NEED A PRO BONO ATTORNEY TO SAVE A LIFE IN HILLSBORO OHIO
- par: A DAUGHTER WHO IS TRYING TO SAVE HER MOTHER!
- destinataire: U.S. BAR ASSOCIATION/WASHINGTON FBI/ OFFICIALS FOR DISABLED VICTIMS/CONGRESS
JANE CONTACTED THE WIHITE HOUSE AND WAS TOLD BY F. MICHAEL KELLEHER, SPECIAL ASSISTANT TO PRESIDENT OBAMA, " THERE IS GOVERNMENT ASSISTANCE THAT WILL HELP JANE." THE GOVERNMENT AGENCIES JANE CONTACTED STATED, "THAT WAS NOT TRUE" AND THEY COULD NOT HELP HER. OMBUDSMAN, PRO SENIORS, LEGAL AID, NUMEROUS ATTORNEY'S, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, MR. CORDRAY, SHERROD BROWN, UNITED STATES SENATOR, OHIO GOVERNOR STRICKLAND, THE FBI AND "THE WHITE HOUSE " THEY EITHER DON'T RESPOND OR JANE IS TOLD, IT'S NOT THEIR JURISDICTION, IT'S A PROBATE MATTER, WE CAN'T HELP OR SINCE YOU CAN'T AFFORD TO HIRE AN ATTORNEY, GUESS YOU WON'T BE ABLE TO HELP YOUR MOTHER.
READERS ONCE AGAIN JANE IS CONTACTING YOU TO HELP FIND AN ORGANIZATION, A HIGH OFFICIAL OR A PRO BONO ATTORNEY THAT WILL COME TO HILLSBORO OHIO TO CONTEST THE GUARDIAN OF MOLLIE FLORKEY AND ALLOW MOLLIE TO RETURN HOME TO LIVE OUT HER DAYS WITH LOVING FAMILY.
THE WASHINGTON D.C. NATIONAL DISABILITY RIGHTS FOR VICTIMS IS NOT RESPONDING, IT COULD BE, THEY DIDN'T RECEIVE THE INFORMATION.
PLEASE HELP JANE FIND A WAY TO CONTACT THEM!
THE PETITION IS IN DETAIL TO SHOW THE OFFENSES.
1. JANE BRANSON CANNOT AFFORD AN ATTORNEY TO HELP FREE HER MOTHER MOLLIE FLORKEY. JANE IS A SENIOR CITIZEN ON A RESTRICTIVE INCOME AND DESPERATELY NEEDS HELP. JANE HAS CONTACTED LEGAL AID AND NUMEROUS ATTORNEY'S WHO DO NOT WANT TO COME TO HILLSBORO OHIO AND WORK PRO BONO.
2. AMERICA, PLEASE UNDERSTAND OUR NATION'S ELDERS ARE IN CRISIS THERE MUST BE CHANGE OR THIS COULD BE THE OUTCOME FOR YOUR LOVE ONE OR EVEN YOURSELF.
3. FOR OVER TWO YEARS JANE HAS CONTACTED NUMEROUS AGENCIES AND HIGH OFFICIALS TO HELP RESCUE HER MOTHER, MOLLIE FLORKEY, BEFORE THE WORSE HAPPENS. BECAUSE OF INADEQUATE LAWS AND THE FACT MOLLIE IS NOW NINETY ONE YEARS OLD, OFFICIALS DON'T WANT TO BE BOTHERED, ESPECIALLY WHEN THEY ARE NOT BEING PAID AND THERE ARE OTHER GREAT IMPORTANT ISSUES TO RESOLVE. MOLLIE FLORKEY IS "WORTH" YOUR TIME!
4. WHERE DO PEOPLE WITH RESTRICTIVE INCOMES GO FOR HELP TO SAVE A LOVED ONES LIFE WHEN A GREAT INJUSTICE HAS BEEN DONE TO THEM BY A CORRUPT JUDICIAL BUDDY SYSTEM?
5. IF YOU CAN'T HELP, (PLEASE) CONTACT THE WHITE HOUSE, THE FBI ANYONE THAT CAN HELP SAVE MOLLIE FLORKEY.
6. NOTHING IS IMPOSSIBLE IF SOMEONE IN AUTHORITY WOULD TAKE THE TIME TO PICK UP THE PHONE AND PUT AN END TO MOLLIE FLORKEY'S NIGHTMARE AND ALLOW HER TO RETURN HOME TO HER DAUGHTER JANE BRANSON.
THE STOCKHOLM SYNDROME
7. MOLLIE FLORKEY WAS FORCED IN THE HEARTLAND NURSING HOME IN HILLSBORO OHIO AGAINST HER WILL, BY HER SON, WHO IS IN LAW ENFORCEMENT & HAS WORKED WITH THE FBI IN CINCINNATI OHIO.
8. MOLLIE FLORKEY HAS DEMENTIA AND CAN'T REMEMBER WHAT JIM MALOTT HAS DONE TO HER.
9. THE OMBUDSMAN AGENCY IN HIGHLAND COUNTY OHIO AND PRO SENIORS OUT OF CINCINNATI OHIO INFORMED JANE BRANSON, " UNLESS MOLLIE FLORKEY, CONTACTS THEM AND INFORMS THEM SHE IS NOT RECEIVING PROPER MEDICAL CARE AND SHE IS NOT HAPPY WITH THE GUARDIAN, THEY CANNOT HELP HER."
10. MOLLIE FLORKEY IS VERY SOCIABLE, FRIENDLY, UNDERSTANDS WHAT IS BEING SAID, HOWEVER, HOW DOES OMBUDSMAN AND PRO SENIORS EXPECT MOLLIE, WHO HAS A DISABILITY OF DEMENTIA, WHO CAN'T REMEMBER FIVE MINUTES AGO, CALL THEM AND EXPLAIN, " THE SON IS HOLDING HER PRISONER AT THE HEARTLAND NURSING HOME IN HILLSBORO OHIO ? "
11. THERE IS NO PHONE IN MOLLIES ROOM, THE SON WILL NOT ALLOW MOLLIE TO TALK ON A PHONE UNLESS HE IS THERE DICTATING TO HER WHAT TO SAY.
THE STOCKHOLM SYNDROME!
12. THE SON REPEATEDLY TELLS MOLLIE, " HE IS MAKING THE RIGHT CHOICES AND DECISIONS FOR HER LIFE. HOW WOULD MOLLIE KNOW THAT'S TRUE? THE SON HAS KEPT MOLLIE ISOLATED IN VERY SMALL QUARTERS AT HEARTLAND, FOR OVER TWO YEARS FROM FAMILY. THE SON UNDERSTANDS BY ISOLATING MOLLIE FORCES HER TO DEPEND COMPLETELY ON HIM WHICH CREATES A FALSE IMPRESSION IN MOLLIE'S MIND, HE CAN DO NO WRONG AND HE'S LOOKING OUT FOR HER BEST INTEREST. MOLLIE'S FAMILY MEMBERS DO NOT CONDONE THE SON'S ABUSIVE TACTICS DUE TO THE FACT IT HAS CAUSED MOLLIE GREAT HARM. SEE PICTURES OF MOLLIE'S ABUSE CAN BE EMAILED.
13. THE SON ALWAYS REMINDS MOLLIE HE HAS A DANGEROUS JOB, WHICH ELEVATES AN IMPRESSION IN MOLLIE'S MIND, SHE MUST NOT UPSET HIM BY ASKING TO RETURN HOME TO LIVE WITH HER DAUGHTER JANE BRANSON, BECAUSE IT MIGHT UPSET HIM AND HE HAS ENOUGH TO WORRY ABOUT. BULL! THIS IS EXACTLY HOW THE SON WANTS MOLLIE TO THINK IN ORDER TO CONTROL HER. MOLLIE DOESN'T HAVE A CHOICE BUT TO BELIEVE THE SON'S LIES BECAUSE OF THE ISOLATION MALOTT HAS FORCED HER IN.
14. IN OVER TWO YEARS MOLLIE HAS NOT BEEN ALLOWED TO SEE HER DAUGHTER, JANE BRANSON. THE SON UNDERSTANDS MOLLIE WANTS TO RETURN HOME TO LIVE WITH JANE AND HE ALSO UNDERSTANDS JANE WILL ADVOCATE MOLLIE'S RIGHTS TO FREE HER FROM THE HIS GRIPS. MOLLIE AT NINETY ONE YEARS OLD IS AT THE END OF HER LIFE. TO NOT ALLOW MOLLIETO SEE HER YOUNGEST CHILD JANE IN OVER TWO YEARS, IS DISGRACEFUL, EVIL ACT BY THE SON
15. TO REMOVE MOLLIE WHO WAS STABILIZED AND WELL, OUT OF A SAFE, LOVING, HOME ENVIRONMENT AND FORCE HER IN A NURSING HOME, THAT THE SON KNOWS FOR A FACT, IS MOLLIE'S WORSE FEAR, SHOULD RAISE A RED FLAG TO ALL OFFICIALS.
16. OMBUDSMAN AND PRO SENIORS CONSIDER JANE BRANSON AS A CONTACT PERSON ONLY, WITHOUT ANY RIGHTS TO RESCUE MOLLIE FROM HER ABUSERS. OMBUDSMAN AND PRO SENIORS WERE GIVEN PICTURES AND EVIDENCE OF MOLLIE'S ABUSE BUT UNLESS (MOLLIE) CONTACTS OMBUDSMAN AND PRO SENIORS AND REPORTS THE ABUSE (HERSELF,) OMBUDSMAN AND PRO SENIORS STATE, "THEY CANNOT HELP HER." MOLLIE HAS A DISABILITY OF DEMENTIA, SHE IS NOT CAPABLE OF CALLING AND EXPRESSING THE OFFENSES THAT HAS BEEN DONE TO HER BY THE SON AND HEARTLAND BECAUSE SHE CAN'T REMEMBER.
NOTE: MOLLIE ONLY REMEMBERS TWO THINGS, SHE LOVES ALL HER CHILDREN AND SHE WANTS TO RETURN HOME.
17. IT IS IMPORTANT TO UNDERSTAND OMBUDSMAN & PRO SENIORS ARE SUPPOSE TO "PROTECT " OUR ELDERLY. PRO SENIORS IN CINCINNAT OHIO, INFORMED JANE BRANSON, "MOLLIE IS THEIR CLIENT, JANE IS ONLY THE CONTACT PERSON THAT ALERTED THEM ABOUT MOLLIE'S ABUSE AT THE HEARTLAND NURSING HOME IN HILLSBORO OHIO, WHICH JANE CAN PROVE ALLOWED MOLLIE'S ABUSE. SINCE JANE IS ONLY THE CONTACT PERSON, UNLESS MOLLIE REPORTS IT, PRO SENIORS DO NOTHING. PRO SENIORS REPRESENTATIVE STATED, HE SAW THE PICTURES OF MOLLIE'S ABUSE, HE UNDERSTANDS MOLLIE HAS DEMENTIA AND CAN'T REMEMBER FIVE MINUTES AGO HOWEVER, THEY CAN'T HELP HER.
dUE TO JANE NOT BEING ABLE TO AFFORD AN ATTORNEY,JANE STATED TO PRO SENIORS, "SHE WANTED TO BE THEIR CLIENT AND REPORT THE SON WITHOUT REASON OR JUST CAUSE HAS NOT ALLOWED JANE TO SEE MOLLIE HER MOTHER, IN OVER TWO YEARS. JANE LIVES FIVE MINUTES AWAY FROM THE HEARTLAND NURSING HOME. PRO SENIORS REPRESENTATIVES INFORMED JANE, " SINCE IT INVOLVED MOLLIE FLORKEY, THEY COULD NOT HELP HER," AND THEY COULD NOT RECOMMEND ANY ATTORNEY.
OMBUDSAMAN AND PRO SENIORS UNDERSTAND MOLLIE HAS BEEN ABUSED, WAS FORCED IN THE HEARTLAND NURSING HOME AGAINST HER WILL WITHOUT JUST CAUSE OR REASON BY A DECEPTIVE SON.
WHAT KIND OF INSANE JUSTICE SYSTEM ARE WE LIVING IN? OMBUDSMAN AND PRO SENIOR RULES AND REGULATIONS ARE INSIDIOUS AND INHUMANE AND SHOUT TO THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, "IF YOU GET OLD YOUR RIGHTS WILL BE TAKEN AND YOU WILL BE TREATED AS IF YOUR LIFE IS WORTHLESS."
NOT ONLY HAS MOLLIE BEEN ABUSED BY THE JUDICIAL SYSTEM WHO REFUSED TO CONSIDER MOLLIE FLORKEY'S RIGHTS, A JUDICIAL SYSTEM THAT REFUSED MOLLIE THE RIGHT TO BE PRESENT IN THE COURT ROOM TO DEFEND HER CONSTITUTIONAL AND HUMAN RIGHTS BY TELLING THE HILLSBORO PROBATE JUDGE, " SHE WANTED TO RETURN HOME TO LIVE WITH HER DAUGHTER," AT THAT POINT IN TIME, MOLLIE WAS MENTALLY STRONG BECAUSE SHE RECEIVED ONE ON CARE AT HOME, SHE COULD COMMUNICATE HER WISHES AND NEEDS TO THE JUDGE.
MOLLIE WAS BETRAYED BY HER OWN SON. THE SON TOOK AWAY EVERYTHING SACRED AND DEAR TO MOLLIE, THREW HER AWAY, GAVE HER TO STRANGERS, WHEN THERE WAS LOVING FAMILY WILLING AND CAPABLE TO CARE FOR HER. THE SON BREACHED HIS DUTY AS GUARDIAN THAT WAS GIVEN TO HIM BY A JUDICIAL, BUDDY SYSTEM BY ALLOWING THE HEARTLAND NURSING HOME STAFF TO ABUSE AND NEGLECT MOLLIE. MOLLIE HAS SUFFERED UNNECESSARY PAIN AND GREAT MENTAL ANGUISH DUE TO THE SON'S WRONG CHOICES AND DECISIONS SINCE HE WAS GIVEN THE GUARDIANSHIP.
NOTE: EVEN IF THE SON AND THE HEARTLAND STAFF HAVE CORRECTED THEIR TWO YEARS OF TERRORISM OF MOLLIE'S CARE, MOLLIE SHOULD STILL HAVE THE RIGHT TO BE SET FREE AND ALLOWED TO RETURN HOME TO HER DAUGHTER. DUE TO THE FACT MOLLIE WAS FORCED IN HEARTLAND AGAINST HER WILL EVERYONE OF MOLLIE'S CONSTITUTIONAL AND HUMAN RIGHTS WERE VIOLATED BY THE SON WHO ILLEGALLY ASSIGNED HIMSELF HEALTH P.O.A., THE HEARTLAND NURSING HOME AND A JUDICIAL BUDDY SYSTEM.
18. OMBUDSMAN AND PRO SENIORS, AGENCIES THAT ARE SUPPOSE TO PROTECT OUR SENIOR CITIZENS FROM HARM AND ABUSE ARE ENABLING ABUSERS TO GET AWAY WITH THEIR CRIME BY INADEQUATE FORM OF PROCEDURES AND INVESTIGATIONS. KNOWING MOLLIE HAS A DEMENTIA DISABILITY OMBUDSMAN AND PRO SENIORS STILL (ASSUME) MOLLIE CAN COMMUNICATE WITH THEM, EXPLAIN HER NEEDS AND WISHES AND IS ABLE TO DEFEND HERSELF AGAINST PREDATORS. MOLLIE HAS BEEN BULLIED, ABUSED, ISOLATED, TOLD SHE CANNOT TALK, SHE IS HELPLESS BECAUSE OF HER DEMENTIA DISABILITY.
19. OMBUDSMAN AND PRO SENIORS ARE FOLLOWING INCOMPETENT, INSUFFICIENT RULES AND REGULATIONS THAT ARE ACTUALLY CREATING GREAT HARM TO OUR SENIOR CITIZENS. BY NOT ALLOWING ALL EVIDENCE AND WITNESS'S TO BE BROUGHT FORTH. THE FACT OF THE MATTER, ANYONE WITH A TITLE CAN BE AN ABUSER. WHEN YOU SHOW AUTHORITIES PROOF, THE GUARDIAN HAS ALLOWED THE ABUSE, HAS ISOLATED MOLLIE AND THE AUTHORITIES STILL REPLY, "WE CAN'T HELP BECAUSE MOLLIE HAS A GUARDIAN, YOU HAVE TO WONDER, ARE THESE PEOPLE NUTS?
20. TO SIMPLY RELY ON MOLLIE'S SON WHO CLEARLY, HAS ULTERIOR MOTIVES AND THE HEARTLAND NURSING HOME WHO HAS PROVEN THEIR POOR CARE AND NEGLECT OF MOLLIE, IS TOO ONE SIDED AND ALLOWS MOLLIE TO FALL BETWEEN THE CRACKS OF THE JUSTICE SYSTEM.
21. OMBUDSMAN AND PRO SENIORS ONLY TALK TO THE SON AND THE HEARTLAND NURSING HOME STAFF, THE VERY ON'E'S THAT ABUSED AND NEGLECTED MOLLIE, WHO REFUSE TO ADVOCATE MOLLIE'S RIGHTS. OMBUDSMAN PURPOSELY ASK MOLLIE, OPEN END QUESTIONS.
22. NOTE: BECAUSE OF MOLLIE'S DISABILITY OF DEMENTIA, OMBUDSMAN FAILED TO ASK PRECISE QUESTIONS, IN ORDER TO PIN POINT MOLLIES NEEDS AND REQUESTS.
23. EXAMPLE OF A QUESTION THAT WILL ENABLE MOLLIE TO EXPRESS THE TRUTH AND WHAT (SHE) REALLY WANTS:
(1.) MOLLIE, DO YOU WANT TO STAY AT THE HEARTLAND NURSING HOME OR DO YOU WANT TO RETURN HOME AND LIVE WITH YOUR DAUGHTER JANE?
24. A GREAT DEAL OF MOLLIE IS STILL WITH US. IT IS IMPORTANT TO KEEP THE SON AND THE HEARTLAND STAFF OUT OF THE ROOM WHEN TALKING TO MOLLIE, THEY WILL CONTROL WHAT SHE SAYS. MOLLIE HAS BEEN THREATENED AND INTIMIDATED, EITHER DO WHAT THEY SAY OR ELSE! MAKE SURE THE INTERCOM IS TURNED OFF AT THE NURSES STATION.
25. OMBUDSMAN REFUSES TO ASK MOLLIE QUESTION NUMBER 1.???????
26. OMBUDSMAN MAKES A POINT TO ASK MOLLIE A VAGUE AND A OPEN END QUESTION.
(2.) "MOLLIE, IF YOU COULD LIVE ANYWHERE, WHERE WOULD THAT BE? NOTE: MOLLIE MUST STAY WITH A CAREGIVER, THEREFORE IT IS ONLY FAIR TO ASK MOLLIE QUESTION NUMBER 1.
YOUR NOT LEADING MOLLIE, YOUR GIVING HER A CHOICE AND ASKING MOLLIE A QUESTION SHE CAN RELATE TO.
NOTE: JUST BECAUSE A PERSON LOOKS NORMAL, IS MAKING PLEASANT CONVERSATION, OMBUDSMAN FORGETS, A BATTLE IS GOING ON IN THE MIND OF A PERSON WITH DEMENTIA, THEY DON'T WANT ANYONE TO KNOW THEY CAN'T REMEMBER, THEY'RE STRUGGLING WITH, WHAT TO SAY NEXT. THEIR SELF ESTEEM IS FRAGILE, IT IS THE REASON YOU MUST PUT MOLLIE IN A COMFORT ZONE AND ASK DIRECT, SIMPLE QUESTIONS TO FIND OUT WHAT WOULD BE IN MOLLIE'S BEST INTEREST.
27. IN 2007 WHEN MOLLIE FOUND OUT THE SON WAS FORCING HER TO STAY AT HEARTLAND, MOLLIE MADE HER VOICE HEARD IN THE HALLWAYS AT HEARTLAND AND IN FRONT OF WITNESS'S, MOLLIE DEMANDED TO BE RELEASED AND RETURN HOME TO LIVE WITH JANE. THERE ARE TAPE RECORDINGS OF THESE CONVERSATIONS OF MOLLIE STATING THIS FACT AT HEARTLAND.
28. NOTE: MOLLIE ONLY WENT INTO HEARTLAND BECAUSE JANE HAD SURGERY. IT WAS UNDERSTOOD BY MOLLIE AND MOLLIE'S PASSPORT CASEWORKER, AND ALL THE FAMILY, ONCE JANE RECOVERED, SHE WOULD RESUME MOLLIE'S CARE.
29. THERE ARE TAPE RECORDINGS OF MOLLIE AND JANE BEING HARASSED BY THE HEARTLAND STAFF AND THE HEARTLAND SOCIAL WORKER. THERE IS A TAPE RECORDINGS OF A HEARTLAND AID, STATING TO JANE, "HEARTLAND WAS GOING TO TRY AND FORCE HER OUT OF THEIR FACILITY IN ORDER TO FORCE MOLLIE TO SUBMIT TO STAY THERE."
NOTE: HEARTLAND MAY HAVE DISMISSED THE AIDE, THEY KNOW ABOUT JANE'S TAPE RECORDINGS.
30. IT IS IMPORTANT TO UNDERSTAND THERE WAS NO REASON FOR THE SON TO FORCE MOLLIE IN THE HEARTLAND NURSING HOME IN HILLSBORO OHIO.
1. MOLLIE WAS NOT DYING.
2. MOLLIE WAS NOT ILL.
3. MOLLIE DID NOT NEED SKILLED CARE.
4. MOLLIE HAD A HOME AND A CAREGIVER THAT STAYED WITH HER. (JANE BRANSON/DAUGHTER)
5 MOLLIE LIVED IN A SAFE,LOVING, HOME ENVIRONMENT WHERE SHE WAS HAPPY AND CONTENT.
31. THE SON AND HEARTLAND SOCIAL WORKER, KNOWINGLY AND WILLINGLY CONSPIRED TO DEFAME JANES GOOD NAME IN ORDER TO KEEP HER OUT OF HEARTLAND FOR OVER TWO YEARS, THEY WANTED TO PREVENT JANE FROM ADVOCATING MOLLIE'S RIGHTS.
FACTS!
32. THE SON AND HEARTLAND STAFF LIED TO THE PROBATE JUDGE WHEN HE CALLED HEARTLAND JULY 2007 AND ASKED THEM, "IF THERE WAS AN EMERGENCY CONCERNING MOLLIE'S CARE?"
33. WITH ALL DUE RESPECT TO THE PROBATE JUDGE, DID HE REALLY THINK HEARTLAND STAFF WOULD TELL HIM THE TRUTH? DID HE THINK THE HEARTLAND STAFF WOULD SAY, "YES, MOLLIE FLORKEY IS SITTING IN URINE AND FECES DAILY, WE DON'T WRAP AND KEEP MOLLIE'S LEGS ELEVATED DAILY, WHICH WE UNDERSTAND ARE DOCTORS ORDERS, EVEN THOUGH WE KNOW HER LEGS WILL ULCERATE IF WE DON'T. (WE REFUSE TO KEEP MOLLIES LEGS ELEVATED, ( NOTE ) THAT STATEMENT IS ON A TAPE RECORDING THE HEARTLAND SOCIAL WORKER, MADE) WE KNOW MOLLIE HAS BLEEDING BEDSORES BUT WE REFUSE TO MAKE SURE HER WEIGHT IS SHIFTED DURING THE DAY, WE REFUSE TO DO MONTHLY URINE CULTURES, EVEN THOUGH WE KNOW MOLLIE HAS CHRONIC URINARY TRACK INFECTIONS, MOLLIE RARELY GETS BATHED AND SHE'S ALWAYS WEARING SOMEONE ELSE'S CLOTHES BUT NO JUDGE, THERE IS NO EMERGENCY.
THIS IS WHAT THE HEARTLAND STAFF WITH THE COORPERATION OF THE SON, DID TO MOLLIE FLORKEY AND THEY GOT AWAY WITH IT.
34. THE SON AND HEARTLAND DEFAMED JANE'S GOOD NAME TO THE JUDGE, OUTSIDE OF COURTROOM PROCEDURE TO PURPOSELY MISLEAD THE JUDGE INTO THINKING JANE WAS A TROUBLE MAKER. NOTHING WAS SAID AGAINST JANE'S GOOD NAME AT THE AUGUST 8, 2007 EMERGENCY HEARING, OR AT THE NOVEMBER 14, 2007 GUARDIANSHIP HEARING, HOWEVER, THE PROBATE JUDGE CALLED JANE A TROUBLE MAKER WITHOUT ANY EVIDENCE OF PROOF.
NOTE: JANE HAD PROOF SHE AND MOLLIE WERE HARASSED AT THE HEARTLAND NURSING HOME, MOLLIE SITTING IN HER URINE AND FECES DAILY FOR MONTHS, MOLLIE'S LEGS NOT WRAPPED OR EVER ELEVATED. WITHOUT REASON OR JUST CAUSE THE PROBATE JUDGE REFUSED TO ALLOW HER EVIDENCE. THE SON PRESENTED NO EVIDENCE IN COURT JANE CAUSED TROUBLE, NOTHING WAS MENTIONED IN COURT AGAINST JANE'S GOOD NAME, BUT STILL, THE JUDGE CALLED JANE A TROUBLE MAKER?????
35. WITHOUT REASON OR JUST CAUSE THE JUDGE STATES TO JANE, "HE'S GIVING GUARDIANSHIP TO THE SON, HE'S NOT GRANTING JANE ANY VISITATIONS TO SEE MOLLIE, THE SON WILL BE CALLING THE SHOTS AND HE WILL DECIDE ( IF) AND ( WHEN ) JANE, WILL GET TO SEE MOLLIE, THE PROBATE JUDGE THEN STATED TO JANE, " THAT'S JUST WHAT YOU GET FOR ALL THE TROUBLE YOU'VE CAUSED." THE JUDGE ALSO STATED TO JANE, "IT WON'T DO YOU ANY GOOD TO FILE AN APPEAL
36. THE JUDGE'S STATEMENTS WERE SHOCKING, ESPECIALLY, WHEN NO EVIDENCE WAS PRESENTED TO HIM IN COURT OF HIS FALSE STATEMENT, STATING JANE CAUSED TROUBLE. THE SON REALLY DID AN AX JOB ON HIS SISTER JANE! FOR OVER THREE YEARS JANE SUCCESSFULLY TOOK CARE OF MOLLIE. JANE IS A SENIOR CITIZEN, WORKS PART TIME TAKING CARE OF THE ELDERLY, SHE IS A LAW ABIDING CITIZEN. THERE IS NO RETRAINING ORDER, PREVENTING JANE FROM SEEING MOLLIE. HOWEVER, WHEN JANE, HAS GONE INTO HEARTLAND TO SEE MOLLIE, AS THEY'RE EMBRACING, WITHOUT JUST CAUSE OR REASON, A NURSE STANDS OVER MOLLIE'S BED, REPEATEDLY SHOUTING AT JANE, "GET OUT," THERE IS A WITNESS THAT CAN CONFIRM THIS FACT.
37. IT WAS OBVIOUS TO ALL IN COURT, THE SON WANTED JANE KEPT OUT OF HEARTLAND TO GIVE HIM TIME TO BULLY AND FORCE MOLLIE TO SUBMIT TO STAY THERE AND THE PROBATE JUDGE, THE SON'S LAW ENFORCEMENT ASSOCIATE, WAS MORE THAN WILLING TO ASSIST HIM WITHOUT ANY CONSIDERATION OF WHAT WAS IN MOLLIE'S BEST INTEREST OR THE TREMENDOUS PAIN IT CAUSED JANE NOT TO SEE HER DEAR MOTHER FOR OVER TWO YEARS.
38. WITHOUT AN ATTORNEY JANE FILED AN APPEAL, JANE FILED A MOTION AND ASKED THE COURT TO WAVE THE COURT COST DUE TO RESTRICTIVE INCOME. THE JUDGE DENIED IT. JANE CALLED THE PROBATE JUDGE, COURT REPORTER AND ASKED HER TO TRANSCRIBE THE AUDIO OF THE GUARDIANSHIP HEARING. THE COURT REPORTER INFORMED JANE, " HER TESTIMONY COULD NOT BE HEARD, THEREFORE SHE COULD NOT TRANSCRIBE THE AUDIO.
39. JANE CALLED THE COURT OF APPEALS AND ASKED THEM WHAT TO DO SINCE THE AUDIO COULD NOT BE TRANSCRIBED. THE COURT OF APPEALS STATED TO JANE, " TO DO HER BRIEF BY MEMORY." AFTER JANE SUBMITTED HER BRIEF TO THE COURT, THE SON'S ATTORNEY, FILED A MOTION FOR JANE TO NOW DO ( ANOTHER ) BRIEF BECAUSE THE AUDIO WAS ( NOW ) REPAIRED. IT IS JANE'S OPINION, "THE HILLSBORO BULLY, BUDDY SYSTEM" WAS PLAYING A CAT AND MOUSE GAME WITH HER AND ENJOYED THE FACT SHE DID NOT KNOW THE LAW AND WERE HAVING A FIELD DAY BECAUSE JANE COULD NOT AFFORD AN ATTORNEY TO REPRESENT HER.
40. THE COURT REPORTER, GAVE NO TIME FOR JANE TO PROOF READ THE TRANSCRIPT. THE COURT REPORTER HAD ALREADY SUBMITTED HER COPY TO THE CLERK OF COURTS ALONG WITH A LETTER DEFAMING JANE'S CHARACTER. JANE DISPUTED THE FACT, THE COURT REPORTER ADDED ON EXTRA CHARGES WITHOUT JANE'S OK, (AFTER) THE INITIAL PRICE, THE COURT REPORTER QUOTED JANE. JANE FOUND OUT ABOUT THE ADDED CHARGES ONCE THE COURT REPORTER HANDED THE TYPED TRANSCRIPT TO HER. THE COURT REPORTER STATED TO JANE, "IF YOU WANT IT, YOU'LL PAY IT." THE COURT REPORTER TOLD JANE, "THE ADDED CHARGES WERE FOR STARTING AND STOPPING THE MACHINE." IT WAS ONLY AFTER JANE PROOF READ HER COPY OF THE TRANSCRIPT DID SHE DISCOVER THE COURT REPORTER MADE NUMEROUS MISTAKES AND LEFT OUT IMPORTANT INFORMATION. THIS WAS "NO SURPRISE TO JANE."
IT WAS THE HILLSBORO BULLY, BUDDY SYSTEM LETTING JANE KNOW SHE WAS "BLACKBALLED."
41. JANE FILED A MOTION FOR THE HILLSBORO COURT REPORTER, TO CORRECT THE TRANSCRIPT. THE JUDGE DENIED IT.
JANE FILED A MOTION FOR THE AUDIO OF THE TRANSCRIPT, THE JUDGE DENIED IT. .
42. THE JUDGE WAS CORRECT WHEN HE TOLD JANE AT THE NOVEMBER 14, 2007 GUARDIANSHIP HEARING, "IT WOULDN'T DO HER ANY GOOD TO FILE AN APPEAL." WITHOUT AN ATTORNEY NATURALLY, JANE LOST HER APPEAL TO REMOVE THE SON AS MOLLIE FLORKEY'S GUARDIAN DUE TO THE FACT HE IS NOT SUITABLE!
43. JANE FILED A MOTION TO HAVE A GUARDIAN AD LITEM ASSIGNED TO HELP MOLLE. THE PROBATE JUDGE ASSIGNED, THE GUARDIAN AD LITEM, HE ONLY SPOKE TO THE SON, HE REFUSED TO RETURN JANE'S NUMEROUS PHONE CALLS TO HIM. THE JUDGE DISMISSED THE GUARDIAN AD LITEM AT THE AUGUST 8, 2007 HEARING WITHOUT REASON. IT LEFT MOLLIE FLORKEY WITHOUT AN ATTORNEY TO REPRESENT HER AND DEFEND HER RIGHT TO RETURN HOME. "NO SURPRISE."
44. MOLLIE WAS SUBPOENA TO APPEAR IN COURT TO STATE HER RIGHT TO RETURN HOME. MOLLIE WAITED OUTSIDE IN THE HALL WAY AT THE COURT HOUSE WAITING TO GIVE HER TESTIMONY. MOLLIE WAS NOT ALLOWED IN THE COURT ROOM. THE JUDGE ORDERED MOLLIE BACK TO THE HEARTLAND NURSING HOME WHERE SHE HAD TO ENDURE MORE ABUSE AND POOR CARE ALONG WITH NUMEROUS TRIPS TO THE ER, WHERE MOLLIE CAME CLOSE TO DYING PREMATURELY. IT WAS A VIOLATION OF MOLLIE'S CONSTITUTIONAL AND HUMAN RIGHTS NOT TO BE HEARD IN A COURT OF LAW ESPECIALLY, SINCE IT WAS ABOUT THE OUTCOME OF MOLLIE'S LIFE.
45. THERE ARE TAPE RECORDINGS THAT PROVE IT WAS THE HEARTLAND STAFF THAT WAS HARMING MOLLIE AND JANE BY INTENTIONALLY HARASSING JANE IN FRONT OF MOLLIE IN ORDER TO INITIATE FALSE INCIDENT REPORTS AGAINST JANE. THE SON'S GOAL WAS TO KEEP JANE OUT OF HEARTLAND TO STOP JANE FROM HELPING MOLLIE RETURN HOME AND GETTING THIS FALSE INFORMATION TO THE JUDGE. WHY ELSE WOULD THE JUDGE CALL JANE A TROUBLE MAKER IN HIS COURT ROOM?
46. NOTHING WAS EVER BROUGHT UP IN COURT AGAINST JANE'S CHARACTER WHEN SHE WOULD VISIT MOLLIE AT THE HEARTLAND NURSING HOME. IT WAS ALWAYS BEHIND CLOSED DOORS, TO STOP JANE FROM DEFENDING HER GOOD NAME AT THE GUARDIANSHIP HEARING. THE JUDGE LISTENED TO THE SON AND HEARTLAND'S LIES OUTSIDE OF COURTROOM PROCEDURE AND MADE HIS OWN ASSUMPTIONS ABOUT JANE WITHOUT ANY EVIDENCE OF PROOF. IT WAS ONLY HEAR-SAY. THE JUDGE ASSUMED THE SON WAS TELLING THE TRUTH BECAUSE OF HIS LAW ENFORCEMENT POSITION AND THEIR ASSOCIATION. THE SON USED THE JUDGE HIS ATTORNEY AND THE HEARTLAND STAFF FOR HIS OWN DECEPTIVE MOTIVES.
47. THERE ARE THREE WITNESS'S THAT CAN CONFIRM THE (JANUARY 8, 2002) HEALTH P.O.A DOCUMENTS THE SON PRESENTED AT THE NOVEMBER 14, 2007 GUARDIANSHIP HEARING DID NOT EXIST IN (2003.)
WHICH MEANS THE JANUARY 8, 2002 HEALTH P.O.A. DOCUMENTS IS A LIE.
48. WITHOUT MOLLIE'S KNOWLEDGE, THE SON ASSIGNED HIMSELF HEALTH P.O.A. MOLLIE NEVER GAVE HER LIFE AWAY TO THE SON TO FORCE HER IN A NURSING HOME WHEN THERE IS FAMILY WILLING AND CAPABLE OF CARING FOR HER.
49. BECAUSE OF THE SON'S POSITION IN LAW ENFORCEMENT WAS THE ONLY REASON THE PROBATE JUDGE (GAVE) THE SON THE GUARDIANSHIP. HE NEVER TOOK CARE OF MOLLIE A DAY IN HIS LIFE NOR WANTED TO. THE JUDGE REFUSED TO HEAR JANE'S EVIDENCE, THE SON WAS NOT SUITABLE TO BE MOLLIE FLORKEY'S GUARDIAN. THE JUDGE REFUSED TO ACKNOWLEDGE MOLLIE'S MEDICAL OR PERSONAL NEEDS AND HER WISHES TO RETURN HOME. MOLLIE FLORKEY WAS WELL THERE WAS NO NEED TO FORCE HER TO STAY AT HEARTLAND.
50. NO REASON WAS EVER ESTABLISHED IN COURT (WHY) THE SON FORCED MOLLIE IN THE HEARTLAND NURSING HOME. A BIAS, ILLEGAL, JUDICIAL BUDDY SYSTEM, CAUSED MOLLIE FLORKEY, UNNECESSARY PAIN AND SUFFERING AND ALMOST DYING PREMATURELY BECAUSE OF THE SON'S LIES AND DECEPTION.
51. IT WAS JANE'S RIGHT AS MOLLIE FLORKEY'S DAUGHTER TO CALL THE OHIO STATE HEALTH DEPARTMENT AFTER NUMEROUS ATTEMPTS FAILED, ASKING THE HEARTLAND STAFF TO GIVE MOLLIE PROPER MEDICAL AND PERSONAL CARE PER HER DOCTOR'S ORDERS. HEARTLAND STAFF STATED, "THEY WERE TOLD BY THE SON NOT TO LISTEN TO JANE, THE CAREGIVER, WHO SAVED MOLLIE'S LIFE, AND HAD TAKEN CARE OF MOLLIE'S MEDICAL AND PERSONAL NEEDS FOR OVER THREE YEARS. THE SON HANDED MOLLIE OVER TO STRANGERS, MOLLIE ALMOST DIED PREMATURELY DUE TO HEARTLAND'S ABUSIVE, POOR CARE WHICH CAN BE CONFIRMED BY PICTURES WHICH CAN BE EMAILED.
52. IT IS JANE'S OPINION DUE TO THE FACT SHE CALLED THE OHIO STATE HEALTH DEPARTMENT ON HEARTLAND IS THE REASON THE HEARTLAND, SOCIAL WORKER, CONSPIRED WITH THE SON TO KEEP JANE OUT OF HEARTLAND PREVENTING JANE FROM SEEING HER MOTHER FOR OVER TWO YEARS.
JANE LIVES FIVE MINUTES AWAY FROM THE HEARTLAND NURSING HOME.
53. THE OHIO STATE HEALTH DEPARTMENT STATED, "UNLESS THE ABUSE IS HAPPENING WHILE THEIR AT THE FACILITY THEY CANNOT HELP MOLLIE.
54. ARE THEY REALLY SO GULLIBLE TO THINK AN ABUSER IS GOING TO ABUSE THEIR VICTIM IN FRONT OF THEM? THE STATE HEALTH DEPARTMENT REFUSED TO ACKNOWLEDGE THE EVIDENCE OF MOLLIE'S PICTURES WHICH CLEARLY REVEAL NEGLECT AND POOR CARE. THEY REFUSED TO CONSIDER THE NUMEROUS INCIDENT REPORTS OF MOLLIE SITTING IN HER URINE AND FECES DAILY FOR MONTHS. THEY REFUSED TO CONSIDER MOLLIE'S LEGS WERE HEALED BEFORE SHE WAS FORCED INTO HEARTLAND. SIMPLE CARE OF WRAPPING HER LEGS AND KEEPING THEM ELEVATED PREVENTS MOLLIE'S LEGS FROM ULCERATING, IT'S A PROVEN FACT!. DUE TO THE FACT HEARTLAND STAFF AND THE SON REFUSED TO KEEP MOLLIE'S LEGS WRAPPED AND ELEVATED DAILY CAUSED MOLLIE SERIOUS MEDICAL PROBLEMS.
55. THE OHIO STATE HEALTH DEPARTMENT REFUSED TO TALK TO OUTSIDE WITNESS'S THAT COULD CONFIRM MOLLIE'S POOR CARE.
56. HEARTLANDS EXCUSE WAS, "MOLLIE WON'T KEEP HER LEGS UP." MOLLIE CAN'T KEEP HER LEGS ELEVATED IF THERE IS NO LIFT CHAIR IN PLACE. IT TOOK THE SON OVER TWO MONTHS BEFORE HE TOOK TIME TO TAKE MOLLIE'S LIFT CHAIR TO HEARTLAND EVEN AFTER MOLLIE HAD HER LIFT CHAIR HER LEGS REMAINED DOWN. IT IS THE REASON HER LEGS BEGAN ULCERATING AND BLEEDING.
57. MOLLIE HAS A DISABILITY OF DEMENTIA, MOLLIE FORGETS, HEARTLAND SEEMED TO FORGET THAT IMPORTANT FACT OF HER CARE.
THERE WAS NEVER A PROBLEM AT HOME KEEPING MOLLIE'S LEGS ELEVATED. WHEN SHE WOULD FORGET, SHE WAS REMINDED, "TO PUT HER LEGS UP, " IT WAS THAT SIMPLE.
58. IN 2007 JANE CALLED THE OMBUDSMAN DIRECTOR,OUT OF PORTSMOUTH OHIO, ABOUT MOLLIE'S ABUSIVE, POOR CARE AT HEARTLAND. AFTER THE DIRECTOR SAW MOLLIE ON JULY 26, 2007, SHE CALLED JANE AND STATED, " MOLLIE WASN'T GETTING PROPER MEDICAL CARE. SHE STATED, "SHE CALLED THE SON BUT HE DISAGREED AND REFUSED TO INITIATE PROPER MEDICAL CARE FOR MOLLIE.
59. THE OMBUDSMAN DIRECTOR AFTER TALKING TO THE SON, SENT IN ANOTHER OMBUDSMAN REPRESENTATIVE, AT A LATER TIME. THAT OMBUDSMAN REPRESENTATIVE STATED, HEARTLAND HAD CORRECTED THE PROBLEM." THAT WAS A FALSE STATEMENT! MOLLIE'S POOR CARE ESCALATED, HER CONDITION GOT MUCH WORSE!. THERE ARE PICTURES OF BLEEDING OPEN WOUNDS ON MOLLIE'S LEGS. MOLLIE'S PHYSICAL APPEARANCE HAD DETERIORATED.
60. THE CONDITION MOLLIE'S LEGS ARE IN IS DISGRACEFUL. MOLLIE'S LEGS WERE COMPLETELY HEALED BEFORE SHE WAS FORCED INTO HEARTLAND BY THE SON.
61. WHAT EVERYONE IS MISSING, EVEN IF MOLLIE FLORKEY RECEIVED PROPER MEDICAL CARE, THE FACT REMAINS, MOLLIE FLORKEY ( DEMANDED ) TO RETURN HOME (BEFORE) THE SON WAS GIVEN THE GUARDIANSHIP. THERE WERE WITNESS'S AT HEARTLAND THAT HEARD MOLLIE STATE SHE WANTED THE DOCTOR CALLED TO RELEASE HER, HEARTLAND STAFF REFUSED PER THE SON'S ORDERS. TAPE RECORDINGS PROVE THIS FACT. THE SON ILLEGALLY, ASSIGNED HIMSELF HEALTH P.O.A, WITHOUT MOLLIE'S KNOWLEDGE.!
62. MOLLIE STILL HAD RIGHTS TO RETURN HOME AND HER RIGHTS WERE VIOLATED BY THE SON, THE HEARTLAND NURSING HOME AND THE HILLSBORO JUDICIAL SYSTEM.
63. MOLLIE'S WOUND SPECIALIST IN MIDDLETOWN OHIO, CAN CONFIRM HEARTLAND STAFF DID NOT KEEP MOLLIE'S LEGS WRAPPED AND ELEVATED BECAUSE OF THE HORENDOUS CONDITION MOLLIE'S LEGS WERE IN WHEN HE LAST SAW HER IN JUNE 2009. MOLLIE HAS SUFFERED UNNECESSARY PAIN AND MENTAL ANGUISH SINCE 2007.
64. IT TOOK OVER TWO YEARS OF WRAPPING MOLLIE'S LEGS SEVERAL TIMES DAILY, DUE TO THE INFECTION FROM THE FIRST NURSING HOME IN 2003, THE SON FORCED MOLLIE IN WITHOUT LEGAL AUTHORITY. THE HAWTHORN GLEN NURSING HOME IN MIDDLETOWN OHIO. THREE WITNESS'S CAN CONFIRM THE SON DID NOT HAVE LEGAL AUTHORITY TO FORCE MOLLIE TO STAY THERE.
65. HAWTHORN GLEN NURSING HOME CONSPIRED WITH THE SON TO HOLD MOLLIE ILLEGALLY WITHOUT LEGAL DOCUMENTS ON FILE THE SON, USED HIS LAW ENFORCEMENT CREDENTIALS ILLEGALLY TO HOLD MOLLIE PRISONER THERE.
67. AT HAWTHORN GLEN THE SON TOLD THE MEDICAL STAFF IF JANE BRANSON OR JERRY FOGLE, MOLLIE'S OLDEST DAUGHTER TRIED TO TAKE MOLLIE HOME TO CALL THE POLICE AND HAVE THEM ARRESTED.
68. WHILE AT HAWTHORN GLEN IN MIDDLETOWN OHIO, THE SON HAD A STRAIGHT JACKET PUT ON MOLLIE AND THROWN IN LOCK DOWN, LATER, MOLLIE WAS RUSHED TO THE MIDDLETOWN HOSPITAL (ER). THE SON REFUSED TO TELL JANE BRANSON AND JERRY FOGLE ABOUT MOLLIE'S ACCIDENT?????
69. MOLLIE HAD BLACK AND BLUE BRUISES AROUND HER EYES, NOSE AND MOUTH. MOLLIE WAS CONFUSED AND IN PAIN. IT IS JANE'S OPINION, MOLLIE WAS BEATEN BECAUSE SHE RESISTED AND WANTED TO RETURN TO HER HOME.
70. THE SON HAS FORCEFULLY PUT HIS HANDS ON JANE BRANSON AND MOLLIE'S ELDEST DAUGHTER, JERRY FOGLE. IT IS ANOTHER REASON JANE IS ASKING FOR HELP TO FIND AN ATTORNEY THAT WILL HELP FREE MOLLIE, FROM A PERSON THAT NEVER SHOULD HAVE BEEN GIVEN THE GUARDIANSHIP.
71. DUE TO A RESTRICTIVE INCOME JANE CANNOT AFFORD AN ATTORNEY TO CONTEST THE GUARDIAN. THE ATTORNEY'S IN HILLSBORO WILL NOT WORK (PRO BONO) BECAUSE MOLLIE HAS A GUARDIAN. OMBUDSMAN, PRO SENIORS AND LEGAL AIDE REFUSE TO HELP.
JANE BRANSON NEVER WANTED TO BE MOLLIE'S GUARDIAN, SHE FILED FOR GUARDIANSHIP OF "MOLLIE'S PERSON ONLY," TO STOP THE SON FFROM DESTROYING THE TIME MOLLIE HAS LEFT. MOLLIE NEVER WANTED A GUARDIAN.
JANE'S GOAL IS TO FIND OTHER ALTERNATIVES OTHER THAN GUARDIANSHIP AND ALLOW MOLLIE FLORKEY TO RETURN HOME TO BE WITH LOVING FAMILY BEFORE IT'S TOO LATE.
72. JANE ONLY WANTS TO TAKE CARE OF MOLLIE, IT'S ALSO WHAT MOLLIE WANTS!
73. MOLLIE WANTS TO RETURN TO HER ROOTS, SHE WANTS TO GO BACK HOME TO MIDDLETOWN OHIO, WHERE SHE WAS BORN AND RAISED. JANE WANTS TO TAKE MOLLIE HOME. JANE'S SISTER, JERRY FOGLE IS DISABLED, SHE IS BLIND, SHE LIVES CLOSE TO MIDDLETOWN, JANE CAN HELP THEM BOTH.
IT IS NO CRIME TO WANT TO HELP YOUR FAMILY!
74. THE SON HAS KEPT MOLLIE ISOLATED FROM FAMILY FOR OVER TWO YEARS, THERE IS NO PHONE IN HER ROOM. MOLLIE IS ONLY ALLOWED TO TALK ON THE SON'S CELL PHONE WHILE HE DICTATES TO MOLLIE WHAT TO SAY. THE SON LIES TO MOLLIE IN ORDER TO CONTROL HER.
MOLLIE LOVES HER SON BUT UNFORTUNATELY SHE DOES NOT REMEMBER WHAT HE HAS DONE TO HER. MOLLIE CANNOT PROTECT HERSELF, IT IS WHY AUTHORITIES NEED TO STEP IN AND RESCUE MOLLIE.
THE STOCKHOLM SYNDROME
75. PRO SENIORS INFORMED JANE, "MOLLIE CALLED THEIR OFFICE AND INFORMED THEM, " SHE DID NOT WANT THE GUARDIAN OPPOSED." NOTE: THE SON WAS THE ONE THAT CALLED PRO SENIORS, NOT MOLLIE AND TOLD MOLLIE, WHAT TO SAY. THE SON CONSISTENTLY TELLS MOLLIE, "HE'S MAKING THE RIGHT CHOICES ON HER BEHALF." " HOW WOULD MOLLIE KNOW WHAT TO SAY? DUE TO THE FACT OF HER DEMENTIA DISABILITY AND THE FACT THE SON HAS KEPT HER ISOLATED FOR OVER TWO YEARS. MOLLIE'S FAMILY DOES NOT AGREE MOLLIE SHOULD BE FORCED TO STAY IN A NURSING HOME WHEN THERE IS FAMILY THAT WANT TO TAKE CARE OF HER AND HAVE PROVEN IT CAN BE DONE BE DONE AT HOME.
JANE TAKES CARE OF THE ELDERLY PART TIME AND SHE KNOWS FOR A FACT THERE ARE ELDERS A LOT WORSE OFF THAN MOLLIE STILL LIVING AT HOME WITH AND WITHOUT CAREGIVERS.
76. IN 2007 WHEN MOLLIE FOUND OUT THE SON WAS GOING TO FORCE HER TO STAY AT HEARTLAND SHE BECAME VERY UPSET. MOLLIE, BEGGED JANE TO HELP HER GET RELEASED FROM THE SON'S GRIP.
MOLLIE'S PASSPORT CASE WORKER, WAS INFORMED JANE NEEDED SURGERY. IT WAS UNDERSTOOD BY MOLLIE AND ALL THE FAMILY, ONCE JANE RECOVERED SHE WOULD RESUME MOLLIE'S CARE. MOLLIE WAS COUNTING ON RETURNING HOME TO LIVE WITH JANE.
JANE'S SURGERY WAS THE ONLY REASON MOLLIE WENT INTO HEARTLAND, IT WAS FOR RESPITE STAY ONLY!
WHILE MOLLIE IS AT HEARTLAND, THE SON TELLS MOLLIE, " SHE WILL NOT RETURN HOME TO LIVE WITH JANE, THAT HEARTLAND IS NOW HER HOME. AT THAT POINT IN TIME, THE SON WAS NOT MOLLIE'S GUARDIAN. MOLLIE STILL HAD THE RIGHT TO RETURN HOME.
1. THE SON THEN CLOSED MOLLIE'S APARTMENT DOWN WITHOUT HER CONSENT.
MOLLIE ASKED JANE TO STOP THE SON!
2. MALOTT THROWS JANE OUT ON THE STREET, AFTER AN EMERGENCY SURGERY. JANE RECECEIVED A CALL WHILE IN THE HOSPITAL, THE SON WAS MOVING THEIR THINGS OUT OF THE APARTMENT. JANE LEFT THE HOSPITAL TO TRY AND STOP THE SON FROM DESTROYING MOLLIE'S LIFE. MOLLIE IS NOW 91 YEARS OLD. THE LAST TWO YEARS OF MOLLIE'S LIFE HAS BEEN A HELLISH TRANSITION FROM A HEALTHTY, HAPPY CONTENT ENVIRONMENT TO ABUSE AND NEGLIGENT CARE AT HEARTLAND. IN ORDER FOR MOLLIE TO SURVIVE SHE HAD TO SUBMIT TO THE SON.
PICTURES CAN BE EMAILED SHOWING PROOF OF MOLLIES ABUSIVE CARE AT HEARTLAND.
3. WHEN JANE ARRIVED HOME SHE SAW IT WAS TOO LATE, MOLLIE'S BELOVED POSSESSIONS HAD BEEN REMOVED. THE SON PUT HIS HANDS ON JANE BECAUSE SHE WAS TAKING A BAG OF GARBAGE OUTSIDE. THE SON ORDERED JANE TO PUT THE BAG DOWN, HE WANTED TO SEE WHAT WAS IN THE GARBAGE BAG. JANE TOLD HIM, "DON'T BE RIDICULOUS." AT THAT POINT THE SON GRABBED JANE'S WRIST AND SQUEESED HARD. JANE TOLD THE SON, "TO TAKE HIS HANDS OFF HER." IT WAS AT THAT POINT A NEIGHBOR CAME OUT OF THEIR APARTMENT, THE SON, PUSHED JANE BACK AND RELEASED HIS GRIP.
4. WHEN JANE RETURNED TO THE APARTMENT, THE SON'S WIFE WAS IN JANE'S BEDROOM GOING THROUGH JANE'S DRESSER. THE SON BLOCKED JANE'S BEDROOM DOOR TO PREVENT HER FROM GOING IN.
THE SON INFORMED JANE, IN FRONT OF HIS SON IN LAW AND GRANDSON, "IF SHE DIDN'T LEAVE HE WOULD CALL THE POLICE, TELL THEM JANE HIT HIM AND HAVE JANE ARRESTED."
5. AT THAT POINT, JANE LEFT, WENT TO A NEIGHBORS HOME, CALLED THE POLICE, INFORMED THEM, THE SON AND HIS WIFE WERE STEALING HER POSSESSIONS.
6. WHEN THE POLICE ARRIVED, THE SON PULLED OUT HIS LAW ENFORCEMENT CREDENTIALS, THE YOUNG OFFICERS WERE IMPRESSED. THEY MADE JANE WAIT OUTSIDE WHILE THE SON AND HIS WIFE CONTINUED TO LOOT JANE'S POSSESSIONS.
7. THE OFFICERS THEN INFORMED JANE, WHO WERE NOT PRESENT WHEN THE SON FORCEFULLY PUT HIS HANDS ON JANE, " THE SON DIDN'T HURT HER AND SHE DIDN'T WANT TO PRESS CHARGES AND HAVE THE SON ARRESTED. PLEASE RECALL, JANE JUST HAD AN EMERGENCY SURGERY, SHE JUST LEFT HER HOSPITAL BED AFTER BEING TAKEN TO EMERGENCY THE NIGHT BEFORE AND WAS BEING TOLD BY THE SON'S LAW ENFORCEMENT IMPRESSIONABLE, YOUNG OFFICERS, "SHE DID NOT WANT TO PRESS CHARGES AND HAVE THE SON ARRESTED," THE SON " MAN HANDLED" JANE, HIS WIFE, BLATANTLY STOLE JANE'S POSSESSIONS IN FRONT OF HIS SON IN LAW, HIS GRANDSON AND IN FRONT OF THE POLICE OFFICERS THAT JANE HAD CALLED, TO HELP HER.
8. THE SON NOT ONLY HURT JANE, HE STOLE HER POSSESSIONS ALONG WITH JANE'S EVIDENCE SHE HAD HID UNDER HER BED, OF CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENTS SHE WAS GOING TO PRESENT TO THE JUDGE AGAINST THE SON'S CHARACTER, AT THE NOVEMBER 14, 2007 GUARDIANSHIP HEARING, TO PROVE HE WAS NOT A SUITABLE GUARDIAN.
9. AFTER THE OFFICERS ALLOWED THE SON TO TAKE WHAT HE WANTED, THEY INFORMED JANE, "SHE COULD GO BACK IN THE APARTMENT."
10. JANE SAW THE OFFICERS SHAKING HANDS WITH THE SON. AFTER THE OFFICERS LEFT, THE SON'S WIFE, IN FRONT OF JANE, BEGAN READING OUTLOUD, JANE'S EVIDENCE, AGAINST THE SON, THEY HAD STOLEN, FROM UNDER JANES BED. JANE REMEMBERS SEEING THEM LAUGH WHILE THEY INTENTIONALLY HARMED THEIR OWN FAMILY.
JANE TRIED TO FILE A POLICE REPORT AGAINST THE SON. THE OFFICER AT THE POLICE STATION REFUSED TO TYPE UP THE REPORT. INSTEAD, THE OFFICER CALLED THE SON AND ASKED HIM, " TO RETURN JANE'S POSSESSIONS." JANE HAS NEVER RECEIVED HER STOLEN POSSESSIONS FROM THE SON.
11. ALL THE SON HAS TO DO IS SHOW HIS LAW ENFORCEMENT CREDENTIALS AND HE GETS AWAY WITH HIS ILLEGAL ACTS. A CORRUPT, ILLEGAL JUDICIAL, BUDDY SYSTEM THAT HAS CAUSED MUCH PAIN FOR INNOCENT VICTIMS.
12. THE SON THEN HAD HIS GIRLFRIEND, THE APARTMENT MANAGER OF THE "PANTS FACTORY APARTMENTS IN HILLSBORO OHIO, WHERE MOLLIE AND JANE LIVED, ON AUGUST 31, 2007 GIVE JANE A ILLEGAL, THIRTY DAY NOTICE. THE MANAGER DID NOT GO THROUGH THE COURT SYSTEM, IT WAS NOT A LEGAL THIRTY DAY NOTICE.
13. SEPTEMBER 7, 2007, SEVEN DAYS LATER, THE SON HAD HIS APARTMENT MANAGER, CHANGE THE LOCK ON JANE'S APARTMENT DOOR WHILE SHE WAS AT THE DOCTORS. WHEN JANE RETURNED TO FIND THE LOCK CHANGED, SHE CALLED THE HILLSBORO POLICE. THE POLICE INFORMED JANE, SHE HAD TO LEAVE.
A. IT WAS AN ILLEGAL SELF HELP EVICTION THAT NEVER WENT THROUGH THE COURT SYSTEM.
B. BECAUSE JANE'S NAME WAS NOT ON THE LEASE WAS THE REASON THE POLICE OFFICER FORCED JANE TO LEAVE HER HOME.
C. JANE HAD STAYED WITH MOLLIE AS HER CAREGIVER FOR OVER THREE YEARS AT THE PANTS FACTORY APARTMENTS. THERE IS DOCUMENTED PROOF OF THAT FACT. HER FURNITURE AND PERSONAL ITEMS WERE THERE, THE SON MADE IT A POINT TO TELL EVERYONE IT WAS JANE'S HOME TOO.
D. THE MANAGER REFUSED TO ALLOW JANE TO GET HER FURNITURE AND PERSONAL ITEMS.
14. THE SON'S ABUSE AND BROKEN HEARTS OF HIS MOTHER AND SISTERS IS A MEMORY HE WILL HAVE TO LIVE WITH THE REST OF HIS LIFE. HE THREW HIS FAMILY AWAY WITHOUT ANY CONSIDERATION FOR THEIR WELL BEING OR SAFETY. ONLY TO PROTECT HIS DECEPTIVE ACTS AND TO SHOW JANE, HE WAS THE ONE IN AUTHORITY. A PERSON'S ACTIONS SPEAK THE REAL TRUTH!
15. JANE FILED A COMPLAINT IN SMALL CLAIMS COURT AGAINST THE PANTS FACTORY OWNERS DUE TO THEIR APARTMENT MANAGER'S ILLEGAL EVICTION. HER THIRTY DAY NOTICE ON AUGUST 31, 2007 THEN ILLEGALLY CHANGING THE LOCK ON THE FRONT DOOR SEVEN DAYS LATER, SEPTEMBER 7, 2007. NO EVICTION NOTICE OR LOCK OUT NOTICE WAS EVER FILED IN COURT.
16. THE JUDGE IN THE SMALL CLAIMS COURT HAD TO RESCHEDULE THE COURT DATE BECAUSE THE APARTMENT MANAGER STATED IN COURT, THE OFFICER THAT CAME OUT TO THE APARTMENT WHEN THE LOCK WAS CHANGED, TALKED TO THE JUDGE WHO WAS HEARING JANE'S CLAIM.
17. WHEN JANE WENT BACK TO SMALL CLAIMS COURT, ANOTHER JUDGE INFORMED JANE, " BECAUSE SHE LEFT OFF THREE INITIALS ON HER CLAIM FORM, HE WAS DISMISSING HER CLAIM. FORCING JANE TO PAY AGAIN TO FILE ANOTHER CLAIM. HOWEVER, A LADY THAT HAD FILED A CLAIM BEFORE ME, LEFT OFF A NAME ON HER CLAIM AND THE JUDGE DIDN'T HAVE A PROBLEM WRITING IT IN FOR HER. ???????
NOTE; THE SON WAS IN COURT THAT DAY, SUPPORTING THE APARTMENT MANAGER. IT IS JANE'S OPINION, THE SON USED HIS LAW ENFORCEMENT CREDENTIALS WITH HIS LAW ENFORCEMENT ASSOCIATES AND IS THE REAL REASON JANE'S CLAIM WAS DISMISSED.
NOW JANE WOULD HAVE TO GO BACK A THIRD TIME TO SMALL CLAIMS COURT AND PAY AN ADDITIONAL FEE TO FILE THE CLAIM.
18. THE FBI NEEDS TO COME INTO HILLSBORO OHIO AND CLEAN THE CORRUPTION UP IN THIS SMALL TOWN.
19. THE SON OWED THE APARTMENT MANAGER A FAVOR AND IS THE REASON HE WAS IN COURT SUPPORTING HER THAT DAY. MAY 2007, JANE LEFT TO RUN ERRANDS, WHILE JANE WAS OUT, THE SON CALLED MOLLIE, TOLD HER JANE WANTED HER TO MEET HER OUTSIDE, THAT WAS A LIE. THE SON WAS SETTING MOLLIE UP TO LOOK LIKE SHE COULD NOT BE LEFT ALONE AND HIS (FRIEND) THE APARTMENT MANAGER WAS MORE THAN WILLING TO HELP HIM.
20. THE SON THEN CALLS JANE AND ASKED HER, "IF SHE KNOWS WHERE MOLLIE IS."
21. WHEN JANE RETURNED HOME, SHE FOUND MOLLIE OUTSIDE SITTING ON THE FRONT BENCH BY THE APARTMENT DOOR. THE APARTMENT MANAGER AND HER FRIENDS WERE LOOKING OUT THE WINDOW LAUGHING. THE DOOR WAS LOCKED SO MOLLIE COULD NOT GET BACK IN. IT WAS A DISGRACEFUL ACT TO DO TO YOUR OWN MOTHER. MOLLIE TOLD JANE, "THE SON HAD CALLED AND TOLD HER, " "JANE WANTED HER TO MEET HER OUTSIDE. " BECAUSE MOLLIE RECEIVED ONE ON ONE CARE AT HOME, SHE WAS WELL, STABLE, TAKING HER MEDICNE CONSISTENTLY, MOLLIE'S MEMORY STABLILIZED, THE SON DIDN'T COUNT ON MOLLIE TELLING JANE HE CALLED AND WAS THE ONE THAT TOLD MOLLIE TO MEET JANE OUTSIDE.
22. THE SON MADE SURE THE HEAD OF, ADULT PROTECTION SERVICES IN HILLSBORO OHIO WAS NOTIFIED OF THIS ( ONE ) INCIDENT. IN OVER THREE YEARS MOLLIE NEVER LEFT THE APARTMENT WITHOUT JANE. IN THE MORNING, AFTER MOLLIE HAD HER BREAKFAST AND MEDICATION, SHE WOULD ALWAYS TAKE A LONG NAP BECAUSE OF THE MEDICINE THE DOCTOR HAD HER ON. THE MEDICINE WORKED, MOLLIE WAS WELL CONTENT, HAPPY AND STABILIZED.
23. AT THE HEARTLAND NURSING HOME WHEN MOLLIE FOUND OUT THE SON WAS FORCING HER TO STAY THERE, IN FRONT OF WITNESS'S MOLLIE SAID, THE SON IS FIRED! THE SON WAS NOT HER GUARDIAN, MOLLIE STILL HAD RIGHTS. JANE HAS A HAND WRITTEN NOTE BY A WITNESS THAT STATES MOLLIE WANTED TO GO HOME.
24. IT WAS AT THIS POINT THE SON HAD THE HEARTLAND STAFF/SOCIAL WORKER START HARASSING MOLLIE AND JANE AND FORCED JANE TO LEAVE MOLLIE'S SIDE WITHOUT REASON OR JUST CAUSE. THERE ARE TAPE RECORDINGS OF THE SOCIAL WORKER WITHOUT JUST CAUSE OR REASON ENTERING MOLLIE'S ROOM, IN FRONT OF MOLLIE, HARASSED AND ACCUSED JANE OF STEALING MOLLIE'S ANKLE GUARD, THAT THE SON HAD PUT ON MOLLIE'S ANKLE.??????
25. JANE HAS A TAPE RECORDING OF THE SOCIAL WORKER AT HEARTLAND ACCUSING JANE OF STEALING MOLLIE'S ANKLE GUARD. THE FALSE, VERBAL ASSAULT WAS NEVER BROUGHT UP IN COURT BUT IT IS JANE'S OPINION, THE SOCIAL WORKER ALONG WITH THE SON MADE FALSE ACCUSATIONS ABOUT JANE'S CHARACTER TO THE PROBATE JUDGE, OUTSIDE OF COURTROOM PROCEDURE TO PURPOSELY HARM JANE'S GOOD NAME.
26. IT CAN BE PROVEN THE SON FALSIFIED DOCUMENTS WITHOUT MOLLIE'S KNOWLEDGE MAKING HIM HEALTH P.O.A. THERE ARE THREE WITNESS'S THAT KNOW FOR A FACT THE JANUARY 8, 2002 HEALTH P.O.A. DOCUMENTS THE SON PRESENTED AT THE NOVEMBER 14, 2007 GUARDIANSHIP HEARING DID NOT EXIST IN 2003. A CINCINNATI OMBUDSMAN REPRESENTAIVE DISCOVERED THE SON DID NOT HAVE AUTHORITY TO HOLD MOLLIE FLORKEY PRISONER AT THE HAWTHORN GLEN NURSING HOME IN MIDDLETOWN. OHIO.
THE SON HAD TO LIE, STEAL AND USE HIS LAW ENFORCEMENT ASSOICATES TO OBTAIN THE GUARDIANSHIP OF MOLLIE FLORKEY.
THE FBI REALLY NEEDS TO LOOK INTO THIS CRIME AGAINST AN INNOCENT WOMAN THAT HAD NO CONTROL OF THE TERRIBLE INJUSTICE THAT HAS BEEN DONE TO HER BY HER OWN SON.
JANE BRANSON IS SENDING MOLLIE FLORKEY'S STORY OUT AGAIN TO HELP FIND LEGAL COUNCIL THAT WILL COME TO HILLSBORO OHIO, TO CONTEST THE GUARDIANSHIP AND PRESENT OTHER ALTERNATIVES TO THE COURT TO HELP MOLLIE RETURN HOME. MOLLIE NEEDS TO SEE ALL HER CHILDREN AND FAMILY,
IT IS NOT A CRIME TO WANT TO TAKE CARE OF YOUR FAMILY!
IT IS NOT NECESSARY JANE BRANSON HAS GUARDIANSHIP OF MOLLIE. JANE ONLY WANTS TO TAKE CARE OF HER MOTHER AND TAKE MOLLIE HOME, BACK TO HER ROOTS IN MIDDLETOWN OHIO WHERE SHE WAS BORN AND RAISED. IT'S MOLLIE'S WISH! THE SON MUST BE REMOVED AS GUARDIAN. MOLLIE MUST BE GIVEN THE RIGHT TO SEE ALL HER CHILDREN BEFORE SHE PASSES. TWO PRECIOUS YEARS HAVE BEEN STOLEN FROM MOLLIE BY NOT ALLOWING HER TO SEE HER YOUNGEST CHILD WHO LIVES FIVE MINUTES AWAY FROM THE NURSING HOME. TO TAKE AWAY ONE CHILD AT THE END OF A PARENTS LIFE IS IMMORAL
Ombudsman stated, " they had talked to Mollie and asked her if she was satisfied with the son's decisions he has made on her behalf."
1. MOLLIE FLORKEY HAS DEMENTIA. SHE IS ONLY IN THE MOMENT. YOU CANNNOT ASK SUCH AN OPEN END QUESTION WITH A PERSON THAT HAS A DEMENTIA HANDICAP.
YOU MUST ASK DIRECT QUESTIONS THAT MOLLIE CAN RELATE TO.
MOLLIE MUST HAVE A CAREGIVER. YOU MUST ASK MOLLIE IF SHE PREFERS TO STAY AT THE HEARTLAND NURSING HOME OR RETURN TO LIVE WITH HER DAUGHTER JANE.
STOCKHOLM SYNDROME.
2. THE SON HAS ISOLATED MOLLIE IN SMALL QUARTERS FOR OVER TWO YEARS FROM FAMILY MEMBERS, THAT MOLLIE ASKED TO ADVOCATE HER RIGHTS, TO FREE HER FROM THE SON AND THE HEARTLAND NURSING HOME. IT IS THE REASON JANE HAS NOT BEEN ALLOWED TO SEE MOLLIE IN OVER TWO YEARS.
3. MOLLIE IS NOT ALLOWED TO TALK AND EXPRESS HER WISHES OF RETURNING HOME TO LIVE WITH HER DAUGHTER JANE BRANSON DUE TO THE FACT SHE HAS BEEN BULLIED BY THE SON AND THE HEARTLAND NURSING HOME STAFF.
4. INSTEAD OF OMBUDSMAN ASKING MOLLIE, " IF SHE IS SATISFIED WITH THE SON'S DECISIONS WHICH IS AN OPEN END QUESTION TO A PERSON WHO HAS DEMENTIA, ASK MOLLIE THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS.
A. MOLLIE, DID YOUR SON MAKE THE RIGHT DECISION WHEN HE FORCED YOU INTO THE HEARTLAND NURSING HOME ESPECIALLY SINCE YOU WEREN'T DYING, YOU WERE NOT SICK, YOU DIDN'T NEED SKILLED CARE, YOU HAD A HOME AND A CAREGIVER THAT STAYED WITH YOU?
B MOLLIE, DID YOUR SON MAKE THE RIGHT DECISION WHEN HE FALSIFIED DOCUMENTS GIVING HIM AUTHORITY OVER YOUR HEALTH AND ESTATE WITHOUT YOUR KNOWLEDGE?
NOTE: THERE IS PROOF OF THIS!
C. MOLLIE, DID YOUR SON MAKE THE RIGHT DECISION WHEN HE SOLD YOUR BELOVED HOME AGAINST YOUR WISHES WITHOUT LEGAL AUTHORITY TO DO SO?
D. MOLLIE, DID YOUR SON MAKE THE RIGHT DECISION WHEN HE FORCED YOUR DAUGHTER JANE BRANSON OUT OF THE HEARTLAND NURSING HOME WITHOUT REASON OR JUST CAUSE IN ORDER TO BULLY AND FORCE YOU TO SUBMIT TO STAY THERE? NOTE: TAPE RECORDINGS PROVE THIS FACT!
E. MOLLIE, DID YOUR SON MAKE THE RIGHT DECISION NOT TO ALLOW YOU TO SEE YOUR YOUNGEST CHILD IN OVER TWO YEARS AFTER HE KNOWINGLY AND WILLINGLY DEFAMED HER GOOD NAME WITH HIS LIES ABOUT HER CHARACTER BEHIND CLOSED DOORS, IN ORDER TO STOP HER FROM ADVOCATING YOUR RIGHTS TO LEAVE THE HEARTLAND NURSING HOME AND RETURN HOME TO LIVE WITH HER?
F. MOLLIE, DID YOUR SON MAKE THE RIGHT DECISION WHEN HE CLOSED YOUR APARTMENT, FORCED YOU INTO HEARTLAND, WITHOUT REASON, ILLEGALLY THREW JANE OUT ON THE STREET, AFTER SHE HAD AN EMERGENCY SURGERY AND FORCEFULLY PUT HIS HANDS ON HER TO BULLY AND INTIMIDATE HER?
G. MOLLIE, DID YOUR SON MAKE THE RIGHT DECISION WHEN HE ALLOWED THE HEARTLAND NURSING HOME STAFF, TO FORCE JANE TO LEAVE YOUR SIDE WHEN YOU WERE BEGGING AND CRYING OUT TO THEM, "TO LEAVE JANE ALONE, SHE HAS DONE NOTHING WRONG." YOU BEGGED JANE, TO TAKE YOU WITH HER, AS YOUR WHOLE BODY WAS SHAKING, YOU CRIED OUT, "JANIE, DON'T LEAVE ME HERE," THE HEARTLAND STAFF MADE JANE LEAVE WITHOUT JUST CAUSE OR REASON. THEIR EXCUSE WAS, BECAUSE YOUR SON WANTS JANE TO LEAVE."
NOTE; JANE HAS A TAPE RECORDING THE DAY THE HEARTLAND STAFF DID THIS TO MOLLIE!
H. MOLLIE, DID THE NURSING HOME INFORM YOU YOU HAD RIGHTS TO SEE ANY FAMILY MEMBER YOU WANTED TO? RESIDENTS BILL OF RIGHTS 1983.
I. MOLLIE, WERE YOU TOLD BY YOUR GUARDIAN AD LITEM YOUR RIGHTS WERE VIOLATED? ACCORDING TO THE RESIDENTS BILL OF RIGHTS 1983 NOTE: MOLLIE WAS NOT TOLD, EVEN "BEFORE" THE SON WAS GIVEN THE GUARDIANSHIP BY A JUDICIAL SYSTEM THAT DID NOT CONSIDER WHAT WAS IN HER BEST INTEREST. THE JUDGE DID NOT CONSIDER HER MEDICAL OR PERSONAL NEEDS. THE ONLY CONSIDERATION THE PROBATE JUDGE MADE WAS WHAT THE SON WANTED, HIS LAW ENFORCEMENT ASSOCIATE. MOLLIE WAS NOT ALLOWED IN THE COURT ROOM TO FIGHT FOR HER RIGHTS.
IF ANYONE HAS ANY INFORMATION OF PRO BONO ATTORNEY'S THAT WILL CONTEST THE GUARDIAN OR ORGANIZATIONS FOR VICTIMS OF DISABILITIES THAT CAN REPRESENT THEM IN A COURT OF LAW, EVEN THOUGH THEY HAVE A GUARDIAN, PLEASE CONTACT JANE BRANSON
PLEASE CONTACT THE WASHINGTON FBI AND OTHER OFFICIALS TO HELP!
RESPECTFULLY,
JANE BRANSON
275 HARRY SAUNER RD. APT. B
HILLSBORO, OH 45133
cwaltershillsboro@yahoo.com
signersignerREADERS ONCE AGAIN JANE IS CONTACTING YOU TO HELP FIND AN ORGANIZATION, A HIGH OFFICIAL OR A PRO BONO ATTORNEY THAT WILL COME TO HILLSBORO OHIO TO CONTEST THE GUARDIAN OF MOLLIE FLORKEY AND ALLOW MOLLIE TO RETURN HOME TO LIVE OUT HER DAYS WITH LOVING FAMILY.
THE WASHINGTON D.C. NATIONAL DISABILITY RIGHTS FOR VICTIMS IS NOT RESPONDING, IT COULD BE, THEY DIDN'T RECEIVE THE INFORMATION.
PLEASE HELP JANE FIND A WAY TO CONTACT THEM!
THE PETITION IS IN DETAIL TO SHOW THE OFFENSES.
1. JANE BRANSON CANNOT AFFORD AN ATTORNEY TO HELP FREE HER MOTHER MOLLIE FLORKEY. JANE IS A SENIOR CITIZEN ON A RESTRICTIVE INCOME AND DESPERATELY NEEDS HELP. JANE HAS CONTACTED LEGAL AID AND NUMEROUS ATTORNEY'S WHO DO NOT WANT TO COME TO HILLSBORO OHIO AND WORK PRO BONO.
2. AMERICA, PLEASE UNDERSTAND OUR NATION'S ELDERS ARE IN CRISIS THERE MUST BE CHANGE OR THIS COULD BE THE OUTCOME FOR YOUR LOVE ONE OR EVEN YOURSELF.
3. FOR OVER TWO YEARS JANE HAS CONTACTED NUMEROUS AGENCIES AND HIGH OFFICIALS TO HELP RESCUE HER MOTHER, MOLLIE FLORKEY, BEFORE THE WORSE HAPPENS. BECAUSE OF INADEQUATE LAWS AND THE FACT MOLLIE IS NOW NINETY ONE YEARS OLD, OFFICIALS DON'T WANT TO BE BOTHERED, ESPECIALLY WHEN THEY ARE NOT BEING PAID AND THERE ARE OTHER GREAT IMPORTANT ISSUES TO RESOLVE. MOLLIE FLORKEY IS "WORTH" YOUR TIME!
4. WHERE DO PEOPLE WITH RESTRICTIVE INCOMES GO FOR HELP TO SAVE A LOVED ONES LIFE WHEN A GREAT INJUSTICE HAS BEEN DONE TO THEM BY A CORRUPT JUDICIAL BUDDY SYSTEM?
5. IF YOU CAN'T HELP, (PLEASE) CONTACT THE WHITE HOUSE, THE FBI ANYONE THAT CAN HELP SAVE MOLLIE FLORKEY.
6. NOTHING IS IMPOSSIBLE IF SOMEONE IN AUTHORITY WOULD TAKE THE TIME TO PICK UP THE PHONE AND PUT AN END TO MOLLIE FLORKEY'S NIGHTMARE AND ALLOW HER TO RETURN HOME TO HER DAUGHTER JANE BRANSON.
THE STOCKHOLM SYNDROME
7. MOLLIE FLORKEY WAS FORCED IN THE HEARTLAND NURSING HOME IN HILLSBORO OHIO AGAINST HER WILL, BY HER SON, WHO IS IN LAW ENFORCEMENT & HAS WORKED WITH THE FBI IN CINCINNATI OHIO.
8. MOLLIE FLORKEY HAS DEMENTIA AND CAN'T REMEMBER WHAT JIM MALOTT HAS DONE TO HER.
9. THE OMBUDSMAN AGENCY IN HIGHLAND COUNTY OHIO AND PRO SENIORS OUT OF CINCINNATI OHIO INFORMED JANE BRANSON, " UNLESS MOLLIE FLORKEY, CONTACTS THEM AND INFORMS THEM SHE IS NOT RECEIVING PROPER MEDICAL CARE AND SHE IS NOT HAPPY WITH THE GUARDIAN, THEY CANNOT HELP HER."
10. MOLLIE FLORKEY IS VERY SOCIABLE, FRIENDLY, UNDERSTANDS WHAT IS BEING SAID, HOWEVER, HOW DOES OMBUDSMAN AND PRO SENIORS EXPECT MOLLIE, WHO HAS A DISABILITY OF DEMENTIA, WHO CAN'T REMEMBER FIVE MINUTES AGO, CALL THEM AND EXPLAIN, " THE SON IS HOLDING HER PRISONER AT THE HEARTLAND NURSING HOME IN HILLSBORO OHIO ? "
11. THERE IS NO PHONE IN MOLLIES ROOM, THE SON WILL NOT ALLOW MOLLIE TO TALK ON A PHONE UNLESS HE IS THERE DICTATING TO HER WHAT TO SAY.
THE STOCKHOLM SYNDROME!
12. THE SON REPEATEDLY TELLS MOLLIE, " HE IS MAKING THE RIGHT CHOICES AND DECISIONS FOR HER LIFE. HOW WOULD MOLLIE KNOW THAT'S TRUE? THE SON HAS KEPT MOLLIE ISOLATED IN VERY SMALL QUARTERS AT HEARTLAND, FOR OVER TWO YEARS FROM FAMILY. THE SON UNDERSTANDS BY ISOLATING MOLLIE FORCES HER TO DEPEND COMPLETELY ON HIM WHICH CREATES A FALSE IMPRESSION IN MOLLIE'S MIND, HE CAN DO NO WRONG AND HE'S LOOKING OUT FOR HER BEST INTEREST. MOLLIE'S FAMILY MEMBERS DO NOT CONDONE THE SON'S ABUSIVE TACTICS DUE TO THE FACT IT HAS CAUSED MOLLIE GREAT HARM. SEE PICTURES OF MOLLIE'S ABUSE CAN BE EMAILED.
13. THE SON ALWAYS REMINDS MOLLIE HE HAS A DANGEROUS JOB, WHICH ELEVATES AN IMPRESSION IN MOLLIE'S MIND, SHE MUST NOT UPSET HIM BY ASKING TO RETURN HOME TO LIVE WITH HER DAUGHTER JANE BRANSON, BECAUSE IT MIGHT UPSET HIM AND HE HAS ENOUGH TO WORRY ABOUT. BULL! THIS IS EXACTLY HOW THE SON WANTS MOLLIE TO THINK IN ORDER TO CONTROL HER. MOLLIE DOESN'T HAVE A CHOICE BUT TO BELIEVE THE SON'S LIES BECAUSE OF THE ISOLATION MALOTT HAS FORCED HER IN.
14. IN OVER TWO YEARS MOLLIE HAS NOT BEEN ALLOWED TO SEE HER DAUGHTER, JANE BRANSON. THE SON UNDERSTANDS MOLLIE WANTS TO RETURN HOME TO LIVE WITH JANE AND HE ALSO UNDERSTANDS JANE WILL ADVOCATE MOLLIE'S RIGHTS TO FREE HER FROM THE HIS GRIPS. MOLLIE AT NINETY ONE YEARS OLD IS AT THE END OF HER LIFE. TO NOT ALLOW MOLLIETO SEE HER YOUNGEST CHILD JANE IN OVER TWO YEARS, IS DISGRACEFUL, EVIL ACT BY THE SON
15. TO REMOVE MOLLIE WHO WAS STABILIZED AND WELL, OUT OF A SAFE, LOVING, HOME ENVIRONMENT AND FORCE HER IN A NURSING HOME, THAT THE SON KNOWS FOR A FACT, IS MOLLIE'S WORSE FEAR, SHOULD RAISE A RED FLAG TO ALL OFFICIALS.
16. OMBUDSMAN AND PRO SENIORS CONSIDER JANE BRANSON AS A CONTACT PERSON ONLY, WITHOUT ANY RIGHTS TO RESCUE MOLLIE FROM HER ABUSERS. OMBUDSMAN AND PRO SENIORS WERE GIVEN PICTURES AND EVIDENCE OF MOLLIE'S ABUSE BUT UNLESS (MOLLIE) CONTACTS OMBUDSMAN AND PRO SENIORS AND REPORTS THE ABUSE (HERSELF,) OMBUDSMAN AND PRO SENIORS STATE, "THEY CANNOT HELP HER." MOLLIE HAS A DISABILITY OF DEMENTIA, SHE IS NOT CAPABLE OF CALLING AND EXPRESSING THE OFFENSES THAT HAS BEEN DONE TO HER BY THE SON AND HEARTLAND BECAUSE SHE CAN'T REMEMBER.
NOTE: MOLLIE ONLY REMEMBERS TWO THINGS, SHE LOVES ALL HER CHILDREN AND SHE WANTS TO RETURN HOME.
17. IT IS IMPORTANT TO UNDERSTAND OMBUDSMAN & PRO SENIORS ARE SUPPOSE TO "PROTECT " OUR ELDERLY. PRO SENIORS IN CINCINNAT OHIO, INFORMED JANE BRANSON, "MOLLIE IS THEIR CLIENT, JANE IS ONLY THE CONTACT PERSON THAT ALERTED THEM ABOUT MOLLIE'S ABUSE AT THE HEARTLAND NURSING HOME IN HILLSBORO OHIO, WHICH JANE CAN PROVE ALLOWED MOLLIE'S ABUSE. SINCE JANE IS ONLY THE CONTACT PERSON, UNLESS MOLLIE REPORTS IT, PRO SENIORS DO NOTHING. PRO SENIORS REPRESENTATIVE STATED, HE SAW THE PICTURES OF MOLLIE'S ABUSE, HE UNDERSTANDS MOLLIE HAS DEMENTIA AND CAN'T REMEMBER FIVE MINUTES AGO HOWEVER, THEY CAN'T HELP HER.
dUE TO JANE NOT BEING ABLE TO AFFORD AN ATTORNEY,JANE STATED TO PRO SENIORS, "SHE WANTED TO BE THEIR CLIENT AND REPORT THE SON WITHOUT REASON OR JUST CAUSE HAS NOT ALLOWED JANE TO SEE MOLLIE HER MOTHER, IN OVER TWO YEARS. JANE LIVES FIVE MINUTES AWAY FROM THE HEARTLAND NURSING HOME. PRO SENIORS REPRESENTATIVES INFORMED JANE, " SINCE IT INVOLVED MOLLIE FLORKEY, THEY COULD NOT HELP HER," AND THEY COULD NOT RECOMMEND ANY ATTORNEY.
OMBUDSAMAN AND PRO SENIORS UNDERSTAND MOLLIE HAS BEEN ABUSED, WAS FORCED IN THE HEARTLAND NURSING HOME AGAINST HER WILL WITHOUT JUST CAUSE OR REASON BY A DECEPTIVE SON.
WHAT KIND OF INSANE JUSTICE SYSTEM ARE WE LIVING IN? OMBUDSMAN AND PRO SENIOR RULES AND REGULATIONS ARE INSIDIOUS AND INHUMANE AND SHOUT TO THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, "IF YOU GET OLD YOUR RIGHTS WILL BE TAKEN AND YOU WILL BE TREATED AS IF YOUR LIFE IS WORTHLESS."
NOT ONLY HAS MOLLIE BEEN ABUSED BY THE JUDICIAL SYSTEM WHO REFUSED TO CONSIDER MOLLIE FLORKEY'S RIGHTS, A JUDICIAL SYSTEM THAT REFUSED MOLLIE THE RIGHT TO BE PRESENT IN THE COURT ROOM TO DEFEND HER CONSTITUTIONAL AND HUMAN RIGHTS BY TELLING THE HILLSBORO PROBATE JUDGE, " SHE WANTED TO RETURN HOME TO LIVE WITH HER DAUGHTER," AT THAT POINT IN TIME, MOLLIE WAS MENTALLY STRONG BECAUSE SHE RECEIVED ONE ON CARE AT HOME, SHE COULD COMMUNICATE HER WISHES AND NEEDS TO THE JUDGE.
MOLLIE WAS BETRAYED BY HER OWN SON. THE SON TOOK AWAY EVERYTHING SACRED AND DEAR TO MOLLIE, THREW HER AWAY, GAVE HER TO STRANGERS, WHEN THERE WAS LOVING FAMILY WILLING AND CAPABLE TO CARE FOR HER. THE SON BREACHED HIS DUTY AS GUARDIAN THAT WAS GIVEN TO HIM BY A JUDICIAL, BUDDY SYSTEM BY ALLOWING THE HEARTLAND NURSING HOME STAFF TO ABUSE AND NEGLECT MOLLIE. MOLLIE HAS SUFFERED UNNECESSARY PAIN AND GREAT MENTAL ANGUISH DUE TO THE SON'S WRONG CHOICES AND DECISIONS SINCE HE WAS GIVEN THE GUARDIANSHIP.
NOTE: EVEN IF THE SON AND THE HEARTLAND STAFF HAVE CORRECTED THEIR TWO YEARS OF TERRORISM OF MOLLIE'S CARE, MOLLIE SHOULD STILL HAVE THE RIGHT TO BE SET FREE AND ALLOWED TO RETURN HOME TO HER DAUGHTER. DUE TO THE FACT MOLLIE WAS FORCED IN HEARTLAND AGAINST HER WILL EVERYONE OF MOLLIE'S CONSTITUTIONAL AND HUMAN RIGHTS WERE VIOLATED BY THE SON WHO ILLEGALLY ASSIGNED HIMSELF HEALTH P.O.A., THE HEARTLAND NURSING HOME AND A JUDICIAL BUDDY SYSTEM.
18. OMBUDSMAN AND PRO SENIORS, AGENCIES THAT ARE SUPPOSE TO PROTECT OUR SENIOR CITIZENS FROM HARM AND ABUSE ARE ENABLING ABUSERS TO GET AWAY WITH THEIR CRIME BY INADEQUATE FORM OF PROCEDURES AND INVESTIGATIONS. KNOWING MOLLIE HAS A DEMENTIA DISABILITY OMBUDSMAN AND PRO SENIORS STILL (ASSUME) MOLLIE CAN COMMUNICATE WITH THEM, EXPLAIN HER NEEDS AND WISHES AND IS ABLE TO DEFEND HERSELF AGAINST PREDATORS. MOLLIE HAS BEEN BULLIED, ABUSED, ISOLATED, TOLD SHE CANNOT TALK, SHE IS HELPLESS BECAUSE OF HER DEMENTIA DISABILITY.
19. OMBUDSMAN AND PRO SENIORS ARE FOLLOWING INCOMPETENT, INSUFFICIENT RULES AND REGULATIONS THAT ARE ACTUALLY CREATING GREAT HARM TO OUR SENIOR CITIZENS. BY NOT ALLOWING ALL EVIDENCE AND WITNESS'S TO BE BROUGHT FORTH. THE FACT OF THE MATTER, ANYONE WITH A TITLE CAN BE AN ABUSER. WHEN YOU SHOW AUTHORITIES PROOF, THE GUARDIAN HAS ALLOWED THE ABUSE, HAS ISOLATED MOLLIE AND THE AUTHORITIES STILL REPLY, "WE CAN'T HELP BECAUSE MOLLIE HAS A GUARDIAN, YOU HAVE TO WONDER, ARE THESE PEOPLE NUTS?
20. TO SIMPLY RELY ON MOLLIE'S SON WHO CLEARLY, HAS ULTERIOR MOTIVES AND THE HEARTLAND NURSING HOME WHO HAS PROVEN THEIR POOR CARE AND NEGLECT OF MOLLIE, IS TOO ONE SIDED AND ALLOWS MOLLIE TO FALL BETWEEN THE CRACKS OF THE JUSTICE SYSTEM.
21. OMBUDSMAN AND PRO SENIORS ONLY TALK TO THE SON AND THE HEARTLAND NURSING HOME STAFF, THE VERY ON'E'S THAT ABUSED AND NEGLECTED MOLLIE, WHO REFUSE TO ADVOCATE MOLLIE'S RIGHTS. OMBUDSMAN PURPOSELY ASK MOLLIE, OPEN END QUESTIONS.
22. NOTE: BECAUSE OF MOLLIE'S DISABILITY OF DEMENTIA, OMBUDSMAN FAILED TO ASK PRECISE QUESTIONS, IN ORDER TO PIN POINT MOLLIES NEEDS AND REQUESTS.
23. EXAMPLE OF A QUESTION THAT WILL ENABLE MOLLIE TO EXPRESS THE TRUTH AND WHAT (SHE) REALLY WANTS:
(1.) MOLLIE, DO YOU WANT TO STAY AT THE HEARTLAND NURSING HOME OR DO YOU WANT TO RETURN HOME AND LIVE WITH YOUR DAUGHTER JANE?
24. A GREAT DEAL OF MOLLIE IS STILL WITH US. IT IS IMPORTANT TO KEEP THE SON AND THE HEARTLAND STAFF OUT OF THE ROOM WHEN TALKING TO MOLLIE, THEY WILL CONTROL WHAT SHE SAYS. MOLLIE HAS BEEN THREATENED AND INTIMIDATED, EITHER DO WHAT THEY SAY OR ELSE! MAKE SURE THE INTERCOM IS TURNED OFF AT THE NURSES STATION.
25. OMBUDSMAN REFUSES TO ASK MOLLIE QUESTION NUMBER 1.???????
26. OMBUDSMAN MAKES A POINT TO ASK MOLLIE A VAGUE AND A OPEN END QUESTION.
(2.) "MOLLIE, IF YOU COULD LIVE ANYWHERE, WHERE WOULD THAT BE? NOTE: MOLLIE MUST STAY WITH A CAREGIVER, THEREFORE IT IS ONLY FAIR TO ASK MOLLIE QUESTION NUMBER 1.
YOUR NOT LEADING MOLLIE, YOUR GIVING HER A CHOICE AND ASKING MOLLIE A QUESTION SHE CAN RELATE TO.
NOTE: JUST BECAUSE A PERSON LOOKS NORMAL, IS MAKING PLEASANT CONVERSATION, OMBUDSMAN FORGETS, A BATTLE IS GOING ON IN THE MIND OF A PERSON WITH DEMENTIA, THEY DON'T WANT ANYONE TO KNOW THEY CAN'T REMEMBER, THEY'RE STRUGGLING WITH, WHAT TO SAY NEXT. THEIR SELF ESTEEM IS FRAGILE, IT IS THE REASON YOU MUST PUT MOLLIE IN A COMFORT ZONE AND ASK DIRECT, SIMPLE QUESTIONS TO FIND OUT WHAT WOULD BE IN MOLLIE'S BEST INTEREST.
27. IN 2007 WHEN MOLLIE FOUND OUT THE SON WAS FORCING HER TO STAY AT HEARTLAND, MOLLIE MADE HER VOICE HEARD IN THE HALLWAYS AT HEARTLAND AND IN FRONT OF WITNESS'S, MOLLIE DEMANDED TO BE RELEASED AND RETURN HOME TO LIVE WITH JANE. THERE ARE TAPE RECORDINGS OF THESE CONVERSATIONS OF MOLLIE STATING THIS FACT AT HEARTLAND.
28. NOTE: MOLLIE ONLY WENT INTO HEARTLAND BECAUSE JANE HAD SURGERY. IT WAS UNDERSTOOD BY MOLLIE AND MOLLIE'S PASSPORT CASEWORKER, AND ALL THE FAMILY, ONCE JANE RECOVERED, SHE WOULD RESUME MOLLIE'S CARE.
29. THERE ARE TAPE RECORDINGS OF MOLLIE AND JANE BEING HARASSED BY THE HEARTLAND STAFF AND THE HEARTLAND SOCIAL WORKER. THERE IS A TAPE RECORDINGS OF A HEARTLAND AID, STATING TO JANE, "HEARTLAND WAS GOING TO TRY AND FORCE HER OUT OF THEIR FACILITY IN ORDER TO FORCE MOLLIE TO SUBMIT TO STAY THERE."
NOTE: HEARTLAND MAY HAVE DISMISSED THE AIDE, THEY KNOW ABOUT JANE'S TAPE RECORDINGS.
30. IT IS IMPORTANT TO UNDERSTAND THERE WAS NO REASON FOR THE SON TO FORCE MOLLIE IN THE HEARTLAND NURSING HOME IN HILLSBORO OHIO.
1. MOLLIE WAS NOT DYING.
2. MOLLIE WAS NOT ILL.
3. MOLLIE DID NOT NEED SKILLED CARE.
4. MOLLIE HAD A HOME AND A CAREGIVER THAT STAYED WITH HER. (JANE BRANSON/DAUGHTER)
5 MOLLIE LIVED IN A SAFE,LOVING, HOME ENVIRONMENT WHERE SHE WAS HAPPY AND CONTENT.
31. THE SON AND HEARTLAND SOCIAL WORKER, KNOWINGLY AND WILLINGLY CONSPIRED TO DEFAME JANES GOOD NAME IN ORDER TO KEEP HER OUT OF HEARTLAND FOR OVER TWO YEARS, THEY WANTED TO PREVENT JANE FROM ADVOCATING MOLLIE'S RIGHTS.
FACTS!
32. THE SON AND HEARTLAND STAFF LIED TO THE PROBATE JUDGE WHEN HE CALLED HEARTLAND JULY 2007 AND ASKED THEM, "IF THERE WAS AN EMERGENCY CONCERNING MOLLIE'S CARE?"
33. WITH ALL DUE RESPECT TO THE PROBATE JUDGE, DID HE REALLY THINK HEARTLAND STAFF WOULD TELL HIM THE TRUTH? DID HE THINK THE HEARTLAND STAFF WOULD SAY, "YES, MOLLIE FLORKEY IS SITTING IN URINE AND FECES DAILY, WE DON'T WRAP AND KEEP MOLLIE'S LEGS ELEVATED DAILY, WHICH WE UNDERSTAND ARE DOCTORS ORDERS, EVEN THOUGH WE KNOW HER LEGS WILL ULCERATE IF WE DON'T. (WE REFUSE TO KEEP MOLLIES LEGS ELEVATED, ( NOTE ) THAT STATEMENT IS ON A TAPE RECORDING THE HEARTLAND SOCIAL WORKER, MADE) WE KNOW MOLLIE HAS BLEEDING BEDSORES BUT WE REFUSE TO MAKE SURE HER WEIGHT IS SHIFTED DURING THE DAY, WE REFUSE TO DO MONTHLY URINE CULTURES, EVEN THOUGH WE KNOW MOLLIE HAS CHRONIC URINARY TRACK INFECTIONS, MOLLIE RARELY GETS BATHED AND SHE'S ALWAYS WEARING SOMEONE ELSE'S CLOTHES BUT NO JUDGE, THERE IS NO EMERGENCY.
THIS IS WHAT THE HEARTLAND STAFF WITH THE COORPERATION OF THE SON, DID TO MOLLIE FLORKEY AND THEY GOT AWAY WITH IT.
34. THE SON AND HEARTLAND DEFAMED JANE'S GOOD NAME TO THE JUDGE, OUTSIDE OF COURTROOM PROCEDURE TO PURPOSELY MISLEAD THE JUDGE INTO THINKING JANE WAS A TROUBLE MAKER. NOTHING WAS SAID AGAINST JANE'S GOOD NAME AT THE AUGUST 8, 2007 EMERGENCY HEARING, OR AT THE NOVEMBER 14, 2007 GUARDIANSHIP HEARING, HOWEVER, THE PROBATE JUDGE CALLED JANE A TROUBLE MAKER WITHOUT ANY EVIDENCE OF PROOF.
NOTE: JANE HAD PROOF SHE AND MOLLIE WERE HARASSED AT THE HEARTLAND NURSING HOME, MOLLIE SITTING IN HER URINE AND FECES DAILY FOR MONTHS, MOLLIE'S LEGS NOT WRAPPED OR EVER ELEVATED. WITHOUT REASON OR JUST CAUSE THE PROBATE JUDGE REFUSED TO ALLOW HER EVIDENCE. THE SON PRESENTED NO EVIDENCE IN COURT JANE CAUSED TROUBLE, NOTHING WAS MENTIONED IN COURT AGAINST JANE'S GOOD NAME, BUT STILL, THE JUDGE CALLED JANE A TROUBLE MAKER?????
35. WITHOUT REASON OR JUST CAUSE THE JUDGE STATES TO JANE, "HE'S GIVING GUARDIANSHIP TO THE SON, HE'S NOT GRANTING JANE ANY VISITATIONS TO SEE MOLLIE, THE SON WILL BE CALLING THE SHOTS AND HE WILL DECIDE ( IF) AND ( WHEN ) JANE, WILL GET TO SEE MOLLIE, THE PROBATE JUDGE THEN STATED TO JANE, " THAT'S JUST WHAT YOU GET FOR ALL THE TROUBLE YOU'VE CAUSED." THE JUDGE ALSO STATED TO JANE, "IT WON'T DO YOU ANY GOOD TO FILE AN APPEAL
36. THE JUDGE'S STATEMENTS WERE SHOCKING, ESPECIALLY, WHEN NO EVIDENCE WAS PRESENTED TO HIM IN COURT OF HIS FALSE STATEMENT, STATING JANE CAUSED TROUBLE. THE SON REALLY DID AN AX JOB ON HIS SISTER JANE! FOR OVER THREE YEARS JANE SUCCESSFULLY TOOK CARE OF MOLLIE. JANE IS A SENIOR CITIZEN, WORKS PART TIME TAKING CARE OF THE ELDERLY, SHE IS A LAW ABIDING CITIZEN. THERE IS NO RETRAINING ORDER, PREVENTING JANE FROM SEEING MOLLIE. HOWEVER, WHEN JANE, HAS GONE INTO HEARTLAND TO SEE MOLLIE, AS THEY'RE EMBRACING, WITHOUT JUST CAUSE OR REASON, A NURSE STANDS OVER MOLLIE'S BED, REPEATEDLY SHOUTING AT JANE, "GET OUT," THERE IS A WITNESS THAT CAN CONFIRM THIS FACT.
37. IT WAS OBVIOUS TO ALL IN COURT, THE SON WANTED JANE KEPT OUT OF HEARTLAND TO GIVE HIM TIME TO BULLY AND FORCE MOLLIE TO SUBMIT TO STAY THERE AND THE PROBATE JUDGE, THE SON'S LAW ENFORCEMENT ASSOCIATE, WAS MORE THAN WILLING TO ASSIST HIM WITHOUT ANY CONSIDERATION OF WHAT WAS IN MOLLIE'S BEST INTEREST OR THE TREMENDOUS PAIN IT CAUSED JANE NOT TO SEE HER DEAR MOTHER FOR OVER TWO YEARS.
38. WITHOUT AN ATTORNEY JANE FILED AN APPEAL, JANE FILED A MOTION AND ASKED THE COURT TO WAVE THE COURT COST DUE TO RESTRICTIVE INCOME. THE JUDGE DENIED IT. JANE CALLED THE PROBATE JUDGE, COURT REPORTER AND ASKED HER TO TRANSCRIBE THE AUDIO OF THE GUARDIANSHIP HEARING. THE COURT REPORTER INFORMED JANE, " HER TESTIMONY COULD NOT BE HEARD, THEREFORE SHE COULD NOT TRANSCRIBE THE AUDIO.
39. JANE CALLED THE COURT OF APPEALS AND ASKED THEM WHAT TO DO SINCE THE AUDIO COULD NOT BE TRANSCRIBED. THE COURT OF APPEALS STATED TO JANE, " TO DO HER BRIEF BY MEMORY." AFTER JANE SUBMITTED HER BRIEF TO THE COURT, THE SON'S ATTORNEY, FILED A MOTION FOR JANE TO NOW DO ( ANOTHER ) BRIEF BECAUSE THE AUDIO WAS ( NOW ) REPAIRED. IT IS JANE'S OPINION, "THE HILLSBORO BULLY, BUDDY SYSTEM" WAS PLAYING A CAT AND MOUSE GAME WITH HER AND ENJOYED THE FACT SHE DID NOT KNOW THE LAW AND WERE HAVING A FIELD DAY BECAUSE JANE COULD NOT AFFORD AN ATTORNEY TO REPRESENT HER.
40. THE COURT REPORTER, GAVE NO TIME FOR JANE TO PROOF READ THE TRANSCRIPT. THE COURT REPORTER HAD ALREADY SUBMITTED HER COPY TO THE CLERK OF COURTS ALONG WITH A LETTER DEFAMING JANE'S CHARACTER. JANE DISPUTED THE FACT, THE COURT REPORTER ADDED ON EXTRA CHARGES WITHOUT JANE'S OK, (AFTER) THE INITIAL PRICE, THE COURT REPORTER QUOTED JANE. JANE FOUND OUT ABOUT THE ADDED CHARGES ONCE THE COURT REPORTER HANDED THE TYPED TRANSCRIPT TO HER. THE COURT REPORTER STATED TO JANE, "IF YOU WANT IT, YOU'LL PAY IT." THE COURT REPORTER TOLD JANE, "THE ADDED CHARGES WERE FOR STARTING AND STOPPING THE MACHINE." IT WAS ONLY AFTER JANE PROOF READ HER COPY OF THE TRANSCRIPT DID SHE DISCOVER THE COURT REPORTER MADE NUMEROUS MISTAKES AND LEFT OUT IMPORTANT INFORMATION. THIS WAS "NO SURPRISE TO JANE."
IT WAS THE HILLSBORO BULLY, BUDDY SYSTEM LETTING JANE KNOW SHE WAS "BLACKBALLED."
41. JANE FILED A MOTION FOR THE HILLSBORO COURT REPORTER, TO CORRECT THE TRANSCRIPT. THE JUDGE DENIED IT.
JANE FILED A MOTION FOR THE AUDIO OF THE TRANSCRIPT, THE JUDGE DENIED IT. .
42. THE JUDGE WAS CORRECT WHEN HE TOLD JANE AT THE NOVEMBER 14, 2007 GUARDIANSHIP HEARING, "IT WOULDN'T DO HER ANY GOOD TO FILE AN APPEAL." WITHOUT AN ATTORNEY NATURALLY, JANE LOST HER APPEAL TO REMOVE THE SON AS MOLLIE FLORKEY'S GUARDIAN DUE TO THE FACT HE IS NOT SUITABLE!
43. JANE FILED A MOTION TO HAVE A GUARDIAN AD LITEM ASSIGNED TO HELP MOLLE. THE PROBATE JUDGE ASSIGNED, THE GUARDIAN AD LITEM, HE ONLY SPOKE TO THE SON, HE REFUSED TO RETURN JANE'S NUMEROUS PHONE CALLS TO HIM. THE JUDGE DISMISSED THE GUARDIAN AD LITEM AT THE AUGUST 8, 2007 HEARING WITHOUT REASON. IT LEFT MOLLIE FLORKEY WITHOUT AN ATTORNEY TO REPRESENT HER AND DEFEND HER RIGHT TO RETURN HOME. "NO SURPRISE."
44. MOLLIE WAS SUBPOENA TO APPEAR IN COURT TO STATE HER RIGHT TO RETURN HOME. MOLLIE WAITED OUTSIDE IN THE HALL WAY AT THE COURT HOUSE WAITING TO GIVE HER TESTIMONY. MOLLIE WAS NOT ALLOWED IN THE COURT ROOM. THE JUDGE ORDERED MOLLIE BACK TO THE HEARTLAND NURSING HOME WHERE SHE HAD TO ENDURE MORE ABUSE AND POOR CARE ALONG WITH NUMEROUS TRIPS TO THE ER, WHERE MOLLIE CAME CLOSE TO DYING PREMATURELY. IT WAS A VIOLATION OF MOLLIE'S CONSTITUTIONAL AND HUMAN RIGHTS NOT TO BE HEARD IN A COURT OF LAW ESPECIALLY, SINCE IT WAS ABOUT THE OUTCOME OF MOLLIE'S LIFE.
45. THERE ARE TAPE RECORDINGS THAT PROVE IT WAS THE HEARTLAND STAFF THAT WAS HARMING MOLLIE AND JANE BY INTENTIONALLY HARASSING JANE IN FRONT OF MOLLIE IN ORDER TO INITIATE FALSE INCIDENT REPORTS AGAINST JANE. THE SON'S GOAL WAS TO KEEP JANE OUT OF HEARTLAND TO STOP JANE FROM HELPING MOLLIE RETURN HOME AND GETTING THIS FALSE INFORMATION TO THE JUDGE. WHY ELSE WOULD THE JUDGE CALL JANE A TROUBLE MAKER IN HIS COURT ROOM?
46. NOTHING WAS EVER BROUGHT UP IN COURT AGAINST JANE'S CHARACTER WHEN SHE WOULD VISIT MOLLIE AT THE HEARTLAND NURSING HOME. IT WAS ALWAYS BEHIND CLOSED DOORS, TO STOP JANE FROM DEFENDING HER GOOD NAME AT THE GUARDIANSHIP HEARING. THE JUDGE LISTENED TO THE SON AND HEARTLAND'S LIES OUTSIDE OF COURTROOM PROCEDURE AND MADE HIS OWN ASSUMPTIONS ABOUT JANE WITHOUT ANY EVIDENCE OF PROOF. IT WAS ONLY HEAR-SAY. THE JUDGE ASSUMED THE SON WAS TELLING THE TRUTH BECAUSE OF HIS LAW ENFORCEMENT POSITION AND THEIR ASSOCIATION. THE SON USED THE JUDGE HIS ATTORNEY AND THE HEARTLAND STAFF FOR HIS OWN DECEPTIVE MOTIVES.
47. THERE ARE THREE WITNESS'S THAT CAN CONFIRM THE (JANUARY 8, 2002) HEALTH P.O.A DOCUMENTS THE SON PRESENTED AT THE NOVEMBER 14, 2007 GUARDIANSHIP HEARING DID NOT EXIST IN (2003.)
WHICH MEANS THE JANUARY 8, 2002 HEALTH P.O.A. DOCUMENTS IS A LIE.
48. WITHOUT MOLLIE'S KNOWLEDGE, THE SON ASSIGNED HIMSELF HEALTH P.O.A. MOLLIE NEVER GAVE HER LIFE AWAY TO THE SON TO FORCE HER IN A NURSING HOME WHEN THERE IS FAMILY WILLING AND CAPABLE OF CARING FOR HER.
49. BECAUSE OF THE SON'S POSITION IN LAW ENFORCEMENT WAS THE ONLY REASON THE PROBATE JUDGE (GAVE) THE SON THE GUARDIANSHIP. HE NEVER TOOK CARE OF MOLLIE A DAY IN HIS LIFE NOR WANTED TO. THE JUDGE REFUSED TO HEAR JANE'S EVIDENCE, THE SON WAS NOT SUITABLE TO BE MOLLIE FLORKEY'S GUARDIAN. THE JUDGE REFUSED TO ACKNOWLEDGE MOLLIE'S MEDICAL OR PERSONAL NEEDS AND HER WISHES TO RETURN HOME. MOLLIE FLORKEY WAS WELL THERE WAS NO NEED TO FORCE HER TO STAY AT HEARTLAND.
50. NO REASON WAS EVER ESTABLISHED IN COURT (WHY) THE SON FORCED MOLLIE IN THE HEARTLAND NURSING HOME. A BIAS, ILLEGAL, JUDICIAL BUDDY SYSTEM, CAUSED MOLLIE FLORKEY, UNNECESSARY PAIN AND SUFFERING AND ALMOST DYING PREMATURELY BECAUSE OF THE SON'S LIES AND DECEPTION.
51. IT WAS JANE'S RIGHT AS MOLLIE FLORKEY'S DAUGHTER TO CALL THE OHIO STATE HEALTH DEPARTMENT AFTER NUMEROUS ATTEMPTS FAILED, ASKING THE HEARTLAND STAFF TO GIVE MOLLIE PROPER MEDICAL AND PERSONAL CARE PER HER DOCTOR'S ORDERS. HEARTLAND STAFF STATED, "THEY WERE TOLD BY THE SON NOT TO LISTEN TO JANE, THE CAREGIVER, WHO SAVED MOLLIE'S LIFE, AND HAD TAKEN CARE OF MOLLIE'S MEDICAL AND PERSONAL NEEDS FOR OVER THREE YEARS. THE SON HANDED MOLLIE OVER TO STRANGERS, MOLLIE ALMOST DIED PREMATURELY DUE TO HEARTLAND'S ABUSIVE, POOR CARE WHICH CAN BE CONFIRMED BY PICTURES WHICH CAN BE EMAILED.
52. IT IS JANE'S OPINION DUE TO THE FACT SHE CALLED THE OHIO STATE HEALTH DEPARTMENT ON HEARTLAND IS THE REASON THE HEARTLAND, SOCIAL WORKER, CONSPIRED WITH THE SON TO KEEP JANE OUT OF HEARTLAND PREVENTING JANE FROM SEEING HER MOTHER FOR OVER TWO YEARS.
JANE LIVES FIVE MINUTES AWAY FROM THE HEARTLAND NURSING HOME.
53. THE OHIO STATE HEALTH DEPARTMENT STATED, "UNLESS THE ABUSE IS HAPPENING WHILE THEIR AT THE FACILITY THEY CANNOT HELP MOLLIE.
54. ARE THEY REALLY SO GULLIBLE TO THINK AN ABUSER IS GOING TO ABUSE THEIR VICTIM IN FRONT OF THEM? THE STATE HEALTH DEPARTMENT REFUSED TO ACKNOWLEDGE THE EVIDENCE OF MOLLIE'S PICTURES WHICH CLEARLY REVEAL NEGLECT AND POOR CARE. THEY REFUSED TO CONSIDER THE NUMEROUS INCIDENT REPORTS OF MOLLIE SITTING IN HER URINE AND FECES DAILY FOR MONTHS. THEY REFUSED TO CONSIDER MOLLIE'S LEGS WERE HEALED BEFORE SHE WAS FORCED INTO HEARTLAND. SIMPLE CARE OF WRAPPING HER LEGS AND KEEPING THEM ELEVATED PREVENTS MOLLIE'S LEGS FROM ULCERATING, IT'S A PROVEN FACT!. DUE TO THE FACT HEARTLAND STAFF AND THE SON REFUSED TO KEEP MOLLIE'S LEGS WRAPPED AND ELEVATED DAILY CAUSED MOLLIE SERIOUS MEDICAL PROBLEMS.
55. THE OHIO STATE HEALTH DEPARTMENT REFUSED TO TALK TO OUTSIDE WITNESS'S THAT COULD CONFIRM MOLLIE'S POOR CARE.
56. HEARTLANDS EXCUSE WAS, "MOLLIE WON'T KEEP HER LEGS UP." MOLLIE CAN'T KEEP HER LEGS ELEVATED IF THERE IS NO LIFT CHAIR IN PLACE. IT TOOK THE SON OVER TWO MONTHS BEFORE HE TOOK TIME TO TAKE MOLLIE'S LIFT CHAIR TO HEARTLAND EVEN AFTER MOLLIE HAD HER LIFT CHAIR HER LEGS REMAINED DOWN. IT IS THE REASON HER LEGS BEGAN ULCERATING AND BLEEDING.
57. MOLLIE HAS A DISABILITY OF DEMENTIA, MOLLIE FORGETS, HEARTLAND SEEMED TO FORGET THAT IMPORTANT FACT OF HER CARE.
THERE WAS NEVER A PROBLEM AT HOME KEEPING MOLLIE'S LEGS ELEVATED. WHEN SHE WOULD FORGET, SHE WAS REMINDED, "TO PUT HER LEGS UP, " IT WAS THAT SIMPLE.
58. IN 2007 JANE CALLED THE OMBUDSMAN DIRECTOR,OUT OF PORTSMOUTH OHIO, ABOUT MOLLIE'S ABUSIVE, POOR CARE AT HEARTLAND. AFTER THE DIRECTOR SAW MOLLIE ON JULY 26, 2007, SHE CALLED JANE AND STATED, " MOLLIE WASN'T GETTING PROPER MEDICAL CARE. SHE STATED, "SHE CALLED THE SON BUT HE DISAGREED AND REFUSED TO INITIATE PROPER MEDICAL CARE FOR MOLLIE.
59. THE OMBUDSMAN DIRECTOR AFTER TALKING TO THE SON, SENT IN ANOTHER OMBUDSMAN REPRESENTATIVE, AT A LATER TIME. THAT OMBUDSMAN REPRESENTATIVE STATED, HEARTLAND HAD CORRECTED THE PROBLEM." THAT WAS A FALSE STATEMENT! MOLLIE'S POOR CARE ESCALATED, HER CONDITION GOT MUCH WORSE!. THERE ARE PICTURES OF BLEEDING OPEN WOUNDS ON MOLLIE'S LEGS. MOLLIE'S PHYSICAL APPEARANCE HAD DETERIORATED.
60. THE CONDITION MOLLIE'S LEGS ARE IN IS DISGRACEFUL. MOLLIE'S LEGS WERE COMPLETELY HEALED BEFORE SHE WAS FORCED INTO HEARTLAND BY THE SON.
61. WHAT EVERYONE IS MISSING, EVEN IF MOLLIE FLORKEY RECEIVED PROPER MEDICAL CARE, THE FACT REMAINS, MOLLIE FLORKEY ( DEMANDED ) TO RETURN HOME (BEFORE) THE SON WAS GIVEN THE GUARDIANSHIP. THERE WERE WITNESS'S AT HEARTLAND THAT HEARD MOLLIE STATE SHE WANTED THE DOCTOR CALLED TO RELEASE HER, HEARTLAND STAFF REFUSED PER THE SON'S ORDERS. TAPE RECORDINGS PROVE THIS FACT. THE SON ILLEGALLY, ASSIGNED HIMSELF HEALTH P.O.A, WITHOUT MOLLIE'S KNOWLEDGE.!
62. MOLLIE STILL HAD RIGHTS TO RETURN HOME AND HER RIGHTS WERE VIOLATED BY THE SON, THE HEARTLAND NURSING HOME AND THE HILLSBORO JUDICIAL SYSTEM.
63. MOLLIE'S WOUND SPECIALIST IN MIDDLETOWN OHIO, CAN CONFIRM HEARTLAND STAFF DID NOT KEEP MOLLIE'S LEGS WRAPPED AND ELEVATED BECAUSE OF THE HORENDOUS CONDITION MOLLIE'S LEGS WERE IN WHEN HE LAST SAW HER IN JUNE 2009. MOLLIE HAS SUFFERED UNNECESSARY PAIN AND MENTAL ANGUISH SINCE 2007.
64. IT TOOK OVER TWO YEARS OF WRAPPING MOLLIE'S LEGS SEVERAL TIMES DAILY, DUE TO THE INFECTION FROM THE FIRST NURSING HOME IN 2003, THE SON FORCED MOLLIE IN WITHOUT LEGAL AUTHORITY. THE HAWTHORN GLEN NURSING HOME IN MIDDLETOWN OHIO. THREE WITNESS'S CAN CONFIRM THE SON DID NOT HAVE LEGAL AUTHORITY TO FORCE MOLLIE TO STAY THERE.
65. HAWTHORN GLEN NURSING HOME CONSPIRED WITH THE SON TO HOLD MOLLIE ILLEGALLY WITHOUT LEGAL DOCUMENTS ON FILE THE SON, USED HIS LAW ENFORCEMENT CREDENTIALS ILLEGALLY TO HOLD MOLLIE PRISONER THERE.
67. AT HAWTHORN GLEN THE SON TOLD THE MEDICAL STAFF IF JANE BRANSON OR JERRY FOGLE, MOLLIE'S OLDEST DAUGHTER TRIED TO TAKE MOLLIE HOME TO CALL THE POLICE AND HAVE THEM ARRESTED.
68. WHILE AT HAWTHORN GLEN IN MIDDLETOWN OHIO, THE SON HAD A STRAIGHT JACKET PUT ON MOLLIE AND THROWN IN LOCK DOWN, LATER, MOLLIE WAS RUSHED TO THE MIDDLETOWN HOSPITAL (ER). THE SON REFUSED TO TELL JANE BRANSON AND JERRY FOGLE ABOUT MOLLIE'S ACCIDENT?????
69. MOLLIE HAD BLACK AND BLUE BRUISES AROUND HER EYES, NOSE AND MOUTH. MOLLIE WAS CONFUSED AND IN PAIN. IT IS JANE'S OPINION, MOLLIE WAS BEATEN BECAUSE SHE RESISTED AND WANTED TO RETURN TO HER HOME.
70. THE SON HAS FORCEFULLY PUT HIS HANDS ON JANE BRANSON AND MOLLIE'S ELDEST DAUGHTER, JERRY FOGLE. IT IS ANOTHER REASON JANE IS ASKING FOR HELP TO FIND AN ATTORNEY THAT WILL HELP FREE MOLLIE, FROM A PERSON THAT NEVER SHOULD HAVE BEEN GIVEN THE GUARDIANSHIP.
71. DUE TO A RESTRICTIVE INCOME JANE CANNOT AFFORD AN ATTORNEY TO CONTEST THE GUARDIAN. THE ATTORNEY'S IN HILLSBORO WILL NOT WORK (PRO BONO) BECAUSE MOLLIE HAS A GUARDIAN. OMBUDSMAN, PRO SENIORS AND LEGAL AIDE REFUSE TO HELP.
JANE BRANSON NEVER WANTED TO BE MOLLIE'S GUARDIAN, SHE FILED FOR GUARDIANSHIP OF "MOLLIE'S PERSON ONLY," TO STOP THE SON FFROM DESTROYING THE TIME MOLLIE HAS LEFT. MOLLIE NEVER WANTED A GUARDIAN.
JANE'S GOAL IS TO FIND OTHER ALTERNATIVES OTHER THAN GUARDIANSHIP AND ALLOW MOLLIE FLORKEY TO RETURN HOME TO BE WITH LOVING FAMILY BEFORE IT'S TOO LATE.
72. JANE ONLY WANTS TO TAKE CARE OF MOLLIE, IT'S ALSO WHAT MOLLIE WANTS!
73. MOLLIE WANTS TO RETURN TO HER ROOTS, SHE WANTS TO GO BACK HOME TO MIDDLETOWN OHIO, WHERE SHE WAS BORN AND RAISED. JANE WANTS TO TAKE MOLLIE HOME. JANE'S SISTER, JERRY FOGLE IS DISABLED, SHE IS BLIND, SHE LIVES CLOSE TO MIDDLETOWN, JANE CAN HELP THEM BOTH.
IT IS NO CRIME TO WANT TO HELP YOUR FAMILY!
74. THE SON HAS KEPT MOLLIE ISOLATED FROM FAMILY FOR OVER TWO YEARS, THERE IS NO PHONE IN HER ROOM. MOLLIE IS ONLY ALLOWED TO TALK ON THE SON'S CELL PHONE WHILE HE DICTATES TO MOLLIE WHAT TO SAY. THE SON LIES TO MOLLIE IN ORDER TO CONTROL HER.
MOLLIE LOVES HER SON BUT UNFORTUNATELY SHE DOES NOT REMEMBER WHAT HE HAS DONE TO HER. MOLLIE CANNOT PROTECT HERSELF, IT IS WHY AUTHORITIES NEED TO STEP IN AND RESCUE MOLLIE.
THE STOCKHOLM SYNDROME
75. PRO SENIORS INFORMED JANE, "MOLLIE CALLED THEIR OFFICE AND INFORMED THEM, " SHE DID NOT WANT THE GUARDIAN OPPOSED." NOTE: THE SON WAS THE ONE THAT CALLED PRO SENIORS, NOT MOLLIE AND TOLD MOLLIE, WHAT TO SAY. THE SON CONSISTENTLY TELLS MOLLIE, "HE'S MAKING THE RIGHT CHOICES ON HER BEHALF." " HOW WOULD MOLLIE KNOW WHAT TO SAY? DUE TO THE FACT OF HER DEMENTIA DISABILITY AND THE FACT THE SON HAS KEPT HER ISOLATED FOR OVER TWO YEARS. MOLLIE'S FAMILY DOES NOT AGREE MOLLIE SHOULD BE FORCED TO STAY IN A NURSING HOME WHEN THERE IS FAMILY THAT WANT TO TAKE CARE OF HER AND HAVE PROVEN IT CAN BE DONE BE DONE AT HOME.
JANE TAKES CARE OF THE ELDERLY PART TIME AND SHE KNOWS FOR A FACT THERE ARE ELDERS A LOT WORSE OFF THAN MOLLIE STILL LIVING AT HOME WITH AND WITHOUT CAREGIVERS.
76. IN 2007 WHEN MOLLIE FOUND OUT THE SON WAS GOING TO FORCE HER TO STAY AT HEARTLAND SHE BECAME VERY UPSET. MOLLIE, BEGGED JANE TO HELP HER GET RELEASED FROM THE SON'S GRIP.
MOLLIE'S PASSPORT CASE WORKER, WAS INFORMED JANE NEEDED SURGERY. IT WAS UNDERSTOOD BY MOLLIE AND ALL THE FAMILY, ONCE JANE RECOVERED SHE WOULD RESUME MOLLIE'S CARE. MOLLIE WAS COUNTING ON RETURNING HOME TO LIVE WITH JANE.
JANE'S SURGERY WAS THE ONLY REASON MOLLIE WENT INTO HEARTLAND, IT WAS FOR RESPITE STAY ONLY!
WHILE MOLLIE IS AT HEARTLAND, THE SON TELLS MOLLIE, " SHE WILL NOT RETURN HOME TO LIVE WITH JANE, THAT HEARTLAND IS NOW HER HOME. AT THAT POINT IN TIME, THE SON WAS NOT MOLLIE'S GUARDIAN. MOLLIE STILL HAD THE RIGHT TO RETURN HOME.
1. THE SON THEN CLOSED MOLLIE'S APARTMENT DOWN WITHOUT HER CONSENT.
MOLLIE ASKED JANE TO STOP THE SON!
2. MALOTT THROWS JANE OUT ON THE STREET, AFTER AN EMERGENCY SURGERY. JANE RECECEIVED A CALL WHILE IN THE HOSPITAL, THE SON WAS MOVING THEIR THINGS OUT OF THE APARTMENT. JANE LEFT THE HOSPITAL TO TRY AND STOP THE SON FROM DESTROYING MOLLIE'S LIFE. MOLLIE IS NOW 91 YEARS OLD. THE LAST TWO YEARS OF MOLLIE'S LIFE HAS BEEN A HELLISH TRANSITION FROM A HEALTHTY, HAPPY CONTENT ENVIRONMENT TO ABUSE AND NEGLIGENT CARE AT HEARTLAND. IN ORDER FOR MOLLIE TO SURVIVE SHE HAD TO SUBMIT TO THE SON.
PICTURES CAN BE EMAILED SHOWING PROOF OF MOLLIES ABUSIVE CARE AT HEARTLAND.
3. WHEN JANE ARRIVED HOME SHE SAW IT WAS TOO LATE, MOLLIE'S BELOVED POSSESSIONS HAD BEEN REMOVED. THE SON PUT HIS HANDS ON JANE BECAUSE SHE WAS TAKING A BAG OF GARBAGE OUTSIDE. THE SON ORDERED JANE TO PUT THE BAG DOWN, HE WANTED TO SEE WHAT WAS IN THE GARBAGE BAG. JANE TOLD HIM, "DON'T BE RIDICULOUS." AT THAT POINT THE SON GRABBED JANE'S WRIST AND SQUEESED HARD. JANE TOLD THE SON, "TO TAKE HIS HANDS OFF HER." IT WAS AT THAT POINT A NEIGHBOR CAME OUT OF THEIR APARTMENT, THE SON, PUSHED JANE BACK AND RELEASED HIS GRIP.
4. WHEN JANE RETURNED TO THE APARTMENT, THE SON'S WIFE WAS IN JANE'S BEDROOM GOING THROUGH JANE'S DRESSER. THE SON BLOCKED JANE'S BEDROOM DOOR TO PREVENT HER FROM GOING IN.
THE SON INFORMED JANE, IN FRONT OF HIS SON IN LAW AND GRANDSON, "IF SHE DIDN'T LEAVE HE WOULD CALL THE POLICE, TELL THEM JANE HIT HIM AND HAVE JANE ARRESTED."
5. AT THAT POINT, JANE LEFT, WENT TO A NEIGHBORS HOME, CALLED THE POLICE, INFORMED THEM, THE SON AND HIS WIFE WERE STEALING HER POSSESSIONS.
6. WHEN THE POLICE ARRIVED, THE SON PULLED OUT HIS LAW ENFORCEMENT CREDENTIALS, THE YOUNG OFFICERS WERE IMPRESSED. THEY MADE JANE WAIT OUTSIDE WHILE THE SON AND HIS WIFE CONTINUED TO LOOT JANE'S POSSESSIONS.
7. THE OFFICERS THEN INFORMED JANE, WHO WERE NOT PRESENT WHEN THE SON FORCEFULLY PUT HIS HANDS ON JANE, " THE SON DIDN'T HURT HER AND SHE DIDN'T WANT TO PRESS CHARGES AND HAVE THE SON ARRESTED. PLEASE RECALL, JANE JUST HAD AN EMERGENCY SURGERY, SHE JUST LEFT HER HOSPITAL BED AFTER BEING TAKEN TO EMERGENCY THE NIGHT BEFORE AND WAS BEING TOLD BY THE SON'S LAW ENFORCEMENT IMPRESSIONABLE, YOUNG OFFICERS, "SHE DID NOT WANT TO PRESS CHARGES AND HAVE THE SON ARRESTED," THE SON " MAN HANDLED" JANE, HIS WIFE, BLATANTLY STOLE JANE'S POSSESSIONS IN FRONT OF HIS SON IN LAW, HIS GRANDSON AND IN FRONT OF THE POLICE OFFICERS THAT JANE HAD CALLED, TO HELP HER.
8. THE SON NOT ONLY HURT JANE, HE STOLE HER POSSESSIONS ALONG WITH JANE'S EVIDENCE SHE HAD HID UNDER HER BED, OF CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENTS SHE WAS GOING TO PRESENT TO THE JUDGE AGAINST THE SON'S CHARACTER, AT THE NOVEMBER 14, 2007 GUARDIANSHIP HEARING, TO PROVE HE WAS NOT A SUITABLE GUARDIAN.
9. AFTER THE OFFICERS ALLOWED THE SON TO TAKE WHAT HE WANTED, THEY INFORMED JANE, "SHE COULD GO BACK IN THE APARTMENT."
10. JANE SAW THE OFFICERS SHAKING HANDS WITH THE SON. AFTER THE OFFICERS LEFT, THE SON'S WIFE, IN FRONT OF JANE, BEGAN READING OUTLOUD, JANE'S EVIDENCE, AGAINST THE SON, THEY HAD STOLEN, FROM UNDER JANES BED. JANE REMEMBERS SEEING THEM LAUGH WHILE THEY INTENTIONALLY HARMED THEIR OWN FAMILY.
JANE TRIED TO FILE A POLICE REPORT AGAINST THE SON. THE OFFICER AT THE POLICE STATION REFUSED TO TYPE UP THE REPORT. INSTEAD, THE OFFICER CALLED THE SON AND ASKED HIM, " TO RETURN JANE'S POSSESSIONS." JANE HAS NEVER RECEIVED HER STOLEN POSSESSIONS FROM THE SON.
11. ALL THE SON HAS TO DO IS SHOW HIS LAW ENFORCEMENT CREDENTIALS AND HE GETS AWAY WITH HIS ILLEGAL ACTS. A CORRUPT, ILLEGAL JUDICIAL, BUDDY SYSTEM THAT HAS CAUSED MUCH PAIN FOR INNOCENT VICTIMS.
12. THE SON THEN HAD HIS GIRLFRIEND, THE APARTMENT MANAGER OF THE "PANTS FACTORY APARTMENTS IN HILLSBORO OHIO, WHERE MOLLIE AND JANE LIVED, ON AUGUST 31, 2007 GIVE JANE A ILLEGAL, THIRTY DAY NOTICE. THE MANAGER DID NOT GO THROUGH THE COURT SYSTEM, IT WAS NOT A LEGAL THIRTY DAY NOTICE.
13. SEPTEMBER 7, 2007, SEVEN DAYS LATER, THE SON HAD HIS APARTMENT MANAGER, CHANGE THE LOCK ON JANE'S APARTMENT DOOR WHILE SHE WAS AT THE DOCTORS. WHEN JANE RETURNED TO FIND THE LOCK CHANGED, SHE CALLED THE HILLSBORO POLICE. THE POLICE INFORMED JANE, SHE HAD TO LEAVE.
A. IT WAS AN ILLEGAL SELF HELP EVICTION THAT NEVER WENT THROUGH THE COURT SYSTEM.
B. BECAUSE JANE'S NAME WAS NOT ON THE LEASE WAS THE REASON THE POLICE OFFICER FORCED JANE TO LEAVE HER HOME.
C. JANE HAD STAYED WITH MOLLIE AS HER CAREGIVER FOR OVER THREE YEARS AT THE PANTS FACTORY APARTMENTS. THERE IS DOCUMENTED PROOF OF THAT FACT. HER FURNITURE AND PERSONAL ITEMS WERE THERE, THE SON MADE IT A POINT TO TELL EVERYONE IT WAS JANE'S HOME TOO.
D. THE MANAGER REFUSED TO ALLOW JANE TO GET HER FURNITURE AND PERSONAL ITEMS.
14. THE SON'S ABUSE AND BROKEN HEARTS OF HIS MOTHER AND SISTERS IS A MEMORY HE WILL HAVE TO LIVE WITH THE REST OF HIS LIFE. HE THREW HIS FAMILY AWAY WITHOUT ANY CONSIDERATION FOR THEIR WELL BEING OR SAFETY. ONLY TO PROTECT HIS DECEPTIVE ACTS AND TO SHOW JANE, HE WAS THE ONE IN AUTHORITY. A PERSON'S ACTIONS SPEAK THE REAL TRUTH!
15. JANE FILED A COMPLAINT IN SMALL CLAIMS COURT AGAINST THE PANTS FACTORY OWNERS DUE TO THEIR APARTMENT MANAGER'S ILLEGAL EVICTION. HER THIRTY DAY NOTICE ON AUGUST 31, 2007 THEN ILLEGALLY CHANGING THE LOCK ON THE FRONT DOOR SEVEN DAYS LATER, SEPTEMBER 7, 2007. NO EVICTION NOTICE OR LOCK OUT NOTICE WAS EVER FILED IN COURT.
16. THE JUDGE IN THE SMALL CLAIMS COURT HAD TO RESCHEDULE THE COURT DATE BECAUSE THE APARTMENT MANAGER STATED IN COURT, THE OFFICER THAT CAME OUT TO THE APARTMENT WHEN THE LOCK WAS CHANGED, TALKED TO THE JUDGE WHO WAS HEARING JANE'S CLAIM.
17. WHEN JANE WENT BACK TO SMALL CLAIMS COURT, ANOTHER JUDGE INFORMED JANE, " BECAUSE SHE LEFT OFF THREE INITIALS ON HER CLAIM FORM, HE WAS DISMISSING HER CLAIM. FORCING JANE TO PAY AGAIN TO FILE ANOTHER CLAIM. HOWEVER, A LADY THAT HAD FILED A CLAIM BEFORE ME, LEFT OFF A NAME ON HER CLAIM AND THE JUDGE DIDN'T HAVE A PROBLEM WRITING IT IN FOR HER. ???????
NOTE; THE SON WAS IN COURT THAT DAY, SUPPORTING THE APARTMENT MANAGER. IT IS JANE'S OPINION, THE SON USED HIS LAW ENFORCEMENT CREDENTIALS WITH HIS LAW ENFORCEMENT ASSOCIATES AND IS THE REAL REASON JANE'S CLAIM WAS DISMISSED.
NOW JANE WOULD HAVE TO GO BACK A THIRD TIME TO SMALL CLAIMS COURT AND PAY AN ADDITIONAL FEE TO FILE THE CLAIM.
18. THE FBI NEEDS TO COME INTO HILLSBORO OHIO AND CLEAN THE CORRUPTION UP IN THIS SMALL TOWN.
19. THE SON OWED THE APARTMENT MANAGER A FAVOR AND IS THE REASON HE WAS IN COURT SUPPORTING HER THAT DAY. MAY 2007, JANE LEFT TO RUN ERRANDS, WHILE JANE WAS OUT, THE SON CALLED MOLLIE, TOLD HER JANE WANTED HER TO MEET HER OUTSIDE, THAT WAS A LIE. THE SON WAS SETTING MOLLIE UP TO LOOK LIKE SHE COULD NOT BE LEFT ALONE AND HIS (FRIEND) THE APARTMENT MANAGER WAS MORE THAN WILLING TO HELP HIM.
20. THE SON THEN CALLS JANE AND ASKED HER, "IF SHE KNOWS WHERE MOLLIE IS."
21. WHEN JANE RETURNED HOME, SHE FOUND MOLLIE OUTSIDE SITTING ON THE FRONT BENCH BY THE APARTMENT DOOR. THE APARTMENT MANAGER AND HER FRIENDS WERE LOOKING OUT THE WINDOW LAUGHING. THE DOOR WAS LOCKED SO MOLLIE COULD NOT GET BACK IN. IT WAS A DISGRACEFUL ACT TO DO TO YOUR OWN MOTHER. MOLLIE TOLD JANE, "THE SON HAD CALLED AND TOLD HER, " "JANE WANTED HER TO MEET HER OUTSIDE. " BECAUSE MOLLIE RECEIVED ONE ON ONE CARE AT HOME, SHE WAS WELL, STABLE, TAKING HER MEDICNE CONSISTENTLY, MOLLIE'S MEMORY STABLILIZED, THE SON DIDN'T COUNT ON MOLLIE TELLING JANE HE CALLED AND WAS THE ONE THAT TOLD MOLLIE TO MEET JANE OUTSIDE.
22. THE SON MADE SURE THE HEAD OF, ADULT PROTECTION SERVICES IN HILLSBORO OHIO WAS NOTIFIED OF THIS ( ONE ) INCIDENT. IN OVER THREE YEARS MOLLIE NEVER LEFT THE APARTMENT WITHOUT JANE. IN THE MORNING, AFTER MOLLIE HAD HER BREAKFAST AND MEDICATION, SHE WOULD ALWAYS TAKE A LONG NAP BECAUSE OF THE MEDICINE THE DOCTOR HAD HER ON. THE MEDICINE WORKED, MOLLIE WAS WELL CONTENT, HAPPY AND STABILIZED.
23. AT THE HEARTLAND NURSING HOME WHEN MOLLIE FOUND OUT THE SON WAS FORCING HER TO STAY THERE, IN FRONT OF WITNESS'S MOLLIE SAID, THE SON IS FIRED! THE SON WAS NOT HER GUARDIAN, MOLLIE STILL HAD RIGHTS. JANE HAS A HAND WRITTEN NOTE BY A WITNESS THAT STATES MOLLIE WANTED TO GO HOME.
24. IT WAS AT THIS POINT THE SON HAD THE HEARTLAND STAFF/SOCIAL WORKER START HARASSING MOLLIE AND JANE AND FORCED JANE TO LEAVE MOLLIE'S SIDE WITHOUT REASON OR JUST CAUSE. THERE ARE TAPE RECORDINGS OF THE SOCIAL WORKER WITHOUT JUST CAUSE OR REASON ENTERING MOLLIE'S ROOM, IN FRONT OF MOLLIE, HARASSED AND ACCUSED JANE OF STEALING MOLLIE'S ANKLE GUARD, THAT THE SON HAD PUT ON MOLLIE'S ANKLE.??????
25. JANE HAS A TAPE RECORDING OF THE SOCIAL WORKER AT HEARTLAND ACCUSING JANE OF STEALING MOLLIE'S ANKLE GUARD. THE FALSE, VERBAL ASSAULT WAS NEVER BROUGHT UP IN COURT BUT IT IS JANE'S OPINION, THE SOCIAL WORKER ALONG WITH THE SON MADE FALSE ACCUSATIONS ABOUT JANE'S CHARACTER TO THE PROBATE JUDGE, OUTSIDE OF COURTROOM PROCEDURE TO PURPOSELY HARM JANE'S GOOD NAME.
26. IT CAN BE PROVEN THE SON FALSIFIED DOCUMENTS WITHOUT MOLLIE'S KNOWLEDGE MAKING HIM HEALTH P.O.A. THERE ARE THREE WITNESS'S THAT KNOW FOR A FACT THE JANUARY 8, 2002 HEALTH P.O.A. DOCUMENTS THE SON PRESENTED AT THE NOVEMBER 14, 2007 GUARDIANSHIP HEARING DID NOT EXIST IN 2003. A CINCINNATI OMBUDSMAN REPRESENTAIVE DISCOVERED THE SON DID NOT HAVE AUTHORITY TO HOLD MOLLIE FLORKEY PRISONER AT THE HAWTHORN GLEN NURSING HOME IN MIDDLETOWN. OHIO.
THE SON HAD TO LIE, STEAL AND USE HIS LAW ENFORCEMENT ASSOICATES TO OBTAIN THE GUARDIANSHIP OF MOLLIE FLORKEY.
THE FBI REALLY NEEDS TO LOOK INTO THIS CRIME AGAINST AN INNOCENT WOMAN THAT HAD NO CONTROL OF THE TERRIBLE INJUSTICE THAT HAS BEEN DONE TO HER BY HER OWN SON.
JANE BRANSON IS SENDING MOLLIE FLORKEY'S STORY OUT AGAIN TO HELP FIND LEGAL COUNCIL THAT WILL COME TO HILLSBORO OHIO, TO CONTEST THE GUARDIANSHIP AND PRESENT OTHER ALTERNATIVES TO THE COURT TO HELP MOLLIE RETURN HOME. MOLLIE NEEDS TO SEE ALL HER CHILDREN AND FAMILY,
IT IS NOT A CRIME TO WANT TO TAKE CARE OF YOUR FAMILY!
IT IS NOT NECESSARY JANE BRANSON HAS GUARDIANSHIP OF MOLLIE. JANE ONLY WANTS TO TAKE CARE OF HER MOTHER AND TAKE MOLLIE HOME, BACK TO HER ROOTS IN MIDDLETOWN OHIO WHERE SHE WAS BORN AND RAISED. IT'S MOLLIE'S WISH! THE SON MUST BE REMOVED AS GUARDIAN. MOLLIE MUST BE GIVEN THE RIGHT TO SEE ALL HER CHILDREN BEFORE SHE PASSES. TWO PRECIOUS YEARS HAVE BEEN STOLEN FROM MOLLIE BY NOT ALLOWING HER TO SEE HER YOUNGEST CHILD WHO LIVES FIVE MINUTES AWAY FROM THE NURSING HOME. TO TAKE AWAY ONE CHILD AT THE END OF A PARENTS LIFE IS IMMORAL
Ombudsman stated, " they had talked to Mollie and asked her if she was satisfied with the son's decisions he has made on her behalf."
1. MOLLIE FLORKEY HAS DEMENTIA. SHE IS ONLY IN THE MOMENT. YOU CANNNOT ASK SUCH AN OPEN END QUESTION WITH A PERSON THAT HAS A DEMENTIA HANDICAP.
YOU MUST ASK DIRECT QUESTIONS THAT MOLLIE CAN RELATE TO.
MOLLIE MUST HAVE A CAREGIVER. YOU MUST ASK MOLLIE IF SHE PREFERS TO STAY AT THE HEARTLAND NURSING HOME OR RETURN TO LIVE WITH HER DAUGHTER JANE.
STOCKHOLM SYNDROME.
2. THE SON HAS ISOLATED MOLLIE IN SMALL QUARTERS FOR OVER TWO YEARS FROM FAMILY MEMBERS, THAT MOLLIE ASKED TO ADVOCATE HER RIGHTS, TO FREE HER FROM THE SON AND THE HEARTLAND NURSING HOME. IT IS THE REASON JANE HAS NOT BEEN ALLOWED TO SEE MOLLIE IN OVER TWO YEARS.
3. MOLLIE IS NOT ALLOWED TO TALK AND EXPRESS HER WISHES OF RETURNING HOME TO LIVE WITH HER DAUGHTER JANE BRANSON DUE TO THE FACT SHE HAS BEEN BULLIED BY THE SON AND THE HEARTLAND NURSING HOME STAFF.
4. INSTEAD OF OMBUDSMAN ASKING MOLLIE, " IF SHE IS SATISFIED WITH THE SON'S DECISIONS WHICH IS AN OPEN END QUESTION TO A PERSON WHO HAS DEMENTIA, ASK MOLLIE THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS.
A. MOLLIE, DID YOUR SON MAKE THE RIGHT DECISION WHEN HE FORCED YOU INTO THE HEARTLAND NURSING HOME ESPECIALLY SINCE YOU WEREN'T DYING, YOU WERE NOT SICK, YOU DIDN'T NEED SKILLED CARE, YOU HAD A HOME AND A CAREGIVER THAT STAYED WITH YOU?
B MOLLIE, DID YOUR SON MAKE THE RIGHT DECISION WHEN HE FALSIFIED DOCUMENTS GIVING HIM AUTHORITY OVER YOUR HEALTH AND ESTATE WITHOUT YOUR KNOWLEDGE?
NOTE: THERE IS PROOF OF THIS!
C. MOLLIE, DID YOUR SON MAKE THE RIGHT DECISION WHEN HE SOLD YOUR BELOVED HOME AGAINST YOUR WISHES WITHOUT LEGAL AUTHORITY TO DO SO?
D. MOLLIE, DID YOUR SON MAKE THE RIGHT DECISION WHEN HE FORCED YOUR DAUGHTER JANE BRANSON OUT OF THE HEARTLAND NURSING HOME WITHOUT REASON OR JUST CAUSE IN ORDER TO BULLY AND FORCE YOU TO SUBMIT TO STAY THERE? NOTE: TAPE RECORDINGS PROVE THIS FACT!
E. MOLLIE, DID YOUR SON MAKE THE RIGHT DECISION NOT TO ALLOW YOU TO SEE YOUR YOUNGEST CHILD IN OVER TWO YEARS AFTER HE KNOWINGLY AND WILLINGLY DEFAMED HER GOOD NAME WITH HIS LIES ABOUT HER CHARACTER BEHIND CLOSED DOORS, IN ORDER TO STOP HER FROM ADVOCATING YOUR RIGHTS TO LEAVE THE HEARTLAND NURSING HOME AND RETURN HOME TO LIVE WITH HER?
F. MOLLIE, DID YOUR SON MAKE THE RIGHT DECISION WHEN HE CLOSED YOUR APARTMENT, FORCED YOU INTO HEARTLAND, WITHOUT REASON, ILLEGALLY THREW JANE OUT ON THE STREET, AFTER SHE HAD AN EMERGENCY SURGERY AND FORCEFULLY PUT HIS HANDS ON HER TO BULLY AND INTIMIDATE HER?
G. MOLLIE, DID YOUR SON MAKE THE RIGHT DECISION WHEN HE ALLOWED THE HEARTLAND NURSING HOME STAFF, TO FORCE JANE TO LEAVE YOUR SIDE WHEN YOU WERE BEGGING AND CRYING OUT TO THEM, "TO LEAVE JANE ALONE, SHE HAS DONE NOTHING WRONG." YOU BEGGED JANE, TO TAKE YOU WITH HER, AS YOUR WHOLE BODY WAS SHAKING, YOU CRIED OUT, "JANIE, DON'T LEAVE ME HERE," THE HEARTLAND STAFF MADE JANE LEAVE WITHOUT JUST CAUSE OR REASON. THEIR EXCUSE WAS, BECAUSE YOUR SON WANTS JANE TO LEAVE."
NOTE; JANE HAS A TAPE RECORDING THE DAY THE HEARTLAND STAFF DID THIS TO MOLLIE!
H. MOLLIE, DID THE NURSING HOME INFORM YOU YOU HAD RIGHTS TO SEE ANY FAMILY MEMBER YOU WANTED TO? RESIDENTS BILL OF RIGHTS 1983.
I. MOLLIE, WERE YOU TOLD BY YOUR GUARDIAN AD LITEM YOUR RIGHTS WERE VIOLATED? ACCORDING TO THE RESIDENTS BILL OF RIGHTS 1983 NOTE: MOLLIE WAS NOT TOLD, EVEN "BEFORE" THE SON WAS GIVEN THE GUARDIANSHIP BY A JUDICIAL SYSTEM THAT DID NOT CONSIDER WHAT WAS IN HER BEST INTEREST. THE JUDGE DID NOT CONSIDER HER MEDICAL OR PERSONAL NEEDS. THE ONLY CONSIDERATION THE PROBATE JUDGE MADE WAS WHAT THE SON WANTED, HIS LAW ENFORCEMENT ASSOCIATE. MOLLIE WAS NOT ALLOWED IN THE COURT ROOM TO FIGHT FOR HER RIGHTS.
IF ANYONE HAS ANY INFORMATION OF PRO BONO ATTORNEY'S THAT WILL CONTEST THE GUARDIAN OR ORGANIZATIONS FOR VICTIMS OF DISABILITIES THAT CAN REPRESENT THEM IN A COURT OF LAW, EVEN THOUGH THEY HAVE A GUARDIAN, PLEASE CONTACT JANE BRANSON
PLEASE CONTACT THE WASHINGTON FBI AND OTHER OFFICIALS TO HELP!
RESPECTFULLY,
JANE BRANSON
275 HARRY SAUNER RD. APT. B
HILLSBORO, OH 45133
cwaltershillsboro@yahoo.com
Voir plus de pétitions:
Vous avez désactivé JavaScript sur votre navigateur. Sans JavaScript, il se peut que notre site Internet ne fonctionne pas correctement.
En signant, vous acceptez les conditions de service de Care2
Vous pouvez gérer vos abonnements à tout moment.
Vous ne parvenez pas à signer cette pétition ?? Faites-le nous savoir.