- Signatures: 1,276
- Goal: 2,000
- Deadline: 10-3-2003
See Full Petition
Email this Petition
The US secret military threatens the stability and health of the entire planet. Americans can no longer gain access to these secret technologies and projects. We appeal to the UN Security Council to pass a resolution to require the US to open its secret military bases for inspection.
| Number | Date | Prefix | Name | City | State | Zip/Postal Code | Country | Your personal appeal to the United Nations Security Council: |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1,289 | 11:30 am PST, Feb 26 | cecilia barria | santiago | 00000 | Chile | |||
| 1,288 | 10:56 am PST, Feb 26 | Adolph Hitler | Berlin | 11111 | Germany | What no insult for me from "BZ Botani wannabe"? This is due to your profound respect for my ideals, no doubt! Herr Speer, a free pair of jack boots for our accolyte. Herr Himmler, sign him up for the SS. He's got a taste for the blood of the innocent. I like that! | ||
| 1,287 | 7:27 am PST, Feb 26 | Anonymous | Tokyo | 1760021 | Japan | Which country has ever used WMD in a war? Not Iraq. It was the USA. Remember that, Mr Bush? Just in case it has slipped from your mind, in 1945, two Atomic Bombs were dropped by the USA onto the cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. It's more than 55 years ago, and the USA has been boasting about their power. Then, what do you really have now, dear USA? | ||
| 1,286 | 6:56 am PST, Feb 26 | Henry Mintzberg | Montreal | M3B 4L9 | Canada | When it comes to the war on Iraq, "Why now?" is the question on many minds. The President of the United States tells us repeatedly that he is losing patience with Saddam Hussein, yet offers no evidence of anything having changed there for years. The man is presumably no more evil, if no less, than he has been for a long time. So why now? The answer is simple: because that is how long it has taken the U.S. administration to get to this point. Think back to the beginning of this administration (how short memories are these days!) and recall that hawks in it were pushing for an attack on Iraq from the outset. At that time, they were dismissed as extremists; now they are mainstream. This suggests that the intended war has nothing to do with the events of Sept. 11. Terrorism is the excuse for attacking Iraq, not the reason. Let's not mix up rogue states with terrorist cells. Consider the evidence -- about the lack of evidence. When efforts to link Iraq with al-Qaeda failed, the case shifted to the dangers of Iraq supplying terrorists with weapons. Sure, that could happen. But the world is a big and porous place. A band of lunatics in the Tokyo subways did not need Saddam Hussein to get their chemicals. Terrorism will not be stopped by an America that runs around putting its finger in every weapons dike that springs a leak. Trying instead to get at the causes of terrorism could help, but that has not been on the U.S. agenda. "Why?" is the more difficult part to answer. Why is this happening at all; what logic is behind all this? Obviously, most well-meaning people, Muslims included, would like to see Saddam Hussein go. But just as obviously, most of these people do not want to see him removed by a war on Iraq. Colin Powell said recently that because Iraq is in material breach of UN resolutions, "serious consequences" would follow. That's precisely what many of us fear. First possible serious consequence: more terrorism. Can anyone really believe that humiliating another Muslim country (for whatever reason) will lead to less terrorism? Terrorists, too, need excuses, if not reasons. What better one than bombs raining down on Iraqis, with Americans pushing the buttons? Picture the images on hundreds of millions of television sets in Muslim homes around the world. The response won't be "Finally that S.O.B. is getting what he deserves," but "Look what those S.O.B.s are doing to us." If there really is a war on terrorism, then attacking Iraq in this way at this time is the worst possible move. Second possible serious consequence: political instability. Regime change works both ways -- getting rid of one Saddam Hussein risks bringing several others to power. Such regime changes already happened some years ago in Iran, Libya, and Afghanistan. We know what Egypt and Algeria have been living with; we are also aware of equivalent forces at work in Jordan and Saudi Arabia. Do we want to encourage them? Third possible serious consequence: economic depression. The U.S. economy is not in good shape; there have been repeated warnings about the effect of war on it. This could send the whole global economic system into a downward spiral. Is that worth the risk? Fourth possible serious consequence: wholesale death. And not only for a great many Iraqis. If Saddam Hussein really has these weapons, then he could use them on U.S. troops. If he does not, why attack? Either way, the logic of this war is questionable. George W. Bush and Tony Blair consider themselves to be religious men, but truly religious men don't normally engage in wanton murder. War is wanton murder. Sometimes, its ends justify its means, notably to stop more wanton murder. But the Pope is a religious man; he is trying to stop this war. Fifth possible serious consequence: failed peace. Washington feels it is right to pursue this war, with or without its allies. Has any country ever gone to war without feeling its cause to be right? (One of Napoleon's biographers wrote about his noble efforts to unite Europe -- with or without the consent of the other states!) A peaceful world does not depend on any state being right. It depends on the rule of law. Saddam Hussein may be in breach of UN resolutions; Mr. Bush is prepared to be in breach of the UN Charter, which requires member states to "refrain in their international relations from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state . . ." What kind of example will that set in the world? Put all this together and it just does not add up. Why, then, is the U.S. administration so intent on pursuing this course of action? Why is it investing so much of its resources and credibility in what so many prominent people around the world just cannot understand? And why is it prepared to alienate so many of its allies, and so many common people around the world? There has been much speculation about this: control of oil supplies, revenge by the son for the father, "finishing" the war in the Persian Gulf, pursuing a stalled war on terrorism that has nowhere else to go except against another government. Choose any or all of the above. But add in a good dose of ideological groupthink, that mindless collective drive toward a flawed course of action. It has happened before in America, most notably in the 1960s when the greatest brain trust ever put together in an administration could not distinguish a nationalist movement from a Communist one. (I should add that the currently popular comparison with the Cuban missile crisis is inappropriate. That represented a clear, direct, and proximate threat, and so people were convinced. The Iraqi "threat" today is much like the Vietnamese "threat" of the 1960s: vague, distant, mired in ideology and paranoia.) Groupthink also occurred in the 1950s when a paranoid senator named Joe McCarthy managed to take control of the American political agenda for a time. Then, too, it was communism. Or was it? Now it is terrorism. Or is it? Foreigners visiting the United States these days, myself included, feel uneasy about all those "God Bless America" signs. After all, Osama bin Laden also believed he was acting in the name of God. In Flaubert's Parrot, Julian Barnes wrote about Flaubert with respect to France that "The greatest patriotism is to tell your country when it is behaving dishonestly, foolishly, viciously." America needs some honest patriotism right now. Not to have "God Bless America," so much as to have "God Save America." And the rest of us, too. *******Henry Mintzberg is Cleghorn professor of management studies at McGill University in Montreal and author of the forthcoming Developing Managers, Not MBAs*****. | ||
| 1,285 | 3:50 pm PST, Feb 25 | USA#1 USA#1 | everywhere | Pennsylvania | 111111 | United States | The "BZ Impersonator" is a little rude, but he is correct in his assessment: The Radical Left does not present a reasonable argument as to why Bush and most Americans are wrong about Iraq. Instead, they simply cry "foul" and go on ad infinitum with their empty discourse. Reviewing the blather at this site confirms that the left cannot hope to have viable talk radio programs (except NPR): blah, blah, blah and repeated, overly emotional assertions of victimhood. | |
| 1,284 | 1:34 pm PST, Feb 25 | Adolph Hitler | Berlin | 111111 | Germany | The National Socialist party must protect the interest of the Volk. We must conquer Lebensraum in the East. Poland is a good place to start but we must hide our illegitimate aims by cloaking them in palatable terms. This will be a war of self-defense so let's get some German bums, kill them, dress them up in Polish uniforms and pretend that they have attacked a German radio station. Herr Goebbels, the propaganda machine must move into full gear to explain to the German people that the aggressor Slavs are a threat to the way of life of the Volk. Herr Himmler, use all means at your disposal to determine if this BZ Botani impersonator is really a Republican. This seems doubtful as he is clearly on welfare since he spends his entire day on the internet. See if he can be turned to act as an apologist for our cause. He clearly has a knack for disinformation. | ||
| 1,283 | 12:49 pm PST, Feb 25 | John Kesich | Millerton | Pennsylvania | 16936 | United States | when the US vetoes this resolution invoke Resolution 377 “Uniting for Peace” to bring it before the general assembly for a vote. | |
| 1,282 | 12:48 pm PST, Feb 25 | Ima Commie | Stamford | Connecticut | 06543 | United States | BZ Botani: Yu referred to the "historical" poster as "he". How very sexist! Can't a womyn be a moron too? In the future, use "he/she/it" | |
| 1,281 | 12:43 pm PST, Feb 25 | Saddam Hussein | Baghdad | ----- | Iraq | Hey, I want to thank everyone who signed this petition. Please spread the word that totalitarian dictators have rights, too! And to all that marched last weekend: my sincere thanks. Please remember, before you sleep each night, that you help me elict the screams from my torture dens, the crying of mothers whose children I gassed, the pain of the hundreds of thousands of Kurds I banished and Shi'ites I have murdered, and the pain of the millions I have starved so that I may build palaces. - Sincerely, Saddam Hussein | ||
| 1,279 | 9:21 am PST, Feb 25 | Anonymous | Ottawa | k2p2k8 | Canada | I notice a lot of messages here from people like Stalin, Kruschev, Aziz and Hussein. That's funny because they seem to hold similar opinions on the proposed war as 1. The Pope (an infamous liberal) 2. The Archbishop of Canterbury (another noted liberal) 3. General Norman Schwarzkopf a.k.a the guy that led a war against Hussein when he actually posed a threat in '91 and who helped disarm him of 80% of his weapons of "mass destruction" - the weapons that didn't actually cause any mass destruction in the first Gulf War, remember? 4. General Anthony Zinni - former head of the U.S. Central Command 5. at least a dozen other high ranking American military officers 6. Brent Scowcroft, the American National Security Advisor (to Bush senior) who played a crucial role in presenting a case for war against Hussein in '91. I guess that the above personalities have all joined the Communist and Ba'ath parties recently. 7. Most of Hussein's neighbours who are allegedly threatened by him but who have to be subjected to half a year of arm twisting and billions of dollars in bribery to announce that they regretfully will participate in some manner. On the other hand, it seems like the U.S. is doing its best impersonation of Soviet Russia lately: 1. Jailing thousands of people and holding them months on end without charge and without allowing them to see their lawyers 2. A media that does its best imitation of Pravda and claims that criticism of the President is tantamount to treason (a example of freedom of the press and freedom of speech at its finest - you can say anything that you want as long as it agrees with the Bush administration's party line). 3. A government that has called on federal workers to participate in a snitch program. The government wanted 1,000,000 Americans to participate, which number would have represented a larger per capita number of government informants than employed by the former East Germany (which, in turn, had the highest per capita number of informants in the Soviet bloc). 4. A head of government who not only did not get a majority of the votes but did not even get a plurality. The same guy who barely eked out enough electoral votes to win the presidency by claiming a 500 vote "victory" in a state of over 10,000,000 people. This all despite the facts that a) His brother was the governor of the state under dispute b) His campaign manager happened to be the Secretary of State (who set the rules for the recount) of the state under dispute. c) The aforementioned Secretary of State allowed overseas military ballots (which traditionally favour Republicans obverwhelmingly) to be counted even if they were post-marked AFTER the election and even if the ballot belonged to a citizen who had already voted, which is a violation of Florida election law. d) Bush's first cousin is the head of Fox news (the first American news organization to announce that Bush had "won" the presidency on election night even though their correspondants on the ground claimed that the election was too close to call). 5. Two of the 5 judges that appointed Bush President had close family (a wife for Rhenquist and a son for Scalia) that either worked for the Bush campaign or for legal firms that argued Bush's case before the Supreme Court. A good example of a new kind of show trial that would have made Stalin envious. 6. A government that has nothing but contempt for the rule of law (the very foundation of democracy) and is willing to violate its own constitution (the power to declare war is delegated to Congress and NOT to the Prsident), international law (in launching a preventitive war - not even preemptive - which is what the Germans did in 1914) and the UN Charter. This is all in the name of defeating a third world country, that was absolutely pulverized within a matter of weeks (12 years ago) and has less weapons than it did back then using claims that this 3rd world nation is a threat to the American way of life and the to very existence of its citizens. A fine piece of propaganda , indeed. Stalin must be smiling in his grave but the source of his pleasure is the decline in the state of American democracy. | ||
| 1,278 | 11:48 pm PST, Feb 24 | Anonymous | Ottawa | k2p2k8 | Canada | BZ Botani: By paranoid rantings are you referring to the Bush administration's claims of the alleged catastrophic threat posed by a small third-world country (Iraq)- whose military and weapons have been largely detroyed by war (and inspections) and whose capacity for rearmament has been seriously impaired by sanctions (and inspections) - to a nation that has enough weaponry to destroy the world hundreds of time over? Do you think anybody in the world actually believes your blood-thirsty, money-loving, retarded President's crap? Apparently, the millions of people around the world who took to the streets (mostly in the countries whose leaders support Bush's war-mongering) a little over a week ago, don't. Of course Bush doesn't care about public opinion in the nations of the world since he couldn't care less about the wishes of his own people. Losing the popular vote didn't prevent him from stealing the election in the U.S. by pulling every nepotistic string, did it? By the way, if Dick Cheney thinks that Hussein is evil then why did he allow his company to do millions of dollars of business with him in the mid to late 90's - you know, AFTER he prosecuted a war against him as Secretary of Defence? I guess that, according to Cheney, no one is evil while they're lining your pockets with loads and loads of money. Oh ya, here's a great bit of logic on Cheney's, Rumsfeld's, and Powell's behalf (I can't include Bush because he is too stupid to chew pretzels safely let alone devise foreign policy): We can't attack North Korea because they have weapons that can cause catastrophic destruction to its neighbours. On the other hand, we must attack Iraq because they have weapons that can cause mass destruction in neighbouring lands. Hmmmm, but if the U.S. claims that it won't attack a nation because of that nation's capacity to render massive harm against its neighbours then clearly the Bush administration does not believe that Iraq's weapons are actually capable of causing massive devastation i.e. their weapons of "mass destruction" aren't sufficient for the purpose. The other explanation is that they feel that the lives of Japanese and South Korean citizens are worth more than those of Israelis, Kuwaitis, Iranians, etc. As for Powell's evidence - which was totally shot to hell by Blix - if the U.S. has pictures of the Iraqis moving weapons then they must know where those weapons are being stored (Iraq is mostly a desert, isn't it?). Then why does Powell not tell Blix where those weapons are so that they can be confiscated and destroyed OR why doesn't the U.S. just seek a resolution to bomb the weapons sites? I guess its more fun bombing civilians than weapons though, isn't it? Oh ya, then Powell told us how Hussein tests his chemical weapons on death-row prisoners. Right. In the U.S. they just call it the "gas chamber" and "lethal injection". Didn't a report come out a couple of months ago about the U.S. subjecting its military personnel to nuclear weapons tests in the 50's? It's also funny to hear how shocked Bush is by the fact that Hussein used chemical weapons against the Iranians in the 80's. Right! His daddy and Reagan were so shocked that they just had to keep supplying Hussein with more weapons and money - but selling those weapons helped line the pockets of big business, didn't it. Again, the guy isn't evil if he's helping Americans make a buck. Moreover, why don't you pick up any text book on American foreign policy so that you can discover the following: the U.S. produced photos of landing strips in Grenada and doctored them (by adding alleged Soviet fighter planes) in order to justify an invasion of Grenada - a country of less than 200,000 people that posed a "deadly" threat to the U.S., in 1983. The U.S. went on to invade Grenada despite objections from each of the members of the Organization of American States that such an action violated the charter of the OAS while the U.S. also vetoed a U.N. resolution that held that such an invasion violated international law. During congressional hearings, designed to authorize action in the first Gulf War, Bush I's administration produced a "nurse" from a hospital that claimed that she witnessed Iraqi troops murdering Kuwaiti babies in their hospital incubators. Bush I then went on to parrot her comments in rallying Americans to the war cause. After the war, it was revealed that this "nurse" was, in fact, the daughter of the Kuwaiti ambassador to the U.S. who hadn't recently spent any time in Kuwaiti hospitals. When you're reading your book on American foreign policy look up, "the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution" i.e. the resolution passed by Congress allowing LBJ to bomb the crap out of Vietnam after LBJ went on t.v. and presented some fabricated b.s. about how an American destroyer was attacked in international waters by the Vietnamese. How about the one where Ronald Reagan blamed Libya for a bombing at a Berlin disco, which killed a couple of hundred American GI's, and then used this as an excuse for bombing Libya. Later investigations proved that Libya had nothing to do with the bombing. Then there is the evidence that the U.S. had of a chemical weapons factory, allegedly mascarading as a pharmaceutical plant, in Sudan. After bombing the crap out the area it was revealed that the building was, in fact, a pharmaceutical plant. And the world is supposed to believe that the joke speech that Powell gave presented any actual evidence? You know, the "British intelligence report" which documented Hussein's evil ways and which was revealed to, in fact, be a plagiarized essay from the Internet? How about the ACTUAL, leaked British - the guys that are on your side - intelligence report, which stated that no evidence existed of a link to Al Quaeda despite Powell's rantings on the topic. Then there were pictures of a building with a truck parked beside it. Compelling stuff made even more compelling by the pictures of the U.N. vehicles arriving at the building - SEVERAL WEEKS LATER. Why no photos of weapons being loaded onto the truck - the U.S. has satellites which can focus on a coin on the ground, doesn't it? Why did the air and soil samples not show any traces of biological or chemical weapons residue? The moral of the story? The U.S. hardly has any credibility when it comes to revealing "evidence" that supports its foreign policy adventures. As long as we're talking paranoia, here are a few examples: 1. McCarthyism - yeah, those commies were just everywhere, weren't they? 2. The "Domino theory" - if Vietnam goes commie, then so will the rest of Asia. Well, Vietnam went commie but the rest of Asia didn't, did it? 3. Nicaragua - this impoverished 3rd world nation posed such a threat to the U.S. that Reagan claimed that if Ortega wasn't stopped the commies would be in Missouri in no time flat. After, mining Nicaragua's harbours (a violation of international law, according to the World Court, which the U.S. just ignored) and support for the Nicaraguan rebels (through arms sales to Iran - a mortal enemy of the U.S. - which was involved in a war against Saddam Hussein's Iraq, which the U.S. also supported against Iran with weapons and money) Ortega stayed. The Red Army hasn't made an appearance in St. Louis yet though. To this list you can add Chile, Cuba, El Salvador, etc. Now we have another panic regarding Iraq. It's amazing how susceptible Americans are to this kind of crap and how often they fall for it hook, line and sinker. By the way, isn't Bush a born-again Christian fundamentalist? Here's something to consider: don't Christian fundamentalists long for the second coming of Christ? Isn't Christ supposed to come at the end of the world? Therefore, don't Bush's religious beliefs support the idea that the end of the world is a good thing? It's good to know that this cocaine snorting, alcoholic is in a position to make God's plan come true. It's even more reassuring to hear this nut case threaten his enemies with nuclear weapons - you know, the weapons of mass destruction that can ensure that the planet is inhabitable for cockroaches only. | ||
| 1,277 | 7:23 pm PST, Feb 24 | Gloria Martin | Carney | Michigan | 49812 | United States | ||
| 1,271 | 3:30 pm PST, Feb 24 | Future Generation 7 | Kilauea | Hawaii | 96720 | United States | WHAT SOME THOUGHTFUL & CARING PEOPLE HAVE TO SAY: As far as those who are killed are concerned, it would not make any difference whatsoever as to whether such people are killed by enemy fire or by friendly fire. Their life is gone for ever just the same. If such countries as Iraq and North Korea are required to open their secret military bases for inspection because of the possibility that they may have a few weapons of brutal destruction, such countries as the United States and Great Britain, which have tons and tons of such brutal and dangerous weapons, ought to be required to open their secret military bases in no lesser way. And if such countries as Iraq and North Korea are expected to comply, countries such as the United States and Great Britain are also expected to comply by all means. Charles Mercieca Huntsville The most dangerous country on earth is the one with the most / most destructive weapons and the ability to deliver those weapons anywhere. The U.S. holds no "moral superiority" over the rest of the world, and must be held to the same standards. Mark Rushton Oxford Let's stop the hypocrisy of the US dictating to the rest of the world about "weapons of mass destruction", when it is the No. 1 threat to the world. Nathan M. Gant Oviedo "Only after the Last Tree has been cut down, Only after the Last River has been poisoned, Only after the Last Fish has been caught, Only then will you find that Money cannot be Eaten." Cree Indian Prophecy To us all that lives is sacred. Please think about the future, about what kind of a World we will leave to our children and grandchildren. Please be fully aware of the choices you are making now. Choose and decide with your HEART. There is SO much at stake! Please take note of our concerns: there are many more of us who just don't know the ways to speak out. Let us speak on behalf of All of them. Jan Gosen and Margot Wolff Zwolle The whole world is copying the U.S. in the worse possible ways. Bombings in multiple countries, North Korea admitting to secret nuclear weapons and WMD, human rights and liberties being suspended worldwide under the guise of security etc. The One World Order and WTO must be stopped before they destroy any resemblance to normal happy life for any living thing on this planet. The U.S. should lead by example, not force. meria Heller Phoenix Please don't accept the argument that Iraq is the only dangerous country with 'weapons of mass destruction'. ALL countries with 'weapons of mass destruction' are dangerous and this includes the United States among others. susan ambler katoomba When President Bush repeatedly uses statements such as, "...the forces of evil..." he is guiding his followers towards hatred. He invented a great oxymoron when he said that if Iraq doesn't comply, then we will use force to create peace. He sounds a lot like the big bully in school! "You do as I say or I'll shove this fist down your throat!" ...It's easy to fight with brute force. The real challenge is resolving the situation in a mutually beneficial way...Additionally, what is the integrity in forcing others to comply to a rule that we consider ourselves exempt from??? What if we began preaching what we practice? I wonder how we would sound then? Angie Watson Salt Lake City It is a great hypocrisy that the US demands weapons inspections in Iraq, yet itself retains the most advanced program of developing weapons of mass destruction, including nuclear, chemical and biological weapons. The US is not interested in disarmament - its a weapons monopoly that it is after. In the interest of world peace, the Security Council must demand access for inspections of the US military bases. Karol Florek Lidcombe I urge you not to bow down to US Government pressure to attack Iraq. Granted, Saddam Hussain is a tyrant to his people but he is not the threat to the world that George Bush Junior would have us believe. I am gravely concerned by the holier than thou stance the US Government is taking on this issue considering its own dark past in terms crimes against humanity (bombing Hiroshima being one of many deplorable acts of barbarity). That it has the nerve to feel it has the moral superiority to just take over another country is outrageous. This is imperialism at it's worse and will only seek to promote hatred of the west in nations that have been exploited by the west for centuries. Ann Carroll Melbourne I believe that weapons inspections should begin with the U.S. government. The U.S. develops and supplies weapons to many nations and has done so for many years. This proliferation of weaponry promotes deadly conflict and misuses resources which would better be used for the enhancement of human life. Justine Shrider Huntsville The secret US military bases that hide "weapons of mass destruction" should be under just as much scrutiny as those in Iraq. Do not let our government push the rest of the world around. Please hold our country accountable for it's actions. Please also save countless lives by standing up against our country's agenda against Iraq. Eric Grossmann Elgin in the name of international rights and the worlds indigenous peoples the un must recognise and deconstruct the us hegemony that is choking the world. no one appointed the us government/cia/military industrial complex as 'our' world leader. ray jackson Sydney Stop this ridicules imperialistic action!! The US does not own everything in the world and therefore have the right to destroy at will!! Basta!! lucille cordova Albuquerque There should be no double standard. These weapons and chemicals are dangerous to ALL people of the world. The U.S. Government must not be allowed to hold itself above international law. Please make them accountable. Catana Weinbrown Sea Cliff | |
| 1,270 | 3:27 pm PST, Feb 24 | Planetary Rescue | Hilo | Hawaii | 96720 | United States | To the dimwit megalomaniac who keeps entering the disinformation: this petition will be turned in at 1000 signatures, so enter all the hateful remarks you want. We have moved on to other petitions. Your blather is the most un-American and neo-fascist argument for why we must continue to expose the dishonest and hateful elements behind the U.S. war machine. Thanks for all of your idiotic comments! We veterans couldn't ask for a more ridiculous American example! You win a direct trip to the dog cages at Quantico, regardless of your political affiliations. | |
| 1,269 | 3:18 pm PST, Feb 24 | Bryan Evans | Hilo | Hawaii | 96720 | United States | Obviously, this petition has been sabotaged by a person who is either working for the intelligence/counter-intelligence "disinformation" Company, or simply can't tolerate freedom of speech & opinion as guaranteed by the US Constitution. Another possibility is that this idiot is so ego-driven and dim-witted that he actually does believe that this is a bulletin board, and not a petition. Neverthe less, the many entries signed as "BZ Botani", other than the original one at the beginning, are by one hateful and disturbed individual who believes he actually has something original to say, or is out to discredit this petition. Unfortunately for him, like so many of his ilk, his comments are his own worst revelation, his intolerance reminds us all why we must forge on to achieve peace & justice for those who don't have the privilege of free speech. Sadly, on the internet we must live with these type of idiots, and simply filter out their hateful remarks. | |
| 1,268 | 6:25 pm PST, Feb 22 | Janine Bacquie | miami | Florida | 33029 | United States | ||
| 1,267 | 2:24 pm PST, Feb 22 | USA #1 | ------ | Nebraska | -----11111 | United States | Jim Lenko: Come on, Man! You cannot really believe that hideous tripe! Talk about biting that hand that feeds you! Why don't you move to Baghdad? | |
| 1,266 | 2:14 pm PST, Feb 22 | Iosef Stalin | Moscow | ---- | Russian Federation | The United Nations has become a U.S. arm-twisting venue for intimidating less powerful countries into participating in the mass murder of innocent civilians world-wide while pursuing its ultimate goal of world domination. Has the U.N. forgotten that the U.S. is the only country in the world to ever have actually used nuclear weapons and has recently threatened to use them in Korea? When will the United Nations starting living up to its international duty of keeping the peace in the world and stop granting special privileges to the world's biggest nuclear bully, the Unites States? - Iosef Stalin, 1950 | ||
| 1,264 | 9:53 pm PST, Feb 20 | Lisa BLasch | Honalulu | Hawaii | 90776 | United States | If anyone wants to contact the originator of this petition, his e-mail adress is planetary@wildmail.com. But a word of warning, he does not tolerant criticism well. If you disagree with him you will get a most unusual response. | |
| 1,263 | 9:37 am PST, Feb 20 | James Robinson | Halifax | B3K 4N4 | Canada | The United States government are hypocrites and they are the greatest threat to world peace. After all, their wonderful, wealthy, nation was created from the decimation of Native Americans and the use of millions of black slaves from Africa. | ||
| 1,262 | 6:33 pm PST, Feb 17 | Tariq Assiz | It's a secret! | ----- | Iraq | Can you not see how unfair it is that you insist on rigorous inspection of Iraqi bases, and yet the US has none? How the hell am I supposed to massacre Kurds, Jews, and my political enemies if the US stands in the way? Talk about your basic unfairness! I'll be you people would have dumped all over my buddy Adolf Hitler! - Tariq Assiz | ||
| 1,260 | 10:08 am PST, Feb 17 | Saddam Hussein | Baghdad | ----- | Iraq | As a citizen of the world, please stop this aggression and destroy your weapons of mass destruction. How the hell can I use mine if you don't destroy yours? Jeez, don't you Americans have any sense of fairness??? S. Hussein, Baghdad | ||
| 1,259 | 10:06 am PST, Feb 17 | Nikita Khrushchev | Moscow | ----- | Russian Federation | As a citizen of the world, please stop your aggression and destroy your weapons of mass destruction. That way, we can launch our missiles from Cuba without any undue stress - Nikita Khrushchev (to John Kennedy), 1962 | ||
| 1,258 | 7:07 pm PST, Feb 16 | Katie Dionne | esmond | Rhode Island | 02917 | United States | Please allow this | |
| 1,257 | 2:13 pm PST, Feb 16 | Marilyn Fraser | Ottawa | K1J 6S8 | Canada | As a citizen of the world, please stop this aggression and destroy your weapons of mass destruction | ||
| 1,256 | 10:07 am PST, Feb 16 | True Patriot | Flagstaff | New Mexico | 14444 | United States | ||
| 1,255 | 10:18 pm PST, Feb 15 | Jerrika H. | dallas | Texas | 75275 | United States | ||
| 1,254 | 5:14 pm PST, Feb 14 | Anonymous | bennettsville | South Carolina | 29512 | United States | ||
| 1,253 | 8:10 am PST, Feb 13 | Joel Miller | St. Louis | Missouri | 63118 | United States | Let's maintain equal standards for all nations | |
| 1,252 | 4:42 am PST, Feb 13 | gene grabiner | buffalo | New York | 14214 | United States | ||
| 1,251 | 7:52 pm PST, Feb 12 | Archie Bunker | Bronx | New York | 20001 | United States | Edith, get me a beer! Get outta my chair, Meathead and you, little girl, tell that commie petition-writer I said... pfffffffffffffffffffffffffffttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt! |
Require Weapons Inspections at US Secret Military Bases
We, the undersigned, hereby appeal to the UN Security Council to pass a resolution to require the United States to open its secret military and research facilities for inspection.
Evidence has been mounting, from the world's leading viral scientists, chemical weapons experts, and former military officers at these facilities, that highly dangerous and experimental technologies and weapons are being developed at US secret bases, under the cloak of "National "Security."
The American people, including our representatives, can not gain access to these facilities, under threat of death (posted), and have no way of monitoring the threats to our security, health, and foreign relations. We can no longer trust our secret government agencies to tell us the truth.
If the UN Security Council does not intervene, and no action is taken to expose the deadly nuclear, biological, chemical, and energy weapons in various stages of deployment, then we believe the survival of humanity may be jeopardized.
The United States is not automatically the "good cowboy" simply because we have a pretty flag and a White House on our money, especially with secret elite societies having colonized our military and spy agencies for the past century, now having taken control of the Executive "Command in Chief."
We appeal to the international community to rise up with us and confront this military danger to our children and our future.
Evidence has been mounting, from the world's leading viral scientists, chemical weapons experts, and former military officers at these facilities, that highly dangerous and experimental technologies and weapons are being developed at US secret bases, under the cloak of "National "Security."
The American people, including our representatives, can not gain access to these facilities, under threat of death (posted), and have no way of monitoring the threats to our security, health, and foreign relations. We can no longer trust our secret government agencies to tell us the truth.
If the UN Security Council does not intervene, and no action is taken to expose the deadly nuclear, biological, chemical, and energy weapons in various stages of deployment, then we believe the survival of humanity may be jeopardized.
The United States is not automatically the "good cowboy" simply because we have a pretty flag and a White House on our money, especially with secret elite societies having colonized our military and spy agencies for the past century, now having taken control of the Executive "Command in Chief."
We appeal to the international community to rise up with us and confront this military danger to our children and our future.
Note: This Require Weapons Inspections at US Secret Military Bases petition was submitted by BZ Botani. ThePetitionSite.com is a free service provided to help concerned citizens rally support for issues they believe in. The opinions expressed by this petition do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of ThePetitionSite.com or Care2.com. There is no express or implied endorsement of this petition nor any newsletter offers (except those from Care2.com) by Care2.com, Inc, ThePetitionSite.com, or our sponsors. If you believe this system is being abused, please contact customer support.
Questions about this petition? Contact the petition sponsor: BZ Botani.
Questions about thePetitionSite.com? Visit our FAQ Page.
