PM Trudeau at 4.22 minutes in the video States:“While recognizing our role as Government is to protect the rule of law ”The AG failed Canadians to protect the rule of law and Obstruction of justice willfully committed by 14 Canadian Judges.

See:https://www.youtube.com/watchtime_continue=8&v=Qm25x30VQ-s

IF YOU AGREE THAT THE GOVERNMENT OF CANADA AND THE CURRENT ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA SHOULD UPHOLD AND PROTECT THE RULE OF LAW AND HOLD THESE NAMED JUDGES ACCOUNTABLE FOR THEIR UNLAWFUL ACTS WILLFULLY COMMITTED AGAINST IT'S CITIZENS THEN PLEASE SIGN THIS PETITION.

The evidence in case Indexed as Hirji v. The Owners Strata Corporation Plan VR-44 2015 BCSC 2043 confirms the indisputable evidence that can leave no reasonable doubt in the minds of reasonable and knowledgeable impartial judges, or the legal counsels of willful Obstruction of justice by 14 judicial officers of the Canadian courts including nine judges of the Supreme Court of Canada who obstructed the course of justices in a judicial proceeding that can neither be justified nor can it be defended by any judicial officer of the court named in the petition submitted to the United Nations Human Rights Committee by the Hirjis. 

ON OCTOBER 9, 2018 LAW & CIVIL RIGHTS PUBLISHED AND SAID JUSTICE NEENA SHARMA SUPREME COURT LACKS INTELLIGENCE OF JUDGE / JUSTICE NEENA SHARMA SUPREME COURT DUMBEST CANADIAN JUDGE. SEE https://www.complaintsboard.com/complaints/justice-neena-sharma-supreme-court-lacks-intelligence-of-judge-justice-neena-sharma-supreme-court-dumbest-canadian-judge-c1065056.html                                            

Mohd Ali Hirji a 74-year-old Canadian Citizen a pensioner has challenged the integrity of the Supreme Court of Canada the Highest Court of Canada,  and the integrity of Canadian courts in the United Nations Human Rights Commission in Geneva Switzerland. Hirjis publicly condemns and opposes the lawless acts unlawfully and willfully committed by the Canadian Courts against them.

The Hirjis have refused to comply with void court orders passed by trial judge Madam Justice Sharma which were based on "falsified findings of facts" in the Reasons for Judgement rendered on November 6, 2015. Madam Justice Sharma committed one of the most serious criminal acts in violation of Criminal Code s. 139 "any judge that willfully commits and jeopardized his/her secured carrier by "Falsifying the Facts" in Reasons for Judgement by taking advantage and abusing the trusted judicial office is punishable in law by removal of the judge from the office and possible jail sentence of up to 10 years". These lawless acts, atrocities, cruelty, and injustices committed by the trial judge on the Hirjis were willfully upheld and aided by the Court of Appeal Judges Madam justice Newbury, Mr. justice Ian T. Donald, Madam Justice Mary E. Saunders, and madam justice Elizabeth A. Bennett.

Furthermore, these criminal acts committed by the lower court judges are willfully supported and approved by the Supreme Court of Canada judges Honourable Beverley McLachlin, P.C.Chief Justice of Canada, Honourable Justice Russell Brown, Honourable Justice Clément Gascon, Honourable Justice Suzanne Côté, Honourable Justice Malcolm Rowe, Honourable Justice Andromache Karakatsanis, Honourable justice Rosalie Silberman Abella, Honourable Justice Michael J. Moldaver, Honourable Justice Richard Wagner. The Supreme Court of Canada upheld the invalid, void and unenforceable court orders in law to willfully deny justice to the Hirjis and make them homeless unlawfully abusing their judicial offices for the purpose other than the public good.

These are extremely serious and explosive charges against the fourteen Canadian judicial officers supported by facts, pieces of evidence and court records as presented by Hirji in his case. However, to this day none of the judicial officers named in the petition have defended or repudiated these claims by the Hirjis simply because based on the evidence it can not be justified under the law by the judicial officers of the Court.   

On April 7, 2015, Hirjis appeared before the Supreme Court of British Columbia in a 25 days trial in front of trial judge Madam Justice Sharma. Hirji proved their burden of proof and their case with cogent evidence at the trial. However; Madam Justice Sharma willfully "falsified the facts" in reasons for her Judgment on November 6, 2015, and committed one of the most serious criminal act in violation of criminal code s. 139  that any judge would willingly commit. Such an offense is punishable in law by removal of the judge from the office and possible jail sentence of up to 10 years. The Hirjis repeatedly brought the falsified facts to the attention of the trial judge Madam Justice Sharma before the order was sealed and requested Madam Justice Sharma to correct the "Falsified facts" that results in "Miscarriage of Justice". Madam Justice Sharma unlawfully refused/ ignored to correct the "Falsified Facts" with the full knowledge of the consequences of "falsified facts" and willfully denied justice to the Hirjis. The court issued orders that amount to over $900,000 in favor of the defendants based on the "falsified facts" that would unlawfully strip down the Hirjis of their lives savings and their home. It allowed the defendants and their insurers to put the charge on Hirjis home that would make them homeless.

On November 25, 2016, Hirjis submitted the facts and evidence before a penal of three judges of the Court of Appeal of British Columbia namely justice Ian T. Donald, Madam Justice Mary E. Saunders, and madam justice Elizabeth A. The penal of judges willfully ignored the pieces of evidence placed before them that unquestionably establishes the fraud committed by the trial judge. Furthermore, the penal of judges of the Court of Appeal of British Columbia willfully aided and abated the lawless acts of the trial judge and upheld the lawless acts of the trial judge made into law.

On November 25, 2016, Hirji submitted the following evidence to the penal of judges of the challenge issued to the defendants in his affidavit filed on October 24, 2016, to produce the evidence at the hearing at paragraph 44 it reads as follows: "This is one of the key issues in this litigation. Here is my challenge to the defendants. If the defendants can submit to this honorable court and produce any strata minutes entered into evidence in the trial that would indicate to this honorable court that strata responded diligently to all of the plaintiffs complaints and took reasonable actions to remediate the problem then the plaintiff gives this undertaking to this honourable court in this sworn affidavit that plaintiff will not only concede but he will also hand over the keys to his unit to the defendants.(unit valued at over $600,000). There cannot be any more "cogent evidence" than this to convince the court what the facts were in the trial and who has the questionable credibility issue is it the plaintiff or is it the learned trial judge and the defense counsel who misled the court."

The defense counsel was fully aware of falsified facts by the trial judge in almost entire reasons for Judgment. The defense counsel could neither produce a single evidence to penal of judges at the hearing that would indicate to the penal of judges that the Hirjis claims of violations of their Charter Rights and "Falsified Facts" by the trial judge in Hirjis affidavit are false, nor could the defense counsel produce any evidence that would negate or repudiate the Hirjis claims of falsified facts by the trial judge on November 6, 2015, in Reasons for Judgement.

The evidence clearly established the fact that the penal of the court of appeal willfully violated Hirjis Charter Rights and again committed "fraud upon the court and fraud upon the Hirjis" by upholding invalid void and unenforceable court orders in law of the trial judge Madam Justice Sharma.

Lawless acts of the court of appeal, violations of Hirjis Charter rights and falsified facts by the trial judge were repeatedly brought to the attention of all nine judges of the Supreme Court of Canada. The Supreme Court of Canada had Constitutional obligations as well as judicial duty to quash invalid orders based on void orders passed by lower courts and court of appeal.

However, all nine judges, of Supreme Court of Canada willfully aided and abated the lawless and fraudulent acts of lower court judges and maintained the void and unenforceable orders of the lower courts by upholding the unlawful orders of the lower courts.

On April 27, 2017, the Supreme Court of Canada approved the lawless acts of the lower court judges and willfully dismissed the Hirjis application for leave to appeal. Thus, Supreme Court of Canada willfully denied justice to Hirjis and awarded costs against them by unlawfully abusing their judicial office contrary to the pledge to uphold the rule of law under the Supreme law of the land; "Constitution of Canada".

On December 4, 2017, after the Hirjis put all nine Judges of Supreme Court of Canada on notice for their lawless acts and failures to act lawfully, to carry out their judicial duties and willfully violating the Canadian Constitution and oath of office. The Supreme Court of Canada reverted in an email on the same date, specifically denying any further remedies to Hirjis stating that Supreme Court of Canada no longer has the jurisdiction on the case and has no further remedies for Hirjis. Thus, the Supreme Court of Canada has left Hirjis without the remedies and illegally placed the charge on their property. https://drive.google.com/open?id=1WtMUmZtwZ9bTziNpqm_4Ziz6z6N8xA0b and https://drive.google.com/open?id=1ro6WBCJ4q63sSbiDTDtksYl3f-jJJhA8 and https://drive.google.com/open?id=1OJCOKsto1sCgbKJt3ESW4090PQcvoAPk

The Government of Canada has turned a blind eye to this issue of national Importance and allows these corrupt judges to sit on the bench and allows the Canadian Court judges to continue to abuse their judicial office and to continue to commit lawless acts, atrocities, cruelty, and injustices with dictatorial powers against its citizens who appear before these judges with their legal counsels in good faith in pursuit of truth and justice.

On Monday, August 27, 2018, 2:02 PM following email was received from the Prime Minister's Office.

Dear Mr. Hirji:

On behalf of Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, I would like to acknowledge receipt of your correspondence. Please be assured that your comments have been carefully reviewed. In your correspondence, you raise an issue that falls more directly within the portfolio of the Honourable Jody Wilson-Raybould, Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada. I have therefore taken the liberty of forwarding your email to Minister Wilson-Raybould, so that she may be made aware of the circumstances that prompted you to write. Thank you for taking the time to write. S. Shepherd Executive Correspondence Officer for the Prime Minister's Office

The following message and response were received after some seven months from the Minister of Justice of Canada that is self-explanatory:  Your message To: Wilson-Raybould, Jody - M.P. Subject: FW: FRAUD COMMITTED BY THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA. Sent: Saturday, July 7, 2018 4:41:08 PM (UTC-08:00) Pacific Time (US & Canada) was deleted without being read on Thursday, January 24, 2019 7:42:50 PM (UTC-08:00) Pacific Time (US & Canada).

Hirjis having exhausted all domestic remedies have submitted and filed their petition to the United Nations Human Rights Committee on June 30, 2018, that provides comprehensive details and evidence of Wilfull violations of Hirjis Human rights and the fraudulent acts of the Canadian Court Judges named in the petition to unlawfully deny justice and make Hirjis homeless on Hirjis website https://www.mohdhirji.com/ 

On November 25, 2018, The Hirjis Re-Submitted their petition to the United Nations Human Rights Committee in compliance with the admissibility requirement in Article 5(2) (b) of the first Optional Protocol to the ICCPR. 

As Canadian Citizen can any member or any leader of any community feel secure and be proud of being a Canadian Citizen in face of outrages acts of the Canadian Courts to willfully commit lawless acts, atrocities, cruelty, and injustices on its citizens and unlawfully issuing court orders to rob one of its law-abiding citizens, a pensioner, of their lives savings, their home and make them homeless by unlawfully abusing their Judicial privileges? Can any respectable legal professionals who believe in justice and fails to condemn and oppose the injustices willfully committed by Canadian court judges be proud of their legal profession? Can the current members of Government of Canada be proud of their office by the outrageous acts of the highest court in the land and ignoring the issue of National Importance by simply turning a blind eye and ignoring the complaints of violations of its citizens guaranteed Rights under the Constitution and Charter rights and violations of Human Rights and allows the handful of Canadian Court judges to continue to commit lawless acts, atrocities, cruelty, and injustices against its citizens that cannot be justified in any competent court of law in the world?

According to the global criminal justice watchdog, 40% https://www.fairtrials.org/right-fair-trial of Human rights violations found around the world occur due to unfair trials as clearly demonstrated by Hirjis case. These crimes against Humanity and the member of Human families are willfully committed by some of the most trusted senior officers of the Court appointed by the Member States of the United Nations who have signed the ICCPR covenants and have ratified the treaties to uphold Human Rights and to protect the fundamental rights of the members of the Human families.

Hirjis Appeals and urges to all the Scholars of the legal institutions, and the leaders of NGO, as well as the Leaders of all religious Institutions, and the Leaders and campaigners of justices and any other organization that believes that "injustices imposed on any member of Human family is injustice imposed on everyone and Injustice is the root cause of poverty, violence and unrest in the world" to take firm action and publicly condemn and oppose the injustices and submit their own submissions to United Nations as submitted by  International Human Rights Program, University of Toronto Faculty  Rating: 5 - ‎1 vote Joint Submission to UN by Human Rights Groups Says Treatment of Children ... Mohd Ali Hirji Constitutional and Human rights of Canadian Citizens are violated.

Please do the right thing for your children and grandchildren and save this wonderful country of ours by condemning and opposing this kind of injustices imposed on any member of Human Family in Canada or anywhere in the world In the United Nations. Please register your disapproval against injustices and submit your own submissions to the United Nations, by signing this petition to the United Nation to protect your as well as your children and grandchildren rights.