Law vs. Law Enforcement

John W. Dobbs,Florida inmate no. C00618

Case no. 48 - 2006 - CF -15201-O

                                   Law vs Law Enforcement

They want to punish us to the Full extent of the law and deny us the full protection of the law.

I am asking for viewers to sign the new and updated complaint on petition as witnesses to fraud on the court perpetrated by the named respondents on the petition based on their having viewed the public records and arguments to the courts on the website amku.org and sygds.com; for failure to grant relief from judgements rendered in absence of subject matter jurisdiction when properly challenged and failure to provide a legally sworn complaint file on the October 25,2006 record to refute the merits.

American citizen detained without a formally sworn complaint against him to protect his wealthy assailants and the detainment has been maintained by officials indulging in fraud on the court. They refuse to hold anyone accountable, refuse to have an evidentiary hearing, refuse to show how they have jurisdiction and the fraudulent acts deprived John of his constitutional protection. All of his properly presented challenges is a voided by misdirection and procedural bars that don't apply, and it seems there is no end to judges that lawlessly protect each other.

State whether or not you have an invested interest as a witness or complainant.

                               Sign to oppose corruption by officials

I, John W. Dobbs, being duly sworn, depose, say and declare by my signature, that the facts and statements attested to through this complaint and supplemental affidavit are true and correct and filed in good faith, respectful of court resources. John moved this court for declaratory judgment and relief as we certify the following statements of undisputed facts demonstrating fraud on the court as prima facie evidence that the integrity of the legal construction of my detainment has been undermined, with the result of rendering my participation ineffective.

(1) We certify that the subject matter jurisdiction of this Court
regarding case # 48-2006-CF-015201-0 is called into question
as it was invoked by fraud on the court.

(2) We certify that on October 25, 2006, John was arrested for
alleged offenses involving at least five other men who posed
a threat to John's female companion and John, by the Orange
County Sheriff's Department despite its awareness that they
were approached unprovoked and John was assaulted and
battered in a continuous episode in and around the parking
lot of a bar with topless dancers. At least 3, of the no less than
5 men, were highly intoxicated. At least 4 of these men were
convicted felons. John was the only man classified as Black
or African American and the only man arrested despite his, at
the time, uncontradicted demonstration of justifiable use of force.
Neither of the no less than 5 men were arrested, and neither
they nor the 4 eyewitnesses provided any evidence contradicting
John's claim of defending himself and another. Despite the fact
that no complaint was made against him, Detective David Phelan
disregarded Fla. Stat. 776.032's. Immunity clause and his duty to
act in accordance with the conclusions of a reasonable person's
assessment of the totality of the circumstances standard. This is
clearly shown in his response to John's exasperated question to
him during his interrogation of John, where John asked,
"what do you think happened?" and he answers, "You get into a
fight with four guys, you pull out your knife and go to work", 1:14:50.
Thus, despite his own reasonable conclusion, along with that of
Crime Scene Investigator

Allison Wright, who responds to John's question, " Have you ever
heard of anything like this? "and she answers, "self defense, yea," 1:22:31
at that same interrogation, while photographing my multiple injuries
and, the assessment of the original detaining officer, Deputy
Herbert Mercado, who refers to John as the victim twice while
testifying at the Adversary Preliminary Hearing on Dec.22, 2006,
Detective David Phelan commits fraud on the court by alleging
probable cause. John W. Dobbs Interrogation by Phelan (in part).

(3) We certify that the submitting of the instrument, alleging
to be a charging affidavit, in absence of being sworn to before
a person authorized to administer oaths, by Detective Phelan
to legitimize the arrest and detainment, demonstrates fraud on
the court as it in fact does not qualify as an "affidavit".

(4) We certify that the court docket titled "case History/Register
of Actions" for case number 48-2006-CF-015201-0 gives notice,
while referring to John by his county jail inmate number 06048638,
that John's October 25, 2006, detainment and processing was not
based on an actual complaint as the clerk alerts the court that
"None" was filed. Thus demonstrating that any allegation of hav-
ing probable cause to detain or seek prosecution against him by
any officer of Orange County Sheriff's Office, officer of the court,
or, prosecutor on behalf of the state, including the First Appearance
Hearing findings of Judge Jerry Brewer, especially in light of John's
self defense claim, manifested fraud on the court, as the
demonstrable evidence illustrates that John was charged with
crimes that never occurred.

(5) We certify that the designated Assistant State Attorney
James Altman, alleged to have signed the charging "Infor-
mation" on November 20, 2006, acted outside his authority
at the time having failed to have taken his Oath of Office,
and thereby perpetrated fraud on the court.

(6) We certify that Assistant State Attorney James Altman
allegedly signing the charge "Information" in good faith
after having received testimony under oath from material
witnesses, which if true, would constitute the charged
offenses, is false; and his signature and submitting of the
"Information" to the clerk was done manifesting fraud on
the court.

(7) We certify that the photocopy of the unsigned charging
"Information"stamped by the clerk as having been filed on
November 20, 2006, provided, upon request for discovery
to the Public Defender's Office, verified by John's trial
representative P.D. Catherine Chien's letter to his mother
on June 9, 2008, and was acknowledged as an issue, but not
one that should be brought up on direct appeal by John's
temporary appellate counsel, P.D. Kevin Holtz, as verified by
his letter to John on February 20, 2008; as well as by the order
dismissing John's original petition for writ of habeas corpus
filed in the 14th Judicial Circuit for Jackson County, Florida in
2008, where Judge William L. Wright held that after reviewing
the record it was in fact an issue that should be raised on direct
appeal. This Is sufficient demonstration that the copy alleging
to have been signed on Nov. 2006, is an actual backdated one,
manifesting fraud on the court.

(8) We certify that, in light of the fact that former Orange
County Circuit Judge Stan Strickland silenced John's
Objection to the "Information" and his request for dis-
Missal based on the fact that no complaint or evidence
of culpability was submitted by the alleged victims, right
after John specifically invoked the protection and immunity
of Florida's "Stand Your Ground Law", Fla.Stat.776.013 (3)
at the beginning of the Dec.22, 2006, Adversary Preliminary
Hearing, and used his Affirmative defense against John, finding
probable cause, claiming that the standard was only for him to
hear information that led him to believe John was the" one
involved", despite the preponderance of the evidence, the
absence of demonstrable evidence supporting count 3 and,
absolutely no evidence being presented in support of counts
1,2,4 and 5, John was prevented from effectively participating
in the actions against him and further victimized by fraud on
the court.

(9) We certify that alleged victim Andre Blanco makes the
only sworn criminal accusation against John, starting with
his Dec. 22, 2006, Adversary Preliminary Hearing Test-
imony alleging the altercation initiated with John parking
directly next to his vehicle, jumping out, lunging, and stab-
bing him in the face. In light of his elaborate testimony
demonstrating that he has no personal knowledge to
support the pivotal theory that the violence initiated with
him being stabbed, as he saw no knife and recognized
nothing that would indicate that he was stabbed at the time,
only that he was punched really hard. While John admitted
to punching him really hard and stabbing him further into the
altercation, his claim providing the only theory of guilt from a
witness throughout John's entire judicial process, renders the
evidence circumstantial and insufficient. And his transcript of
taped interview with detectives where he claims he only entered
the fight to help a friend, and which shows the detective
had to inform him of where and how many times he was cut
or stabbed because he says he never knew he was stabbed
because of how much he drank, added to crime scene investiga-
tor (CSI) findings that their cars were actually parked six
parking space apart, and that the altercation actually took
place at the rear passenger side of John's vehicle, along with the
testimony of alleged victim Francisco Gotay, and other witnesses,
such as Deanna Washington, Phillip Wastfall, and, Justin Idle, show
that Blanco approached John and it started as a fist fight
which Gotay joined before anyone was stabbed. The prosecutor
pursuit of the charges demonstrates a diligent will to defraud
John and perpetrate fraud on the court, especially as no other
relevant evidence exists.

(10) We certify that Public Defender Mellisa Vickers' submitting of
the defense and jury instructions on " Necessity " derived from
the " Duress or Necessity " defense and instructions, at John's trial,
which, in essence, amounts to a guilty plea where a defendant
places themselves at the mercy of the court, without advising
or discussing any such defense or pleading with him, knowing
John never presented evidence to support any criminal aspect of
the charges, and being fully aware of his actual innocence and
immunity claim of justifiable use of force, demonstrates her
intent to defraud John, and manifest fraud on the court.

(11) We certify that prosecutor for the State Kimberly Laskoffs'
practice of law before the court, acting as an Assistant State
Attorney in John's case, without having at the time taken the
oath of office, manifests fraud on the court.

(12) We certify that prosecutor Kimberly Laskoff knowingly
used perjured testimony from Andre Blanco as demonstrated
in the contradictory statements and fabricated evidence he
offered in his statements, pointed out in the # (9) certification
of this complaint and supplemental affidavit. She must also
be held to have been aware of his statement to detectives that
he didn't know what happened between William Troy and John
and also his Adversary Preliminary Hearing testimony that he
never saw William Troy and John in a confrontation, then his
uncorrected trial testimony that he saw William Troy and John
wrestling and scuffling, at which time William is on the ground;
evidence unsupported by any corroborating evidence and the
first and only demonstration inferring Troy at a disadvantage
or as the victim. She also perpetrated fraud on the court with
her opening statement that the altercation initiated with Blanco
and John "in a fighting stance," abandoning Blanco's testimony
and the only theory of guilt submitted by an alleged victim,
misleading the jury, as to what she set out to prove, what she
was burdened to prove, and misleading John as to the accusa-
tions John had been defending against. Then further in closing
arguments she abandoned all prior theory and evidence by making
fraudulent claims asserting John " was mad " and "Fired up " and
"the only thing" John was finding "it necessary to protect was his ego,"
building off her entirely fabricated verbal exchange between Deanna
and John; also that Blanco's friends came to rescue him based on
information they each denied having, and the conflicts in their stories
"really didn't matter " and rather demonstrates their honesty; telling
the jury John cut himself, rather than being cut by his assailants as
John testified, by what witnesses say John was being struck by, that
may have been a "key or a ring"; contradicting all her witnesses
and alleged victims to get a conviction with statements like the
"only time they start to engage in a brawl is after John
"start to stab and cut all of them"; telling the jury it doesn't
to think about John's fear for the well being of his girlfriend
because that's a magic trick"'; and there's no way John didn't get
out of his car and commit second degree murder or manslaughter
and aggravated battery, despite the fact that John's theory of events,
along with the evidence, clearly demonstrated the "way" she
abused the jurors' trust. Her presentation of the case was fraud
on a massive scale, especially at the close of the case and at
a time when John's further participation was prevented. She
basically begged for his conviction, despite her failure to prove
the corpus delicti, using her capacity as an officer of the
court to infer her knowledge of facts off the record that
warrant John's conviction, rendering his participation ineffective.

(13) We certify that the cumulative fraud and misconduct
Evinces collusion and a conspiracy by the Respondents
To punish him for exercising a Constitutional Right.

Questions

(B) Whether John is entitled to relief from detainment
And convictions for crimes that according to Fla. Stat. 77.6013 (3)
(2006) never occurred, especially when any inference of the
corpus delicti was established by fraud?

(C) Whether John can be deprived of the protections of Fla. Stat.
776.013 (3) based on the personal conduct of the Respondents
thereby selectively applying the "Stand Your Ground "law?

                             Conclusion

Thus, based on this complaint and supplemental affidavit, John requests declaratory judgment and demands the
commencement of the remedies within the jurisdiction of this Honorable Court. Notary sheet attached.

The Corona virus is running a mock in prisons worldwide because of their close proximity. Please pray for all of them and the families. May GOD help us all.

 Is this what John's detainers, the Florida State Officials are hoping and waiting to happen to him. A favor for a favor? Covid19.

View his court trial and legal documents on his website 
AmericanMeKingUniversal.org and amku.org

and also go to subtitle "Information " no. 46 and 47.

We Certify - Law vs. Law Enforcement    and  The Immediate Family of John Dobbs

Hear in his own words what happen to him for yourself please go to
" Revelations 2020 King U Exposes the Game from Prison " part 1of 4 (4 part video)
https://youtu.be/keHYOMimEfA

Respectfully submitted,

John W. Dobbs, DC (inmate no.) COO618

Okeechobee Correctional Institution

3420 N.E. 168^TH Street