Critics have said that a Cap and Trade program is too expensive. But we have already spent billions on the repercussions of global warming, and it will only get worse.
Don't believe it? Consider this: - We have lost $1.3 billion as a result of crop loss from Georgia's drought in 2007.
- It cost $300 million to repair rail transportation after Hurricane Katrina.
- We spent $272 million in 2007 as a result of increasing flood damage.
Not convincing enough? How about this: Four global warming impacts alone -- hurricane damage, real estate losses, energy costs, and water costs -- will come with a price tag of 1.8 percent of U.S. GDP, or almost $1.9 trillion annually (in today's dollars) by 2100.
And now, consider the cost of Cap and Trade: The median projected impact of climate policy is less than one-half of one percent of U.S. GDP for the period 2010-2030, and under three-quarters of one percent through the middle of the century. So now is the cost of a Cap and Trade system worth it? We think so. Ask your members of Congress to pass a Cap and Trade system to regulate greenhouse gases today!
Sign Here
There are errors in your form. Please fix the fields in red.
Keep up the great work. Look what you've accomplished!
1
0
0
0
grab this widget
for your site or blog
Make a difference for the issues you care about while adding cool interactive
content. Your readers sign without ever leaving your site. It's simple, just choose
your widget size and color and copy the embed code to your site or blog.