Demand parental alienation theory be made a Felony to use under aiding and abetting
- av: Victorious Children
- mottagare: U.S. House of Representatives,U.S. Senate,president, and Governors
The discredited parental alienation theory is used to aid and abed criminals to swipe criminal acts and give the criminal's custody of the child while concealing criminal child abuse hindering the arrest of a child abuser's and giving them custody of the child. Experts have been told repeatedly not to use this theory, to block testimony from experts using this theory, and they have been warned by the department of Justice that if they continue to use this theory they will lose there license yet they still continue to use it.
We must make this theory a felony to use and criminally charge the individuals who continue to use it knowing it discredited and places children in abusers homes. We must protect children and make this theory a felony to use.
Excerpts see section Texas: A Case Study 10th paragraph of 4th paragraph from bottom of section Texas a case study
" Many women have testified under oath regarding the forced removal of their children based on the scientifically inept theory of Parental Alienation Syndrome promulgated by Kinseyan-adherent Richard Gardner and his disciples. This suggests that few judges have read the following excerpt from the report of the Attorney General's Task Force on Family Violence.
Judges should treat incest and molestation as serious criminal offenses.... Incarceration, whether in hospitals, treatment centers or prisons, is absolutely essential to the protection of the nation's children. The only true protection for children from a pedophile is incapacitation of the offender.25
Friday, May 4, 2012 Department of Justice Report Demands Custody Court Reforms Part II by Barry Goldstein Section
Challenging Evaluators Last Paragraph
If the evaluator issues a report based on PAS or even alienation, there is strong research in the Saunders’ study to challenge it. We can start by asking the evaluator if he agrees that sex between adults and children is improper. Then ask if there is any research not based on the belief that sex between adults and children can be appropriate (this is what PAS is based on), that “alienating” behavior creates a safety risk. Are you aware the DOJ study found that PAS, including by any other name has no scientific basis? Are you aware PAS was rejected for inclusion in the DSM-V because it has no scientific basis? Are you aware that the Saunders’ study found that evaluators with inadequate training tended to believe the myth that women frequently make false allegations but alienation theories, particularly those used to separate children from their primary attachment figure are based on a belief that most dv and child abuse allegations by mothers are false? Are you aware that evaluators are starting to lose their licenses for using PAS? Do you know if that is because they are in affect creating a diagnosis that does not exist? You can also ask questions comparing the harm of separating a child from their primary attachment figure with the harm of negative statements about the other parent. Ask for any research findings because there is no scientific support for these standard biased practices.
http://timesupblog.blogspot.com/2012/05/department-of-justice-report-demands.html
Tuesday, June 25, 2013 Why the Official Rejection of PAS Matters
Tuesday, June 25, 2013 Why the Official Rejection of PAS Matters by Barry Goldstein
There is no valid scientific research that would support or justify the use of PAS.
Section
Regardless of the Nomenclature When Is it PAS?
Excerpts Regardless of the term used, if it is used to discredit or avoid investigation of domestic violence or child abuse allegations, it is in fact PAS. If it is used to justify the kind of extreme outcomes referred to by Dr. Daniel Saunders as “harmful outcomes,” in which the alleged abuser received custody and the safe, protective mothers who is the primary attachment figure is limited to supervised or no visitation, it is in fact PAS. If it is used to suggest that the child’s hostility or fear of a parent can only be explained by the mother’s alienating behavior, it is in fact PAS.
Fundamental to PAS is the assumption that most allegations of domestic violence and child abuse are false. This is the justification to avoid an investigation of the allegations and instead assume they are false. In reality, less than 2% of abuse allegations made by mothers are deliberately false. The Saunders’ study found that inadequately trained professionals tend to believe the myth that mothers often make false allegations and believe unscientific alienation theories. Significantly this misinformation leads to recommendations and outcomes that hurt children. Accordingly when professionals rely on this type of misinformation they are being influenced and really biased by PAS.
http://timesupblog.blogspot.com/2013/06/why-official-rejection-of-pas-matters.html
Criminal Rewards: The Impact of Parent Alienation Syndrome on Families
Criminal Rewards: The Impact of Parent Alienation Syndrome on Families Andraé L. Brown
Andraé L. Brown
See page 395 Section Conclusion
Excerpts "Call to Advocacy If you are not familiar with families who are involved in PAS cases, you may not believe that these types of egregious acts occur. While listening to the stories of women and children, I have felt overwhelmed and dumbfounded because the deck seems to be stacked against truth and justice. Ironically, the horrific abuses that occur in the marital relationship are comparable to the systematic oppression that is sanctioned by the state through the family courts after divorce. The legal system and its officers create kangaroo courts in which civil liberties and human rights are arbitrarily violated (Waller, Waller, & Shin, 2001). There is no oversight and accountability for judges, lawyers, and mental health professionals who collude with the batterers and abusers. The need for a nationwide policy that bans PAS from family courts is long overdue. In 2006, the National Organization of Women moved toward this goal by denouncing PAS and resolving that any professional whose mission involves the protection of the rights of women and children denounce its use as unethical, unconstitutional, and dangerous. Social workers and other social justice advocates who are compelled to take action should, therefore, educate themselves about the perils of PAS and validate the experiences of, and create safe spaces, for victims of this oppression to speak their truth. Furthermore, there must be a concerted effort to challenge the agents of the family courts and mental health professionals to stop perpetuating the abuse and violence against women and children. This is a call for advocacy and social change"
Criminal Rewards: The Impact of Parent Alienation Syndrome on Families Andraé L. Brown
Demand parental alienation theory be made a Felony to use under aiding and abetting
Please sign and share this petition far and wide we must protect children from this theory being used to swipe criminal child abuse charges and give abusers custody Please help us make it a felony and charge them with aiding and abetting criminals. We must protect children.
Excerpts see section Texas: A Case Study 10th paragraph of 4th paragraph from bottom of section Texas a case study
" Many women have testified under oath regarding the forced removal of their children based on the scientifically inept theory of Parental Alienation Syndrome promulgated by Kinseyan-adherent Richard Gardner and his disciples. This suggests that few judges have read the following excerpt from the report of the Attorney General's Task Force on Family Violence.
Judges should treat incest and molestation as serious criminal offenses.... Incarceration, whether in hospitals, treatment centers or prisons, is absolutely essential to the protection of the nation's children. The only true protection for children from a pedophile is incapacitation of the offender.25
Friday, May 4, 2012 Department of Justice Report Demands Custody Court Reforms Part II by Barry Goldstein Section
Challenging Evaluators Last Paragraph
If the evaluator issues a report based on PAS or even alienation, there is strong research in the Saunders’ study to challenge it. We can start by asking the evaluator if he agrees that sex between adults and children is improper. Then ask if there is any research not based on the belief that sex between adults and children can be appropriate (this is what PAS is based on), that “alienating” behavior creates a safety risk. Are you aware the DOJ study found that PAS, including by any other name has no scientific basis? Are you aware PAS was rejected for inclusion in the DSM-V because it has no scientific basis? Are you aware that the Saunders’ study found that evaluators with inadequate training tended to believe the myth that women frequently make false allegations but alienation theories, particularly those used to separate children from their primary attachment figure are based on a belief that most dv and child abuse allegations by mothers are false? Are you aware that evaluators are starting to lose their licenses for using PAS? Do you know if that is because they are in affect creating a diagnosis that does not exist? You can also ask questions comparing the harm of separating a child from their primary attachment figure with the harm of negative statements about the other parent. Ask for any research findings because there is no scientific support for these standard biased practices.
http://timesupblog.blogspot.com/2012/05/department-of-justice-report-demands.html
Tuesday, June 25, 2013 Why the Official Rejection of PAS Matters by Barry Goldstein
There is no valid scientific research that would support or justify the use of PAS.
Section
Regardless of the Nomenclature When Is it PAS?
Excerpts Regardless of the term used, if it is used to discredit or avoid investigation of domestic violence or child abuse allegations, it is in fact PAS. If it is used to justify the kind of extreme outcomes referred to by Dr. Daniel Saunders as “harmful outcomes,” in which the alleged abuser received custody and the safe, protective mothers who is the primary attachment figure is limited to supervised or no visitation, it is in fact PAS. If it is used to suggest that the child’s hostility or fear of a parent can only be explained by the mother’s alienating behavior, it is in fact PAS.
Fundamental to PAS is the assumption that most allegations of domestic violence and child abuse are false. This is the justification to avoid an investigation of the allegations and instead assume they are false. In reality, less than 2% of abuse allegations made by mothers are deliberately false. The Saunders’ study found that inadequately trained professionals tend to believe the myth that mothers often make false allegations and believe unscientific alienation theories. Significantly this misinformation leads to recommendations and outcomes that hurt children. Accordingly when professionals rely on this type of misinformation they are being influenced and really biased by PAS.
http://timesupblog.blogspot.com/2013/06/why-official-rejection-of-pas-matters.html
Criminal Rewards: The Impact of Parent Alienation Syndrome on Families
Criminal Rewards: The Impact of Parent Alienation Syndrome on Families Andraé L. Brown
Andraé L. Brown
See page 395 Section Conclusion
Excerpts "Call to Advocacy If you are not familiar with families who are involved in PAS cases, you may not believe that these types of egregious acts occur. While listening to the stories of women and children, I have felt overwhelmed and dumbfounded because the deck seems to be stacked against truth and justice. Ironically, the horrific abuses that occur in the marital relationship are comparable to the systematic oppression that is sanctioned by the state through the family courts after divorce. The legal system and its officers create kangaroo courts in which civil liberties and human rights are arbitrarily violated (Waller, Waller, & Shin, 2001). There is no oversight and accountability for judges, lawyers, and mental health professionals who collude with the batterers and abusers. The need for a nationwide policy that bans PAS from family courts is long overdue. In 2006, the National Organization of Women moved toward this goal by denouncing PAS and resolving that any professional whose mission involves the protection of the rights of women and children denounce its use as unethical, unconstitutional, and dangerous. Social workers and other social justice advocates who are compelled to take action should, therefore, educate themselves about the perils of PAS and validate the experiences of, and create safe spaces, for victims of this oppression to speak their truth. Furthermore, there must be a concerted effort to challenge the agents of the family courts and mental health professionals to stop perpetuating the abuse and violence against women and children. This is a call for advocacy and social change"
Criminal Rewards: The Impact of Parent Alienation Syndrome on Families Andraé L. Brown
genom att skriva under accepterar du användarvillkor för Care2 Du kan hantera dina epostabonnemang när som helst.
Har problem med att skriva under detta? Låt oss veta.