- Signatures: 640
- Goal: 1,000
- Deadline: 10-1-2007
The LSBME has proposed suggestions and modifications to the rules and regulations for Licensed Midwives in Louisianna which could have a far reaching impact on both consumers and midwifery providers in our state. Your rights as a consumer can be vastly limited with their proposals.
If you want to see choice in childbirth; if you want to preserve Licensed Midwifery care; if you want to contain health care costs; and if you want to choose where and with whom you may give birth, please sign this petition. Help protect the rights of childbearing women. DO IT TODAY! And thank you for helping us to maintain Licensed Midwifery in Louisiana.
| Number | Date | Name |
|---|---|---|
| 641 | 12:48 pm PDT, Sep 22 | Michele Power |
| 640 | 9:33 am PDT, Sep 7 | Tanya Smith-Johnson |
| 639 | 10:56 am PDT, May 31 | Linda Klann |
| 638 | 3:15 pm PDT, May 6 | Shiu Hung |
| 637 | 3:14 pm PDT, May 6 | Maureen Primerano |
| 636 | 9:16 am PST, Feb 28 | Eileen Roberts |
| 635 | 12:50 am PST, Feb 6 | Laurel Burns |
| 634 | 1:53 pm PST, Jan 24 | Chandra Stewart |
| 633 | 8:31 am PST, Jan 2 | Simos Tarabatzis |
| 632 | 9:14 am PST, Dec 27 | Anonymous |
| 631 | 7:41 am PST, Dec 19 | Tana Goodwin |
| 630 | 8:00 am PDT, Oct 27 | Chris Schneider |
| 629 | 5:02 am PDT, Oct 26 | Nicolette Meadows |
| 628 | 2:01 pm PDT, Oct 10 | Daina J. Keel |
| 627 | 6:13 pm PDT, Aug 21 | Brittany Kopke |
| 626 | 9:33 am PDT, Aug 20 | Anonymous |
| 625 | 5:17 pm PDT, Aug 18 | Anonymous |
| 624 | 10:36 am PDT, Aug 3 | Kimberly Sanders Vanderbrook |
| 623 | 9:35 am PDT, Aug 3 | brandi alexander |
| 622 | 1:43 pm PDT, Jul 25 | Chakwaina Reeves |
| 621 | 11:43 am PDT, Jul 23 | Melanie Kihnel |
| 620 | 7:05 pm PDT, Jul 19 | Lori D. Jackson |
| 619 | 8:22 pm PDT, Jun 30 | Nichole Treas |
| 618 | 9:04 am PDT, Jun 14 | amy haskett |
| 617 | 9:11 am PDT, Jun 13 | angela waters |
| 616 | 6:18 pm PDT, May 23 | Kristen Carlson |
| 615 | 11:06 pm PDT, May 21 | Tabitha Orr |
| 614 | 2:28 am PDT, May 11 | Jaime Cammarata, RD |
| 613 | 9:14 am PDT, Apr 30 | Desiree Ouellette |
| 612 | 2:37 pm PDT, Apr 28 | Katie Beers |
| 611 | 2:26 pm PDT, Apr 18 | Petra Ullmann |
| 610 | 2:23 pm PDT, Apr 11 | jamie huguet |
| 609 | 6:54 pm PDT, Apr 5 | Gabrielle Hagelstrom |
| 608 | 8:43 am PDT, Apr 5 | Alexandra Amour'de paix |
| 607 | 6:43 pm PDT, Mar 31 | Sarah Campbell |
| 606 | 10:27 am PDT, Mar 27 | Tracy B. Pratt |
| 605 | 3:40 pm PDT, Mar 25 | Holly Deering |
| 604 | 1:53 pm PDT, Mar 24 | Jessica Bolyer |
| 603 | 11:14 am PDT, Mar 24 | Christine Baldwin |
| 602 | 10:47 pm PDT, Mar 23 | Julie Gray |
| 601 | 6:30 pm PDT, Mar 23 | Tera Smith |
Protect the Rights of Childbearing Women
The Louisiana Midwives Association points of concern and contention are:
1) The LMA would like the radius requirement of living within 25 miles to the nearest hospital eradicated. We feel this inhibits women’s choices to give birth where and with whom they wish. Most midwifery transports are for non-emergent care and are not life threatening. Many areas in Louisiana are rural and do not have access to a hospital within “25 miles or 25 minutes” of a client’s home. Do doctors insist their clients live within thee boundaries before being accepted into their care? We feel this proposal would limit the ability of midwives to provide care and would be illegal under the rights of childbearing women.
2) The required eight (8) prenatal visits by a midwife (two physician visits included) would dictate at what point the consumer could choose midwifery care. Some consumers make the decisions late in pregnancy to seek midwifery care. It should be left up to the midwife to decide if she is comfortable taking clients late in pregnancy because it is the midwife who bears the responsibility and liability of providing the care to the consumer. Just as physician’s are not limited in accepting care at any point in the pregnancy, nor should midwives. There are no prenatal visit limitations for CNM’s, so why should there be for Licensed Midwives?
3) LSBME is also seeking to disallow midwives from attending vaginal births after caesareans. The Louisiana Midwives Association feels this does not serve the women of our state. Women who have had a previous c-section with a lower transverse uterine incision, with double suture layer closure, who are not induced with pitocin or who do not receive cytotec to induce labor have a 0.2% thru 0.7% risk of uterine rupture. Women should have the ability to seek informed consent to choose the site and provider of their choice. If the LSBME has allowed Licensed Midwives the ability to provide care in homes, hospitals, birth centers, and clinics, it would prevent clients from obtaining VBAC’s with midwives in any setting. Such a precedence would again violate the rights of childbearing women and would force women to undergo caesarean surgeries if no physicians or midwives were willing or able to do so because of the proposed suggestions. Women are being allowed to choose “C-Sections on demand” so why are they in turn being denied access to VBAC’s with the health care provider of their choice? The American College of Nurse Midwives and the North American Registry of Midwives have both allowed CNM’s and CPM’s the ability to provide such care. The C-Section rate in the U.S. has grown at an astounding rate of 40% in the last 10 years nationwide. This further increases health care costs to YOU the consumer through increased insurance premiums! If this trend is not reversed, we will continue to see rising premiums and limited providers and birthing options.
1) The LMA would like the radius requirement of living within 25 miles to the nearest hospital eradicated. We feel this inhibits women’s choices to give birth where and with whom they wish. Most midwifery transports are for non-emergent care and are not life threatening. Many areas in Louisiana are rural and do not have access to a hospital within “25 miles or 25 minutes” of a client’s home. Do doctors insist their clients live within thee boundaries before being accepted into their care? We feel this proposal would limit the ability of midwives to provide care and would be illegal under the rights of childbearing women.
2) The required eight (8) prenatal visits by a midwife (two physician visits included) would dictate at what point the consumer could choose midwifery care. Some consumers make the decisions late in pregnancy to seek midwifery care. It should be left up to the midwife to decide if she is comfortable taking clients late in pregnancy because it is the midwife who bears the responsibility and liability of providing the care to the consumer. Just as physician’s are not limited in accepting care at any point in the pregnancy, nor should midwives. There are no prenatal visit limitations for CNM’s, so why should there be for Licensed Midwives?
3) LSBME is also seeking to disallow midwives from attending vaginal births after caesareans. The Louisiana Midwives Association feels this does not serve the women of our state. Women who have had a previous c-section with a lower transverse uterine incision, with double suture layer closure, who are not induced with pitocin or who do not receive cytotec to induce labor have a 0.2% thru 0.7% risk of uterine rupture. Women should have the ability to seek informed consent to choose the site and provider of their choice. If the LSBME has allowed Licensed Midwives the ability to provide care in homes, hospitals, birth centers, and clinics, it would prevent clients from obtaining VBAC’s with midwives in any setting. Such a precedence would again violate the rights of childbearing women and would force women to undergo caesarean surgeries if no physicians or midwives were willing or able to do so because of the proposed suggestions. Women are being allowed to choose “C-Sections on demand” so why are they in turn being denied access to VBAC’s with the health care provider of their choice? The American College of Nurse Midwives and the North American Registry of Midwives have both allowed CNM’s and CPM’s the ability to provide such care. The C-Section rate in the U.S. has grown at an astounding rate of 40% in the last 10 years nationwide. This further increases health care costs to YOU the consumer through increased insurance premiums! If this trend is not reversed, we will continue to see rising premiums and limited providers and birthing options.
Note: This Protect the Rights of Childbearing Women petition was submitted by Kami Dehler. ThePetitionSite.com is a free service provided to help concerned citizens rally support for issues they believe in. The opinions expressed by this petition do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of ThePetitionSite.com or Care2.com. There is no express or implied endorsement of this petition nor any newsletter offers (except those from Care2.com) by Care2.com, Inc, ThePetitionSite.com, or our sponsors. If you believe this system is being abused, please contact customer support.
Questions about this petition? Contact the petition sponsor: Kami Dehler.
Questions about thePetitionSite.com? Visit our FAQ Page.