my care2
make a difference

take action

petitionsite

start a petition, change the world

We, the Undersigned, endorse the following petition:

Democracy in Corporate Elections

Target: Jonathan G. Katz, Secretary, U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
Sponsor: Myra Young
  • Signatures: 416
  • Goal: 2,500
  • Deadline: 8-3-2003
Amend SEC Rule 14a-(8)(i)(8), which currently excludes proposals related to Corporate Board elections, to require that Shareholder nominees for Director positions, who meet the other legal requirements, be required to be included in Corporate proxy materials.

Enter your name:
Or log in.
Display in public list as "Anonymous"
Number Date Name
416 11:35 am PST, Nov 6 G. Sherwood Sage
415 9:42 am PDT, Jun 14 Hazel Matich
414 11:59 pm PDT, Jun 12 Anonymous
413 6:55 am PST, Mar 3 james booth
412 3:41 pm PST, Jan 24 Jessica O'Connell
411 11:53 pm PST, Jan 17 SHERRI HENRY
410 1:01 pm PST, Jan 16 Lisa Cowdrey
409 8:09 pm PST, Nov 26 Emily MacDonald
408 4:54 pm PST, Nov 10 Brian Reynolds
407 1:53 am PDT, Aug 19 Nicole Glaze
406 4:05 am PDT, Jun 29 Brenda Schenk
405 10:11 pm PDT, Jun 24 Charlie Gargiulo
404 7:36 pm PDT, Jun 14 Michael Gualtieri
403 3:35 am PDT, May 25 Anna Asbury
402 1:00 pm PDT, May 17 KARLA GLOOR
401 12:48 pm PDT, May 16 Desiray Nagrone
400 9:10 pm PDT, May 13 Anonymous
399 12:40 am PDT, Apr 29 Eran Kleinbaum
398 3:55 am PDT, Apr 23 Neal Jeffries
397 6:32 pm PDT, Apr 9 David Dunkleberger
396 3:21 pm PDT, Apr 2 Anonymous
395 10:00 pm PST, Mar 29 Megan Cutler
394 4:41 am PST, Mar 25 CC Schenk
393 9:29 pm PST, Mar 18 Erik Douglas
392 9:48 am PST, Mar 18 Nikolai Dragnes
391 4:56 am PST, Mar 14 Emily Eidson
390 9:00 am PST, Mar 13 Jennifer Gardner
389 3:05 pm PST, Mar 7 Michael Mitsuda
388 8:49 am PST, Mar 4 stephanie lessard
387 11:47 pm PST, Mar 2 Jette Guyette
386 10:29 pm PST, Feb 23 Sherie Anderson
385 4:22 pm PST, Feb 23 Karl Ford
384 5:36 pm PST, Feb 18 Paul Paine
383 2:13 am PST, Feb 18 Steve Klein
382 8:50 pm PST, Feb 17 Cristina Ramirez
381 4:01 pm PST, Feb 15 Gabriel Gardner
380 9:59 am PST, Feb 14 Robin Stuart-Tilley
379 4:08 pm PST, Feb 8 Michael Kisielewski, Jr.
378 8:15 am PST, Feb 8 Toni Sokoloski
377 3:59 pm PST, Feb 4 Genie Brooks
376 6:57 pm PST, Jan 23 Larry Petersen
375 5:43 pm PST, Jan 21 Emily Wahl
374 11:05 am PST, Jan 21 C Lisa Jackson
373 5:52 pm PST, Jan 14 Anonymous
372 8:44 am PST, Jan 9 Bruce Combs
371 4:06 pm PST, Jan 7 Lawrence Smith, BA
370 8:33 pm PST, Dec 30 Dinda Evans
369 6:46 am PST, Dec 30 Chandra Patel
368 5:11 pm PST, Dec 23 Ann Drechsler
367 10:08 am PST, Dec 21 Anonymous
366 7:29 pm PST, Dec 18 Earth Indigo
365 1:01 pm PST, Dec 14 Donna Hodsdon-Trips
364 8:57 am PST, Dec 12 Jason J Green
363 9:02 am PST, Dec 11 Sue Harrington
362 11:32 am PST, Dec 10 Joanne Ferguson
361 7:52 am PST, Dec 6 James A Clark Jr
360 10:24 pm PST, Dec 1 Dee Emry
359 4:12 pm PST, Nov 29 Michele Long
358 5:55 am PST, Nov 29 Steve Dale
357 7:51 pm PST, Nov 28 Anonymous
356 5:03 am PST, Nov 27 Anonymous
355 3:41 pm PST, Nov 24 Anonymous
354 1:59 pm PST, Nov 23 Paula Delavigne
353 5:41 am PST, Nov 20 Thomas Pirovano
352 9:02 pm PST, Nov 12 Nancy Vernand
351 10:44 am PST, Nov 12 Kat Rudd

Democracy in Corporate Elections

Democracy in Corporate Elections


The problems of ENRON, Global Crossing, WorldCom and similar corporations will not solved by more disclosure and stiffer penalties, although such reforms at the margin are long overdue. Those who ask corporate management ("Management") and/or Directors to voluntarily abandon concepts of greed and conflicts of interest miss the core issue.


While the corporation laws of every state, solemnly recite that the Shareholders elect the Directors, each year Shareholders of American corporations are asked to participate in an exercise which bears little resemblance to the word "election" as commonly used in any democratic country.


Shareholders generally have no real choice. Even if an overwhelming majority of Shareholders oppose a Director- nominee, any nominee listed on the corporate proxy will serve as a Director so long as he or she gets one vote, unless an expensive proxy contest is undertaken. The real election for Directors occurs within the boardroom, with Shareholders relegated to a rubber-stamp process of affirmation.


When intelligent, honest professionals repeatedly use a legal term in a manner contrary to its commonly accepted usage, we are entitled to ask why. When the corporation laws of 50 states indicate that Shareholders "elect" Directors; that Shareholders "vote" for their choice of "nominees"; that proxies are solicited for the "election" of Directors, we are given an impression contrary to actual practice.


The "independent" Board of Directors ("Board") is supposed (and assumed) to hold power granted to it by the owners ("Shareholders"). Its actual power in fact derives from the Chief Executive Officer ("CEO"). The vast majority of Board vacancies have been filled via recommendations from the Chairman of the Board ("Chairman"). Further, given that in the vast majority of companies the Chairman is also the CEO, it is clear the CEO plays a dominant role in the selection of Directors. The fact that we speak of Directors as "representing" or being "elected" by Shareholders, when Shareholders play no role in their nomination, is evidence of the challenges we face in corporate accountability.


Since it is the duty of a Director to supervise Management, there is little likelihood that Management will select a candidate who is inclined to ask "tough questions." A Director who does not cooperate with Management will, in all likelihood, not be asked to serve an additional term. However, while dependent on Management and/or fellow Directors for his/her longevity, a Director still has a fiduciary duty to the Shareholders to monitor Management’s actions.


Until Directors can be held accountable by Shareholders, they will not be responsive to the desires of Shareholders. However, it is almost impossible for Shareholders to replace Directors who are incompetent and/or corrupt.


Other potential means to achieve accountability of Directors are ineffective. The threat of potential litigation, through class-action lawsuits by Shareholders, is highly overrated as a deterrent to corporate malfeasance and wasting of corporate assets. When they win, Shareholders end up paying themselves from corporate assets after plaintiffs’ attorneys recover substantial sums.


Under present SEC Rules, it is practically impossible for a candidate NOT selected by Management and/or incumbent Directors to mount an effective proxy contest to replace Directors.


For example, in May of 1991, Robert A. G. Monks indicated he would engage in a proxy contest for one seat on the Board of a public company, something no one had ever done before at any company; his target was Sears. Sears hired renowned takeover lawyer Marty Lipton, brought a lawsuit to stop Monks and budgeted $5.5 million dollars over and above Sears’ usual solicitation expenses, just to defeat him (as Crain’s Chicago Business pointed out, one out of every seven dollars made by the retail operation during the previous year). Sears also assigned 30 of its employees to spend their time working to defeat his candidacy.


The myth is that the Management reports to the Board. The reality is that the Board reports to the CEO. Strengthening the definition of an "independent" Directors will have little impact, as long as they owe their positions to the CEO.


The major barrier to democratic corporate elections is the fact that, under present SEC Rules, only the names of those persons nominated by the corporation are required to appear on the corporation’s ballot.


We hereby join with the Committee of Concerned Shareholders and James McRitchie in their petition for a rulemking by the SEC to amend SEC Rule 14a-(8)(i)(8) to require that ALL nominees for Director positions, who meet the other legal requirements, be required to be included in Corporate proxy materials.

Note: This Democracy in Corporate Elections petition was submitted by Myra Young. ThePetitionSite.com is a free service provided to help concerned citizens rally support for issues they believe in. The opinions expressed by this petition do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of ThePetitionSite.com or Care2.com. There is no express or implied endorsement of this petition nor any newsletter offers (except those from Care2.com) by Care2.com, Inc, ThePetitionSite.com, or our sponsors. If you believe this system is being abused, please contact customer support.

Questions about this petition? Contact the petition sponsor: Myra Young.
Questions about thePetitionSite.com? Visit our FAQ Page.

Copyright © 2008 Care2.com, inc. and its licensors. All rights reserved