End Infant Male Circumcision

I would argue that there are no good arguments for the need for male infant circumcision. The foreskin is actually a very sensitive body part, protects the head of the penis, provides moisture and lubrication, and provides sexual pleasure. The circumcision rate in the U.S. recently fell below 40% and most men in the world are not circumcised.  I would also say that the argument that circumcision helps stop the spread of HIV is a potentially dangerous distraction in the fight against this illness, and that the use of condoms is a much better way.
 

Some of the above information was taken from the Intact America website and edited to some extent

Skriv under
Skriv under
JavaScript er deaktiveret på din computer. Vores websted fungerer muligvis ikke korrekt, hvis ikke JavaScript er aktiveret.

fortrolighedspolitik

ved at underskrive accepterer du Care2's vilkår for tjeneste
Du kan til enhver tid administrere dine e-mailabonnementer.

Har problemer med at underskrive dette? Giv os besked.