pro for the death penalty

   “Katy Davis noticed 3 strangers outside her apartment in Austin, Texas. She went away then, but later when she came back, she was attacked by Charles Rector, who committed a murder previously and was on parole. Katy was forced to open the door and after ransacking her apartment, she was abducted by the men to a lake where she was beaten mercilessly, gang-raped, shot in the head and continuously forced underwater until she finally drowned and died.”   Charles Rector was on parole for murder before he killed Katy Davis. If he would have gotten the death penalty before for the other murder he wouldn’t have had the chance to kill Katy Davis. (Bhatti)

Wisconsin currently doesn’t have the death penalty but it should because it can stop murders like Charles Rector from killing innocent people and getting away with it  “If the Death Penalty is abolished, abolitionists will turn to eliminate life without parole as well and will drive the appeals costs higher than death penalty appeals since there is no execution to end the process of a life without parole prisoner.” “If we execute murderers and there is in fact no deterrent effect, we have killed a bunch of murderers. IF we fail to execute murderers, and doing so would in fact have deterred other murders, we have allowed the killing of a bunch of innocent victims.”  “It is easier for a person to escape imprisonment in the long run, but no one can escape death.”   “U.S states that repel death penalty laws do not see a significant savings in trial costs. In states where the death penalty is the maximum punishment, a larger number of defendants are willing to plead guilty and receive a life sentence.”   “The death penalty remains primarily a form of punishment. It assumes that human life is sacred, and that the killers who take the lives of their victims forfeit the right to their own.   “Others believe that execution alleviate their suffering of victims and their families and reassures the public that immoral or unethical acts will be punished to the full extent of the law.”(Newton)  “We disagree over whether the death penalty is necessary. If you recognize the sanctity of human life, however, there can be no debate. The ultimate crime deserves the ultimate punishment.”  “The death penalty is the most expensive part of the system on per-Offender basis. Millions are spent to achieve a single death sentence that, even if imposed, is unlikely to be carried out. Thus money that the police desperately need for more effective law enforcement may be wasted on the death penalty.”  “The state spends at least an additional $117 million a year on capital punishment, about ½ of it on prison expenses that exceed the usual costs of housing inmates and the rest on arguing and judging death penalty appeals.”  “Justice for all (JFA) estimates that life without parole cases will cost 1.2 million to 3.6 million more than equivalent death penalty cases.”  “If we only allowed appeals that are relevant in proving ones innocence and eliminated the many more that are used merely as delaying tactics, it would save millions in taxpayer dollars.” “Some people believe it is morally wrong to execute people.”  “At least the guilty criminals get the time to say their last words, make a will, mentally prepare themselves for death. Did the innocent victims get the chance to do so?” “We follow the law so that we get justice when what happened to us is unfair. Even the victims ask for mercy, plead for their lives, but if the criminals show no mercy, why should the law be merciful to the criminal.” (Bhatti)