Butterfly Rewards - earn free credits and redeem for good causes -  learn more!
Care2 member? Log in

Please Help Protect Alaska's Ocean Ecosystems

Target: James W. Balsiger, National Marine Fisheries Service
Sponsored by: The Ocean Conservancy
Alaskan waters are among the world's most diverse, productive and complex marine ecosystems. The seafloor of the North Pacific Ocean is adorned with magnificent, yet fragile, communities of deepwater coral and sponge, which recent scientific studies show provides essential habitat to fish, crabs and other marine life. Ongoing loss of this habitat, however, places the health of these remarkable deepwater ocean ecosystems at risk.

Like clear-cutting of old growth forests, bottom trawling fishing vessels cause extensive damage to deepwater coral habitat, potentially causing long-term changes to the entire marine ecosystem. For eight years, the federal National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) has failed to protect Alaska's waters from the harmful effects of fishing, as required by law. In response to a court order, NMFS has finally drafted an Essential Fish Habitat Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the North Pacific, which includes the Gulf of Alaska, Bering Sea, and Aleutian Islands. This EIS contains several alternatives to protect habitat from ongoing destruction, but amazingly recommends taking no action to do so!

NMFS must take action to implement measures contained in the Essential Fish Habitat alternatives to:
  • Establish a network of marine reserves to fully protect 20 to 30 percent of all marine habitats (Alternative 6), or
  • At a minimum, significantly increase protection for sensitive habitats by requiring less damaging fishing gear and reductions in allowable catch (Alternative 5-B), and
  • Augment Alternative 5-B by adding fully protected "Habitat Areas of Particular Concern", such as seamounts, pinnacles, coral gardens, and submarine canyons.
Sign this petition to submit your public comments to support protecting Alaska's marine habitats from harmful fishing practices! The public comment period ends April 15, 2004 - please sign today!
deadline: 3-2-2005
goal: 20,000
 

Sign Petition!  see who signed this
50
50 log in or sign up to start earning Butterfly Credits today!
log in

This petition has been closed.

see more petitions

Dear Dr. Balsiger,

Recent scientific studies have indicated that Alaskan waters contain a diversity of sensitive habitats and that destructive fishing practices, primarily bottom trawling, cause serious impacts to these habitats. The National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) must adopt new management measures contained in the Essential Fish Habitat Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the North Pacific that protect essential fish habitat from the impacts of industrial fisheries.

NMFS should adopt a system of marine reserves that fully protects 20 to 30 percent of all marine habitats. Fully protected marine reserves offer an ecosystem-based approach to fisheries management that takes into account the large amount of uncertainty associated with marine ecosystems. Alternative 6 of the EIS, which protects 20 percent of the fishable waters in Alaska, is a good start. I am disappointed, however, that NMFS ignores the wealth of scientific literature on the ecosystem benefits of marine reserves, and has not properly quantified these benefits when evaluating this alternative. This must be rectified in the final EIS.

If the agency does not choose a marine reserves alternative, they must, at a minimum, adopt Alternative 5-B and fully protect “Habitat Areas of Particular Concern.” Alternative 5-B would significantly increase protection for cold-water corals in the Aleutians, protect rockfish habitat along the Gulf of Alaska slope, and protect crab habitat in the Bering Sea from the impacts of bottom trawling. This alternative is responsive to documented impacts on sensitive habitats and implements appropriate management tools - habitat protection areas, gear conversions, and reductions in total allowable catch - while maintaining vibrant fisheries. In addition, agency must also augment Alternative 5-B by fully protecting “Habitat Areas of Particular Concern,” such as seamounts, pinnacles, coral gardens, and submarine canyons.

These precautionary measures must be undertaken to ensure healthy, vibrant ecosystems in Alaska’s seas. Thank you for considering my comments.
We signed the “Please Help Protect Alaska's Ocean Ecosystems” petition!
# 21,185:
5:27 pm PDT, Apr 29, Anna Benson, Colorado
One system balances another. When there is no balance, there is chaos. When there is chaos, humanity will die. Plain and simple.
# 21,184:
2:17 pm PDT, Apr 29, Name not displayed, Michigan
# 21,183:
1:42 pm PDT, Apr 29, D. Sink, Ohio
WE CAN NOT SURVIVE WITHOUT OUR OCEANS.
# 21,182:
1:24 pm PDT, Apr 29, Carolyn S, Colorado
# 21,181:
1:16 pm PDT, Apr 29, Maria Slight, California
For every good and right reason humanity and the earth needs, enjoys, respects and cherishes.
# 21,180:
12:33 pm PDT, Apr 29, Joy Schochet, Illinois
We cannot survive without our oceans - They are not only the source of life on earth, but the plankton, flora and fauna are essential in the intricate network of nature. Many species depend on the abundance of the ocean and we are no exception. We degrade our oceans at our peril.
# 21,179:
12:31 pm PDT, Apr 29, Anna Gray, Minnesota
Put the environment ahead of corporate profits. THINK LONG TERM!
# 21,178:
11:44 am PDT, Apr 29, Paul Bookidis, Arizona
# 21,177:
11:27 am PDT, Apr 29, Catherine N. Boatner, Louisiana
The Earth is like one organism made up of many systems, and like an organism, if one system becomes sick, the other systems can not function properly, and the entire organism becomes sick. The oceans are a system in the organism of Earth, and the oceans are stressed. To do more damage could make them sick, and the consequences would be global. Please, use foresight and refute shortsighted profiteering.
# 21,176:
9:29 am PDT, Apr 29, Rosemarie Gaasbeck, New Jersey
We must protect our eco system. What benefits them benefits us.
# 21,175:
9:20 am PDT, Apr 29, Rev. Jason Covington, Texas
Alaska's ecosystem is not limited to the land areas. They extend into the ocean for a great distance. Since every ecosystem in the world is connected, a change in one will affect the others. We cannot allow Alaska's ocean ecosystem to be harmed in any way.
# 21,174:
9:15 am PDT, Apr 29, Corrina Furrow, California
Because the ocean supports life on our beautiful planet. We have an obligation for ourselves and the other inhabitants of this planet to protect it.
# 21,173:
8:35 am PDT, Apr 29, Terri Tuomisto, Vermont
I think this should be a no brainer
# 21,172:
8:33 am PDT, Apr 29, Name not displayed, Maine
I love nature, and hate to see it harmed A healthy enviornment to me is very important, I know I like one
# 21,171:
8:29 am PDT, Apr 29, Name not displayed, North Dakota
Am total in support of keeping our last special place, from being harm By President Bush and Big Oil out of these waters.Our Bush doesnot clear about oceans, only for oil, we know mess it cost in prime waters and etc In Alaska.This a part of planet and us, they die we will soon follow.Thanks
# 21,170:
7:10 am PDT, Apr 29, Sakti Calabria, Massachusetts
# 21,169:
6:14 am PDT, Apr 29, Name not displayed, Massachusetts
# 21,168:
5:19 am PDT, Apr 29, Nicole Hardin, Alabama
# 21,167:
4:43 am PDT, Apr 29, M E Burkhart, West Virginia
Our dependency on the natural environment SHOULD make us humble instead of being so short-sighted and destructive.
# 21,166:
1:01 am PDT, Apr 29, Lori Barrow, Virginia
# 21,165:
12:57 am PDT, Apr 29, Wilmer Alkhas, California
.
# 21,164:
12:37 am PDT, Apr 29, Diane Wallis, United Kingdom
# 21,163:
10:54 pm PDT, Apr 28, Patricia J. Haverkamp, Texas
Must we completely destroy everything created by nature? Keep in mind ALL things were created to live together - when one is destroyed, it affects another - eventually we will destroy ourselves if something is not drastically changed!
# 21,162:
10:34 pm PDT, Apr 28, Jean M Greene, Texas
i agree with all of the other reasons.
# 21,161:
10:08 pm PDT, Apr 28, Aleta Leggett, California
They help preserve the world.
# 21,160:
8:52 pm PDT, Apr 28, Name not displayed, Virginia
All ecosystems are important because they support life. Destroying any ONE creates a domino effect eventually. And humans are one of those dominos.
# 21,159:
8:29 pm PDT, Apr 28, Kathe Ewing, California
# 21,158:
7:51 pm PDT, Apr 28, Desiree Wosochlo, Pennsylvania
# 21,157:
7:12 pm PDT, Apr 28, James Castillo, Texas
# 21,156:
7:07 pm PDT, Apr 28, Patricia Wood, New York
I agree with Gretchen... We are Stewards of this wonderful Planet and Our America the Beautiful. We MUST fight to keep our ocean ecosystems and preserve them and protect them. If the Oceans are not cared for neither are we!!! It is like a pebble in a pond....ripple after ripple affects us ALL.
# 21,155:
6:56 pm PDT, Apr 28, Alexa Fong Drubay, Maryland
Protect the living organisms in our waters so that we may enjoy them for future generations!
# 21,154:
6:49 pm PDT, Apr 28, Tanner Lundy, Kansas
oceans cover 75% of the earths' surface, destroy that, and you may as well destroy the other 25%....
# 21,153:
6:35 pm PDT, Apr 28, Colleen Rivera, West Virginia
Each and every ecosystem on this Earth are inextricably linked in beautiful balance...when any one is harmed, it inevitably affects all others, and the effects are cumulative and devastating over time. Our children deserve better!
# 21,152:
6:10 pm PDT, Apr 28, Jennifer Harper, New York
All ecosystems on the planet must be preserved because they are all necessary to co-exist in harmony to properly and healthily preserve life on this planet. Duh!
# 21,151:
5:54 pm PDT, Apr 28, Christine Zahm, Vermont
I am an avid diver, and I think your respect for the dollar takes presidence over respect for "Our Mother"!
Copyright © 2009 Care2.com, inc. and its licensors. All rights reserved