Demand and end to NSW Police affording protection to judicial assailants from the criminal justice s

Because each Australian litigant requires protection from judicial officers who breach the criminal code in assaulting litigants while administrating justice from the bench.

NSW Police have steadfastly refused to charge judicial assailants with assault!

Assault is the act of creating apprehension of an imminent harmful or offensive contact with a person. An assault is carried out by a threat to cause the harm. It is a crime!

The litigant community needs to be protected from judicial assailants who were unable to control their impulses and assaulted litigant parties and/or their witnesses. Each judicial assault was occasioned by the litigant/witness victim openly challenging the authority of the judicial officer to blatantly pervert the course of justice with his/her contrived findings and orders. MBM infers that each judicial assailant was overwhelmed by the challenge and emotionally and/or impulsively lashed out at his victim during a judicial hearings of a matter. The assault characterized the state of mind of the judicial abuser and the lack of impartiality by the judicial officer who occasioned the assault.

Michael Bar-Mordecai [MBM] as a litigant in person has been assaulted in three jurisdictions by three different judicial officers [justices of the Supreme Court of NSW (SC)].

In the Probate jurisdiction of the SC at a 25 day hearing in Bar-Mordecai v Rotman and Hillston matter no. 120009/94 MBM was assaulted by justice Clifford Roy Einstein who thereafter systematically contrived his findings in the revocation and the de facto issues, causing MBM property losses.

In the Equity jurisdiction of the SC at a 47 day hearing in Hillston v Bar-Mordecai matter no. 3240/98, MBM and his father Elias Mordecai [EM] were assaulted by Justice John Purdy Bryson who systematically contrived his findings and orders in the undue influence presumption and the de facto issues, causing MBM property losses.

In the Medical Tribunal jurisdiction of the District Court at a Directions Hearing in Dr Michael Bar-Mordecai and the Medical Practice Act 1992, MBM was assaulted by justice Reginald Blanch [Chairperson of the Medical Tribunal of NSW]. The judicial assailant had unlawfully authorised disciplinary proceedings by the Health Care Complaints Commission to prosecute Dr Bar-Mordecai, causing MBM losses of professional income of over 14 years by Blanch CJ having breached s 48 of the Medical Practice Act 1992.

MBM and EM lodged complaints supported by affidavit evidence against the judicial assailants with NSW Police. Sergeant Gates of Rocks Police Station, the determining officer wrongly concluded that it was not in the public interest to charge the judicial assailants with assault, or to alert the public of such criminal conduct perpetrated by judicial officers from the bench.

MBM as a victim of multiple judicial assaults asserts that judicial assailants should be charged by the NSW criminal justice system, like any other criminal. Criminal offences are not time limited or statute barred.

Sign Petition
Sign Petition
You have JavaScript disabled. Without it, our site might not function properly.

Privacy Policy

By signing, you accept Care2's Terms of Service.
You can unsub at any time here.

Having problems signing this? Let us know.