Congress: Don't Cut Social Security to Fix Your Own Budget Shortfalls!
- by: AARP
- recipient: United States Congress
For many older Americans, every dollar of their Social Security retirement benefits is absolutely critical. Forcing older Americans to shoulder cuts to Social Security would jeopardize their financial stability and health security.
Yet right now Congress is threatening to avoid sequester budget cuts by instead making harmful cuts to Social Security and Medicare.
That's not a real solution. It's not fair to the Americans who have paid into the system their entire lives, only to see their benefits cut to fix Congress's budget woes.
Resolving the financing challenges of Social Security and addressing the retirement crisis facing millions of Americans deserves a separate conversation. Social Security, which is off-budget, self-financed by payroll taxes and has run surpluses for most of the last 30 years, must be done separately and carefully, not for purposes of reducing the federal budget deficit or as a bargaining chip for other government spending.
Take action today: Let your Congressional representatives know they can't cut Social Security to makeup for their budget shortfalls.
Yet right now Congress is threatening to avoid sequester budget cuts by instead making harmful cuts to Social Security and Medicare.
That's not a real solution. It's not fair to the Americans who have paid into the system their entire lives, only to see their benefits cut to fix Congress's budget woes.
Resolving the financing challenges of Social Security and addressing the retirement crisis facing millions of Americans deserves a separate conversation. Social Security, which is off-budget, self-financed by payroll taxes and has run surpluses for most of the last 30 years, must be done separately and carefully, not for purposes of reducing the federal budget deficit or as a bargaining chip for other government spending.
Take action today: Let your Congressional representatives know they can't cut Social Security to makeup for their budget shortfalls.
Dear Chairman Murray and Chairman Ryan:
I am writing to stand with AARP in urging the budget conference committee to reject harmful cuts to Social Security and Medicare benefits for the purpose of achieving deficit reduction or as a tradeoff for scheduled sequestration cuts or other government spending. While sequestration cuts will have a growing impact on critical discretionary programs and should be revisited, we remain steadfast in our commitment to protect the earned benefits upon which millions of Americans rely daily, and we oppose cutting Medicare and Social Security benefits to replace sequestration cuts.
[Your comment will be added here]
Resolving the financing challenges of Social Security and addressing the retirement crisis facing millions of Americans deserves a separate conversation. Any changes to Social Security, which is off-budget, self-financed by payroll taxes and has run surpluses for most of the last 30 years, must be done separately within the proper context of ensuring the retirement security of present and future generations of Americans, and not for purposes of reducing the federal budget deficit or as a bargaining chip for other government spending. We continue to oppose proposals to authorize Social Security changes for, or within the context of, deficit reduction or budget agreements. Using the Social Security benefits that American taxpayers have earned to remedy a problem that Social Security did not create is neither right nor fair.
Every dollar of the average annual Social Security retirement benefit of a little over $15,000 is absolutely critical to the typical beneficiary. For older American households receiving benefits, Social Security is the principal source of income for nearly two-thirds, and roughly one-third of these households depend on Social Security for nearly all of their income. Social Security also provides a measure of economic security for families who face a loss of income because of the disability or the death of a wage earner. Moreover, the inflation protection provided through Social Security's annual COLA -- which prevents beneficiaries' modest income from falling further behind over time -- is a critical component of the success of the program.
As it pertains to Medicare, AARP believes that Congress must remain focused on reducing the cost of health care, not simply cutting the federal share of health care expenditures. AARP opposes any proposal which either shifts costs to Medicare beneficiaries or reduces their benefits. Cost-shifts, such as expanding income-relating of premiums, adding copays, raising deductibles, or limiting first-dollar coverage, do nothing to improve our health care system or lower overall health care costs.
The typical Medicare beneficiary lives on roughly $22,000 per year and already spends 17% of their income on health care. Asking older Americans to shoulder higher costs will jeopardize their financial stability and health security. Moreover, it ignores the role physicians, providers, hospitals, and drug manufacturers play in establishing prices and utilizing services. Instead of placing an extra burden on older Americans, we should implement responsible solutions. Better coordination of care; greater investment in information technology and reducing waste, fraud, and abuse; and reducing prescription drug prices are just a few areas where we can achieve true cost reduction. Attempts to shift costs will only hurt those who have paid into Medicare their entire working lives.
Sincerely,
[Your name]
Sign PetitionSign PetitionI am writing to stand with AARP in urging the budget conference committee to reject harmful cuts to Social Security and Medicare benefits for the purpose of achieving deficit reduction or as a tradeoff for scheduled sequestration cuts or other government spending. While sequestration cuts will have a growing impact on critical discretionary programs and should be revisited, we remain steadfast in our commitment to protect the earned benefits upon which millions of Americans rely daily, and we oppose cutting Medicare and Social Security benefits to replace sequestration cuts.
[Your comment will be added here]
Resolving the financing challenges of Social Security and addressing the retirement crisis facing millions of Americans deserves a separate conversation. Any changes to Social Security, which is off-budget, self-financed by payroll taxes and has run surpluses for most of the last 30 years, must be done separately within the proper context of ensuring the retirement security of present and future generations of Americans, and not for purposes of reducing the federal budget deficit or as a bargaining chip for other government spending. We continue to oppose proposals to authorize Social Security changes for, or within the context of, deficit reduction or budget agreements. Using the Social Security benefits that American taxpayers have earned to remedy a problem that Social Security did not create is neither right nor fair.
Every dollar of the average annual Social Security retirement benefit of a little over $15,000 is absolutely critical to the typical beneficiary. For older American households receiving benefits, Social Security is the principal source of income for nearly two-thirds, and roughly one-third of these households depend on Social Security for nearly all of their income. Social Security also provides a measure of economic security for families who face a loss of income because of the disability or the death of a wage earner. Moreover, the inflation protection provided through Social Security's annual COLA -- which prevents beneficiaries' modest income from falling further behind over time -- is a critical component of the success of the program.
As it pertains to Medicare, AARP believes that Congress must remain focused on reducing the cost of health care, not simply cutting the federal share of health care expenditures. AARP opposes any proposal which either shifts costs to Medicare beneficiaries or reduces their benefits. Cost-shifts, such as expanding income-relating of premiums, adding copays, raising deductibles, or limiting first-dollar coverage, do nothing to improve our health care system or lower overall health care costs.
The typical Medicare beneficiary lives on roughly $22,000 per year and already spends 17% of their income on health care. Asking older Americans to shoulder higher costs will jeopardize their financial stability and health security. Moreover, it ignores the role physicians, providers, hospitals, and drug manufacturers play in establishing prices and utilizing services. Instead of placing an extra burden on older Americans, we should implement responsible solutions. Better coordination of care; greater investment in information technology and reducing waste, fraud, and abuse; and reducing prescription drug prices are just a few areas where we can achieve true cost reduction. Attempts to shift costs will only hurt those who have paid into Medicare their entire working lives.
Sincerely,
[Your name]
See more petitions:
You have JavaScript disabled. Without it, our site might not function properly.
By signing, you accept Care2's Terms of Service.
You can unsub at any time here.
Having problems signing this? Let us know.