Care2 member? Log in

Say No to President Bush's Extreme Federal Judicial Nominee

Target: U.S. Senate
Sponsored by: NARAL Pro-Choice America

Richard Honaker, a former Wyoming state representative, is President Bush's pick for a lifetime appointment as a federal judge. Honaker is one of Bush's most anti-choice nominees to date. He has spent his career fighting to deny women access to safe, legal reproductive-health services. And now Bush has nominated him for a lifetime appointment as a federal judge.

At this pivotal time in history, it's so important that an open and fair-minded federal judge be appointed - not someone bent on interfering with women's personal choices. Send your message telling the Senate that Bush's anti-choice nominee, Richard Honaker, is too extreme for the federal bench!

deadline: Ongoing...
goal: 50,000

16,505
signatures!

Sign Petition! see who signed this

Prefix

*First Name

*Last Name

don’t display my name

*Email

*Address

*City

*State

*Province

*Zip/Postal

*Country

Let the Senator know why this anti-choice nominee should not not be considered:

	I agree to Care2's terms of service.
	We respect your privacy. Your email address is used to confirm your signature and is NOT displayed publicly.

Dear Senator [Name],

As a constituent, I am writing to voice my strong opposition to the nomination of Richard Honaker to the U.S. District Court for the District of Wyoming.

Honaker has spent his career fighting to deny women access to safe, legal reproductive-health services. He publicly and actively opposes abortion, saying it is "wrong, and no one should have the right to do what is wrong," and tried three times to ban abortion in Wyoming.

By nominating Richard Honaker to a lifetime judgeship, President Bush has shown yet again that he is totally out of step with the views of mainstream America. Honaker led the push for a ballot measure to ban abortion, which Wyoming voters resoundingly rejected. Now I urge you to do the same with this nomination.

We signed the “Say No to President Bush's Extreme Federal Judicial Nominee” petition!

# 16,350:

10:12 am PDT, Mar 18, Emma Lariz, California

# 16,349:

9:05 am PDT, Mar 18, Tabitha Wilson, Ohio

# 16,348:

7:39 pm PDT, Mar 17, Name not displayed, California

# 16,347:

4:29 pm PDT, Mar 17, Name not displayed, California

# 16,346:

3:44 pm PDT, Mar 17, Adrian Maldonado, Colorado

# 16,345:

3:37 am PDT, Mar 17, Brendan Tait, New Zealand

# 16,344:

10:25 pm PDT, Mar 16, Tom Zahrobsky, Iowa

# 16,343:

6:27 pm PDT, Mar 16, Tiffany Patch, New Jersey

# 16,342:

2:48 pm PDT, Mar 16, Name not displayed, Florida

# 16,341:

9:48 am PDT, Mar 16, Melissa Dawson Chapman, Michigan

# 16,340:

8:04 am PDT, Mar 16, Wendy Orewyler, Florida

# 16,339:

2:35 am PDT, Mar 16, Jodi Souders, California

# 16,338:

8:17 am PDT, Mar 15, Virginia Schwartman, Virginia

# 16,337:

6:26 am PDT, Mar 15, Dawn Montague, New York

# 16,336:

5:46 pm PDT, Mar 14, Allison Harrington, California

# 16,335:

5:25 pm PDT, Mar 14, David Peters, United Kingdom

# 16,334:

5:09 pm PDT, Mar 14, Name not displayed, New York

# 16,333:

1:32 pm PDT, Mar 14, Judy Reynolds, Missouri

# 16,332:

8:42 pm PDT, Mar 13, Stephanie Andrews, Virginia

# 16,331:

6:56 pm PDT, Mar 13, Erin Shelly, New York

# 16,330:

3:16 pm PDT, Mar 13, J.W. Thornton, Mississippi

# 16,329:

3:04 pm PDT, Mar 13, Name not displayed, North Carolina

# 16,328:

1:55 pm PDT, Mar 13, Jennifer Mcmullen, Texas

# 16,327:

6:35 am PDT, Mar 13, Erin Hebbe, Georgia

# 16,326:

8:51 pm PDT, Mar 12, Mark Boe, Washington

# 16,325:

4:00 pm PDT, Mar 12, Nora Novic, Minnesota
I am very concerned that so many men wish to punish women, as if they get pregnant all by themselves.and must suffer the consequences.

# 16,324:

10:38 pm PDT, Mar 11, Shannon Sultan, Wisconsin

# 16,323:

3:09 pm PDT, Mar 11, Kathleen Oliver, New Hampshire

# 16,322:

1:12 pm PDT, Mar 11, Alek WIlliams, Florida

# 16,321:

11:39 am PDT, Mar 11, Nancy Amodeo, California

# 16,320:

10:12 am PDT, Mar 11, Nancy Kohut, New Jersey

# 16,319:

10:55 pm PDT, Mar 10, Debbie J Pruiett, Georgia

# 16,318:

5:19 pm PDT, Mar 10, Carla Corazzol, Michigan

# 16,317:

10:23 pm PDT, Mar 9, A. Costello, California
We need fair judges, who will study the issues and judge, not ones who already have a closed mind. Bush has already appointed too many judges for life that are anti Choice and other issues he favors. A democracy needs more than one opinion!!!!

# 16,316:

4:09 pm PDT, Mar 9, Jessica Snyder, Colorado
The majority of Americans are pro-choice. I believe America is still a democracy?

# 16,315:

9:52 am PDT, Mar 9, Josh Gray, Connecticut

# 16,314:

4:15 pm PST, Mar 8, Amber Adkins, Maryland

# 16,313:

3:56 pm PST, Mar 8, Name not displayed, Arizona

# 16,312:

3:39 pm PST, Mar 8, Hope Ryden, New York

# 16,311:

3:02 pm PST, Mar 8, John Russell, North Carolina
This is without doubt the most unqualified person to ever be nominated as a Federal judge (next to Clarence Thomas).

# 16,310:

9:59 am PST, Mar 8, Joanie Winchester, Virginia
the removal of rights starts gradually, and before you know, they are gone... how dare some fascists decide the size of my family!!!!!!!!!!! hopefully, with the awful way the economy is going, the Democrats will be nominating the judges soon, with Bushco just a bad memory

# 16,309:

4:03 am PST, Mar 8, Ayman Fadel, Georgia

# 16,308:

3:30 am PST, Mar 8, Fred Watstein, Nevada

# 16,307:

6:04 pm PST, Mar 7, Steven Ross, Illinois

# 16,306:

5:12 pm PST, Mar 7, Carl Kitchen, Utah
Because denying access to safe and legal reproductive health services is only going to result from deaths from very unsafe and potentially illegal alternatives, and overpopulation is a REAL problem

# 16,305:

10:53 am PST, Mar 7, Diana Neiley, Massachusetts

# 16,304:

10:44 am PST, Mar 7, JULIE WILCZAK, New York

# 16,303:

8:18 am PST, Mar 7, Anthony Vincent, Washington

# 16,302:

11:51 pm PST, Mar 6, Dawn Craghead, California

# 16,301:

8:48 pm PST, Mar 6, S. Vickers, Illinois
Every Bush nominee that congress has approved has ended up hurting Americans. Here's another one.

View Signatures:
|<
<
16,516
16,450
16,400
16,350
16,300
16,250
...
150
100
50
>
>|