

**More plastic pollution, for longer.** Mechanical recycling can't process the contaminated, mixed, and flexible plastics that make up much of what reaches landfills, waterways, and the ocean. Closing off other recovery pathways before we've evaluated them means more of that material ends up in the environment.
**Higher costs for California families.** Restricting the tools manufacturers use to source and verify recycled content raises the cost of complying with SB 54, and those costs will reach consumers. It also pushes production and processing to states with weaker environmental standards, and takes California jobs with it.
Will you sign this petition today and send a message to California lawmakers urging them to oppose Assembly Bill 2253? Your support will help make a difference for clean oceans and an affordable California!
We're writing today to ask you to do everything in your power to stop Assembly Bill 2253.
Should AB 2253 proceed, the consequences will be:
**More plastic pollution, for longer.** Mechanical recycling can't process the contaminated, mixed, and flexible plastics that make up much of what reaches landfills, waterways, and the ocean. Closing off other recovery pathways before we've evaluated them means more of that material ends up in the environment.
**Higher costs for California families.** Restricting the tools manufacturers use to source and verify recycled content raises the cost of complying with SB 54, and those costs will reach consumers. It also pushes production and processing to states with weaker environmental standards, and takes California jobs with it.
On mass balance accounting specifically — it isn't a loophole. It's one of the most widely used chain-of-custody methods in the world for supply chains where physically segregating material isn't practical, and it underpins verified sustainable sourcing well beyond plastics.
We don't defend the status quo on greenwashing. Californians deserve confidence that environmental claims are honest. We support rigorous verification.
The right response is to regulate the integrity of mass balance accounting, not eliminate it: exclude anything converted to fuel or lost as process residue from recycled-content claims, require third-party certification and transparency wherever a claim is made, and study book-and-claim accounting before legislating around it.
Thank you.
__FIRSTNAME__ __LASTNAME__
__STREET__ __CITY__ __STATE__ __ZIP__
ved at underskrive accepterer du Care2's vilkår for tjeneste Du kan til enhver tid administrere dine e-mailabonnementer.
Har problemer med at underskrive dette? Giv os besked.