THE GOVERNMENT AND MP's FROM ALL PARTIES COULD NOT DECIDE AT ALL MATERIAL TIMES whether THE UK SHOULD REMAIN OR LEAVE THE EUROPEAN UNION.
THAT RIGHT, AND SUBSEQUENT DECISION, WAS GIVING TO THE BRITISH PUBLIC, AND BY BY THE BRITISH GOVERNMENT, ACCORDINGLY.
ON THE 23RD JUNE 2016, THE BRITISH PUBLIC AND IN A DEMOCRATIC MANNER EXCERCISED THEIR LEGAL RIGHT AS TO DECIDE WHAT GOVERNMENT AND ANY OPPOSITION PARTIES COULD NOT DETERMINED, WHETHER THE UK SHOULD STAY OR LEAVE THE EU.
IT IS NOW FAIRLY EVIDENT THE DECISION AND ANY ARGUMENT THIS GOVERNMENT OR OPPOSITION PARTIES ADVOCATED BOTH IN SUPPORT OF STAYING OR LEAVING THE EU, WAS NOT BASED NOR WAS IT GIVING TO THE BRITISH PUBLIC, AS SHOULD HAVE BEEN THE CASE, IF RELEVENT, BEFOR THE VOTE, THAT ANY DEAL TO LEAVE THE EU WOULD BE SUBJECT TO NEGOTIATIONS BETWEEN THE UK GOVERNMENT AND THE EU, AND ANY DEALS.
IF THAT WAS RELEVENT, WHICH AGAIN IS DENIED, THE GOVERNMENT WOULD HAVE HAD AN OBLIGATION AND TO THE BRITISH PUBLIC TO DISCLOSE THOSE FACTS, PRE DEMOCRATIC VOTE AND NOT POST DEMOCRATIVE VOTE.
ON THE 23RD JUNE 2016 THE BRITISH PUBLIC VOTED TO LEAVE THE EU AFTER CONSIDERING THE PROS AND THE CONS BY ALL PARTY MEMBERS WITHIN THE HOUSES OF PARLIMENT.
THE PUBLIC DECIDED AND IN A DEMOCRTAIC MANNER TO LEAVE THE EU.
IF PARLIMENT AND THE EU CANNOT AGREE TO STRIKE A SECONDARY DEAL TO THE INITIAL DECISION, TO LEAVE THE EU, A NO DEAL WITH THE EU CAN ONLY BE A VIABLE OPTION AS THIS WAS NEVER IN MENTIONED ON OR BEFORE THE 22ND JUNE 2016.
IT HAS BEEN ENGINEERED, ALL THIS NONSENCE ABOUT DEALS.
