- Signatures: 2,783
- Goal: 10,000
- Deadline: 12-31-2009
ANIMALS IN LABORATORIES
UNSEEN THEY SUFFER
UNHEARD THEY CRY
IN AGONY THEY LINGER
IN LONELINESS THEY DIE
Unknown
Since this petition was first published, there has been a change in the Secretary of Agriculture. This petition will now be forwarded to: Secretary of Agriculture Ed Schafer
http://www.usda.gov/wps/portal/usdahome
As many as 115 million animals are experimented on and killed in laboratories in the U.S. every year.
Much of the experimentation-including pumping chemicals into rats' stomachs, hacking muscle tissue from dogs' thighs, and putting baby monkeys in isolation chambers far from their mothers-is paid for by you, the American taxpayer and consumer.
What have we learned from all of this suffering? That animal research is inherently unethical, inevitably wasteful, and wholly unreliable. The U.S. squanders approximately $18 billion per year on animal experiments, even though alternatives are less expensive and can be used repeatedly.
UNSEEN THEY SUFFER
UNHEARD THEY CRY
IN AGONY THEY LINGER
IN LONELINESS THEY DIE
Unknown
Since this petition was first published, there has been a change in the Secretary of Agriculture. This petition will now be forwarded to: Secretary of Agriculture Ed Schafer
http://www.usda.gov/wps/portal/usdahome
As many as 115 million animals are experimented on and killed in laboratories in the U.S. every year. Much of the experimentation-including pumping chemicals into rats' stomachs, hacking muscle tissue from dogs' thighs, and putting baby monkeys in isolation chambers far from their mothers-is paid for by you, the American taxpayer and consumer.
What have we learned from all of this suffering? That animal research is inherently unethical, inevitably wasteful, and wholly unreliable. The U.S. squanders approximately $18 billion per year on animal experiments, even though alternatives are less expensive and can be used repeatedly.
| Number | Date | Prefix | Name | State | Country | I believe vivisection should end because..... |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2,788 | 9:06 pm PST, Nov 20 | Ms. | Anonymous | Australia | ||
| 2,787 | 12:47 pm PST, Nov 20 | Ms. | Sylvie Ries | Luxembourg | ||
| 2,786 | 6:47 am PST, Nov 15 | Ms. | Dianne Ritchie | Texas | United States | It is cruel and unnecessary |
| 2,785 | 10:46 am PDT, Oct 30 | Mrs. | Olga Azovsky | New York | United States | |
| 2,784 | 10:51 am PDT, Oct 29 | Ms. | Amy Mulvany | Ireland | ||
| 2,783 | 5:42 pm PDT, Oct 28 | Ms. | patrycja ostrzyniewska | Poland | ||
| 2,782 | 5:56 am PDT, Oct 24 | Ms. | randi jackson | Massachusetts | United States | |
| 2,781 | 9:19 am PDT, Oct 19 | Ms. | Anonymous | South Africa | ||
| 2,780 | 6:20 pm PDT, Oct 15 | Ms. | Anonymous | California | United States | |
| 2,779 | 4:17 am PDT, Oct 15 | Mrs. | Sara Gaspar | Portugal | ||
| 2,778 | 4:26 pm PDT, Oct 10 | Ms. | Victoria Truelove | Georgia | United States | Animals are suffering in laboratories right now. Plus, why test on animals when there are alternatives,huh? We desperately need to halt this right now. |
| 2,777 | 7:22 pm PDT, Oct 7 | Mrs. | Nadine Wyatt | Tennessee | United States | |
| 2,776 | 12:23 pm PDT, Oct 4 | Ms. | Jessica Lozano | Texas | United States | |
| 2,775 | 3:33 pm PDT, Sep 28 | Ms. | Olga Mironchuk | Moldova, Republic Of | ||
| 2,774 | 8:31 pm PDT, Sep 23 | Ms. | sonia beccheri | Brazil | ||
| 2,773 | 5:09 pm PDT, Sep 23 | Lara bahun | Slovenia | |||
| 2,772 | 8:06 am PDT, Sep 23 | Mrs. | Sarah Mehl | Ohio | United States | |
| 2,771 | 1:44 pm PDT, Sep 21 | Ms. | Angela Butzen | Colorado | United States | |
| 2,770 | 10:19 am PDT, Sep 20 | Mrs. | Janice Sturdy | United Kingdom | ||
| 2,769 | 11:48 pm PDT, Sep 16 | Ms. | Anonymous | Kentucky | United States | |
| 2,768 | 7:28 am PDT, Sep 16 | Monica Olofsson | California | United States | ||
| 2,767 | 1:12 am PDT, Sep 16 | Mr. | ANGEL CARPENA | Spain | ||
| 2,766 | 9:48 pm PDT, Sep 15 | Mrs. | trudi radabaugh | South Carolina | United States | |
| 2,765 | 7:52 pm PDT, Sep 15 | Mrs. | Chantelle McQueen | Australia | Its wrong in so many ways,these aminals have souls and personality and feeling,they feel too and they feel all ....It just has to stop it makes me feel sick to think people feel there nothing wrong in doing this.... | |
| 2,764 | 5:22 pm PDT, Sep 15 | Angie Forbes | Australia | We dont need it and its heart breaking!!!! | ||
| 2,763 | 4:33 pm PDT, Sep 15 | Ms. | MaryAnn Mcleod | California | United States | Leave God's creatures alone. KARMA KARMA KARMA |
| 2,762 | 10:34 am PDT, Sep 15 | Ms. | Ivana Soldic | Serbia And Montenegro | ||
| 2,761 | 10:16 am PDT, Sep 15 | Ms. | Diana Giron | Colombia | It is a horrible thing, is imposible that it is still happenig, all the animals deserve our respect and compation. What kind of mosters are we. This must stop now. cruel people. | |
| 2,760 | 9:18 am PDT, Sep 15 | Neil Rapsey | United Kingdom | |||
| 2,759 | 7:59 am PDT, Sep 15 | Mrs. | JILL PIORKOWSKI | Ohio | United States | |
| 2,758 | 6:48 am PDT, Sep 15 | Ms. | MERSY BARLETTA | Florida | United States | |
| 2,757 | 4:48 am PDT, Sep 15 | JACKIE GRAVES | Florida | United States | ||
| 2,756 | 2:21 am PDT, Sep 15 | chris Lepretre | France | |||
| 2,755 | 12:24 am PDT, Sep 15 | Mrs. | Jana Pešová | Czech Republic | I do not believe that it is right way for future. The animals are not people ... they are different. The tests performed on them are for nothing ... | |
| 2,754 | 11:07 pm PDT, Sep 14 | Peter Rodriguez | California | United States | ||
| 2,753 | 11:02 pm PDT, Sep 14 | Mr. | stephen rapsey | New York | United States | the pain and suffering inflicted on these animals you wouldn't do on a human so why should it been done to any other living creature |
| 2,752 | 10:40 pm PDT, Sep 14 | effects 69 | California | United States | It's pure torture for the poor animals. | |
| 2,751 | 9:37 pm PDT, Sep 14 | Ms. | Anonymous | California | United States | it's horrific, brutal and inhumane! There are alternative research options. |
Victims of Vivisection - End the carnage !
Experimenters force-feed chemicals to animals, conduct repeated surgeries on them, implant wires in their brains, crush their spines, and much more. Think of what it would be like to endure this and then be dumped back into a cage, usually without any painkillers. Video footage from inside laboratories shows that animals cower in fear every time someone walks by their cages. They don't know if they will be dragged from their prison cells for an injection, blood withdrawal, a painful procedure or surgery, or death. Often animals see other animals killed right in front of them.
Most people believe that experiments on animals are necessary for medicine and science to progress. This is not the case! The belief that we must experiment on animals is being challenged by a growing number of physicians and scientists who are utilizing many research methods that do not harm or kill animals. Physicians and scientists also see the negative consequences of using one species to provide information about another species; often the results of animal experiments are misleading or even harmful to humans.
Increasing numbers of scientists and clinicians are challenging animal experimentation on scientific grounds. (1-3) Considerable evidence demonstrates that animal experimentation is inefficient and unreliable, while newly developed methodologies are more valid and less expensive than animal studies.
Vivisection is self-perpetuating. Scientists' salaries and professional status are often tied to grants, and a critical element of success in grant applications is proof of prior experience and expertise.
Vivisection is lucrative. It’s traditionally respected place in modern medicine results in secure financial support, which is often an integral component of a university's budget. Many medical centers receive tens of millions of dollars annually in direct grants for animal research, and tens of millions more for overhead costs that are supposedly related to that research. Since these medical centers depend on this overhead for much of their administrative costs, construction, and building maintenance, they perpetuate vivisection by praising it in the media and to legislators. Animal researchers' ethical defense of the practice has been superficial and self-serving.
The general public, which cares about animal welfare, has been led to believe that animals rarely suffer in laboratories. Animal researchers often cite U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) statistics (derived from researchers themselves) that only 6 to 8 percent of animals used in vivisection experience pain unrelieved by anesthesia or analgesia.(174)
Evidence indicates, however, that many animal researchers fail to acknowledge - or even perceive - animal pain and suffering.
The tens of millions of animals used and killed each year in American laboratories generally suffer enormously, often from fear and physical pain, nearly always from the deprivation inflicted by their confinement, which denies their most basic psychological and physical needs.
Conclusion
The value of animal experimentation has been grossly exaggerated by those with a vested economic interest in its preservation. Because animal experimentation focuses on artificially created pathology, involves confounding variables, and is undermined by differences in human and nonhuman anatomy, physiology, and pathology, it is an inherently unsound method to investigate human disease processes. Billions of dollars invested annually in animal research would be put to much more efficient, effective, and humane use if redirected to clinical and epidemiological research and public health programs.
Original source: 'The Absurdity of Vivisection' http://vivisection-absurd.org.uk/menu.html
Sources: The Vivisection Industry http://www.health.org.nz/vivind.html
LCA Vivisection Campaign http://www.lcanimal.org/cmpgn/cmpgn_016.htm
American Anti-Vivisection Society http://www.aavs.org/home.html
Vivisection is Scientific Fraud - We are all Victims http://www.bava.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/
LET’S PUT AN END TO THIS SENSELESS TORTURE ONCE AND FOR ALL!
“I abhor vivisection. It should at least be curbed. Better, it should be abolished. I know of no achievement through vivisection, no scientific discovery that could not have been obtained without such barbarism and cruelty. The whole thing is evil.” -Dr. Charles Mayo, founder of the Mayo Clinic
Most people believe that experiments on animals are necessary for medicine and science to progress. This is not the case! The belief that we must experiment on animals is being challenged by a growing number of physicians and scientists who are utilizing many research methods that do not harm or kill animals. Physicians and scientists also see the negative consequences of using one species to provide information about another species; often the results of animal experiments are misleading or even harmful to humans.
Increasing numbers of scientists and clinicians are challenging animal experimentation on scientific grounds. (1-3) Considerable evidence demonstrates that animal experimentation is inefficient and unreliable, while newly developed methodologies are more valid and less expensive than animal studies.
Vivisection is self-perpetuating. Scientists' salaries and professional status are often tied to grants, and a critical element of success in grant applications is proof of prior experience and expertise.
Vivisection is lucrative. It’s traditionally respected place in modern medicine results in secure financial support, which is often an integral component of a university's budget. Many medical centers receive tens of millions of dollars annually in direct grants for animal research, and tens of millions more for overhead costs that are supposedly related to that research. Since these medical centers depend on this overhead for much of their administrative costs, construction, and building maintenance, they perpetuate vivisection by praising it in the media and to legislators. Animal researchers' ethical defense of the practice has been superficial and self-serving.
The general public, which cares about animal welfare, has been led to believe that animals rarely suffer in laboratories. Animal researchers often cite U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) statistics (derived from researchers themselves) that only 6 to 8 percent of animals used in vivisection experience pain unrelieved by anesthesia or analgesia.(174)
Evidence indicates, however, that many animal researchers fail to acknowledge - or even perceive - animal pain and suffering.
The tens of millions of animals used and killed each year in American laboratories generally suffer enormously, often from fear and physical pain, nearly always from the deprivation inflicted by their confinement, which denies their most basic psychological and physical needs.
Conclusion
The value of animal experimentation has been grossly exaggerated by those with a vested economic interest in its preservation. Because animal experimentation focuses on artificially created pathology, involves confounding variables, and is undermined by differences in human and nonhuman anatomy, physiology, and pathology, it is an inherently unsound method to investigate human disease processes. Billions of dollars invested annually in animal research would be put to much more efficient, effective, and humane use if redirected to clinical and epidemiological research and public health programs.
Original source: 'The Absurdity of Vivisection' http://vivisection-absurd.org.uk/menu.html
Sources: The Vivisection Industry http://www.health.org.nz/vivind.html
LCA Vivisection Campaign http://www.lcanimal.org/cmpgn/cmpgn_016.htm
American Anti-Vivisection Society http://www.aavs.org/home.html
Vivisection is Scientific Fraud - We are all Victims http://www.bava.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/
LET’S PUT AN END TO THIS SENSELESS TORTURE ONCE AND FOR ALL!
“I abhor vivisection. It should at least be curbed. Better, it should be abolished. I know of no achievement through vivisection, no scientific discovery that could not have been obtained without such barbarism and cruelty. The whole thing is evil.” -Dr. Charles Mayo, founder of the Mayo Clinic
Note: This Victims of Vivisection - End the carnage ! petition was submitted by Anita Solomon. ThePetitionSite.com is a free service provided to help concerned citizens rally support for issues they believe in. The opinions expressed by this petition do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of ThePetitionSite.com or Care2.com. There is no express or implied endorsement of this petition nor any newsletter offers (except those from Care2.com) by Care2.com, Inc, ThePetitionSite.com, or our sponsors. If you believe this system is being abused, please contact customer support.
Questions about this petition? Contact the petition sponsor: Anita Solomon.
Questions about thePetitionSite.com? Visit our FAQ Page.

