COREY MILLER IS INNOCENT & ILLEGALLY CONVICTED!
- par: Lance Pona
- destinataire: COREY MILLER
.Corey Miller was given a re-trial due to the fact that the criminal background on several of the witnesses were withheld by the prosecutors. A man named Juan Flowers came forward years ago and admitted that he was the one which fired the shot and killed an innocent teen in the now closed Platinum Club. The teen was a fan of Corey Millers and entered the club with a fake id, in attempt to meet Corey Miller. Witnesses which testified against Miller were kept locked up, so that they made sure that they testified... their stories had changed and didn't make sense... they (the prosecutors) claimed that they were threatened... Miller is a celebrity and he would not threaten anyone or put anyone in any position to get into trouble. Besides, no one knew who these witnesses were until the trial! A man named Juan Flowers had already admitted to the crime. This was not looked into, the judge and prosecutors would not allow it. Leaving the DNA found on the necklace by the victim's body unmatched! Could that have been Juan's DNA? When it was time for his re-trial, Mr. Miller's attorney had bought this to the courts attention. Although there was a confession prior by Mr. Flowers, this was basically withheld from the public and kept from being a topic in court. The judge did not allow enough time for an investigation to be carried through about this matter. Constitutionally, one has a right to a fair and speedy trial. Also one is noted INNOCENT until PROVEN guilty. Sources stated that they would not let Flowers testify during the re-trial. It was claimed that Flowers had decided to not testify anyways! This same man (Flowers) then later (after the incident at the club) went on to harm someone else, taking their life, and is now serving time! There were two Jordans that stated during the first trial that they did not see Miller involved with the incident. One was a bouncer. During the re-trial he claimed to have seen Miller shoot the teen. Under cross examination he said that he didn't see Miller with a gun. He also said that he "I didn't see Miller with a gun. I saw him stick his arm out. About 15 men were beating Thomas. That is when I saw the gun go off. I heard shots.... No, I heard a shot.." it also states that this same man stated "I saw Miller stick his hand under the pile and that is when i saw the gun go off.." First off, please get your lie correct... Did you hear shots or a shot? I thought you stated that you didn't see a gun... you also stated you saw him put his arm under the pile! Which one is it? Common sense, you can not stick an arm under a pile of over 15 men! Second, you are a bouncer (supposedly), why didn't you try to stop the incident? This does not add up. He claimed he was scared that is why he changed his story. Let's not forget that no one knew that he was going to testify against until it was time for him to take the stand this second time. Ooops... forgot to mention, this man stated that Miller was not involved the first time. Oh yes, and let's not forget his record. One of the many 'witnesses' who were actually caught lying on the stand the first trial and apparently made bargains to testify against (lie on) Miller so they can get their sentence lessened and stay free themself! The other Jordan was underage during the time of the incident. It was noted that he agreed to testify against Miller to lessen his time for some trouble which he had gotten into. Humm, possibly ken to each other? Isn't it illegal to change your stories under oath?
During deliberations the judge stated one juror changed their vote to end the deliberation. One was asking for a smoke break, one was sleep, and another reading the Bible. Don't you have to go over the evidence to help determine a person's guilt. There was no physical evidence linking Miller to this killing. The judge would NOT listen to the jurors as they attempted to tell him what all was going on in the chambers. Instead he sent them back to 'end' deliberations. They didn't want to have to spend another night contemplating this case. There are statements from the judge basically saying that he knew they voted gulity so that they could go!
A name was given, but never investigated. Why is this? Prosecutors claimed that they checked into it, in a near-by neighborhood. That isn't enough. I'm pretty sure that the person most likely left town after the incident. Plus, that person could have been from anywhere. Besides, couldn't it have been Flowers?
Since then jurors have came forward stating that they were pressured to end their deliberations so that they would not have to proceed with the case. Not realizing that they would have a drastic affect on an innocent man's life, they now regret what they did.
http://www.sohh.com/2009/08/c-murder_juror_comes_forw.html
Common sense, per study, the avergae height of a man in America is 5'10". Miller is 6 inches or slightly more above this height. Also, a world wide known celebrity... author, actor, and rapper, he was most definately sure to stand out in any crowd. Not to mention his distinct look... his slanted eyes, numerous tattoos, and expensive body and mouth jewelry, and he wears glasses.
Corey Miller had previously requested a different judge. It was indicated that the judge which he had was biased. Due to this fact, it would have been impossible to receive a fair trial. Deny it all we want, but racism still exists. There are tons of current articles about how poor people in Louisiana are given bad trails and not treated fairly. Also, the black to white conviction ratio is horrible. Not to mention, racism still exists and there is proof in the articles! When research about this trial is conducted, there have been numerous violations to this man's constutional rights. He was not granted a fair trial in the first place. Second, no judge has any right to keep telling jurors to go back and change their decisions. Nor do the jurors have any right to argue and pressure other jurors to changetheir decisions to quickly end deliberations. According to the law, when a person comes forward and confess to any crime prior to another person's conviction, then that person who confessed is to be charged with the crime. The courts have no right to withhold any of this information from the public or Mr. Miller's attorneys. Periodical sources state that the judge actually stated he was "not personally interested in this matter," and had been "looking for a reason to increase his bond" prior to his conviction. The United States conviction for a jury trial is 12/12 to be gulity. Louisiana and Oregan do NOT go by this law. They refuse to recognize this Constutional right! ILLEGAL!
To Whom It May Concern:
This petition is intended to touch your heart. When you examine the case and every incident pertaining to it, you will see where we stand. Please look at this through our eyes. Please don't judge according to stage name or character. Actors play roles in movies because that is their career, that is what they are good at, that is what they are trained to do. So is the same with music. We can not judge a man by their lyrics or an image of which they seek to achieve, to keep an audience. We must get to know that man personally and judge them by their character and what is in their heart.
When examined, there is no physical evidence that proves he did this. He is innocent and a LOT of people know. We are not fans, but concerned individuals. We are very concerned and driven to show that the trial which was held for him was most deifantely unfair. He as constiutional rights.
1. An individual had came forward a long time ago when it was assumed that Mr. Miller was linked to this crime. The fact that this man confessed and came forward a long time ago was hidden by 'legal' officials. For what reason?
2. According to the constution, there must be 12/12 votes to convict a person as gulity on murder. Louisiana is one of the two states which does not go by this constutional rule. However Louisiana is a state and part of the United States. So, how is this so?
3. There was no physical evidence to link him to this horrible act. However, a chain with unmatched dna was found at the crime scene. A name was given but this was NEVER investigated. Why is that? Evidently, Mr. Miller's dna didn't match! ACCORDING TO FORENSICS AND INVESTIGATORS, MILLERS DNA DID NOT MATCH OR WAS NOT ON THE VICTIM!
4. When the first trial occured, the bouncer and underage minor stated that Mr. Miller had nothing to do with this incident. Even the sheriff basically concluded that nothing was mentioned about Mr. Miller. tHE 911 CALLS DID NOT INDICATE MILLER AT ALL. During the second trial the bouncer changed his story. (BASICALLY 2 STORIES WERE TOLD AT THE SECOND TRIAL BUT IF YOU USE COMMON SENSE, SCIENCE, AND MATH... THEY DO NOT MAKE SENSE!) Under cross examination he stated that he saw Mr. Miller commit the crime, but Mr. Miller did not have a gun! He stated that Miller stuck his arm out and shot. He stated that Miller stuck his arm under the pile of over 15 people. He stated that he heard shots... no he heard a shot! which one is it? Prosecutors wanted to keep this man's bad record hidden and allow him to lie under oath on numerous occasions! The person who was underage at that time testified against Miller. It was learned that he agreed to testify against Miller, to lessen his sentence. The minor was in trouble and had agreed to this. Isn't it illegal to lie under oath, there credit in not any good, and their stories basically did not make any sense. It was proven that prosecutors had kept their witnesses secret, but said that they were threatened. How are they going to be threatened if no one knew who they were to begin with? Second, it was also known that these witnesses had records and did not want to testify (lying will get you in trouble) but did so... then they were out of trouble. Coincidence!
5. It was bought into the open that the judge had sent the jurors back to change their verdicts because they were hung. They were at each other's throats ready to go home. They were arguing, one was sick, one wanted a smoke break, and one was reading the Bible. This is totally illegel. A lady came forward and told exactly what went on behind closed doors, and it was not pretty! Said in 'innocents' had decided to change their votes to end deliberations. While all of this confusion was going on prior to being sent back to end dliberations, this was bought to the judges attention. No action was taken to handle this matter. They were angry, tired, and their logic was sharp after a long day.
6. Due to other reasons unstated in this letter, the NAACP stepped in to help Mr. Miller as well. There are several other investigations going on with this trail as well. They are not pertaining to Mr. Miller but with the legal officals which handled this case. He was not the only victim, there were many more.....
These are just a few reasons to support our claims. Everyone is quick to point fingers and assume. People do not want to listen and look at the facts. When you personally get to know someone for who they are within, then we can assume.
The trial which was given to Mr. Miller was totally unfair. A name can not and should not let people decide a person's fate.
Please take heed, and realize that this is a man which is suffering. Time is ticking away, and so is his life.
Blessings and thank you for reading this. We ask that action is taken immediately.
En signant, vous acceptez les conditions de service de Care2
Vous pouvez gérer vos abonnements à tout moment.
Vous ne parvenez pas à signer cette pétition ?? Faites-le nous savoir.