Japan has moved to stop any future challenge to its Antarctic whaling in the International Court of Justice, according to a report in the Sydney Morning Herald.
Japan told the United Nations the Court's jurisdiction "does not apply to ... any dispute arising out of, concerning, or relating to research on, or conservation, management or exploitation of, living resources of the sea".
The declaration comes after its last whaling program was ruled illegal by the Court in a case brought by Australia. The report stated: "The court's 2014 decision found that Japan's previous program, JARPA II, was not scientific research, as defined under International Whaling Commission rules.
"The court ruled by 12 votes to four against Japan, and ordered it to revoke scientific permits issued under the program."
Professor of international law at Australian National University, Don Rothwell, said in response: "This is surprising, if only because Japan has previously indicated a strong commitment for the international rule of law."
Japan's decision limits any country's ability to confront Japan about its activities. Furthermore, it sets a dangerous precedent while highlighting the importance of international law in enforcing agreements on conservation, human rights, trade and other global issues.
If Japan is willing to remove itself from being answerable to the international community on whaling, what other issues will it decide to fence itself off from? Moreover, what's to stop other countries from following Japan's lead?
Japan needs to be accountable member of the global community. Will you join me in urging Japan to adhere to international law and respects the International Court's jurisdiction over whaling?
Please sign and share the petition.
