displayed, Washington
# 4,496:
9:26 am PDT, May 28, John Knight, Pennsylvania
# 4,495:
9:26 am PDT, May 28, Name not displayed, New York
# 4,494:
9:26 am PDT, May 28, Name not displayed, California
A woman's right to choice must be protected.
# 4,493:
9:26 am PDT, May 28, Melissa Fuka, Texas
# 4,492:
9:25 am PDT, May 28, David Soule, Arizona
# 4,491:
9:25 am PDT, May 28, Erwin Klaas, Iowa
# 4,490:
9:25 am PDT, May 28, Tobin Carson, Maine
I don't like the idea of abortion, but I like even less the despirate measures women choose when legal and safe abortions are not available. Children are hard work, even when you want them. Nobody should have to raise a child who isn't prepared to take on the duty, and no child should have to be raised by a parent who didn't want them. please reject the nomination of this man.
# 4,489:
9:25 am PDT, May 28, Louis Spirito, California
# 4,488:
9:25 am PDT, May 28, Ruth Lym, California
# 4,487:
9:25 am PDT, May 28, Jennifer Martinez, Colorado
# 4,486:
9:25 am PDT, May 28, Nerissa Russell, New York
# 4,485:
9:24 am PDT, May 28, Name not displayed, New York
# 4,484:
9:24 am PDT, May 28, Name not displayed, Maine
# 4,483:
9:24 am PDT, May 28, Tracy L Carroll, Maryland
# 4,482:
9:24 am PDT, May 28, David Franks, Virginia
# 4,481:
9:24 am PDT, May 28, Name not displayed, California
# 4,480:
9:24 am PDT, May 28, Jeanne Bergman, New York
Please block the appointment of extreme right judicial activist and prevent the further deterioration of the balance of powers. The Bush assault on the Constitution and our rights must end.
# 4,479:
9:24 am PDT, May 28, Sarah Dawson, Utah
# 4,478:
9:23 am PDT, May 28, Lisa Pike, Nebraska
# 4,477:
9:23 am PDT, May 28, Richard Hiersch, California
# 4,476:
9:23 am PDT, May 28, Name not displayed, California
# 4,475:
9:23 am PDT, May 28, Danielle Haven, Tennessee
# 4,474:
9:23 am PDT, May 28, Sally Matheson, North Carolina
# 4,473:
9:22 am PDT, May 28, Wm Lusk, Michigan
He's an ass!
# 4,472:
9:22 am PDT, May 28, Geoffrey Mazer, California
# 4,471:
9:22 am PDT, May 28, Sammy Gonzalez, California
# 4,470:
9:22 am PDT, May 28, Julie Gengo, California
# 4,469:
9:22 am PDT, May 28, Kathy Bentley, Maryland
# 4,468:
9:22 am PDT, May 28, Sarah Ferguson, Delaware
Please do not make the effect of this administration worse then it already is!
# 4,467:
9:21 am PDT, May 28, Lisa J. Taylor, Oregon
# 4,466:
9:21 am PDT, May 28, Roger Avery, California
Please remember that Judges personal opinions on all subjects should be and be seen to be unbiased ahead of any case. This judge clearly demonstrated that at least some of his decisions are already made, namely on the subject of reproduction. This is not acceptable.
# 4,465:
9:21 am PDT, May 28, BRANDI DOUGLAS, California
IT'S NOT THEIR BODIES AND THEY CANNOT TELL A WOMAN WHAT TO DO WITH HER OWN BODY.
# 4,464:
9:21 am PDT, May 28, Leora Barish, New York
The bench is already overloaded with conservative judges. The more there are, the more distorted our legislative climate, and the more their rulings will alter the status quo in this country. NO MORE CONSERVATIVE JUDGES!
# 4,463:
9:20 am PDT, May 28, Clara Piecuch, Illinois
# 4,462:
9:20 am PDT, May 28, Barry Kirshner, Florida
# 4,461:
9:20 am PDT, May 28, Nancy Roberts, California
# 4,460:
9:20 am PDT, May 28, Darlene Glaze, Michigan
We need a person who will respect a choice a woman makes.
# 4,459:
9:20 am PDT, May 28, Norman Joseph, California
# 4,458:
9:20 am PDT, May 28, Erin Grelak, Massachusetts
# 4,457:
9:20 am PDT, May 28, Greg Davis, New Mexico
Our system of justice if fact our very democracy is being compromised by the religious right. It is time to move back toward the center. No more radical judges.
# 4,456:
9:19 am PDT, May 28, Joyce Hawes, Vermont
# 4,455:
9:19 am PDT, May 28, Steve Mattan, New Jersey
# 4,454:
9:19 am PDT, May 28, Maggy Castellaneta, North Carolina
A judge who has such a radical view on what should be a CHOICE can't possibly be a good candidate for a seat with so much power. He has a completely misguided view about Planned Parenthood and, like so many others, feels he has the right to decide what a woman can do with her own body. Mr. Conrad goes beyond being pro-life and into a far more militant view. I personally am Pro-Choice (as I believe that, yes, it is the CHOICE of the individual what they do with their body) and that doesn't mean that I want people to have abortions - it simply means that it's not my business what you decide to do. Until Mr. Conrad can either gain control of his emotions on the topic of abortion or go through the mental and emotional trauma of actually having an abortion, I do not believe he should have power and influence, ESPECIALLY of such a high position. For the millions of women in this country, please, PLEASE do not let this man and his hurtful thoughts and actions get to the Court of Appeals.
# 4,453:
9:18 am PDT, May 28, Name not displayed, Pennsylvania
The right of a woman to choose responsibly is not only good for her, but it is good for society and ultimately prevents an unwanted child who may have a miserable life because it was unwanted. Yes, some children are given up for adoption and placed with loving, caring homes, but many are not. Most women do not take abortions lightly, they are carefully considered, emotionally-packed decisions that are undertaken for a wide variety of reasons. That choice should remain a viable option for women, and not be nullified by politicians who are far removed from the case at hand.
# 4,452:
9:18 am PDT, May 28, Traci Ford, New Jersey
# 4,451:
9:18 am PDT, May 28, Name not displayed, New Jersey
Copyright © 2008 Care2.com, inc. and its licensors. All rights reserved