We need to have guns in our national parks. Its is scientifically proven that all U.S. legally licensed hand gun owners (with permits) are good citizens. Why risk your life?
Dear
U.S. Congress,
We have need of many things at this particular year, but just like every year. Recently there has been talk of getting rid of loaded guns in the
United States National Parks. We question whether or not we need loaded guns in our parks. There are many potential hazards, just like there are many
benefits.
If we allow this to happen there is a very small chance that one of our citizens will kill something, like an animal or person. But what if we didn't allow loaded guns in our national parks? A person could walk up to you and pretend to be helping you but boom like that, they strangle you and kill you because they knew no loaded weapons were allowed, which made you an easy target.
If we get rid of loaded guns in our national parks, they don't we need to get rid of guns altogether? If we get rid of guns in our national parks, we assume that we need to get rid of guns in our nation altogether. If a U.S. citizen owns a gun, the government then must track them down and take their guns that they legally own, but before the government can do even that, they must get rid of the second amendment, do we not? The Second Amendment clearly states that we can bear arms. Simple. How can we the government, we the people, misinterpret that?
If we get rid of the
U.S. citizens guns, that means we have to get rid of police mens' guns, the S.S. and everything. That would create
havoc. The United States would no longer be what it was. Save us. Save the people. Save yourselves. We don't want to be remembered as the idiots that went down shamely, but we want to be remembered as the ones who stood up and led everyone.
