Please Help Me To Release My Daughter From The States Capture.

Siblings separated by the state.
The State Has No Right to Severe The Ties Between Siblings, When The State Allows For Two Siblings To Live With The Parent, While Placing One Up For Adoption.
Photo of Brother & Sister separated by the state. The youngest one was wrongfully placed up for adoption while the older one remained at home with his Mother and other sister.
Special note to all readers: At the bottom of this petition list the names of the state officials who played their role in this case. This is a photo just moments before a Social worker would grab my little girls hand and take her away. We only got to see her for just one hour every two weeks.

She was lined up and instructed to stand up against the wall with the other children, while standing in a long line, as she watched the court officials take two children in to a room where they would be adopted two at a time by Judge Susan Block from the St. Louis Family Courts who's been noted in news articles along with Judge Melvyn Weissman who terminated my rights, for their support with an event called Adoption Fair Saturdays.
This picture shown above was taken of me and of my youngest daughter who became a victim of an illegal state adoption, shown on the left of the photo, with my son on the right of the photo.
We were at the Division of Family Services on that day while we were on a court ordered visit of just one hour.
My olther daughter, who was there to visit her little sister took the picture of the three of us.
When terminating parental rights, the courts must address the issue of a parent being "unfit" in order to rule for a termination of parental rights.
Judge Carolyn Whittington, Judge Melvyn Weissman, to include a panel of appallent judges totaling 4 to 5 appallent Judges from St. Louis, Mossouri who all failed but succeeded in upholding each others wrongful rulings of a wrongful termination.
These Judges skipped right over ruling me to be an unfit parent while working towards covering their unlawful acts by using power in numbers by calling on many family court state officials to support their actions while ignoring the truth.
They used bully tactics in the family courts to torture me and my children where we were forced into emotional torture, through constant separating, the children were forced into forced separation trauma twice a month or more, I was set up with schemes and plots by the state officials of the family courts where they would attack my natural bond by setting up props in the visiting rooms, such as rocking chairs and magazines that they placed in the visiting room.
They used me to get federal funds to support their programs while using their programs to stall for time so they could use the "time law" to wrongfully terminate my rights.
The judges from the appellant courts did not even see or meet me when
making their rulings to support Judge Melvyn Weissman's wrongful and cruel ruling to terminate one child from her natural family members of three to include a sister and a brother and myself.
My other two children were attending school and living under my roof, under my care and custody when Margaret Donnelly, Missouri State Representative recommended that my rights be terminated.
Judge Melvyn Weissman agreed to Margaret Donnelly's recommendation by signing the paper of termination of parental rights.
They never even addressed the topic "unfit" while having full awarness that I was still caring for my other two children.
These judges from the family courts and the appellant courts, still remain on the bench or they are still working within the system today.
All of our leaders in the state of Missouri walk away from this case as though it never happened assuming that I will just go away as long as they continue to ignore me.
They show absolutely no concerns of anykind for my daughter. The state continues to hold her by illegal servitude without concern or any attempts to return her.
After the visits at the state DFS office were over, my older daughter and son, including myself, were allowed to leave together and go home.
The Social Worker would transport my youngest child back to Foster Care.
At the end of the court ordered visits, all three children had to suffer the emotional trauma of becoming separated.
The reason it was so traumatizing to the children is because the older two children were in question as to why their own Mother was not being told as to where these strange people where taking their sister.
It was not like she was going to a babysitter and we all knew where she was, it was like a repeated kidnapping every time by someone who was keeping her in a secret place.
The youngest daughter was dragged off by a social worker's hand, while she had to watch her other two siblings get in the car with her Mother to go back home.
As the social worker drove away with my youngest daughter, we could always see my daughter pressing her face up against the window pane of the social worker's vehicle trying to get as close to us as she could while the social worker drove her away from us.
The children were expected to play together in a office room.
The room was the size of a small office that had various types of chairs.
There were empty wooden shelves, with some toys on the floor.
The children would always end up playing on the dusty floor.
My heart would just break into every time watching the hour quickly go by knowing what the children were going to face at the end of the visit.
The social worker always threatened if I ever tried to voice my opinion regarding my children that she would have the judge put my daughter up for adoption making it to where I could never express my feelings or concerns.
She often said this in front of the children.
The photo above was taken moments before one of the many one hour visits was just about to be over, although the children did not know it at the time their photo was taken.
The social worker named Becky Price would always grab my daughters hand and pull her away from her brother.
The children became upset every time, with my son pulling on my shirt, demanding that I tell him where that lady was taking his sister.
You could hear my daughter screaming out, no! no! as the social worker forced her to walk down the hallways and out the door.
There was a rocking chair among many others in the small visiting room.
The court appointed psychologist Lisa Emmenagger who testified that I, the Mother rocked my little girl to sleep during one of our one hour visits, therefore there was no communication between the child and Mother which indicates that there is no bond between the Mother and child.
This is in the court transcripts.
The state had it set up to where they would continue this act until the 15 months were up which carried out for two years.
They used the "time law" to terminate my rights to my youngest child by stating that since they severed the bond between the mother and child there was no reason to return her.
I was allowed to keep two of my other children ( age's 7 and 15 ) in my care and custody with out any demands by the same individuals who terminated my rights to my youngest daughter who was age (5).
Should this be allowed in the United States to use these reasons to terminate a non-offending divorced parent's parental rights of their child?
Read below the listed items that are stated on my termination of parental rights court document used by the State Officials to terminate my parental rights from my youngest child.
Judge Mylvyn Weisman from the St. Louis Clayton County Courts made this ruling of termination of parental rights.
1; Due to the amount of time the child has been in the system, the bond has slowly diminished, leaving no reason to return the child to the Mother.
Note: (the courts used the time law to their advantage by using their federally funded programs to stall for the time they needed in order to use the time law)
2; There was no evidence presented that the Mother suffers from a mental condition which cannot be reversed which renders the Mother unable to knowingly provide the child the necessary care, custody and control.
Note: (the courts could have turned this around easily and said that the mother had a mental illness, but the fact is I did not have a mental illness and they did not even have to say that I had a mental illness to terminate parental my rights)
3; There was no evidence presented that the Mother suffers from a chemical dependency which cannot be treated and which prevents her from consistently providing the necessary care, custody and control for the child.
Note: (the courts could have easily said that the Mother suffered from a chemical dependency, but the fact is that I did not suffer from a chemical dependency and they did not have to state that the Mother suffered from a chemical dependency to terminate my rights)
4; There was no evidence presented that the Mother has committed any severe or recurrent acts of physical emotional or sexual abuse toward the child or any other child in the family.
Note: (the courts could have said that the Mother has committed abuse, but the facts are that I never did commit any form of abuse and they did not have to state that I committed abuse to terminate my parental rights)
My termination of parental rights shows you that the courts do not even have to find you as an abuser of any kind to keep your child.
Also, if they want to, they have the freedom of writing what ever they want to about you if they feel its necessary for terminating your parental rights.
The juvenile courts are free to write anything without question and this is a very serious situation here when we are talking about making decisions on a child's life.
After the state terminated my rights, the family courts claimed they shredded my files.
Social Services blacked out sections of my files with a black marker and sections of the files were deleted. A suspected killer has more rights in America than a falsely accused parent.
A person suspected of murder gets a fair trial, verses a falsely accused parent.
A falsely accused parent's rights are violated in secrecy behind the juvenile court doors, without any due process or a fair trial.
A fair trial is held in the criminal courts, but not in the juvenile courts where you can loose your child without ever being convicted of child abuse or adjudicated.
According to their own statements which you can hear in the video on this petition, is a phone message that was left for me by the family courts informing me that they shredded the documents to this case.
They also sent a document confirming the phone message.
After the unlawful act was committed, they tried to make it difficult for me to file any court action either by blacking out sections of the files, or by shredding them.
This is how it all began and how my youngest daughter ended up in the state's captivity.
The state of Missouri's Child Protection Services failed as they continued to allow a disgruntled ex-spouse use their hot line as a means of harassment.
The Father, my ex-husband, had court ordered visitations with my daughter.
While she was in his care, the Father made many false hotline calls on a daily basis assuming that he would gain full custody.
Note: Why does'nt CPS have any laws or if they do, why don't they utilize the laws to make someone stop using their hotline if they are using it unwisely? .
The police detectives sent in messages and police reports to the family courts reporting that the Father was an inappropriate custodian and should not have the child.
The police also reported that the Father was fabricating allegations to harass the Mother.
After they left my daughter with the Father for long periods of time, they waited till one Holloween day to take my daughter from her Father.
Immediately, after the state took my daughter from her father on one Holloween day, the state officials dressed her in a Holloween costume and even put lipstick on her.
Not showing any concerns for my daughters emotional state of being, the state officials made her stand around and pose for their camera.
They began to photograph her as soon as they placed her in their vehicle.
I found these pictures that were taken of my daughter by the state officials.
These photos were taken shortly after they took her from the Father, after they dressed her in this costume.


I owned my house for seven years before the state got involved.
After the St. Louis, family courts had my daughter in their state care, I discovered that two state Guardian Ad Litems were holding liens to our house whereby both of their names were attached to our house at the same time, while the court officials made court rulings that the Mother lacked adequate housing as a reason to terminate my parental rights.
Child Protection Services violated my Child's rights even more so, by placing her in foster care immediately after rescuing her from the offenders care, denying her the love and care that she needed from her natural mother.
The St. Louis Family Court, Child Protection Services, the Court Appointed Guardian Ad Litems, and the CASA Advocacy Group of the St. Louis Family courts, did the ultimate damage to her, denying her from her own mother, sister, and brother who still remained to together as a family unit.
I discoverd that the state granted full custody of my daughter to a single man, along with several other little girls that were also adopted out by the state. Also, the judge that granted full custody to a single man, is the same judge who granted child abuse restraining orders to the biological father whom the state removed her from.
This is a photo of my daughter while she was being shuffled around from one foster care home to the next until the state found someone to adopt her for the bonuses and rewards.
Now the man who adopted my little girl receives state subsidies for her, when she has a Mother who does not need state subsidies to care for her.

My rights were terminated based on the time law, and the bond, not the false allegations that were made by the father.
The Court Officials and Child Protection Services had to find other reasons to terminate my rights, because I was the non-offending parent.
If Child Protection Services returns the child to the non-offending divorced/single parent, what kind of financial incentive is there for the state?
There are no financial incentives for giving a child back to the divorced/single non-offending parent, that's why my little girl is not with her family today.
Please help us to return her back into her own home, with her real Mother, brother and sister who love and miss her.
Mother of three, still have two, while missing one,
Sincerely,
Sonja De Vivo
To all who have taken the time to read my petition, I want to thank you.
NAMES OF THE STATE OFFICIALS WHO WORKED ON THIS CASE
The names of the three Guardian Ad Litims who were on this case WITHIN LESS THAT A 12 MONTH SPAN are Jerrilyn Bowie Hill, Brian Dunlop and Margaret Donnelly all from the St. Louis Clayton County Courts from the state of Missouri.
(Every time a Guardian Ad Litem was introduced to the case, they always demanded large lump sums of money)
Guardian Ad Litem, Missouri State Representative, now running for Attorney General, Margerat Donnelly from the St. Louis Clayton County Courts took over the case were Guardian Ad Litem Brain Dunlap left off.
Margaret Donnelly and Brian Donlup both held liens to the children's house while claiming that they work for the best interests of the child.
Margaret Donnelly pushed for the termination of parental rights while knowing and having full awareness that my other two children were living with me.
Judge Melvyn Weissman from the St.Louis Clayton County courts terminated my rights while knowing that my other two children were still in my care.
Judge Susan Block did the adoption.
Judge Melvyn Weissman and Judge Susan Block have been noted in articles for operating adoption fair Saturdays together in the state of Missouri.
NOTICE THIS SMALL PARAGRAPH TAKEN OUT OF A NEWS ARTICLE FOUND BELOW WRITTEN BY Linda Meyers
Special Correspondent."The event wrapped up in the
afternoon with the presentation of
The Dudley Dunlop Distinguished
Guardian Ad Litem Award for 2001
to Donnelly. The award was pre-
sented by Judge Susan E. Block,
administrative judge of the Family
Court of St. Louis County. Block
said of Donnelly, "Margaret is the
consummate professional in a court-
room, and the children couldn't be
in more caring hands when she rep-
resents them."
Dear Readers of this petition,
Please take special notice to the three names mentioned all in one paragraph together IN THE NEWS ARTICLE,
No. 1.
Dudley Dunlop, who was my childs first court appointed Guardian ad litem from the St. Louis Family courts who then passed the case onto
No. 2.
Margaret Donnelly, Guardian Ad Litem who is currently running for Missouri's Attorney General, who pushed for my daughter to be wrongfully adopted while her other two siblings remained at home with the natural Mother, and then
No. 3.
Judge Susan Block who did the final illegal adoption of my daughter.
"See how organized they are and how they all work together?"
Becky Price was the Social Worker on this case who was under oath when she admitted to lieing, while Judge Melvyn Weissman continued to clip his nails and did nothing about it.
Sharon Kramar, was used to throw a wrench into the counselor named Joanna Mason's positive feedback about me.
Sharon Kramar was the state official who would scold me in front of my daughter for giving her a stuffed animal.
Counselor Joanna Mason's, from the St. Louis Clayton County Courts job was threatened because she was supporting my efforts to regain custody of my daughter.
Court appointed psychologist Lisa Emmenaggar pycologist stated under oath that I had no bond with my daughter because there was no communication during the time I rocked my daughter to sleep in a rocking chair that Social Services placed in the visiting room.
Court Appointed Special Advocate NANCY NETSCH from CASA at the St. Louis Clayton County courts was described as a volunteer who would push for terminating my rights while knowing that my other two children were still in my care.
Nancy Netsch, from CASA stood side by side next to JUDGE SUSAN BLOCK who did the adoption of my youngest child.
Juvenile officer appeared by attorney, NANCY L. SIDO pushed for termination by attacking frivolous issues such as child support payments to the courts while they collected federal funds for keeping my youngest daughter while wrongfully holding my daughter under their the states care.
Elizabeth Stonefield from the Adoption Unit from the Missouri Family Services was notified that my child was free for adoption.
Judge Coralyn Whitington from the St. Louis Family courts appointed to me attorney Bill Grant from the St. Louis Clayton County Family Courts to handle this case.
It was later discovered by campaign records that my attorney Bill Grant who was appointed to me by Judge Coralyn Whitington has contributed campaign funds to the Guardian Ad Litim, Missouri State Representative, now running for the Missouri Attorney General, Margaret Donnelly who pushed for my parental rights to be terminated.
Judge Coralyn Whitington and Guardian Ad Litim Brian Dunlap granted custody of my youngest daughter to the biological Father whom the courts took her from and was later adjudicated for abuse.
Judge Coralyn Whitington also granted full custody of my daughter to a single man that ran a foster career home to adopt from the state of Missouri to also include two other little girls who who were also adopted out by the state of Missouri.
Please Help Me To Release My Daughter From The States Capture.

Siblings separated by the state.
The State Has No Right to Severe The Ties Between Siblings, When The State Allows For Two Siblings To Live With The Parent, While Placing One Up For Adoption.
Photo of Brother & Sister separated by the state. The youngest one was wrongfully placed up for adoption while the older one remained at home with his Mother and other sister.
Special note to all readers: At the bottom of this petition list the names of the state officials who played their role in this case. This is a photo just moments before a Social worker would grab my little girls hand and take her away. We only got to see her for just one hour every two weeks.

She was lined up and instructed to stand up against the wall with the other children, while standing in a long line, as she watched the court officials take two children in to a room where they would be adopted two at a time by Judge Susan Block from the St. Louis Family Courts who's been noted in news articles along with Judge Melvyn Weissman who terminated my rights, for their support with an event called Adoption Fair Saturdays.
This picture shown above was taken of me and of my youngest daughter who became a victim of an illegal state adoption, shown on the left of the photo, with my son on the right of the photo.
We were at the Division of Family Services on that day while we were on a court ordered visit of just one hour.
My olther daughter, who was there to visit her little sister took the picture of the three of us.
When terminating parental rights, the courts must address the issue of a parent being "unfit" in order to rule for a termination of parental rights.
Judge Carolyn Whittington, Judge Melvyn Weissman, to include a panel of appallent judges totaling 4 to 5 appallent Judges from St. Louis, Mossouri who all failed but succeeded in upholding each others wrongful rulings of a wrongful termination.
These Judges skipped right over ruling me to be an unfit parent while working towards covering their unlawful acts by using power in numbers by calling on many family court state officials to support their actions while ignoring the truth.
They used bully tactics in the family courts to torture me and my children where we were forced into emotional torture, through constant separating, the children were forced into forced separation trauma twice a month or more, I was set up with schemes and plots by the state officials of the family courts where they would attack my natural bond by setting up props in the visiting rooms, such as rocking chairs and magazines that they placed in the visiting room.
They used me to get federal funds to support their programs while using their programs to stall for time so they could use the "time law" to wrongfully terminate my rights.
The judges from the appellant courts did not even see or meet me when
making their rulings to support Judge Melvyn Weissman's wrongful and cruel ruling to terminate one child from her natural family members of three to include a sister and a brother and myself.
My other two children were attending school and living under my roof, under my care and custody when Margaret Donnelly, Missouri State Representative recommended that my rights be terminated.
Judge Melvyn Weissman agreed to Margaret Donnelly's recommendation by signing the paper of termination of parental rights.
They never even addressed the topic "unfit" while having full awarness that I was still caring for my other two children.
These judges from the family courts and the appellant courts, still remain on the bench or they are still working within the system today.
All of our leaders in the state of Missouri walk away from this case as though it never happened assuming that I will just go away as long as they continue to ignore me.
They show absolutely no concerns of anykind for my daughter. The state continues to hold her by illegal servitude without concern or any attempts to return her.
After the visits at the state DFS office were over, my older daughter and son, including myself, were allowed to leave together and go home.
The Social Worker would transport my youngest child back to Foster Care.
At the end of the court ordered visits, all three children had to suffer the emotional trauma of becoming separated.
The reason it was so traumatizing to the children is because the older two children were in question as to why their own Mother was not being told as to where these strange people where taking their sister.
It was not like she was going to a babysitter and we all knew where she was, it was like a repeated kidnapping every time by someone who was keeping her in a secret place.
The youngest daughter was dragged off by a social worker's hand, while she had to watch her other two siblings get in the car with her Mother to go back home.
As the social worker drove away with my youngest daughter, we could always see my daughter pressing her face up against the window pane of the social worker's vehicle trying to get as close to us as she could while the social worker drove her away from us.
The children were expected to play together in a office room.
The room was the size of a small office that had various types of chairs.
There were empty wooden shelves, with some toys on the floor.
The children would always end up playing on the dusty floor.
My heart would just break into every time watching the hour quickly go by knowing what the children were going to face at the end of the visit.
The social worker always threatened if I ever tried to voice my opinion regarding my children that she would have the judge put my daughter up for adoption making it to where I could never express my feelings or concerns.
She often said this in front of the children.
The photo above was taken moments before one of the many one hour visits was just about to be over, although the children did not know it at the time their photo was taken.
The social worker named Becky Price would always grab my daughters hand and pull her away from her brother.
The children became upset every time, with my son pulling on my shirt, demanding that I tell him where that lady was taking his sister.
You could hear my daughter screaming out, no! no! as the social worker forced her to walk down the hallways and out the door.
There was a rocking chair among many others in the small visiting room.
The court appointed psychologist Lisa Emmenagger who testified that I, the Mother rocked my little girl to sleep during one of our one hour visits, therefore there was no communication between the child and Mother which indicates that there is no bond between the Mother and child.
This is in the court transcripts.
The state had it set up to where they would continue this act until the 15 months were up which carried out for two years.
They used the "time law" to terminate my rights to my youngest child by stating that since they severed the bond between the mother and child there was no reason to return her.
I was allowed to keep two of my other children ( age's 7 and 15 ) in my care and custody with out any demands by the same individuals who terminated my rights to my youngest daughter who was age (5).
Should this be allowed in the United States to use these reasons to terminate a non-offending divorced parent's parental rights of their child?
Read below the listed items that are stated on my termination of parental rights court document used by the State Officials to terminate my parental rights from my youngest child.
Judge Mylvyn Weisman from the St. Louis Clayton County Courts made this ruling of termination of parental rights.
1; Due to the amount of time the child has been in the system, the bond has slowly diminished, leaving no reason to return the child to the Mother.
Note: (the courts used the time law to their advantage by using their federally funded programs to stall for the time they needed in order to use the time law)
2; There was no evidence presented that the Mother suffers from a mental condition which cannot be reversed which renders the Mother unable to knowingly provide the child the necessary care, custody and control.
Note: (the courts could have turned this around easily and said that the mother had a mental illness, but the fact is I did not have a mental illness and they did not even have to say that I had a mental illness to terminate parental my rights)
3; There was no evidence presented that the Mother suffers from a chemical dependency which cannot be treated and which prevents her from consistently providing the necessary care, custody and control for the child.
Note: (the courts could have easily said that the Mother suffered from a chemical dependency, but the fact is that I did not suffer from a chemical dependency and they did not have to state that the Mother suffered from a chemical dependency to terminate my rights)
4; There was no evidence presented that the Mother has committed any severe or recurrent acts of physical emotional or sexual abuse toward the child or any other child in the family.
Note: (the courts could have said that the Mother has committed abuse, but the facts are that I never did commit any form of abuse and they did not have to state that I committed abuse to terminate my parental rights)
My termination of parental rights shows you that the courts do not even have to find you as an abuser of any kind to keep your child.
Also, if they want to, they have the freedom of writing what ever they want to about you if they feel its necessary for terminating your parental rights.
The juvenile courts are free to write anything without question and this is a very serious situation here when we are talking about making decisions on a child's life.
After the state terminated my rights, the family courts claimed they shredded my files.
Social Services blacked out sections of my files with a black marker and sections of the files were deleted. A suspected killer has more rights in America than a falsely accused parent.
A person suspected of murder gets a fair trial, verses a falsely accused parent.
A falsely accused parent's rights are violated in secrecy behind the juvenile court doors, without any due process or a fair trial.
A fair trial is held in the criminal courts, but not in the juvenile courts where you can loose your child without ever being convicted of child abuse or adjudicated.
According to their own statements which you can hear in the video on this petition, is a phone message that was left for me by the family courts informing me that they shredded the documents to this case.
They also sent a document confirming the phone message.
After the unlawful act was committed, they tried to make it difficult for me to file any court action either by blacking out sections of the files, or by shredding them.
This is how it all began and how my youngest daughter ended up in the state's captivity.
The state of Missouri's Child Protection Services failed as they continued to allow a disgruntled ex-spouse use their hot line as a means of harassment.
The Father, my ex-husband, had court ordered visitations with my daughter.
While she was in his care, the Father made many false hotline calls on a daily basis assuming that he would gain full custody.
Note: Why does'nt CPS have any laws or if they do, why don't they utilize the laws to make someone stop using their hotline if they are using it unwisely? .
The police detectives sent in messages and police reports to the family courts reporting that the Father was an inappropriate custodian and should not have the child.
The police also reported that the Father was fabricating allegations to harass the Mother.
After they left my daughter with the Father for long periods of time, they waited till one Holloween day to take my daughter from her Father.
Immediately, after the state took my daughter from her father on one Holloween day, the state officials dressed her in a Holloween costume and even put lipstick on her.
Not showing any concerns for my daughters emotional state of being, the state officials made her stand around and pose for their camera.
They began to photograph her as soon as they placed her in their vehicle.
I found these pictures that were taken of my daughter by the state officials.
These photos were taken shortly after they took her from the Father, after they dressed her in this costume.


I owned my house for seven years before the state got involved.
After the St. Louis, family courts had my daughter in their state care, I discovered that two state Guardian Ad Litems were holding liens to our house whereby both of their names were attached to our house at the same time, while the court officials made court rulings that the Mother lacked adequate housing as a reason to terminate my parental rights.
Child Protection Services violated my Child's rights even more so, by placing her in foster care immediately after rescuing her from the offenders care, denying her the love and care that she needed from her natural mother.
The St. Louis Family Court, Child Protection Services, the Court Appointed Guardian Ad Litems, and the CASA Advocacy Group of the St. Louis Family courts, did the ultimate damage to her, denying her from her own mother, sister, and brother who still remained to together as a family unit.
I discoverd that the state granted full custody of my daughter to a single man, along with several other little girls that were also adopted out by the state. Also, the judge that granted full custody to a single man, is the same judge who granted child abuse restraining orders to the biological father whom the state removed her from.
This is a photo of my daughter while she was being shuffled around from one foster care home to the next until the state found someone to adopt her for the bonuses and rewards.
Now the man who adopted my little girl receives state subsidies for her, when she has a Mother who does not need state subsidies to care for her.

My rights were terminated based on the time law, and the bond, not the false allegations that were made by the father.
The Court Officials and Child Protection Services had to find other reasons to terminate my rights, because I was the non-offending parent.
If Child Protection Services returns the child to the non-offending divorced/single parent, what kind of financial incentive is there for the state?
There are no financial incentives for giving a child back to the divorced/single non-offending parent, that's why my little girl is not with her family today.
Please help us to return her back into her own home, with her real Mother, brother and sister who love and miss her.
Mother of three, still have two, while missing one,
Sincerely,
Sonja De Vivo
To all who have taken the time to read my petition, I want to thank you.
NAMES OF THE STATE OFFICIALS WHO WORKED ON THIS CASE
The names of the three Guardian Ad Litims who were on this case WITHIN LESS THAT A 12 MONTH SPAN are Jerrilyn Bowie Hill, Brian Dunlop and Margaret Donnelly all from the St. Louis Clayton County Courts from the state of Missouri.
(Every time a Guardian Ad Litem was introduced to the case, they always demanded large lump sums of money)
Guardian Ad Litem, Missouri State Representative, now running for Attorney General, Margerat Donnelly from the St. Louis Clayton County Courts took over the case were Guardian Ad Litem Brain Dunlap left off.
Margaret Donnelly and Brian Donlup both held liens to the children's house while claiming that they work for the best interests of the child.
Margaret Donnelly pushed for the termination of parental rights while knowing and having full awareness that my other two children were living with me.
Judge Melvyn Weissman from the St.Louis Clayton County courts terminated my rights while knowing that my other two children were still in my care.
Judge Susan Block did the adoption.
Judge Melvyn Weissman and Judge Susan Block have been noted in articles for operating adoption fair Saturdays together in the state of Missouri.
NOTICE THIS SMALL PARAGRAPH TAKEN OUT OF A NEWS ARTICLE FOUND BELOW WRITTEN BY Linda Meyers
Special Correspondent."The event wrapped up in the
afternoon with the presentation of
The Dudley Dunlop Distinguished
Guardian Ad Litem Award for 2001
to Donnelly. The award was pre-
sented by Judge Susan E. Block,
administrative judge of the Family
Court of St. Louis County. Block
said of Donnelly, "Margaret is the
consummate professional in a court-
room, and the children couldn't be
in more caring hands when she rep-
resents them."
Dear Readers of this petition,
Please take special notice to the three names mentioned all in one paragraph together IN THE NEWS ARTICLE,
No. 1.
Dudley Dunlop, who was my childs first court appointed Guardian ad litem from the St. Louis Family courts who then passed the case onto
No. 2.
Margaret Donnelly, Guardian Ad Litem who is currently running for Missouri's Attorney General, who pushed for my daughter to be wrongfully adopted while her other two siblings remained at home with the natural Mother, and then
No. 3.
Judge Susan Block who did the final illegal adoption of my daughter.
"See how organized they are and how they all work together?"
Becky Price was the Social Worker on this case who was under oath when she admitted to lieing, while Judge Melvyn Weissman continued to clip his nails and did nothing about it.
Sharon Kramar, was used to throw a wrench into the counselor named Joanna Mason's positive feedback about me.
Sharon Kramar was the state official who would scold me in front of my daughter for giving her a stuffed animal.
Counselor Joanna Mason's, from the St. Louis Clayton County Courts job was threatened because she was supporting my efforts to regain custody of my daughter.
Court appointed psychologist Lisa Emmenaggar pycologist stated under oath that I had no bond with my daughter because there was no communication during the time I rocked my daughter to sleep in a rocking chair that Social Services placed in the visiting room.
Court Appointed Special Advocate NANCY NETSCH from CASA at the St. Louis Clayton County courts was described as a volunteer who would push for terminating my rights while knowing that my other two children were still in my care.
Nancy Netsch, from CASA stood side by side next to JUDGE SUSAN BLOCK who did the adoption of my youngest child.
Juvenile officer appeared by attorney, NANCY L. SIDO pushed for termination by attacking frivolous issues such as child support payments to the courts while they collected federal funds for keeping my youngest daughter while wrongfully holding my daughter under their the states care.
Elizabeth Stonefield from the Adoption Unit from the Missouri Family Services was notified that my child was free for adoption.
Judge Coralyn Whitington from the St. Louis Family courts appointed to me attorney Bill Grant from the St. Louis Clayton County Family Courts to handle this case.
It was later discovered by campaign records that my attorney Bill Grant who was appointed to me by Judge Coralyn Whitington has contributed campaign funds to the Guardian Ad Litim, Missouri State Representative, now running for the Missouri Attorney General, Margaret Donnelly who pushed for my parental rights to be terminated.
Judge Coralyn Whitington and Guardian Ad Litim Brian Dunlap granted custody of my youngest daughter to the biological Father whom the courts took her from and was later adjudicated for abuse.
Judge Coralyn Whitington also granted full custody of my daughter to a single man that ran a foster career home to adopt from the state of Missouri to also include two other little girls who who were also adopted out by the state of Missouri.
Please Help Me Get My Daughter Back.

This picture shown above was taken of me and of my youngest daughter who became a victim of an illegal state adoption, shown on the left of the photo, with my son on the right of the photo.
We were at the Division of Family Services on that day while we were on a court ordered visit of just one hour.
My oldest daughter, who was there to visit her little sister took the picture of the three of us.
After the visits at the state DFS office were over, my older daughter and son, including myself, were allowed to leave together and go home.
The Social Worker would transport my youngest child back to Foster Care.
At the end of the court ordered visits, all three children had to suffer the emotional trauma of becoming separated, not knowing why or where their sister was being taken to.
The youngest daughter was dragged off by a social worker's hand, while she had to watch her other two siblings get in the car with her Mother to go back home.
As the social worker drove away with my youngest daughter, we could always see my daughter pressing her face up against the window pane of the social worker's vehicle trying to get as close to us as she could while the social worker drove her away from us.
The children were all traumatized by these acts and had to live many years watching the abuse committed by the state officials.
The state had it set up to where they would continue this act until the 15 months were up.
They could use the "time law" to terminate my rights to my youngest child by stating that since they severed the bond between the mother and child there was no reason to return her.
I was allowed to keep two of my other children ( age's 7 and 15 ) in my care and custody with out any demands by the same individuals who terminated my rights to my youngest daughter who was age (5).
Should this be allowed in the United States to use these reasons to terminate a non-offending divorced parent's parental rights of their child?
Read below the listed items used by the State Officials to terminate my parental rights from my youngest child.
1; Due to the amount of time the child has been in the system, the bond has slowly diminished, leaving no reason to return the child to the Mother.
Note: (the courts used the time law to their advantage)
2; There was no evidence presented that the Mother suffers from a mental condition which cannot be reversed which renders the Mother unable to knowingly provide the child the necessary care, custody and control.
Note: (the courts could have turned this around easily and said that the mother had a mental illness, but the fact is I did not have a mental illness)
3; There was no evidence presented that the Mother suffers from a chemical dependency which cannot be treated and which prevents her from consistently providing the necessary care, custody and control for the child.
Note: (the courts could have easily said that the Mother suffered from a chemical dependency, but the fact is that I did not suffer from a chemical dependency)
4; There was no evidence presented that the Mother has committed any severe or recurrent acts of physical emotional or sexual abuse toward the child or any other child in the family.
Note: (the courts could have said that the Mother has committed abuse, but the facts are that I never did commit any form of abuse)
This termination of parental rights shows you that the courts do not even have to find you as an abuser of any kind to take your child. Also, if they want to, they have the freedom of writing what ever they want to about you if they feel its necessary to get your child.
The judicial courts and social workers have the ultimate freedom to write what they want without proving their statements.
A suspected killer has more rights in America than a falsely accused parent in the system.
A suspected killer has more rights than our own children do in the system.
Read below to learn how my youngest child ended up in the system.
The state of Missouri's Child Protection Services failed as they continued to allow a disgruntled ex-spouse use their hot line as a means of harassment.
The St. Louis Family Court, Guardian Ad Litems, and Child Protection Services all failed my daughter, by placing her with the offender, who was the one making all of the false hotline calls while she was in his care on a daily bases and who was adjudicated for abusing her by the same courts who allowed him to have custody after having full awareness of his history with past mental illnesses and institutionalized stays.
(They never put a stop to his daily false hotline calls, while using his mental instability while leaving the child at great risk of harm so to have reason to justify why they would take the child.
The St. Louis Family Court and the Child Protection Services removed my daughter from the offender's custody after leaving her there long enough to cause damage.
Child Protection Services violated my Child's rights even more so, by placing her in foster care immediately after rescuing her from the offenders care, denying her the love and care that she needed from her natural mother.
The St. Louis Family Court, Child Protection Services, the Court Appointed Guardian Ad Litems, and the CASA Advocacy Group of the St. Louis Family courts, did the ultimate damage to her, denying her from her own mother, sister, and brother who still remained to together as a family unit.
She was lined up and instructed to stand up against the wall with the other children, while standing in a long line, as she watched the court officials take two children in to a room where they would be adopted two at a time.
My rights were terminated based on the time law, and the bond, not the false allegations that were made by the father.
Child Protection Services stated that the bond was severed due to the amount of time the child was in the system, which was their fault in the first place, plus the bond was never severed.
The Court Officials and Child Protection Services had to find other reasons to terminate my rights, because I was the non-offending parent.
Child Protection Services is a state agency with the power to 'Kidnap With Impunity.
They can create a destructive file on any fit parent without any laws in place that would require them to prove their written statements unlike a criminal court whereby a suspect is innocent until proven guilty. Fit parents do not have the same rights as a suspected killer does.
This is why fit parents are dragged into the Juvenile courts so that court records will be sealed and no one of the outside will ever be able to see the destructing methods used to justify their reasoning for legalized kidnapping.
If Child Protection Services returns the child to the non-offending divorced/single parent, what kind of financial incentive is there for the state? There are no financial incentives for giving a child back to the divorced/single non-offending parent, that's why my little girl is not with her family today.
Please help us to return her back into her own home, with her real Mother, brother and sister who love and miss her.
We are grateful for your signatures!
Mother of three, still have two, while missing one,
Sincerely,
Sonja
petition over