PETITION FOR CARE2-PETITIONSITE TO STOP CRIMINALLY OBSTRUCTING JUSTICE

If you will google 28 u.s.c. section 351 to 364 you will see my petition entltled:

PETITION TO CHANGE THE LAW THAT GIVES PERMISSION FOR CORRUPT JUDGES TO MAKE WRONG DECISION

This petition I have receive over 641 thousand people who have click on liking the petition, I have received over  two million people who have click on reading the petition. But I only received 36 signatures on this petition.  This is because care2-pitionsite is getting paid monthly by the State and Federal Judicial system to block the signatures, delete the pages on my petition, and shut off the links to block me from showing related topics.  See petition: http://www.thepetitionsite.com/4/petiton-for-the-death-of-us-district-court-judge-stanley-r-chesler-and-family-court-judge-stephen-j/

This care2 company who build this website page build this page as a design to help us seek change in our life.  But what this company is doing is helping the Government criminally obstruct justice for the greed of money!!!

This 28 u.s.c. section 351 to 364 law actually gives judge the sole permission to make wrong decisions even very wrong decisions so long as they do this in their judicial capacity. But our Lord requires that the judge he appoints are required to make what they believe to be correct decisions even if its wrong. This would be true appellate error. For this Government to be allowed the permission to make wrong decisions is what contributes to the bias, the corruptions, the bribes and criminal acts on the bench in violations of  our inherent rights: 18. U.s.c. section 241, 242, and 371. 28 u.s.c. section 351 to 364 is clearly unconstitutional in conflict with 18. U.s.c. section 241.242. and 371.  See the Department of Justice version: http://www.justice.gov/crt/about/crm/242fin.php

Now if you think about it, none of these judges will ever admit that they are making deliberate wrong decisions in your case. They will lie that their fair and impartial. Deuteronomy 16, verse 18 to 20 requires that these judge act fairly and impartially.  What judge you know will admit that hes not? Then why would they have a law allowing it. 28 u.s.c. section 351 to 364 is clearly unconstitutional and is in direct conflict with 18 u.s.c. section 241, 242 and and 371 that holds judge transparent and accountable for interference of our civil rights.  Those very inherent rights that came from God to protect us against the Government. See Bill of Rights.

To allow care2 to obstruct justice for the greed of money is insane. From slavery to the black code law to the separate but equal to the civil right movement, we have never received our pursuant of happiness. In this Country, theres two sets of law. One for the rich and one for the poor. Study Higgins v people, 368 p2d 371(colo)-you will evidence of our they applied this on me. And then turn right around and used that Higgins v people to harm everybody in America. If you google, Higgins V People, you will not see my case itself because their hiding it. What you will see is how they are using this in every bodys case. Trayvon Martin will never receive justice. Because its only just us. This is why nobody receives justice in the family court dealing with youth and family services. This is why nobody receives justice in the criminal courts where the public defender will not help you. Where that office will assist the prosecutor to coerce you to cop out. Where the judges lift for over substance to absolutely immune themselves when you file a civil right claim in the courts. The civil right case laws have been watered down to mere nothing.

 The bottom line is this, these judges are only human. They are not above the law and we are not beneath the constution. If these judges persist on using the judicial independence against us as a weapon, then we as a people should be required to use the declarations against them-inherent in nature:

 When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.--Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government.

"The contest is not between Us and Them, but between Good and Evil",
            and if those who would fight Evil adopt the ways of Evil, Evil wins

Usurpation:

Usurpation is the exercise of powers by an agent which have not been delegated to him by the principal. In a constitutional republic like the United States of America, acts by officials are legitimate only if they are consistent with and based on a constitution, a body of laws which are superior to all subsequent statutes and other acts of officials, which embodies all delegations of power, and which may recognize certain rights to further define the limits on the powers delegated. It is a fundamental principle that all acts of officials not derived from the delegated powers of the constitution are null and void from inception, not just from the point at which a court may find them unconstitutional. Every person who has an encounter with the acts of officials has the duty not only to obey legitimate official acts, but to help enforce them, but, when there is a conflict among acts of officials, to enforce the superior one, which, when an act of an official is in conflict with the constitution, means enforcing the constitution and not the act in conflict with it. Judges and other citizens do not decide constitutionality, but discover it, and every person who is involved with any act by an official has a nondelegatable duty to make a determination of the constitutionality of that act. This determination is called constitutional review, and, when exercised by a judge in a case, judicial review.

Since the ratification of the Constitution for the United States and each of its properly ratified amendments, there have been numerous acts by officials, including statutes, regulations, executive orders, court rulings, and ordinary decisions and actions taken while on duty and under color of law, which have been unconstitutional, and in many cases, in violation of civil rights of persons and of constitutional laws. We will try to identify some of the worst of such violations of the Constitution, and discuss how compliance with the Constitution can be restored.

 Abuse in general

Besides usurpations, there is a larger class of abuses which include corruption and violations of constitutional statutes. It becomes a matter of special concern to citizens when officials conspire with one another to not enforce the law against such corruption, and use the resources of government and the powers of their offices to cover up such crimes or otherwise protect the perpetrators, whether such crimes are committed by officials themselves or by powerful persons who are allowed to become a privileged class that is above the law. When officials fail to enforce the law, citizens must step in and take action to see that the laws are enforced, and replace those officials with others who will do their constitutional duty.